Re: DNS cleanup

The pool stuff is working. There are probably lots of quirks/bugs, but the general structure seems right. I did the pool stuff first because I found the code I needed while I was cleaning out the old stuff. Normal host mode shouldn't be too hard. e...@thyrsus.com said: > Be aware that at so

Re: TEST fails on NetBSD

Yo Eric! On Tue, 11 Apr 2017 22:23:54 -0400 "Eric S. Raymond" wrote: > Gary E. Miller : > > It was the Trevor one. > > Which is now reverted. > > >Not sure why our commit id's differ?? > > That's not good. I'll re-clone; you should too. 1st thing I always do. And did before sending you

Re: TEST fails on NetBSD

Gary E. Miller : > It was the Trevor one. Which is now reverted. >Not sure why our commit id's differ?? That's not good. I'll re-clone; you should too. -- http://www.catb.org/~esr/";>Eric S. Raymond Please consider contributing to my Patreon page at https://www.patreon.com/e

✘tests test_util.py

Yo Ian! I'm confused by some of the new tests. Like this one: self.assertEqual(f("1.234", nu.UNITS_SEC, nu.UNIT_MS), " 1.234ms") Does that mean the input is 1.234s and the output should be 1.234ms? If not, the function is not very obvious. Why is there UNITS_

Re: Added "tai" variable to units display, fixed lurking bug in ntpmon.

Yo Ian! > Subject: [Git][NTPsec/ntpsec][master] Added "tai" variable to units > display, fixed lurking bug in ntpmon. > > Note that tai has not been properly tested as I have never seen it show > up on my system in the first place. However, it uses the same system as > all the other variables tha

How it works...

Some of this should have been obvious, but ... In the process of trying to understand some pool stuff, I came to some leftover multicast stuff. When the pool code gets an IP address, it doesn't setup a peer slot. It just sends a normal client request packet. When the answer returns, the rece

Re: TEST fails on NetBSD

Yo Eric! It was the Trevor one. Not sure why our commit id's differ?? On Tue, 11 Apr 2017 17:03:32 -0400 "Eric S. Raymond" wrote: > Gary E. Miller : > > Yo Hal! > > > > The last commit I can build is > > 1b47ed72aedcc8f2e39ae198a0ea26a565ca6a15 and that one works for me. > > > > Whoever brok

Re: TEST fails on NetBSD

Gary E. Miller : > Yo Hal! > > The last commit I can build is 1b47ed72aedcc8f2e39ae198a0ea26a565ca6a15 > and that one works for me. > > Whoever broke head this morning, please fix it. There ain't much there there. commit 8b13059e4936e7424062f0b69737b3ecbd96317e Author: Eric S. Raymond Date:

Re: TEST fails on NetBSD

Yo Hal! > The last commit I can build is > 1b47ed72aedcc8f2e39ae198a0ea26a565ca6a15 and that one works for me. Buildbot says this commit broke NetBSD: b298cca81dff03f7d4105a615ca14697cee95dc3 But actually, that just made some warnings into failures, so the bug has likely been around a long tim

Re: TEST fails on NetBSD

Yo Hal! The last commit I can build is 1b47ed72aedcc8f2e39ae198a0ea26a565ca6a15 and that one works for me. Whoever broke head this morning, please fix it. On Mon, 10 Apr 2017 16:15:08 -0700 Hal Murray wrote: > Anybody recognize this? > > TEST(lfpfunc, > FDF_RoundTrip)../../tests/libntp/lfpfun

Re: DNS cleanup - broadcast

On Tue, Apr 11, 2017 at 2:13 PM, Hal Murray wrote: > > What's the current story on broadcast? What do we support? Does anybody > test it? Hal, I asked about this (I was cleaning documentation) in Dec 2016. You mentioned it might be used by the pool directive. See: https://lists.ntpsec.org/p

Test failing on CentOS 6 32-bit

When Matt Selsky made the commit "Make sure to fail on test failures", my very next automated build on CentOS 6 32-bit failed thusly... tests that fail 1/3 stdout: Unity test run 1 of 1 TE

Re: DNS cleanup - broadcast

Hal Murray : > I've started serious work on the DNS cleanup. It will probably take several > of days - maybe longer. /me bows in Hal's direction. Not an easy job. Good luck. > What's the current story on broadcast? What do we support? Does anybody > test it? > > I know we ripped out a lot