On Friday 22 November 2013 14:32 Robin Burchell wrote:
> Ahoy,
>
> In Iekku’s mail yesterday, we referred to application names needing to use a
> “dotted” form (e.g. com.example.myapp). It was brought to our attention
> that this isn’t factually possible at this time due to limitations in Qt
> Cre
ent:* Saturday, November 23, 2013 2:35 PM
> *To:* devel@lists.sailfishos.org
>
> *Subject:* Re: [SailfishDevel] Update on application naming for Harbour
> applications
>
> if i already build and sent to Harbour my org.coderus.persecute
> application, i should rebuild it now to
.org
Subject: Re: [SailfishDevel] Update on application naming for Harbour
applications
if i already build and sent to Harbour my org.coderus.persecute application, i
should rebuild it now to harbour-persecute? =(
On 23.11.2013 18:34, Jonni Rainisto wrote:
Hi,
Whoever grabs the name first keeps i
]
*Sent:* Saturday, November 23, 2013 1:26 PM
*To:* Sailfish OS Developers
*Subject:* Re: [SailfishDevel] Update on application naming for
Harbour applications
What if there are two packages in app store named harbour-videocam?
Or whoever grabs the name first keeps it?
What about the main app
...@lists.sailfishos.org]
on behalf of Artem Marchenko [artem.marche...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2013 1:26 PM
To: Sailfish OS Developers
Subject: Re: [SailfishDevel] Update on application naming for Harbour
applications
What if there are two packages in app store named harbour
*Sent:* Saturday, November 23, 2013 7:59 AM
*To:* Sailfish OS Developers
*Subject:* Re: [SailfishDevel] Update on application naming for
Harbour applications
will such name be accepted by package uploader of Jolla Harbour?
'_' were not accepted before the
t;
> --
> *From:* devel-boun...@lists.sailfishos.org [
> devel-boun...@lists.sailfishos.org] on behalf of zoltan.lu...@gmail.com [
> zoltan.lu...@gmail.com]
> *Sent:* Saturday, November 23, 2013 7:59 AM
> *To:* Sailfish OS Developers
> *Subject:* Re
shos.org [devel-boun...@lists.sailfishos.org]
on behalf of zoltan.lu...@gmail.com [zoltan.lu...@gmail.com]
Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2013 7:59 AM
To: Sailfish OS Developers
Subject: Re: [SailfishDevel] Update on application naming for Harbour
applications
will such name be accepted by package uploa
will such name be accepted by package uploader of Jolla Harbour?
'_' were not accepted before there...
Andrey Kozhevnikov írta ekkor: 2013.11.22. 15:39
really?
harbour-org.coderus.application
how domain.organization.application naming can clash with device packages?
why?
On 22.11.2013 2
Is this package name or binary name?
Because I think you cannot use dots in the base name of the package,
but the binary name should not be a problem to change. Or a dash or
underline could replace the dot without other side effects I think...
Luciano
On Fri, Nov 22, 2013 at 4:25 PM, Artem March
So harbour-myapp or harbour-myapp-mydomain-com? :)
Early next week sounds ok for development except for that we can't make it
for the launch date then :)
Well, I trust you guys are considering whether to let the currently
submitted apps violate the new conditions for a while so that there would
b
i need to rebuild everything again? :D
On 22.11.2013 20:52, Reto Zingg wrote:
Hi,
On 22.11.2013 16:47, Andrey Kozhevnikov wrote:
ah, just harbour-application instead of domain naming? ok then
sorry for misreading.
but i compiled package with dots successfully. check my package in
Harbour :)
Hi,
On 22.11.2013 16:47, Andrey Kozhevnikov wrote:
ah, just harbour-application instead of domain naming? ok then
sorry for misreading.
but i compiled package with dots successfully. check my package in
Harbour :)
yes renaming a existing project by hand works incl. build and compiling,
but y
ah, just harbour-application instead of domain naming? ok then
sorry for misreading.
but i compiled package with dots successfully. check my package in
Harbour :)
On 22.11.2013 20:40, Reto Zingg wrote:
Hi,
On 22.11.2013 16:39, Andrey Kozhevnikov wrote:
really?
harbour-org.coderus.applicati
Hi,
On 22.11.2013 16:39, Andrey Kozhevnikov wrote:
really?
harbour-org.coderus.application
how domain.organization.application naming can clash with device packages?
why?
QtCreator does not allow it:
https://qt.gitorious.org/qt-creator/qt-creator/source/54636d9756966fab7365043d8fd255993675
Well, seems strange 2 me too.
--
Marcin
2013/11/22 Andrey Kozhevnikov
> really?
>
> harbour-org.coderus.application
>
> how domain.organization.application naming can clash with device packages?
>
> why?
>
>
> On 22.11.2013 20:32, Robin Burchell wrote:
>
>> Ahoy,
>>
>> In Iekku’s mail yesterda
really?
harbour-org.coderus.application
how domain.organization.application naming can clash with device packages?
why?
On 22.11.2013 20:32, Robin Burchell wrote:
Ahoy,
In Iekku’s mail yesterday, we referred to application names needing to use a
“dotted” form (e.g. com.example.myapp). It wa
Ahoy,
In Iekku’s mail yesterday, we referred to application names needing to use a
“dotted” form (e.g. com.example.myapp). It was brought to our attention that
this isn’t factually possible at this time due to limitations in Qt
Creator/qmake, so we’re unfortunately forced due to time limitation
18 matches
Mail list logo