Hi, Whoever grabs the name first keeps it (AFAIK). So of someone before you takes harbour-videocam, you can do something like harbour-videocam-artem or some other unique name.
So if $NAME == harbour-videocam then: /usr/bin/$NAME == /usr/bin/harbour-videocam /usr/share/$NAME == /usr/share/harbour-videocam /usr/share/icons/hicolor/86x86/apps/$NAME.png == /usr/share/icons/hicolor/86x86/apps/harbour-videocam.png So forget the domain names with dots as current tools dont really support them currently. ________________________________ From: devel-boun...@lists.sailfishos.org [devel-boun...@lists.sailfishos.org] on behalf of Artem Marchenko [artem.marche...@gmail.com] Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2013 1:26 PM To: Sailfish OS Developers Subject: Re: [SailfishDevel] Update on application naming for Harbour applications What if there are two packages in app store named harbour-videocam? Or whoever grabs the name first keeps it? What about the main app binary name and it's data folder? Shall they be harbour-videocam or com.supercell.videocam? Or harbour-com.supercell.videocam? Cheers, Artem. On Sat, Nov 23, 2013 at 1:11 PM, Jonni Rainisto <jonni.raini...@jolla.com<mailto:jonni.raini...@jolla.com>> wrote: Hi, Domain part is not needed anymore, so its in the form of: harbour-applicationname That way for example "harbour-videocam"-package doesnt confilict with possible systems "videocam"-package. ________________________________ From: devel-boun...@lists.sailfishos.org<mailto:devel-boun...@lists.sailfishos.org> [devel-boun...@lists.sailfishos.org<mailto:devel-boun...@lists.sailfishos.org>] on behalf of zoltan.lu...@gmail.com<mailto:zoltan.lu...@gmail.com> [zoltan.lu...@gmail.com<mailto:zoltan.lu...@gmail.com>] Sent: Saturday, November 23, 2013 7:59 AM To: Sailfish OS Developers Subject: Re: [SailfishDevel] Update on application naming for Harbour applications will such name be accepted by package uploader of Jolla Harbour? '_' were not accepted before there... Andrey Kozhevnikov írta ekkor: 2013.11.22. 15<tel:2013.11.22.%2015>:39 really? harbour-org.coderus.application how domain.organization.application naming can clash with device packages? why? On 22.11.2013 20:32, Robin Burchell wrote: > Ahoy, > > In Iekku’s mail yesterday, we referred to application names needing to use a > “dotted” form (e.g. com.example.myapp). It was brought to our attention that > this isn’t factually possible at this time due to limitations in Qt > Creator/qmake, so we’re unfortunately forced due to time limitations - so as > to not inconvenience you developers - to change plans. > > The new requirement is that application names must start with a prefix of > “harbour-“. > > The reason (if it wasn’t clear) for this requirement is so that applications > do not clash with other installed packages on the device. > > We’re very sorry for the confusion. Thanks for understanding. Should you have > any questions on this or anything else, feel free to send an e-mail as always! > > P.S. We’ll be launching a FAQ explaining this (and other store requirements) > in detail early next week, unless anything unforeseen crops up. > > Happy hacking, > The Jolla Crew > _______________________________________________ > SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list _______________________________________________ SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list _______________________________________________ SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list -- Artem Marchenko http://agilesoftwaredevelopment.com http://twitter.com/AgileArtem
_______________________________________________ SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list
