if you mean tinybrowser maybe but not sure tiny is needed anymore since we now
have portrait in sailfish-browser and its open. Only reason I wrote tiny was
missing
portrait.. So I see that project as dead now.
But I would say geecko engine from sailfish-browser would be great in
jolla2gether c
Thanks Mikael,
That must be it. The response from Harbour was very short, the whole
response message was pasted in my email above.
Br
-Samuli
2014-02-18 21:17 GMT+02:00 Andrey Kozhevnikov :
> Isn't better to fork jolla browser? :)
>
> On 19.02.2014 01:16, Mikael Hermansson wrote:
>
> when I d
Isn't better to fork jolla browser? :)
On 19.02.2014 01:16, Mikael Hermansson wrote:
when I did upload the tinywebbrowser(before I started on
unnoficialtogetherapp) it was cause of webkit eating to much CPU when
app is minimized.
Wasn't this what they said for u too?
AFAIK there is no solut
when I did upload the tinywebbrowser(before I started on unnoficialtogetherapp)
it was cause of webkit eating to much CPU when app is minimized.
Wasn't this what they said for u too?
AFAIK there is no soluton for it except pop webkit page when app minimized.
maybe in future better use Gecko pl
Hi,
I got app rejected with a message:
"sorry for rejecting your application, but there is too high power
consumption, if there is some Question/Question list open. If application
is in main menu, power consumption is ok.
You can check power consumption by yourself, plase take a look here:
https:
