Thank you both for your answers! I tried Kimmo's IconProvider and it worked
perfectly.
Regards,
Decon
On Sat, 04 Mar 2017 16:18:08 +, "Andrey Kozhevnikov"
wrote:
> Or just use such shader:
> https://github.com/CODeRUS/harbour-screentapshot/blob/master/qml/overlay.qml#L171
>
> -- Исх
Or just use such shader:
https://github.com/CODeRUS/harbour-screentapshot/blob/master/qml/overlay.qml#L171
-- Исходное сообщение --
От: "Kimmo Lindholm"
Кому: "cod...@userspace.se" ; "Sailfish OS
Developers"
Отправлено: 04.03.2017 19:12:02
Тема: Re: [SailfishDevel] Custom in-app icon
Hi,
You need to make your own iconprovider. Explained here
https://together.jolla.com/question/44325/iconbutton-how-to-use-own-icons-with-highlight/
-kimmo
-Original Message-
From: Devel [mailto:devel-boun...@lists.sailfishos.org] On Behalf Of decon
Sent: 4. maaliskuuta 2017 18:09
To:
Hi,
Does anyone know how to use custom icons (monocrome) with Silica theme
highlighting?
If I do as described at https://sailfishos.org/develop/docs/jolla-ambient/ it
works with Silica icons, but I have not managed to do it with custom icons. The
following code displays the icon, but highlight
Use FadeAnimation instead of Animator
-- Исходное сообщение --
От: "Matthias Fehring"
Кому: "Sailfish OS Developers"
Отправлено: 04.03.2017 16:55:48
Тема: [SailfishDevel] FadeAnimator in Sailfish OS 2.1
Hi,
with Sailfish OS 2.1 I have a problem when using FadeAnimator in QML
for
ex
Hi,
with Sailfish OS 2.1 I have a problem when using FadeAnimator in QML for
example in
Grid {
add: FadeAnimator {}
}
The content is than not shown, but it works on versions prior to 2.1. Is that
an intended behavior? I could not find any hint in the release notes of Iijoki.
Best greeting
Hi,
thank you very much for the response and explanation. Looking forward to
see the new whitelist / harbour rules. Its fine to take time to do it
properly, thanks for the feedback.
Best wishes,
Rinigus
On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 3:15 PM, Andrew Branson
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've had a look internally
Hi,
I've had a look internally about this, and it's caught up in a larger overhaul
of the whitelist and harbour rules aiming to make development more attractive
to developers while remaining maintainable. This is part of the reason you
haven't had any feedback yet, but also everyone's got caugh
Re OpenRepos: Sure, and I do. And through bundling I am publishing
@Harbour. But the main issue is the lack of response for a rather simple
request. Even a negative response is a response.
Sorry for complains. Enjoy the weekend and let's see if Jolla devs would
respond during the work hours :)
ri
You can always use OpenRepos...
On March 4, 2017 8:50:37 AM GMT+01:00, rinigus wrote:
>Hi,
>
>one month + 10 days later - no response for PR nor SQLite linking from
>Harbour / Jolla devs. Already had to ship few versions with SQLite
>bundled
>with application as well. I'd say its rather poor resp
Hi Damien,
agreed, the topic of adding allowed libraries seems to be a sensitive one.
Which, in many cases, leads to inhibited development and wasting of time.
While I understand the limitations imposed on rather infrequently used
libraries due to inability to ensure Q&A, sqlite is probably used a
Hello,
Le samedi 04 mars 2017, rinigus a écrit :
> one month + 10 days later - no response for PR nor SQLite linking from
> Harbour / Jolla devs.
Well, the topic of adding allowed libraries seems to be a sensitive
one, without easy answering. You may propose this discussion for a
coming community
12 matches
Mail list logo
