Hi, thank you very much for the response and explanation. Looking forward to see the new whitelist / harbour rules. Its fine to take time to do it properly, thanks for the feedback.
Best wishes, Rinigus On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 3:15 PM, Andrew Branson <andrew.bran...@jolla.com> wrote: > Hi, > > I've had a look internally about this, and it's caught up in a larger > overhaul of the whitelist and harbour rules aiming to make development more > attractive to developers while remaining maintainable. This is part of the > reason you haven't had any feedback yet, but also everyone's got caught up > in the huge amount of work lately that you've now seen some news about. > > It's not great when external PRs and bugs on the merproject bugzilla > appear to look dead because they're blocked internally but not visibly, > especially when someone's taken the time and trouble to investigate and > submit something. Sorry about that. Even if the internal progress on such > things can't be made public, an acknowledgement would be nice. The apparent > silence doesn't mean your efforts aren't appreciated nor influential. > > Hope that helps a bit, > > Andrew > > On Saturday, 4 March 2017, rinigus wrote: > > Re OpenRepos: Sure, and I do. And through bundling I am publishing > @Harbour. But the main issue is the lack of response for a rather simple > request. Even a negative response is a response. > > > > > > Sorry for complains. Enjoy the weekend and let's see if Jolla devs would > respond during the work hours :) > > > > > > rinigus > > > > > > On Sat, Mar 4, 2017 at 2:22 PM, Marcin Mielniczuk < > marmistrz...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > You can always use OpenRepos... > > > > > > > > On March 4, 2017 8:50:37 AM GMT+01:00, rinigus <rinigus....@gmail.com> > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > > > one month + 10 days later - no response for PR nor SQLite linking from > Harbour / Jolla devs. Already had to ship few versions with SQLite bundled > with application as well. I'd say its rather poor response times already > now (with the response time not reached yet). > > > > > > Rinigus > > > > > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 4:30 PM, rinigus <rinigus....@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > Slava, > > > > > > thank you for this constructive suggestion. I submitted PR > https://github.com/sailfish-sdk/sdk-harbour-rpmvalidator/pull/86 to add > sqlite into the list of allowed libraries. Hopefully, it will be accepted. > > > > > > Best wishes, > > > > > > Rinigus > > > > > > On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 3:29 PM, Slava Monich <slava.mon...@jolla.com> > wrote: > > > > I believe rpm automatically detects the dependencies, even if they are > not in the spec. Removing the dependency from the spec might not help. > There may be some hackish ways of removing a dependency from the rpm > headers but I don't think that it would be a good idea. Better to spend > time on hacking something more useful than that. > > > > Another approach is to load the library with dlopen, e.g. > > https://github.com/monich/harbour-books/blob/master/app/stubs/libmagic.c > > This allows you to get around the harbour limitations and yet in every > other respect it's as good as linking with the system library. Of course by > doing so you assume the risk of using the unsupported api. Obviously, this > kind of trick should only be done to very stable libraries that are > extremely unlikely to disappear from the system and have a proven track > record of evolving in a backward compatible manner. > > I think the best solution is to add sqlite3 to allowed_libraries.conf > and submit a pull request: > > https://github.com/sailfish-sdk/sdk-harbour-rpmvalidator/ > blob/master/allowed_libraries.conf > > > > Cheers, > > > > -Slava > > > > > > > > > > > > Is the automatic checker not allowing it through with sqlite3 as a > requirement? Are you sure that you used the packagename used on jolla > systems for the requirement? > > > > > > During deployment as RPM, the specific error is > > > > > > Requires > > ======== > > ERROR [libsqlite3.so.0] Cannot require shared library: 'libsqlite3.so.0' > > INFO [harbour-osmscout-server] Please see our FAQ here: > https://harbour.jolla.com/faq#2.6.0 how to use '__provides_exclude_from' > and '__requires_exclude' .spec file to avoid that > > FAILED > > > > > > earlier versions of this app were published in the store without any > issues. Its a part of the app evolution to require sqlite3 for its > function, at least for a time being. > > > > > > I agree that static linking of sqlite3 is not necessary and can be > considered as a bloat. Hence my question :) > > > > > > rinigus > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list > > To unsubscribe, please send a mail to devel-unsubscribe@lists. > sailfishos.org > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list > > To unsubscribe, please send a mail to devel-unsubscribe@lists. > sailfishos.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Sent from my mobile. Please excuse my brevity. > > > > > > -- > Sent from my Jolla > _______________________________________________ > SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list > To unsubscribe, please send a mail to devel-unsubscribe@lists. > sailfishos.org >
_______________________________________________ SailfishOS.org Devel mailing list To unsubscribe, please send a mail to devel-unsubscr...@lists.sailfishos.org
