Re: strange packaging error LaternaMagica

Hi! now it is fixed. Builds amd passes "mgar packages" on all platforms. However, upload fails NFO 2020-05-30 02:05:41,076 rest.py:479 Uploading 'laternamagica-0.5,REV=2020.05.30-SunOS5.10-sparc-CSW.pkg.gz' Checking 2 packages against catalog unstable sparc SunOS5.11 Checking 1 package against

Re: strange packaging error LaternaMagica

Hi! Dagobert Michelsen wrote: I bet I did something trivial wrong... but can you guess what??? Please check the catalogname, it seems to be "laternamagica laternamagica“ including a space instread of just „laternamagica“. good hint. The name was correct... but... PACKAGES += CSWlaternamagic

strange packaging error LaternaMagica

Hi! I tried packaging laterna magica. It builds fine... but at the end I see this: ## Validating control scripts. ## Packaging complete. mkp: exec( pkgtrans -s /home/rmottola/spool.5.9-i386 /tmp/laternamagica laternamagica-0.5,REV=2020.05.27-SunOS5.9-i386-CSW.pkg CSWlaternamagica ) pkgtrans:

Re: good way to generate Diffs

Hi, Dagobert Michelsen via devel wrote: mgar makepatch Exactly. Also the sources are auto-git-repoed and you can also „cd“ into the tree and use all the git commands to patch around in the sources, then "git add …", "git commit" and finally "git format-patch -1“. thank you. I will test it s

good way to generate Diffs

Hi! freshen up my memory please. Is there a good way to "hack" in the sources until something compiles and then generate a patch directly in the "file" section with the corrent level number= I think to remember something, but maybe I mix things up Riccardo

Re: upgrading lynx package -env not found

Hi, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: > Hi Riccardo, > > Am 13.05.2020 um 14:50 schrieb Riccardo Mottola : >> I checked and configure looks to have this "change" of case statements, >> some of them come even fron configure.in itself. > Yes. So unless you want to w

Re: upgrading lynx package -env not found

Hi Dagobert, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: >> >> DESTDIR looks fine for me: >> DESTDIR="/home/rmottola/opencsw/lynx/trunk/work/solaris10-sparc/install-isa-sparcv8plus" >> >> it does not exist yet, is that correct? > > Please commit what you have and I’ll have a look! > I just commited. I checked an

Re: upgrading lynx package -env not found

Hi, Dagobert Michelsen via devel wrote: >> mostly the dowloaded archive has a special structure/namimg.? > It had in the past and this needs to be reverted: > > VERSION = 2.8.8 > REL = rel.2 > DISTFILES = $(NAME)$(VERSION)$(REL).tar.bz2 > DISTNAME = $(NAME)$(subst .,-,$(VERSION)) > > This more ne

upgrading lynx package -env not found

Hi All! long time no news from me... just got asked by someone to attempt an update and add of certain packages. First, lynx... I just tried to update the package version and issue configure and get a strange error: [= NOW BUILDING: lynx2-8-9 MODULATION isa-sparcv8plus: ISA=sparcv8plus =

Re: adding LDFLAGS / lts issue

Hi Dago, did you have a chance to look at this? I'm curious to know if I am doing something wrong on the flags side or if perhaps the cairo/pixman packages are broken on Solaris9 and need a fix? Riccardo Riccardo Mottola via devel wrote: Hi Dagobert, On 2/4/19 9:24 AM, Dagobert Mich

Re: adding LDFLAGS / lts issue

Hi Dagobert, On 2/4/19 9:24 AM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: Works for me, I just committed these lines: # Checkpkg suggests adding the following lines to the GAR recipe: # This is a summary; see above for details. RUNTIME_DEP_PKGS_CSWgnustep-back += CSWlibart If any of the reported errors were fa

Re: adding LDFLAGS / lts issue

Hi Dagobert, you acted in good faith, but I fear you missed a detail. On 2/4/19 9:24 AM, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: Works for me, I just committed these lines: # Checkpkg suggests adding the following lines to the GAR recipe: # This is a summary; see above for details. RUNTIME_DEP_PKGS_CSWgnus

adding LDFLAGS / lts issue

Hi, I am havinng an issue while compiling gnustep-back on solaris9: __tls_get_addr is not found (dependency from pixman) the solution should be to add -lpthread (not needed on Solaris 10 or later, sicne moved inside libc) I thought of adding EXTRA_LDFLAGS += -lcairo EXTRA_LDFLAGS += -lp

Re: SF.net SVN: gar:[26210] csw/mgar/pkg/gs_ftp/trunk/Makefile

Hi, let me add to this topic, since I have seen that also "gnome" apps, for example, have different prefixes. One think is of course the original application name, it may already contain the library/framework/desktop name. Riccardo Mottola via devel wrote: Dagobert Michelsen

Re: SF.net SVN: gar:[26210] csw/mgar/pkg/gs_ftp/trunk/Makefile

Hi, Dagobert Michelsen via devel wrote: please use CSWgnustep-ftp as „gs“ usually means Ghostscript. Please also add OBSOLETED_BY_CSWgnustep-ftp += CSWgs-ftp Do you insist on that? it has been called that way since 2 years. Actually the program is just called "FTP" and I deemed the name too

Re: issues with overrides

Hi Dago, I noticed that I think I used the wrong list ? Dagobert Michelsen wrote: 1. Are you sure you want to override soname-not-found? Usually these should be taken serious. 2. You cannot override hierarchially. Either override all soname-not-found or the specific error with the full t

issues with overrides

Hi, while building gs_PRICE, I get this: CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWgs-price += soname-not-found|libgnustep-base.so.1.25|is|needed|by|opt/csw/GNUstep/Local/Applications/PRICE.app/PRICE CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWgs-price += soname-not-found|libgnustep-gui.so.0.25|is|needed|by|opt/csw/GNUstep/Local/Appli

Re: freetype/ fontconfig issues

Hi, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: I would use EXTRA_CPPFLAGS += -I$(includedir)/freetype2 EXTRA_INC is super-old crap I inherited, I suggest not to use it. Adding explicit to CONFIGURE is ugly and should only be done in an emergency ;-) I agree it is ugly :) and it didn't work any better! It

Re: freetype/ fontconfig issues

Hi, Riccardo Mottola via devel wrote: /opt/csw/include/ft2build.h:56:38: fatal error: freetype/config/ftheader.h: No such file or directory compilation terminated. gmake[7]: *** [obj/xlib.obj/XGFont.m.o] Error 1 I searched for ftheader.h and couldn't find it indeed. I correct m

freetype/ fontconfig issues

Hi, I am unable to build/rebuild gnustep-back on solaris 9. I think that the issue is that fontconfig is somehow detected, but then does not work, some headers are missing. I failed to build an up-to-date package however. I suppose that I can build the package on my old solaris 8 machine, bec

Re: grouping overrides

Hi, Peter Bonivart ha scritto: If you have many of the same sort you can skip everything after the type, in the case above: CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWgnustep-base += soname-not-found works like a charm! I will tyr to simplify gnustep-makefiles. This makes the overrides independent from the parti

grouping overrides

Hi, is there a way to specify overrides together? some kind of regex or by omitting some part? e.g. CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWgnustep-base += soname-not-found|libgnustep-base.so.1.24|is|needed|by|opt/csw/GNUstep/System/Tools/defaults CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWgnustep-base += soname-not-found|libg

Re: SF.net SVN: gar:[25183] csw/mgar/pkg/librsvg/trunk

Hi Laurent, thanks for the fix. Is librsvg fine now? I accidentally thought Dago made the commit :) Are you going to complete and upload the package? Thanks - Riccardo lbl...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: Revision: 25183 http://sourceforge.net/p/gar/code/25183 Author: lblume Dat

Re: SF.net SVN: gar:[24787] csw/mgar/pkg/gnustep-back/trunk/Makefile

Hi, Maciej (Matchek) Bliziński wrote: CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWgnustep-back += no-direct-binding CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWgnustep-back += soname-not-found thanks, will be precious for the future :) R

Re: SF.net SVN: gar:[24742] csw/mgar/pkg/libffi/trunk

Hi Dago, did you with this patch finalize the removal of the special relocation of libffi.so ? I had a much easier patch but in case I throw it away for yours. Did you build & installed also the packages? I didn't see the emal for that. Riccardo dmichel...@users.sourceforge.net wrote: Revi

Re: libffi, missing symbolic link

Hi, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: I will try out as soon as the weekend ends and let you know! What happened then is that the upgrade did not install the -dev package. I installed libffi_dev: bash-4.2$ sudo pkgutil -l | grep ffi CSWlibffi-dev CSWlibffi4 CSWlibffi5 however, no link: bash-4.2$ ls -

Re: libffi, missing symbolic link

Dagobert Michelsen wrote: I notice that both v4 and v5 are required, it would be perhaps What for? If rebuilds are needed just drop a note and we can rebuild them. This is what I get if I attempt a remove: bash-4.2$ sudo pkgutil -r CSWlibffi4 Solving needed dependencies ... Looking at install

Re: libffi, missing symbolic link

On 02/16/14 13:14, Dagobert Michelsen wrote: Hi Riccardo, Am 16.02.2014 um 12:10 schrieb Riccardo Mottola : I had some success getting GNUstep work on solaris 8 & 10! however, when I updated right now on solaris 10, I cannot configure it anymore (use the same options though) I will try

libffi, missing symbolic link

Hi, I had some success getting GNUstep work on solaris 8 & 10! however, when I updated right now on solaris 10, I cannot configure it anymore (use the same options though) configure:13270: checking whether objc really works configure:13300: gcc -o conftest -g -O2 -I/opt/GNUstep/Local/Librar