On 06/04/2011 10:44 AM, Ben Walton wrote:
> Bcc:
> Subject: Re: [csw-devel] SF.net SVN: gar:[14704] csw/mgar/pkg/graphviz/trunk
> In-reply-to:
> References:
>
> Excerpts from ellson's message of Sat Jun 04 10:12:35 -0400 2011:
>
> Hi John,
>
>> @@ -4,7 +4,7 @@
>> b66d09e11339fc981ab7c62518b3f92
On 06/04/2011 02:42 AM, Maciej Bliziński wrote:
> 2011/6/3 John Ellson :
>> I should expand on this:
>>
>>> Libtool built and linked them in the build tree, they only become
>>> unavailable when installing them into DESTDIR, which is not the final
>>>
(The -devel package contains libfoobar.so and libfoobar.so.0 softlinks.The
real, old libfoobar.0.1.2.so is OK, apparently because libtool knows that its
not the version it wants.)
John
On 06/02/2011 08:30 PM, John Ellson wrote:
> The graphviz "package-set" is all the pa
/02/2011 07:39 PM, Maciej Bliziński wrote:
> 2011/6/3 John Ellson :
>> Maciej,
>>
>> You asking about the dependency on the *new* libcdt5 from
>> graphviz2.28.0, right?
> Yes, libcdt5 is with the new graphviz, the previous version of
> graphviz builds libcdt4.
>
Maciej,
You asking about the dependency on the *new* libcdt5 from
graphviz2.28.0, right?
It does depend on it. The perl language binding extends perl with
wrapped functions from libgvc, libgraph, libcdt.
Of course, since CSWgraphvizperl is in the same package-set as
CSWlibcdt5, is has the same
Bonivart wrote:
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 1:38 PM, John Ellson wrote:
>> On 06/01/2011 07:28 AM, Maciej Bliziński wrote:
>>> By the way, why don't you run Solaris 10 in Virtualbox? It's very
>>> easy to use and you get a Solaris instance that you have total contr
Request first:
Would it be possible to uninstall all earlier versions of the
graphviz packages on the buildhosts, perhaps just for a few days while I
build the graphviz-2.28.0 packages?
Problem analysis.
The most recent attempt to package graphviz-2.28.0 failed because
of a libtoo
On 06/01/2011 07:28 AM, Maciej Bliziński wrote:
By the way, why don't you run Solaris 10 in Virtualbox? It's very
easy to use and you get a Solaris instance that you have total control
of. All you need is a couple of gigabytes of disk space and maybe
half a gig of RAM on your workstation or la
so.1 => /usr/lib/libc.so.1
libgcc_s.so.1 => /opt/csw/gcc4/lib/libgcc_s.so.1
I don't understand whats going on. Why are these lib*T files getting
installed? These lib*T files are not created on Fedora.
John
On 06/01/2011 06:32 AM, John Ellson wrote:
Maci
Maciej
Looks like something got linked to the previously installed libgraph...
either dot itself, or possibly libgvc.
I couldn't find this install on test9[sx] Is it still around someplace?
John
On 05/31/2011 05:31 PM, Maciej Bliziński wrote:
In the meantime, I installed updated graphviz p
On 05/31/2011 02:46 PM, Maciej Bliziński wrote:
> 2011/5/31 John Ellson :
>> On 05/31/2011 01:30 PM, Maciej Bliziński wrote:
>>> [+buildfarm]
>>>
>>> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 5:43 PM, John Ellson wrote:
>> ...
>>>> I was able to access test9s,
On 05/31/2011 01:30 PM, Maciej Bliziński wrote:
> [+buildfarm]
>
> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 5:43 PM, John Ellson wrote:
>>
...
>> I was able to access test9s, so can you give me some more instructions
>> on how to use the test system?
>> Do I need to request insta
On 05/31/2011 12:14 PM, Maciej Bliziński wrote:
>
> If you try the version from gar sources, it will work.
>
>
OK, that went well.
gd-2.0.36RC1 and graphviz-2.28.0 uploaded to unstable.
I was able to access test9s, so can you give me some more instructions
on how to use the test system?
Do I ne
-release does not exist
Checks failed for catalogs:
...
Packages have not been submitted to the unstable catalog.
John
On 05/31/2011 09:10 AM, John Ellson wrote:
> I have a minor update for gd. I'm getting the following errors:
>
> ellson@login:~> csw-upload-pkg newpkgs/gd-2.0.3
I have a minor update for gd. I'm getting the following errors:
ellson@login:~> csw-upload-pkg newpkgs/gd-2.0.36RC1/*
...
Checking 3 package(s) against catalog unstable sparc SunOS5.9
ERROR: --catalog-release does not exist
Checking 3 package(s) against catalog unstable i386 SunOS5.9
ERROR: --cat
n checkout tree.
John
On 05/31/2011 02:45 AM, Maciej Bliziński wrote:
> 2011/5/31 John Ellson :
>> These are the remaining errors (at least, the remaining errors that I
>> don't understand).
>>
>> What do they mean? Are they safe to override.
> No need to overrid
These are the remaining errors (at least, the remaining errors that I
don't understand).
What do they mean? Are they safe to override.
John
CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWlibcdt5 += pkginfo-opencsw-repository-uncommitted
CHECKPKG_OVERRIDES_CSWgraphvizgraphs +=
pkginfo-opencsw-repository-uncommitted
C
On 05/30/2011 08:03 PM, Maciej Bliziński wrote:
> In the meantime, I've submitted the a change to the graphviz build recipe:
>
> - Removed the "ENABLE_CHECK = 0" line
> - Removed most of the overrides
> - Split off shared libraries to own packages (used the code generated
> by checkpkg)
> - Adjuste
ld be very similar to the new release.
In the attachment are the outputs from:
echo $LD_LIBRARY_PATH
ldd /opt/csw/bin/dot
ldd /opt/csw/lib/graphviz/libgvplugin_gd.so.6.0.0
John
On 05/30/2011 07:09 PM, Maciej Bliziński wrote:
> 2011/5/30 John Ellson :
>> On 05/30/20
I'm subscribed now.
Still feeling cranky though ;-(
John
On 05/30/2011 03:56 PM, Maciej Bliziński wrote:
> This is John's email, which didn't make it to the list (I think that
> John is not subscribed to devel@).
>
> 2011/5/30 John Ellson :
>>> I
20 matches
Mail list logo
