On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 9:42 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2014-01-29 at 16:33 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
>
> > > I'd rather not confuse what is made from Fedora bits with what is
> > > based on Fedora bits but includes other bits. The remix branding does
> > > not seem appropriate for spins
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 4:10 PM, Christian Schaller wrote:
> The difference here is that the resources for GNOME (or anything else Red
> Hat needs for future versions of RHEL) are
> provided by Red Hat. So if you want the spins to the logically the same in
> terms of resources we should start dema
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 4:21 PM, Christian Schaller wrote:
> What I mean to say is that Red Hat has a business motive to support the
> Fedora community,
> if supporting Fedora was a pure act of charity then I think organizations
> like the Red Cross
> or Unicef would have a much better chance of g
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 5:16 PM, Richard Hughes wrote:
>
> I think you're misinterpreting the words of Christian. Red Hat (also
> my employer, but speaking for myself here) can't and shouldn't be pay
> to fix and QA spins like LXDE or MATE. If keeping a MATE spin makes it
> harder or slower for t
On Thu, Jan 30, 2014 at 6:04 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> And we call these spins now.
>
> > , but I do also see that there are legal and
> > administrative reasons for why that could be a bad idea, but I am sure
> that
> > with
> > some discussion and investigation there are solutions that can b
