abrtd not running: applet complains

2010-01-26 Thread nodata
Hi, When I disable abrtd, I get a tray applet complaining about this. Is there any precedent for this? I have bluetooth disabled, but I don't get a complaint for that.. Filed bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=557866 -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://ad

Re: abrtd not running: applet complains

2010-01-27 Thread nodata
On 27/01/10 09:29, Jiri Moskovcak wrote: > On 01/26/2010 10:02 PM, nodata wrote: >> Hi, >> >> When I disable abrtd, I get a tray applet complaining about this. >> >> Is there any precedent for this? I have bluetooth disabled, but I don't >> get a

Re: abrtd not running: applet complains

2010-01-31 Thread nodata
On 28/01/10 12:18, Jiri Moskovcak wrote: > On 01/27/2010 10:57 PM, nodata wrote: >> On 27/01/10 09:29, Jiri Moskovcak wrote: >>> On 01/26/2010 10:02 PM, nodata wrote: >>>> Hi, >>>> >>>> When I disable abrtd, I get a tray applet complaining ab

Mounting an encrypted volume presents the volume to all users on a machine

2010-10-25 Thread nodata
Hi, I'm concerned about the default behaviour of mounting encrypted volumes. The default behaviour is that a user must know and supply a passphrase in order to mount an encrypted volume. This is good: know the passphrase, you get to mount the volume. What I am concerned about is that the volum

Re: Mounting an encrypted volume presents the volume to all users on a machine

2010-10-25 Thread nodata
On 26/10/10 00:31, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote: > On 10/25/2010 04:28 PM, nodata wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm concerned about the default behaviour of mounting encrypted volumes. >> >> The default behaviour is that a user must know and supply a passphrase >> in

Re: Mounting an encrypted volume presents the volume to all users on a machine

2010-10-25 Thread nodata
On 26/10/10 00:31, Nathanael D. Noblet wrote: > On 10/25/2010 04:28 PM, nodata wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm concerned about the default behaviour of mounting encrypted volumes. >> >> The default behaviour is that a user must know and supply a passphrase >> in

Re: Mounting an encrypted volume presents the volume to all users on a machine

2010-10-26 Thread nodata
On 26/10/10 07:05, Qiang Li wrote: > On Tue, 2010-10-26 at 00:28 +0200, nodata wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I'm concerned about the default behaviour of mounting encrypted volumes. >> >> The default behaviour is that a user must know and supply a passphrase >> in

Re: Mounting an encrypted volume presents the volume to all users on a machine

2010-10-26 Thread nodata
On 26/10/10 16:00, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 12:07:56 +0200, >nodata wrote: >> >> Now imagine if you could read all of _my_ files and I could read all of >> yours. That makes no sense. You _can_ configure that if you want, but by >> defaul

Re: Mounting an encrypted volume presents the volume to all users on a machine

2010-10-26 Thread nodata
On 26/10/10 16:11, Andrew Haley wrote: > On 10/26/2010 02:44 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote: >> On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 12:28:55AM +0200, nodata wrote: >> >>> What I am concerned about is that the volume is mounted for _every_ user >>> on the system to see. >>

Re: Mounting an encrypted volume presents the volume to all users on a machine

2010-10-26 Thread nodata
On 26/10/10 22:24, Gregory Maxwell wrote: > On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 4:10 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: >> This is where we should be going. Encryption is really irrelavent. The issue >> should be if a removable device is inserted, who should have access to it >> if it gets automounted. I would expect

gnome-screensaver: How reliable is it for you?

2011-08-10 Thread nodata
I'm having regular but intermittent problems with gnome-screensaver not locking before swiching users (i.e. leaving an X session unlocked) or when gnome-shell crashes. My bugs are getting no interest, so the problem must be just with me. Is anyone else experiencing similar problems? Ref: https:/

Re: systemd - move /selinux to /sys/fs/selinux - maybe remove /srv ?

2011-04-28 Thread nodata
On 29/04/11 00:37, Michał Piotrowski wrote: > Hi, > > I think it's a very good decision - I never understood why selinux dir > is directly under /. > > By the way, maybe it would be good to think about the meaning of /srv > existance? For seven years FHS requires that this directory exists > http:/

Re: 9base in Fedora?

2011-05-24 Thread nodata
On 20/05/11 14:17, Petr Sabata wrote: > Hi list, > > I've been thinking about packaging 9base [1], a port of Plan 9 userspace > tools, > for Fedora. I'm interested in opinions on what style is "better" and why. > > The problem is most of 9base binaries (and their manpages) have the same > name as

Request for removal of package from Fedora repositories: dasher.x86_64

2011-06-02 Thread nodata
Hello, dasher in Fedora has been broken for me since Fedora 12. The bug I entered has recently been automatically closed. dasher doesn't work in 64-bit and can be crashed by asking it to go fullscreen. What's the procedure to get the package removed? Thanks. Ref: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/

Re: Is F15 unbackuppable? (RemoveSETUID)

2011-06-08 Thread nodata
On 05/06/11 13:50, Roberto Ragusa wrote: > On 06/05/2011 12:32 PM, Ralf Ertzinger wrote: >> Hi. >> >> On Sun, 05 Jun 2011 11:39:02 +0200, Roberto Ragusa wrote >> >>> - rsync -aFAILS! >> >> rsync supports -X (for xattr) and -A (for ACLs), both must be >> given explicitly. > > Thanks,

Re: Trusted Boot in Fedora

2011-06-24 Thread nodata
Two questions: 1. Can you please add some information to the feature page? I can't tell what TrustedBoot is and how it works. 2. This seems like Trusted Computing, which got shot down in flames. Does TrustedBoot go against the core values of Fedora? nd On 22/06/11 21:02, Matthew Garrett wrote

Re: Trusted Boot in Fedora

2011-06-25 Thread nodata
On 25/06/11 18:52, Chris Adams wrote: > Once upon a time, Camilo Mesias said: >> In a sense, part of it isn't under user control. There is a secret in >> there, held against the user, and possibly known by the manufacturer >> or other third parties. There is also a black box of code that could >>

Does gnome-screensaver check the screen is locked before suspending or switching user?

2011-06-27 Thread nodata
When I suspend or switch user gnome-screensaver should kick in (and continue if successful). It seems* instead that gnome-screensaver kicks in on resume, or when I change back to the user. * I see a flash of the user's screen or (sometimes) the screenlock doesn't work at all. Anyone know? --

Re: Does gnome-screensaver check the screen is locked before suspending or switching user?

2011-06-28 Thread nodata
On 28/06/11 14:44, fkoo...@tuxed.net wrote: > On Mon, Jun 27, 2011 at 10:46 PM, nodata wrote: >> Anyone know? > > Maybe this one: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=708543 > > Regards, > François Thanks. I'll follow there. -- devel mailing list

Re: F15 ext3, eCryptfs + samba = data corruption (Re: F15 "Error mounting eCryptfs: [-5] Input/output error" on different disks)

2011-07-05 Thread nodata
On 05/07/11 21:11, Michał Piotrowski wrote: > Hi, > > W dniu 16 czerwca 2011 21:37 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski > napisał: >> Hi, >> >> Do anyone noticed any problems with mounting eCryptfs recently on F15? >> It seems to me unlikely that I have an I/O errors on few disks. >> Especially if only e

Re: F15 ext3, eCryptfs + samba = data corruption (Re: F15 "Error mounting eCryptfs: [-5] Input/output error" on different disks)

2011-07-07 Thread nodata
On 05/07/11 21:25, Michał Piotrowski wrote: > W dniu 5 lipca 2011 21:13 użytkownik nodata napisał: >> On 05/07/11 21:11, Michał Piotrowski wrote: >>> Hi, >>> >>> W dniu 16 czerwca 2011 21:37 użytkownik Michał Piotrowski >>> napisał: >>&

Re: Not prepared for 4096 byte sector hard drives?

2010-02-14 Thread nodata
On 14/02/10 17:59, Neal Becker wrote: > Any truth here? > > http://www.osnews.com/story/22872/Linux_Not_Fully_Prepared_for_4096- > Byte_Sector_Hard_Drives > Yep. But you can align the partition tables to get better results, i.e. don't except the default start value that fdisk gives you. -- devel

Re: Not prepared for 4096 byte sector hard drives?

2010-02-15 Thread nodata
On 15/02/10 01:20, Ric Wheeler wrote: > On 02/14/2010 11:59 AM, Neal Becker wrote: >> Any truth here? >> >> http://www.osnews.com/story/22872/Linux_Not_Fully_Prepared_for_4096- >> Byte_Sector_Hard_Drives >> > > > We have actually been working hard to take advantage of the information that > these d

Re: Not prepared for 4096 byte sector hard drives?

2010-02-15 Thread nodata
On 15/02/10 18:04, Eric Sandeen wrote: > nodata wrote: >> On 15/02/10 01:20, Ric Wheeler wrote: >>> On 02/14/2010 11:59 AM, Neal Becker wrote: >>>> Any truth here? >>>> >>>> http://www.osnews.com/story/22872/Linux_Not_Fully_Prepared_for_4

Re: [HALL-MONITORED] Update threads are now hall-monitored

2010-03-03 Thread nodata
On 03/03/10 20:27, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > Okay. This has gone on long enough. The signal is gone from the > following threads: > > * FESCo wants to ban direct stable pushes in Bodhi (urgent call forfeedback) > * Worthless updates > * Refining the update queues/process > > Accordingly, I'm mar

Re: F13 Alpha - Zarafa

2010-03-09 Thread nodata
On 09/03/10 23:07, Athmane Madjoudj wrote: > On Tue, Mar 9, 2010 at 10:34 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >> On 03/10/2010 03:05 AM, Brian C. Huffman wrote: >>> All, >>> >>> I'm curious why Fedora chose to include Zarafa as opposed to other >>> (mostly) opensource groupware solutions? >>> >>> Ones that

How is Fedora non-american keyboard support for you?

2010-03-25 Thread nodata
Hi, I use a German keyboard on all of my machines. Once or twice a year a bug comes along in Fedora that breaks that and I'm stuck with an American keyboard and system-config-keyboard to change it back again. This time the bug is on resume from suspend * I'd like to know if other people have t

F16: Three bugs that really annoy me

2012-01-10 Thread nodata
I use Fedora for my desktops. I encounter three "death by a thousand papercuts" daily. Judging by the bugzilla traffic I'm nearly the only one with these problems. 1. I cannot save my keyboard layout in Gnome. I have to reset it every time I login by adding and removing a keyboard layout. https:/

Re: service and user-agent disclosure - please consider privacy

2012-01-10 Thread nodata
On Tue 10 Jan 2012 22:50:53 CET, Richard wrote: > On Tue, Jan 10, 2012 at 03:24:14PM +0100, Thomas Spura wrote: > >> Why is that a topic for fedora? I don't think, we should patch >> programs and remove the versions printing everywhere. You are free to >> discuss this with upstream and that's it (o

Re: F16: Three bugs that really annoy me

2012-01-10 Thread nodata
On Wed 11 Jan 2012 03:27:53 CET, Mathieu Bridon wrote: > On Tue, 2012-01-10 at 22:52 +0100, nodata wrote: >> I use Fedora for my desktops. I encounter three "death by a thousand >> papercuts" daily. Judging by the bugzilla traffic I'm nearly the only >> one wi

Re: Xorg bug makes gnome-screensaver crash

2012-01-19 Thread nodata
I can reproduce this consistently and kill the screensaver without entering a password. The trick is to make sure you use the number pad. If you have a virtual number pad that seems to work too (mine worked with the divide symbol). Anyone have a bug#? On Thu 19 Jan 2012 18:00:29 CET, Arun SAG

User switching is broken

2012-03-12 Thread nodata
User switching between different users on X is broken. It's not just broken for me, everyone I have asked has experienced the same problem: Clicking "Switch user" will often or sometimes lead to a hung screen. The switcher doesn't show the correct virtual terminal. Killing the switcher with ctrl+

GNU Parallel

2010-11-12 Thread nodata
I've searched with yum, through bugzilla, and using koji. I can't find it. Is GNU Parallel not in Fedora? http://www.gnu.org/software/parallel/ I can't find a review request. nd -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: GNU Parallel

2010-11-12 Thread nodata
On 12/11/10 20:18, Neal Becker wrote: > nodata wrote: > >> I've searched with yum, through bugzilla, and using koji. I can't find it. >> >> Is GNU Parallel not in Fedora? >>http://www.gnu.org/software/parallel/ >> >> I can't find

Re: Fixing the glibc adobe flash incompatibility

2010-11-17 Thread nodata
On 17/11/10 08:57, Hans de Goede wrote: > Hi all, > > For those who do not know it yet, recent Fedora glibc updates include > an optimized memcpy (which gets used on some processors) which breaks the > 64 bit adobe flash plugin. > > The problem has been analyzed and is known, as well as a fix for i

Re: Fixing the glibc adobe flash incompatibility

2010-11-17 Thread nodata
On 17/11/10 10:20, drago01 wrote: > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 10:17 AM, nodata wrote: >> On 17/11/10 08:57, Hans de Goede wrote: >>> Hi all, >>> >>> For those who do not know it yet, recent Fedora glibc updates include >>> an optimized memcpy (which g

Re: Fixing the glibc adobe flash incompatibility

2010-11-17 Thread nodata
On 17/11/10 22:16, John Reiser wrote: > On 11/17/2010 12:41 PM, Emmanuel Seyman wrote: >> 2) Issues found in proprietary software cannot be fixed by anybody except >> the vendor > > False. In this particular case, it is possible to binary edit the plugin > libflashplayer.so so that all its cal

Kernel crash via gnome usb disk mount

2010-11-19 Thread nodata
I have two btrfs usb disks. If I attach them both at roughly the same time to my computer, and Gnome is running, the computer freezes permanently. If Gnome is not running, it doesn't crash. Can anyone else reproduce this? I haven't tested with any other filesystem yet. Thanks. -- devel maili

Re: Introducing wicked

2010-11-25 Thread nodata
On 25/11/10 17:24, Olaf Kirch wrote: > > Presenting wicked network configuration > === > > This is the first public release of wicked, an experimental framework > for network configuration. > > You may ask, don't we have enough of those already? Don't we have > N

Re: Building production machines out-of-place, regenerating certs when a machine's identity changes, etc.

2010-11-27 Thread nodata
On 26/11/10 23:47, Philip Prindeville wrote: > I recently rebuilt a failing mail server (sendmail and cyrus-imapd), > replacing the hardware and building the replacement machine offline (leaving > the current server in place while I did so). > > This would seem normal enough to do, but had some u

Re: Building production machines out-of-place, regenerating certs when a machine's identity changes, etc.

2010-11-27 Thread nodata
On 27/11/10 16:44, Ralf Ertzinger wrote: > Hi. > > On Sat, 27 Nov 2010 16:15:47 +0100, nodata wrote > >> I don't agree. If you are replacing a production machine, you take >> the keys from the old machine and use them. If you don't want to do >> that, you

Re: Firewall

2010-12-06 Thread nodata
On 06/12/10 21:06, seth vidal wrote: > On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 21:01 +0100, Tomasz Torcz wrote: >> On Mon, Dec 06, 2010 at 02:56:19PM -0500, seth vidal wrote: >>> On Mon, 2010-12-06 at 14:55 -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote: seth vidal (skvi...@fedoraproject.org) said: > Bittorrent won't work th

Re: A GUI tool for Fedora Packagers

2010-12-16 Thread nodata
On 14/12/10 04:38, Ratnadeep Debnath wrote: > Hi, > I've been thinking for sometime now for a GUI for the Fedora Packagers. There > are some steps during the packaging life cycle which needs to be repeated > again and again. So, I was thinking of having some kind of one click system > for updati

Re: SSD support in Anaconda/F14

2010-12-26 Thread nodata
On 26/12/10 18:42, drago01 wrote: > On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 6:34 PM, Ray Strode wrote: >> Hi, >> >> On Sun, Dec 26, 2010 at 10:32 AM, drago01 wrote: >>> You don't want to use LVM (and you should mount the fs with the >>> discard option for trim to work). >> At plumbers it came out during the file

Re: firewalld - A firewall daemon with D-BUS interface providing a dynamic firewall (test version)

2010-12-27 Thread nodata
On 23/12/10 17:03, Thomas Woerner wrote: > Hello, > > as discussed some time ago, I worked on the proof of concept > implementation of firewalld. FirewallD is a service daemon with a D-BUS > interface that provides a dynamic managed firewall. > > For more information on firewalld, please have a loo

Re: firewalld - A firewall daemon with D-BUS interface providing a dynamic firewall (test version)

2010-12-27 Thread nodata
On 27/12/10 20:42, Casey Dahlin wrote: > On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 08:06:05PM +0100, nodata wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> First of all thanks for making this work on the command line first and >> gui second. >> >> Can I ask a stupid question? Does dbus have th

2xbtrfs external usb disks + automount in gnome == crash

2011-01-14 Thread nodata
Which component should I report this under? I have two external usb disks formatted with btrfs. If I connect them both to my computer at the same time, or nearly the same time, the computer freezes. Outside of Gnome I get no crash: If I boot into runlevel 3 and power on both disks, then run a

Re: kernel-2.6.36.x for F14?

2011-02-12 Thread nodata
On 12/02/11 02:08, Chris Jones wrote: > On 2/12/2011 5:24 AM, Christof Damian wrote: >> On Fri, Feb 11, 2011 at 20:20, Joshua C. wrote: >>> Is there any chance that we'll get the kernel-2.6.36.x on f14? >> or 2.6.37 even :-) > > Yeah I'm also curious about this. Is F14 going to get another kernel

Re: Services that can start by default policy feedback

2011-02-24 Thread nodata
On 24/02/11 15:44, Colin Walters wrote: > On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 1:56 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> Greetings. >> >> FESCo is looking at the question of what services can start by default >> (ie, you install something and it's set to start automatically next >> time you boot up). > > Honestly I think