-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA512
http://fpaste.org/GEwJ/
Kevin
DON'T PANIC
On Fri, 4 May 2012, Reindl Harald wrote:
Am 04.05.2012 18:16, schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
On Fri, 04 May 2012 18:07:04 +0200
Reindl Harald wrote:
that is not my point
my point is when i m
The content of this message was lost. It was probably cross-posted to
multiple lists and previously handled on another list.
--
___
devel-announce mailing list -- devel-annou...@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-announce-le...
>
> Hi,
> the leftover packages to be done, for which I do not have commit
> rights, are:
>
>elementary-calendar
>evolution-chime (which is part of pidgin-chime)
>gnome-panel
>phosh
Phosh is done.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signat
this... I assume you plan to get it all done before the
mass rebuild starts? (2024-01-17)
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject
ckages though. But of course if it was
completely broken it would fail after that anyhow...
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists
s no reason it
should ever cause something that be caught by the hook, and if it did,
it would be better for it to do the commit anyhow and cause a failed
build. IMHO.
So, I think we should run with --no-verify.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
at were simply skipped. I think it's better to not skip them
and have them fail than ignore them.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le..
ass rebuild, thats fine too as when it's merged back, the newer builds
will be seen in f40 and the older mass rebuild ones won't be merged.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.o
l do something
> that breaks in wildly unexpected ways), but so we can all learn from the
> mistake.
Absolutely.
Things are not fully normal now, but everything should be up from the
user perspective. We will be working to get the cluster back to a normal
state in the next few days
I'm looking forward to contribute to Fedora especially
> in the i18n area and beta testing.
Welcome!
You may be interested in the #i18n:fedoraproject.org and
#quality:fedoraproject.org matrix channels if you haven't already seen
them. :)
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
On Tue, Jan 30, 2024 at 01:19:18AM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> Sérgio Basto wrote:
> > yes rawhide user should use dnf distro-sync not dnf upgrade
>
> +1. Rawhide EVRs should be allowed to go backwards, that is an integral part
> of being a development branch.
distr
raded version ever made it into a
> > Rawhide compose.
>
> This is the kind of rule that is a prime target for automation. Can we
> have Fedora Rawhide gating validate that the NEVR doesn't go backwards,
> and block bad builds from getting into the compose.
Yeah, seems l
;takes" them early and
> often to insure that the SIG is not unduly
> burdened, and the threshold petition would
> never need to be considered.
Yeah, I agree.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lis
fully that will land
soon and you will not need to wait on a manual process anymore.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorap
On Thu, Aug 25, 2022 at 08:43:38PM -0500, Martin Jackson wrote:
> On Thu, 2022-08-25 at 16:28 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > Everything should be back to working. Try a 'dnf --refresh...' or a
> > 'dnf clean all'.
> >
> Having just
> downloaded
On Sat, Aug 27, 2022 at 07:12:46AM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> Il 26/08/22 19:00, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto:
> > On Wed, Aug 24, 2022 at 05:30:35PM +, Mattia Verga via devel wrote:
> >> ...
> >>
> >> With the exclusion of *-team, *-sig and *-maint,
for 6+ weeks" && \
> fedpkg switch-branch master && \
> git merge f33 && \
> git push
>
> (There used to be a rule to retire older branches first, but I suppose that
> is no longer required and the command might be simplified.)
>
> It wo
Right, aside from that bug/issue it should have worked to just update
fedora-gpg-keys and fedora-repos.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@
gelogs a while back.
Looking at the upstream NEWS or announcement is better for releases, and
just looking at the git commits is better for isolating some change in
packaging.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list --
er of affected *source* packages is naturally lower than that.
> The script also doesn't account for packages being renamed (but in
> those cases, proper Obsoletes and Provides need to be present during
> package review, so I don't think this is a problem).
create and use side tags? Do
> you have any ideas, where/how to start with this?
>
> [1] https://docs.pagure.org/releng/sop_adding_side_build_targets.html
Wrong doc, thats for release engineers. :)
You want:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/rawhide-gating/multi-builds/
kev
nks.
This is because we no longer build a i686 kernel, and libguestfs needs a
kernel. So, it will not be available on i686.
You should be able to:
ExclusiveArch: %{kernel_arches} noarch
and I think koji will now do the right thing.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signatu
On Wed, Aug 26, 2020 at 11:45:48AM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 9:33 PM kevin wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Aug 25, 2020 at 08:14:38PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote:
> > > Do you think it would be a good idea to file bugs for those packages
> &g
wed up by the mass branching somehow?
Yeah, possibly so.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
h
upposed to work.
The 0.10 one was fixed and should behave as you note, and work to
upgrade to rawhide without disabling any gpg key.
Sorry this time it wasn't correct. Mistakes happen.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
dev
builder it was
* what the issue was
* how it impacted your fedora work
into: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/9232
Please don't post to the list, mail me privately, etc.
Just add the info to the above issue.
Thanks for your help
kevin
signature.asc
Descri
:
> mdapi.repo.update mdapi noticed a koji repomd change: , 0ad, and 71041 others
> JSON
>
> In the mean while I saw nirik's comment on IRC:
> > it was broken. I think I fixed it
>
> So it looks like his fix fixed it :)
>
> Thanks @Kevin!
Yeah, oddly, the cronjob
hat said, we have a machine up now there and it's just needing
configuration/setup to get the service back up and running. :)
So, hopefully soon it will again be online.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@
to happen with scratch livemedia
against a sidetag with that kernel tagged in now. :(
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le..
an
account name in there it will use that as your bugzilla login/account),
but it needs some more work with bugzilla admins before it's live.
Right now, you just get your primary email address.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 18:21:15 +
Christopher Brown wrote:
> 2010/1/10 Kevin Fenzi :
> > Here's another (more accurate/correct) run of the sources file
> > checker. Thats against a 2010-01-06 cvs checkout seed.
>
> > snecker:BADURL:jokoshe
xplain in a comment how exactly someone would duplicate your
source file using bzr and tar, and drop the http:// part of the Source.
Does that make sense?
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Sun, 10 Jan 2010 21:11:29 +0200
Jussi Lehtola wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-01-10 at 00:06 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > jussilehtola:BADSOURCE:agedu-r8768.tar.gz:agedu
>
> The upstream agedu tarball is generated nightly, so the md5sum changes
> the whole time. Should I take ou
I'm forwarding this for David Anderson:
From: David Anderson
To: fedora-devel-l...@redhat.com
Subject: Orphaning curlftpfs , mod_auth_shadow
Date: Mon, 11 Jan 2010 11:22:25 +
User-Agent: KMail/1.12.4 (Linux/2.6.31.6-166.fc12.x86_64; KDE/4.3.4; x86_64; ;)
Greetings,
Due to a slow African In
On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 12:44:46 +
Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-01-07 at 15:53 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> > If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can reply to
> > this e-mail, file a new ticket at https://fedorahosted.org/fesco,
> > e-mail
On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 17:29:40 -0500
Peter Jones wrote:
> On 01/10/2010 02:06 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > pjones:BADURL:dumpet-2.0.tar.bz2:dumpet
>
> Should be fixed now (forgot to push the tarball to hosted)
ok.
> > pjones:BADURL:syslinux-3.83.tar.bz2:syslinux
>
&g
On Mon, 11 Jan 2010 22:43:32 +
Mat Booth wrote:
> This is a bit suspicious:
>
> 2010/1/10 Kevin Fenzi :
> >
> > orphan:BADURL:xerces-c-src_2_8_0.tar.gz:xqilla
> > orphan:BADURL:xerces-c-src_2_8_0.tar.gz:xqilla10
> >
>
> Why is it necessary for xquill
far was that implicit linking feature.
Sadly, my concerns got ignored at the FESCo meeting where this "feature" was
discussed:-(
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
g the DSO to the one
providing the symbols is not enough due to the very change which is causing
the problems.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Tue, 12 Jan 2010 06:50:16 + (UTC)
"Justin M. Forbes" wrote:
> Author: jforbes
>
> Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/seabios/F-12
> In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv15649
>
> Added Files:
> seabios-0.5.1-669c991.tar.gz seabios.spec
> Log Message:
> Created initial packag
else, just not on Fedora because we delete .la files. The old
semantics made this case work without the .la file, the new semantics lead to
programs failing to link in Fedora, making Fedora incompatible with upstream
(unless we start to ship .la files again).
Kevin Kofler
--
devel m
else, just not on Fedora because we delete .la files. The old
semantics made this case work without the .la file, the new semantics lead to
programs failing to link in Fedora, making Fedora incompatible with upstream
(unless we start to ship .la files again).
Kevin Kofler
--
devel m
On Wed, 13 Jan 2010 12:01:54 +0100
Laurent Rineau wrote:
> Le dimanche 10 janvier 2010 08:06:11, Kevin Fenzi a écrit :
> > rineau:BADSOURCE:figtoipe-20080505.tar.gz:figtoipe
> > rineau:BADSOURCE:ipe-6.0pre32patch1-src.tar.gz:ipe
>
> Does the change of URLs of Source0 worths
eting time and day will likely be moving starting next week.
Kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Thu, 14 Jan 2010 23:26:39 + (UTC)
Zing wrote:
> On Fri, 08 Jan 2010 09:37:20 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> > Because it won't be on the live media that many of the install
> > from, or the default groups that would be choosen from the dvd
> > install.
>
Here's the logs from todays meeting.
Sorry for the delay in posting it. ;(
NOTE that we will be meeting on tuedays at 20:00 UTC moving forward.
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-01-15/fesco.2010-01-15-17.00.html
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-01-15/fesc
herefore the non responsive maintainer procedure, i.e. orphaning all
> packages from the affected maintainers, seems to me to be more
> appropriate.
In this particular case, yes.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 10:39:54 +0100
Till Maas wrote:
> > Indeed. I don't see much activity from them.
> > Have you tried sending them an email?
> > If not, I can.
>
> No, please go ahead.
I took the liberty right after I posted.
(Hopefully Ian doesn't mind me passing this along:)
Ian Burre
em, in short: who is maintaining
them? Not the maintainer of record it seems.
if you want them to go on, take ownership.
Sorry for the bug that prevented people from doing this, it's been
fixed.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@list
ng else in Fedora. :)
So, it might be nice to have such a tool and have it generate a list of
possible maintainers/packages that need help. Then a human should look
over the list and try and contact maintainers/gather info on packages
and/or start unresponsive maintainer, etc.
Any takers for
ip/approve
your co-maintaining.
Thanks!
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
/report/9
If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can reply to
this e-mail, file a new ticket at https://fedorahosted.org/fesco,
e-mail me directly, or bring it up at the end of the meeting, during
the open floor.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
Here's the summary/minutes from todays meeting:
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-01-19/fesco.2010-01-19-20.00.html
Minutes (text):
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-01-19/fesco.2010-01-19-20.00.txt
Log:
http://meetbot.fedoraproj
On Tue, 19 Jan 2010 13:18:33 +0100
Thomas Moschny wrote:
> 2010/1/10 Kevin Fenzi :
> > thm:BADSOURCE:httperf-0.9.0.tar.gz:httperf
>
> Project URLs changed. Fixed in CVS, not rebuilt.
>
> (But why was this BADSOURCE? Checked, and both tar files at old url
> ftp://ft
On Sun, 17 Jan 2010 20:48:25 +0100
Till Maas wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 10:39:50AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Sat, 16 Jan 2010 10:39:54 +0100
> > Till Maas wrote:
> >
> > > > Indeed. I don't see much activity from them.
> > > > Hav
oned in your list about which
> provenpackager fixed which package.
Odd. Not sure why it wasn't there.
I mailed the maintainer and can orphan it.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Thu, 21 Jan 2010 17:34:50 +0100
Till Maas wrote:
>
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 02:24:39PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> > init process (nirik, 20:00:35)
> > FOLLOWUP: #298 Revoke Paul Johnsons pacakger access and put him on
> > probation. (nirik, 20:02:44) #3
ticket at https://fedorahosted.org/fesco,
e-mail me directly, or bring it up at the end of the meeting, during
the open floor.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
One more feature for tomorrow's meeting:
#323 Feature: Dynamic Firewall (
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DynamicFirewall )
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
a ntfs-3g, but I'm not sure that's vital /
> common enough to block a release.
The problem is that gvfs also uses FUSE (AIUI, it can work without, but FUSE
mounting for the benefit of non-gvfs-enabled apps is enabled by default).
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing
bypass this "automatically reassign
to the comaintainer" "feature".
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Steve Grubb wrote:
> Digging into this further, if you run lsof, it hangs when it gets to
> ~/.gvfs:
It is possible to disable FUSE mounting in gvfs, see:
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/users/2009-August/084569.html
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
ilibbed due to the libraries
and if the script is not identical for 32-bit and 64-bit, there will be a
conflict between the 2 multilibbed packages. (Splitting out the libraries
into a -libs package is a way to work around that.)
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Minutes:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-01-26/fesco.2010-01-26-20.01.html
Minutes (text):
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-01-26/fesco.2010-01-26-20.01.txt
Log:
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-01-26/fesco.2010-01-26
Paul did a commit yesterday and several others last week.
Hopefully he's just swamped and would like to find another maintainer
for the socat package. ;(
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Wed, 27 Jan 2010 15:43:40 +0100
Till Maas wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 02:42:58PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Sun, 17 Jan 2010 20:52:12 +0100
> > Till Maas wrote:
> >
> > > The list of packages you announced that are going to be orphaned
> >
one can just die.
> Unblocked orphan qtoctave
I'll pick this one up, it's useful (a Free Software equivalent to the MATLAB
GUI), it's in my area of expertise (Mathematics tool, and Qt-based, even),
there's AFAIK no obvious replacement and upstream seems active.
Kevin
Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Jesse Keating wrote:
>> Unblocked orphan qtoctave
>
> I'll pick this one up, it's useful (a Free Software equivalent to the
> MATLAB GUI), it's in my area of expertise (Mathematics tool, and Qt-based,
> even), there's AFAIK no obvi
nitor and PKI enrollment client
> New package font-manager
> A font management application for the GNOME desktop environment
> New package iwl5150-firmware
[and it ends here]
The report got truncated yet again. :-(
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
de
s that's part of kdelibs
it's probably not the answer you were looking for. ;-)
libbsd sounds like a decent solution, probably the best you'll get due to
the conflict cited above.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
of evil
things to avoid which the proposal provides and I haven't seen any evidence
as to the contrary (again, the PackageKit example is not applicable because
the PackageKit maintainer did NOT have such a list to go by when he made his
change; there's no reason to believe he&#x
Liu Yu Fei Eric wrote:
> I noticed firefox was stuck on 3.5.6 for a rather long time.
> What about 3.5.7 and the recently 3.6? They are even not in koji.
http://blog.famillecollet.com/post/2010/01/22/Firefox-3.6-en
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
seful. The PackageKit issue was caused by lack of a policy,
not lack of enforcement.)
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
reverse dependencies.
(IMHO, it might make sense for yum to reject --enablerepo=rawhide for
anything other than a full upgrade.)
This is what repositories like Remi's are for!
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
A new version of IcedTea with a new plugin which supports Firefox 3.6 is
being imported into Rawhide. This would have to be backported if Firefox 3.6
were to be pushed to F12.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Rawhide are NOT SUPPORTED and will in many cases NOT
work as expected due to dependencies and reverse dependencies.
(IMHO, it might make sense for yum to reject --enablerepo=rawhide for
anything other than a full upgrade.)
This is what repositories like Remi's are for!
Kevin Ko
LM issue? That looks like it could affect Fedora users if they
are behind a Window$ Vi$ta or 7 proxy.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
f you scratch-build, once it's
successful, you have to redo the build as a real build, so you waste one
build. With my workflow, you save that build. Saves both Koji resources and
your time. Also saves your time over local mock builds where you also have
this "one wasted build&qu
ned
for more than 3 months. You need to submit new review requests, specifying
that this are packages which were previously in Fedora and are being
resurrected.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
e_cb() work on a copied tuple
> (the metadata updates flood is too racy IMO).
> - Fix tuple_copy().
This style is not compliant with the Fedora packaging guidelines.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
it's just a source-level
abstraction layer (so for example, you won't find a PolicyKit policy in the
source code, but a KAuth policy which is converted to a PolicyKit policy at
build time).
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
ipscheck,
> hmaccalc, and openssh. They are violating the FHS which is
> prohibited by the Guidelines. Ralf, have you opened bugs?
I see:
openssl-0:1.0.0-0.20.beta5.fc13.i686
openssh-clients-0:5.3p1-21.fc13.x86_64
fipscheck-0:1.2.0-4.fc13.x86_64
libgcrypt-0:1.4.5-1.
lers (DVD, CD set, netinstall).
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
> Sure it is, it's changelog style #3 of
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Changelogs
No, it's not style #3. It's 2 or more style #3 entries collapsed into 1,
which is not one of the allowed formats.
Kevin Kofler
--
dev
, during
the open floor.
kevin
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
e FPC to officially clarify this.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
m directly in the current code), so they just removed it in
Rawhide:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=561001
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
hange the
requirements, they're not cast in stone. Even existing changelogs can be
fixed.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2010-02-02)
===
Meeting started by nirik at 20:01:34 UTC. The full logs are available at
http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-02-02/fesco.2010-02-02-20.01.log.html
Meeting summary
-
ntly claimed.
PS: And since PulseAudio is a shared technology also used by other desktops
than just GNOME, I'd be willing to pick up comaintainership, but then it'd
very likely be maintained in KDE SIG style, aggressively tracking upstream
development.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel
Matthias Clasen wrote:
> I was on vacation for two weeks, but I'm back now. So our manpower
> should be even again :-)
LOL, it's true that you do a lot of work all by yourself. ;-)
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedorapro
erything in its own bizarre, confusing and broken way. :-(
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
d despite
the fact that this makes us lose our niche, compete directly with
distributions we CANNOT compete with (we stand no chance against Ubuntu's
massive marketing machine) and leave users in our current niche out there in
the cold with no way to go. :-(
Kevin Ko
letting go of the notion that my
> approach is the only right one.
I don't believe it is possible to fix PulseAudio bugs effectively without
tracking upstream more closely. Upstream is where Lennart focuses his
bugfixing.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@list
to entry and much harder work for existing packagers. (And yes, I've also
tried to make these points BEFORE the migration, but nobody listened.)
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Since there is no new upstream release, you will have to triage bugs,
> cherry pick patches and push them as updates. What else do you mean by
> tracking upstream closely?
If there's no new release, I'd just ship a snapshot.
Kevin Kofler
--
mmits and thus repository-wide revision IDs).
Sadly, more and more projects are getting infected by the git virus, KDE is
also moving to git, several other upstream projects already did. :-(
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
if I work on multiple branches, that's what
directories on my file system are for). (And this is another reason why I
consider DVCSes to be broken by design.)
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
updates (unless they fixed that recently) and
they do strange things to specfiles (like automatically bumping Revision)
and encourage the use of constructs which don't work outside of OBS.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
foo when upgrading to F13? The
sequence number before (17 vs. 18) might have been incremented due to one or
more plain rebuild(s), it doesn't necessarily reflect the sequence of
upstream snapshots being packaged.
Kevin Kofler
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
1 - 100 of 8578 matches
Mail list logo
