Just today i check updates, gnome-desktop3 was there, i didn't notice it but
it is following the gtk3 naming scheme, and, what i think is happening more
than desired, a lot of packages just kept going doing it.
I see an overuse or exploit or package names vs versions, which both terms are
very
I see from a first glance that the main reason to keep this way is gonna be
easy packaging and less trouble.
To the easiness, i am pretty sure that it would me much easier to run an
existing operative system than developing a completely rewritten from scratch
as Linux, yet it happened for some
Adam Williamson wrote:
>I'm not sure that 'fixing' it provides any significant benefit other than
>looking tidy in pontificating emails. I mean, what's the actual problem caused
>by 'gnome-desktop' vs. 'gnome-desktop3'?
I think its clear, and also seems clear there is not much willing to
code/imp
On Thursday 28 March 2013 14:43:06 James Antill wrote:
> I agree this is a problem, everyone who knows how Fedora packaging
> works has said, to you, some variant of:
> The technical problem is being able to install multiple versions of a
> package, and you can do that now (and have been able to
On Thursday 28 March 2013 12:13:05 seth vidal wrote:
> The trouble is this - the solution you and others have suggested
> doesn't actually solve the problem it just moves it around. It also
> makes the situation of dep resolution and global updates that much more
> difficult. Which makes the manage
