On Thursday 28 March 2013 12:13:05 seth vidal wrote: > The trouble is this - the solution you and others have suggested > doesn't actually solve the problem it just moves it around. It also > makes the situation of dep resolution and global updates that much more > difficult. Which makes the management end of all this that much harder > on the folks maintaining systems with these tools.
I would expect the real good solution to come from the rpm team, not an outsider with less experience than them on that field. > I've not been working with the package-mgmt team in a while now but I > do not think that any of the team is ignoring the issues - they are > just far harder to balance packager needs, user needs and sysadmins > needs that it would otherwise appear. I would like someone is working or willing to work on it, even on a slow and large time plan, cause to me it seems there is an issue with pkg2-2.0.0.rpm, and expecting to not be like that forever. So that the team is not ignoring the issues is to welcome. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
