dear,
I have a problem with llvm 2.9 build fail
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=3505349&name=build.log
but if i rebuild llvm from src.rpm build success
I have some other D library to add but until i have this problem i can't
do more
Thanks for any help
kind regards
--
devel
Apple move step by step to LLVM and stop to use gcc. The latest apple
IDE (Xcode) will not ship gcc but llvm.
https://developer.apple.com/technologies/tools/whats-new.html
It will be great to know if llvm is ready to do same for several
important linux package.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.
You are welcome.
You can too learn a more modern language as D. Since Fedora 14, you can
use this language. And in Fedora 17 i had some enhancement about it.
--
Bioinfornatics at fedoraproject dot org
- Fedora Packager
- package own: ldc, phobos, druntime, gtkd, derelict, gl3n, gljm
--
devel mai
Dear,
I search to know for which reason th build fail through koji:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=4131995
I have try to build with mock:
wget
http://bioinfornatics.fedorapeople.org/ldc-2-20.20120605git6ad085a.fc17.src.rpm
mock -r fedora-17-x86_64 rebuild
ldc-2-20.20120605git6
Le mercredi 13 juin 2012 à 19:49 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon a écrit :
> On Wed, 2012-06-13 at 11:45 -0600, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> > Suppose I cut a package last year:
> > swift3-1.0.0-878c23.tag.xz
> > Then I build an RPM:
> > openstack-swift-plugin-swift3-1.0.0-878c23-1.fc17.noarch.rpm
> >
> > To
Le dimanche 22 juillet 2012 à 14:21 -0600, Kevin Fenzi a écrit :
> On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 07:39:31 -0500
> Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>
> > it was requested in https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5222 that
> > we do a mass rebuild for Fedora 18 for
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DwarfCom
Le dimanche 22 juillet 2012 à 14:21 -0600, Kevin Fenzi a écrit :
> On Tue, 17 Jul 2012 07:39:31 -0500
> Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>
> > it was requested in https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5222 that
> > we do a mass rebuild for Fedora 18 for
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/DwarfCom
Le mercredi 15 août 2012 à 12:53 -0400, Paul Whalen a écrit :
> Good day all,
>
> This weeks Fedora ARM status meeting will take place today (Wednesday Aug
> 15th) in #fedora-meeting-1 on Freenode.
> Times in various time zones (please let us know if these do not work):
>
> PDT: 1pm
> MDT: 2pm
>
Dear,
Mine review request list grow without get at anytime a review, i am
looking a reviewer to push these packages into fedora. Thanks for your
help:
- Bug 813842 - Review Request: glfw , A cross-platform multimedia
library
- Bug 847794 - Review Request: gl3n An OpenGL Mathematics library for D
-
Dear,
Mine review request list grow without get at anytime a review, i am
looking a reviewer to push these packages into fedora. Thanks for your
help:
- Bug 813842 - Review Request: glfw , A cross-platform multimedia
library
- Bug 847794 - Review Request: gl3n An OpenGL Mathematics library for D
-
2010/1/14 David Malcolm :
> Anyone got any better ideas? Thoughts about which of the above is
> preferrable?
I am not sure it qualifies as "better" than your suggestions... but
the problem of different executables with the same name providing
equivalent functionality via a different implementatio
it wasn't. The firmware is available from
http://intellinuxwireless.org/?p=iwlwifi&n=downloads.
Jonathan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
alent functionality that we're yet in a position to drop xdvik.
Comments? If you use xdvik because other viewers don't give some
particular functionality, it would be helpful if you stated what that
functionality is.
Cheers,
Jonathan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
2010/1/27 Till Maas :
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 06:04:49PM +0000, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
>
>> However, it's not clear to me if okular and evince-dvi provide
>> equivalent functionality that we're yet in a position to drop xdvik.
>> Comments? If you use xdvi
2010/1/27 Orion Poplawski :
> I suspect a lot of our users will be similarly annoyed. This is one of
> those kinds of tools that "just works" and so people stick with it.
Well.. perhaps. OTOH people seem to have happily migrated from xpdf to
evince over time (or at least that's my perception).
--
On 28 January 2010 10:38, Richard Zidlicky wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 27, 2010 at 11:08:25PM +0000, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
>> 2010/1/27 Orion Poplawski :
>> > I suspect a lot of our users will be similarly annoyed. This is one of
>> > those kinds of tools that "just
On 28 January 2010 01:16, Matthew Saltzman wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-01-28 at 01:47 +0200, Jussi Lehtola wrote:
>> On Wed, 2010-01-27 at 23:08 +, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
>> > 2010/1/27 Orion Poplawski :
>> > > I suspect a lot of our users will be similarly annoyed
On Sun, 2010-01-24 at 20:44 +0200, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> Is there some reason we don't have a iwl5150-firmware package? Or
> that /lib/firmware/iwlwifi-5150-2.ucode isn't included in
> iwl5000-firmware?
>
> Just asking because I was helping someone on #fedora get thei
On 29 January 2010 14:16, Maxim Burgerhout wrote:
>> What if we link the lspci and lsusb as static binaries? That would allow
>> us not to break the filesystem architecture and have usable tools.
>
> You'd still miss pci.ids without /usr, so that would have to move too.
> Only place remotely suita
the last push).
So now I've added root-docs to my manual rsync excludes (which only had
kdelibs-apidocs in it before now).
Can we have a guideline added to the packaging guidelines that basically
says, "Make sure autogenerated documentation isn't ridiculously large".
Jonathan &
lously large", but rather, "don't package automatically generated
documentation that's ridiculously large".
Jonathan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 15:19 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> > Please note that I'm not saying "don't package documentation that's
> > ridiculously large", but rather, "don't package automatical
n files really need to be included in file level
dependency generation/resolution?
Jonathan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Fri, 2010-08-06 at 06:27 +0100, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
> On 5 August 2010 21:49, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > Yaah -- so if it's useful documentation, then I'd be against creating a rule
> > that bans it. The next question would be whether it's useful or
On Fri, 2010-08-06 at 10:46 +0200, Thomas Spura wrote:
> On Fri, 06 Aug 2010 11:03:46 +0300
> Jonathan Dieter wrote:
>
> > On Fri, 2010-08-06 at 06:27 +0100, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
> > > On 5 August 2010 21:49, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > > > Yaah -- so if
On 6 August 2010 09:53, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
[snip]
>> No, please not...
>> Generating that documentation will take ages, so each time, %post needs
>> at least 45 min - 1 hour to complete...
>> (One of my reasons for switching to Fedora from Gentoo, was exactly
>>
On Fri, 2010-08-06 at 10:04 +0100, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
> As I said in the bug report, I don't think building docs client side
> is the right way to go at all. In the general case this would require
> end users to install extra tools to build the docs, and defeats the
> pur
On 8 August 2010 09:28, Chen Lei wrote:
> I can help to review mysql-connector-c and Silvercity, howerver we may
> need a approve from FESCo for bundling scintilla in silvercity.
Scintilla is already bundled in with other apps in Fedora,
unfortunately. For example, geany bundles a slightly modifi
On Fri, 2010-08-20 at 16:25 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Orphan drgeo
> Orphan drgeo-doc
Taken.
Jonathan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Le lundi 06 septembre 2010 à 11:45 -0400, John J. McDonough a écrit :
> The wiki has been converted and a draft of the release notes is
> available at
>
> http://jjmcd.fedorapeople.org/Download/Release_Notes/
>
> for your review. The sources are up to date in git, but the translation
> branch i
I brought this up previously in the context of the Fedora ARM bootstrap. It
will be one of topics in the writeup.
--
Sent from my phone - message formatted and/or shortened accordingly.
-Original Message-
From: Richard W.M. Jones [rjo...@redhat.com]
Received: Wednesday, 20 Jul 2011, 8:
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 8:28 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Orphan libsoup22
I am extremely reluctantly taking this as I maintain buoh which
depends on it. If I can verify that buoh works with the current
version of libsoup, I'll orphan it again.
Jonathan
--
devel mailing li
Le mercredi 03 août 2011 à 13:36 +0200, Michel Alexandre Salim a écrit :
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Michel Alexandre Salim
> wrote:
> > Apart from RC2->final, the other changes are:
> ...
> > - enabling multilib parallel installation
>
> > ldc => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinf
Le mercredi 03 août 2011 à 13:36 +0200, Michel Alexandre Salim a écrit :
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Michel Alexandre Salim
> wrote:
> > Apart from RC2->final, the other changes are:
> ...
> > - enabling multilib parallel installation
>
> > ldc => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinf
Le mercredi 03 août 2011 à 13:36 +0200, Michel Alexandre Salim a écrit :
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 1:09 PM, Michel Alexandre Salim
> wrote:
> > Apart from RC2->final, the other changes are:
> ...
> > - enabling multilib parallel installation
>
> > ldc => http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinf
On 26 August 2011 19:50, Michael Ekstrand wrote:
> On 08/26/2011 12:13 PM, Michael Ekstrand wrote:
>> 3. cp-dev seems to not only use Black Box to bootstrap, but it also
>> seems to use Black Box sources as a part of itself. I have not yet
>> investigated whether this is true and, if true, how th
On Fri, 02 Sep 2011 09:18:31 +0200
Hans de Goede wrote:
> Which is in essence the problem you are seeing here Jonathan, after
> my bluez update, your bluetooth dongle is actually being out into
> HCI mode, so that it can for example also be used to sync with your
> phone, use a bluet
On Mon, 05 Sep 2011 19:50:53 +0200
Hans de Goede wrote:
> Jonathan, can you give bluez-4.96-3.fc17 a spin? It should fix your
> mouse + keyboard issue.
Will do, but not before the weekend - I forgot to bring the desktop
system to LPC :)
Thanks for addressing this,
jon
--
devel mailin
On Mon, 05 Sep 2011 19:50:53 +0200
Hans de Goede wrote:
> Jonathan, can you give bluez-4.96-3.fc17 a spin? It should fix your
> mouse + keyboard issue.
OK, I finally got a chance to install this. Mouse and keyboard work
great, thanks.
Thanks,
jon
--
devel mailing list
On 7 April 2011 16:02, Matt Domsch wrote:
> Question is, is it valuable enough to the Project as a whole, that
> someone else should take it on now?
Absolutely!
Actually, have you published you use to BFS the scripts anywhere?
Jonathan.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproje
On Tue, 10 May 2011 11:18:54 +1000
Peter Hutterer wrote:
> This is my fault, sorry. I updated the server but missed out on rebuilding
> the drivers. And with one thing leading to another, Easter came, I forgot
> about it and the above bug didn't show up on my radar until ajax pinged me
> this mor
On Tue, 10 May 2011 12:04:22 -0400
Adam Jackson wrote:
> > Things breaking in Rawhide are not a surprise; indeed, if it doesn't
> > occasionally bite the hand that's feeding it, somebody probably isn't
> > trying hard enough. But if it can remain this fundamentally broken for
> > weeks because t
On Tue, 10 May 2011 13:07:22 -0400
Adam Jackson wrote:
> All we had here was a case where one tool didn't catch a breakage because
> the other bit of the tools weren't complete enough yet. I don't think
> that's sufficient cause to question rawhide's existence.
The breakage is fine, one expects
keep it alive (and,
judging by
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/buglist.cgi?component=presto-utils&product=Fedora,
it seems some people are), now would be a good time to claim it. Otherwise,
I'm going to retire it.
Jonathan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed mes
(or, more
accurately, deltarpm is). When you do this in Dec/Jan, you either need
to disable to yum-presto plugin, or, if you're normally short on RAM
and/or have a fast mirror, remove it completely.
Jonathan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Thu, 2011-05-26 at 15:12 +0200, Michael Schroeder wrote:
> On Thu, May 26, 2011 at 03:51:48PM +0300, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> > The problem is that yum-presto can be a bit of a memory hog (or, more
> > accurately, deltarpm is).
>
> While it's true that *create*deltar
On 30 May 2011 09:52, Kurt Seifried wrote:
> I'm experimenting with a package that needs to have rsyslog write to a
> named fifo pipe (so log data can be handed off from rsyslog to an
> external program). As I see it the options are:
>
> 1) apologize to the user and tell them to disable SELinux (n
Is there any way to rsync from repos.fedoraproject.org? I'd like to
have a local mirror of spot's chromium repository, and wgetting it is
pretty nasty.
Jonathan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject
On Thu, 2011-06-02 at 07:32 -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
> On Thu, 2 Jun 2011, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
>
> > Is there any way to rsync from repos.fedoraproject.org? I'd like to
> > have a local mirror of spot's chromium repository, and wgetting it is
> > pretty
I have built Xerces 3.0.1 for Rawhide. Xerces 3.0.1. was released in
February, 2009.
I think it should replace Xerces 2.8, which was released in August,
2007. Do any packages require Xerces 2.8? Is there anyone who can not
build against the new 3.0.1 packages?
Jonathan
--
devel mailing
On 02/05/2010 03:27 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> Jonathan is actually talking about xerces-c rather htan xerces-j.
>
Yes, this affects xerces-c and xerces-c-devel, for F-13.
Jonathan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
's no python in the
buildroot. For this particular package, it's merely a cosmetic issue,
but I thought I'd raise it here in case it breaks other things.
Build log can be seen here:
http://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org/packages/emacs-common-muse/3.20/2.fc12/data/logs/noarch/build.log
J
On 15 February 2010 17:38, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 15, 2010 at 18:08:37 +0100,
> Haïkel Guémar wrote:
>> Le 15/02/2010 17:37, Bruno Wolff III a écrit :
>> > I saw that there is a change in the way git push works in 1.7.
>> > Currently I only do simple things and a typical workflow i
eration or linking or something. I'd file a bug report but
I am not sure where the problem lies exactly. Any pointers?
Cheers,
Jonathan
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 6 March 2010 17:00, Christoph Wickert
wrote:
> While we are at it, here is another great update:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/F11/FEDORA-2010-3326
>
> * New version introduced in F11.
> * Doesn't fix any bugs but it's an enhancement only.
> * Useless update descripti
On 9 March 2010 21:54, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> ===
> #fedora-meeting: FESCO (2010-03-09)
> ===
>
>
> Meeting started by nirik at 20:00:01 UTC. The full logs are available at
> http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting/2010-03-0
that Fedora can match *your*
vision for it.
Thanks for the party, I'll see myself out.
Jonathan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 19 March 2010 23:52, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> That is a security hole. Since /tmp knows no further access control an
> evil user can just create dirs there for each and every single user on
> the system. Those directories will then be owned by him, and all other
> users will a) either comple
sr), but not to move
directories underneath the main directory. This of course violates our
packaging guidelines in many ways.
Before I look into what's required to patch this beast to meet the
packaging guidelines, I wonder if anyone else has tried packaging it,
and/or wants to help?
Cheers
Hi,
Weirdly I am seeing that mock (1.1.18 on a rhel 6 machine) is now
deleting the logs if a package rebuilds successfully. The logs are not
deleted if the package fails to complete building. I've looked at the
man page and can't see any option to keep the logs. What am I missing?
TIA
fix that, I'd greatly appreciate it.
Jonathan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Fri, 2012-03-02 at 14:43 +0100, Nicola Soranzo wrote:
> Il giorno ven, 02/03/2012 alle 14.41 +0200, Jonathan Dieter ha scritto:
> > I've orphaned buoh and libsoup22 in all active branches of Fedora. Buoh
> > is a GTK online comics reader that I haven't used in forev
On Fri, 2012-03-09 at 10:05 +0200, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> Ok, as it's been a week, I'm going to go ahead and retire buoh. I won't
> retire libsoup22 as it appears that at least one other package is using
> it.
>
> Jonathan
And it appears that I can't comm
On Fri, 2012-03-09 at 10:20 +, Paul Howarth wrote:
> On 03/09/2012 08:12 AM, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> > If a provenpackager could help me, please, I'd like to retire buoh in
> > master and f17 (if possible).
>
> Done. All that's left for you to do is to file
progress :)
Why does the buildroot require deltarpm? Are deltarpms now being
generated during builds instead of at compose time?
Jonathan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 16:15 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> On 03/20/2012 01:49 PM, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> > On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 13:08 +0200, Panu Matilainen wrote:
> >> So... first hickup that broke koji: the buildroot now requires deltarpm
> >> which needs rebu
the proper deltarpms generated.
I'm not sure where to go from here. Any ideas on how to track this
down?
Jonathan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
need to change the Makefile to adjust for this, or just
the spec. Some advice would be greatly appreciated.
Jonathan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Sat, 2011-01-01 at 12:22 -0800, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Fri, Dec 31, 2010 at 05:38:30PM +0200, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> > I now seem to be running into some problems building deltarpm for
> > Rawhide and it seems to be tied into this. See
> > http://koji.fedoraproje
Le dimanche 16 janvier 2011 à 16:10 +0300, Pavel Alexeev (aka
Pahan-Hubbitus) a écrit :
> Hello.
>
> I'm open for himself planet.fedorapeople.org not so long before. Even
> try add there my own blog.
> But I'm wondering how I can filter records which I read via RSS by
> language!?
> I want read
Le dimanche 16 janvier 2011 à 16:50 +0300, Pavel Alexeev (aka
Pahan-Hubbitus) a écrit :
> 16.01.2011 16:21, jonathan MERCIER wrote:
> > Le dimanche 16 janvier 2011 à 16:10 +0300, Pavel Alexeev (aka
> > Pahan-Hubbitus) a écrit :
> >> Hello.
> >>
> >> I&
been rebuilt yet (see yesterdays' heads-up:
> http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2011-January/147881.html)
>
> Deltarpm FTBS at the moment due to Python 3 changes. I dunno if Jonathan
> is available to handle it but a provenpackager can fix it up easily by
> temporarily
On Tue, 2011-01-18 at 14:53 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 04:50:17PM +0200, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> > I am available and on it. Didn't realize that it was affecting the
> > buildroot. Will get it fixed ASAP.
>
> Ah, I've just pushed t
.html
Note that the python3-deltarpm module still doesn't actually work at the
moment, re
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2011-January/147920.html
Panu, I will happily take you up on your offer to look at that whenever
you have time.
Jonathan
signature.asc
Description: This is
hi community,
I stop support valide package, now i programm in D and do some package
for D programming.
If someone would like take it:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/valide
feel free
thanks for all
--
jonathan MERCIER
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Hi,
I try to build ldc2 but i have a litlle problem:
LDC2 need source file from the garbage collector named druntime
and druntime for build need a compiler D2 as LDC2
so how i could package this ?
can i add druntime in same package as LDC2 ?
--
jonathan MERCIER
--
devel mailing list
devel
Le vendredi 21 janvier 2011 à 22:10 +0100, Haïkel Guémar a écrit :
> Le 21/01/2011 21:45, jonathan MERCIER a écrit :
> > Hi,
> > I try to build ldc2 but i have a litlle problem:
> > LDC2 need source file from the garbage collector named druntime
> > and druntime for
the past. Unclear whether it is widely used (do we have anything like
> popcon?)
I'd vote for this one with the proviso that the API break is only done
for Rawhide. Having said that, I'll probably rebuild it locally for
Fedora 13 as that's what's deployed at our school.
Jonath
ave access to it?
>
FWIW, I'd really like to see the console user have access to this by
default. Then, uploading a file to the NXT brick would be plug and
play.
Jonathan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
blems (fixed by
increasing /proc/sys/vm/min_free_kbytes), we've had pretty much zero
trouble.
The best part is we no longer need LVM on those servers and we get the
benefit of painless snapshot generation (we tried LVM snapshots and they
were *slow*).
Jonathan
signature.asc
Description: Thi
On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 14:18 -0500, Josef Bacik wrote:
> On Wed, Feb 23, 2011 at 2:00 PM, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-02-23 at 16:19 +0100, Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> >> I'm actually quite interested in btrfs especially for servers because
> >> o
not a trivial fix
and I haven't had time over the last year or so to get it done.
So volunteers are welcome.
Jonathan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
tect conflicts among headers for multiple
architectures. In this case, the problem was a conflict in the size of
a long:
#define XERCES_SIZEOF_LONG 4
vs.
#define XERCES_SIZEOF_LONG 8
Are there other requirements for -devel packages that I should be aware
of? Is there something I should read?
On 26 May 2010 14:06, Seth Vidal wrote:
>
>
> On Wed, 26 May 2010, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
>
>> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 10:58:29AM +0100, Frank Murphy wrote:
...
nss-softokn-freebl-3.12.6-1.2.fc11.x86_64
>>>
>>> my version is currently at:
>>> nss-softokn-freebl-3.12.4-19.fc12.i686
>>> on a
On 27 May 2010 16:43, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
> On 26 May 2010 14:06, Seth Vidal wrote:
>>
>>
>> On Wed, 26 May 2010, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 10:58:29AM +0100, Frank Murphy wrote:
>>>>> ...
>>>>>
On 27 May 2010 20:58, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 15:03 -0400, James Antill wrote:
>> While it's not good packaging, most of the time these bad versions
>> don't cause any problems.
>
> It's better to have the packages that are supported (to the extent that
> the community provi
Here epiphany works for bugzilla.redhat.com
Le jeudi 27 mai 2010 à 22:43 -0400, Braden McDaniel a écrit :
> On Thu, 2010-05-27 at 15:46 -0400, Braden McDaniel wrote:
> > On 5/27/10 2:11 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> > > On 27/05/10 17:48, Braden McDaniel wrote:
> > >> bugzilla.redhat.com is no long
On 29 May 2010 05:57, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> Hi,
>
> ATM, I am observing this:
>
> # repoquery -qa 'nss-softokn-freebl*'
> nss-softokn-freebl-0:3.12.4-19.fc13.x86_64
> nss-softokn-freebl-0:3.12.4-17.fc13.i686
> nss-softokn-freebl-devel-0:3.12.4-19.fc13.x86_64
> nss-softokn-freebl-devel-0:3.12.4-
It seems that deltarpms aren't being kept from one push to another for
Fedora 13 (and, also it seems, Fedora 11). For example, there's an
openoffice update, but though there were deltarpms when it first came
out, they've gone now. Where should I report the bug?
Jonathan
te for drpm goodness.
>
> Am I missing something obvious?
Old deltarpms are being deleted after each push. This means that the
openoffice.org deltarpms were only available for a day or two before
being deleted. Yes, this is a bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=598584
Jonathan
udo-file structure).
I don't know if that's clear enough, feel free to ask if it's not.
Jonathan
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Mon, 2010-06-14 at 10:26 +0200, Michael Schroeder wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 12, 2010 at 06:48:44PM +0300, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> > I would like to allow deltarpm to split both old and new rpms into block
> > and delta each block separately, but it would involve some very creative
&
urselves into a corner
where we are having to do absolute requires or just end up with broken
software when absolute requirements are not properly documented.
I really look forward to others being involved with this. Count me in
for the SIG.[2]
- Jonathan Steffan
[1] http://pl
hello, i try create 2 package: ldc and tango.
I have a big question where i put *.d file ?
for C/C++ it's in /usr/include but D they are nothing
thanks
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
i submit to package for review:
- Tango standard library for D language of d1
specificationhttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=603904
- LDC a compiler for the D programming language:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608066
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
htt
bad link for tango => https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=608069
Le vendredi 25 juin 2010 à 17:15 +0200, jonathan MERCIER a écrit :
> i submit to package for review:
> - Tango standard library for D language of d1
> specificationhttps://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=6039
hello,
I would like to add a feature for F-14: D programming
For this the needs are
- D compiler
- standard runtime library
Fedora will take some benefit to increase its community of developers
with the inclusion of this feature. And an easy way for people who want
to try this language.
Feature p
I said the same thing to irc chan #ldc #d #d.tango
And unfortunately all said this: "because D likes static, it is actually
a bit complicated to have shared lib"
Le dimanche 27 juin 2010 à 09:25 -0400, Neal Becker a écrit :
> jonathan MERCIER wrote:
>
> > hello,
>
you are welcome
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Peopke who want help this feature can edit
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Talk:Features/D_Programming#Owner and add
name.information ...
Thanks for all
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
1 - 100 of 1178 matches
Mail list logo
