Re: [HEADS UP] F33 Boost 1.73.0 rebuilds starting in a side tag

2020-05-28 Thread Vascom
Hi. pulseeffects package depends on boost and I don't see changes in changelog. чт, 28 мая 2020 г., 11:45 Jonathan Wakely : > I'm starting the rebuilds for Boost 1.73.0 and packages that depend on > it, using the f33-boost side tag. > > If you see "Rebuilt for Boost 1.73.0" in the changelog for

Re: [HEADS UP] F33 Boost 1.73.0 rebuilds starting in a side tag

2020-05-28 Thread Vascom
OK I just write it because you request report about "I don't see changes in changelog". чт, 28 мая 2020 г., 15:16 Jonathan Wakely : > On 28/05/20 14:47 +0300, Vascom wrote: > >Hi. > > > >pulseeffects package depends on boost and I don't see change

Re: Packaging problem

2020-05-30 Thread Vascom
First you should use this macro %{qmake_qt5} and remove %{set_build_flags}. And show your spec or give srpm. сб, 30 мая 2020 г. в 22:21, : > > Hello, > > I've got a problem with a package. > I am trying to clean up a spec file before sending it to review and I've got > an error: > > erreur : Emp

Re: Packaging problem

2020-05-30 Thread Vascom
Also Macro forms of system executables SHOULD NOT be used except when there is a need to allow the location of those executables to be configurable. For example, rm should be used in preference to %{__rm}, but %{__python3} is acceptable. сб, 30 мая 2020 г. в 22:51, : > > Yes, you're right :) > > H

Re: Packaging problem

2020-05-31 Thread Vascom
not with %_qt5_qmake ... > > Thanks a lot > > I see that qmake_qt5 macro call _qt5_qmake with some flags ... > I found the macro via rpm --showrc | grep qmake and I choose the wrong > result. > > > - Mail original - > De: "Vascom" > À: "Development d

Re: Packaging problem

2020-05-31 Thread Vascom
s problem is > already fixed on Fedora 32. > > Does a Qt5 update is programmed for Fedora 31 ? > > - Mail original - > De: "Vascom" > À: "Development discussions related to Fedora" < > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> > Envoyé: Dimanche 31 Mai 2020

Re: Packaging problem

2020-05-31 Thread Vascom
Mail original - > De: "Vascom" > À: "Development discussions related to Fedora" < > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> > Envoyé: Dimanche 31 Mai 2020 12:13:58 > Objet: Re: Packaging problem > > > > I think Qt will not be upgraded in F31. > > &g

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Make nano the default editor

2020-06-26 Thread Vascom
I think it is good step to user friendly Fedora experience. +1 пт, 26 июн. 2020 г., 14:45 Charalampos Stratakis : > +1 > > I'm all for making the user experience better, and I think this change > contributes to that. > > - Original Message - > > From: "Ben Cotton" > > To: devel-annou...

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Make btrfs the default file system for desktop variants

2020-06-28 Thread Vascom
If this change will be accepted I think need to modify anaconda partition dialog for BTRFS scheme. It has difficult and not obvious behavior when user want to change automatically created partition scheme and resize BTRFS volumes. See this bugreport https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=18512

Re: Review swaps

2020-06-29 Thread Vascom
I took it. вт, 30 июн. 2020 г. в 06:28, Chenxiong Qi : > > Hello everyone, > > Could anyone please review these three packages? > > python-django-uuslug > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1851463 > > python-django-contrib-comments > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1851562 >

Re: Add new co-maintainer

2020-07-08 Thread Vascom
Are you sure that he will be a good maintainer? If you want to follow this https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group#Become_a_co-maintainer I can be a sponsor. чт, 9 июл. 2020 г. в 09:01, Andrey Maslennikov : > > Hello! > > I'm trying to add a co-maintainer to my

Re: Add new co-maintainer

2020-07-08 Thread Vascom
Done. Now you can add yshestakov as comaintainer. чт, 9 июл. 2020 г. в 09:47, Andrey Maslennikov : > > Yes, I trust him completely on this matter. > > @Vascom thank you for your help! Should I open a ticket for it? > ___ > devel mai

Re: Add new co-maintainer

2020-07-09 Thread Vascom
Try again. You can see that packager group present https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/user/view/yshestakov чт, 9 июл. 2020 г. в 10:09, Andrey Maslennikov : > > Hm, looks like something is still wrong, I'm getting "This user must be in > one of the following groups to be allowed to be added

Re: Add new co-maintainer

2020-07-09 Thread Vascom
I see you successfully added comaintainer :) чт, 9 июл. 2020 г., 10:14 Vascom : > Try again. > You can see that packager group present > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/user/view/yshestakov > > чт, 9 июл. 2020 г. в 10:09, Andrey Maslennikov >: > > > > Hm,

Re: Disable LTO for now ?

2020-07-29 Thread Vascom
Disable LTO https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/redhat-rpm-config/c/5baaf4a99cc77572d3496a7000674098bef7ed68?branch=master ср, 29 июл. 2020 г., 17:08 : > Hello opencv [1] build also failed around LTO > What is your advise ? What is your advice? > > Thanks, > > [1] > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/

Self introduction: Vasiliy N. Glazov

2012-06-07 Thread Vascom
My name is Vasiliy N. Glazov My nickname Vascom or vascom City, Country: Moscow, Russian Federation. Profession status: Engeneer. Company: Javad GNSS. I want be maintaner of packages for Fedora. I already have few review requests for packages https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=822329

grive - An open source Linux client for Google Drive

2012-06-07 Thread Vascom
Hi, I need a sponsor to include this package in Fedora. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829713 My Self introduction http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-June/168330.html -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinf

Re: grive open source client for google drive

2012-06-07 Thread Vascom
They can check this Package Review Request https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829713 2012/6/7 Stephen Gallagher : > On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 11:51 -0300, Adrian Alves wrote: >> >> >> Am about to package this: >> grive open source client for google drive >> http://match065.github.com/grive/ >

Re: grive open source client for google drive

2012-06-07 Thread Vascom
2012/6/7 Adrian Alves : > On Thu, Jun 7, 2012 at 8:48 AM, Vascom wrote: >> >> They can check this Package Review Request >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829713 >> >> 2012/6/7 Stephen Gallagher : >> > On Thu, 2012-05-24 at 11:51 -0300, Adri

Re: Orphaning fuse-encfs

2012-06-19 Thread Vascom
2012/6/19 Peter Lemenkov : > Hello All. > I don't use fuse-encfs anymore so I'm going to orphan it. Feel free to > take over if you're interested in maintaining it. > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/fuse-encfs > > -- > With best regards, Peter Lemenkov. > -- > devel mailing list >

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 20

2013-08-08 Thread Vascom
I'll take Package fuse-zip (orphan). 2013/8/8 Christopher Meng > I will retire acheck* as it has been orphaned by Debian because dead > upstream since 2006. > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduc

Re: Gsmartcontrol miss a dependency but maintainer, Eric Smith, don't answer

2016-09-24 Thread Vascom
I can take this package. ср, 21 сент. 2016 г., 12:57 jack smith : > Hello, > > Thanks to Yaakov Selkowitz, we finally found why Gsmartcontrol doesn't > start. It miss a dependency (usermode-gtk) but maintainer Eric Smith don't > answer for a month now. > I don't know if he still really maintain G

Re: Gsmartcontrol miss a dependency but maintainer, Eric Smith, don't answer

2016-09-27 Thread Vascom
I am received commit rights and I hope will update gsmartcontrol tomorrow or next few days. сб, 24 сент. 2016 г., 20:42 jack smith : > That will be great ! > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to dev

Re: Attempting to contact unresponsive maintainers - zeenix, theinric, ifarkas, mchalk

2016-09-28 Thread Vascom
Eric Smith recently give me commit rights to gsmartcontrol. ср, 28 сент. 2016 г. в 11:16, jack smith : > 2 others maintainers don't respond > > Craig Barnes (Discount) > > Eric Smith (Gsmartcontrol) > ___ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraprojec

Re: Enlightenment for Fedora

2012-12-28 Thread Vascom
Are you plan package only stable versions or versionf from SVN? 2012/12/29 Rahul Sundaram > Hi > > I am working on bringing in Enlightenment back into Fedora. I am going to > be copying the packages at > > http://repos.fedorapeople.org/repos/sundaram/enlightenment/ > > as I work on them. This

Re: make: gtk-update-icon-cache: Command not found

2017-03-02 Thread Vascom
May be you need add it to BR? чт, 2 мар. 2017 г. в 13:05, Martin Gansser : > the build of cmst fails on rawhide and f26 maybe on other version too. > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/4850/18134850/build.log > > for f26: > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=18135093

Re: Qt 5.8 coming to rawhide

2017-03-31 Thread Vascom
Please update qt5-qtquick1 to 5.8. ср, 29 мар. 2017 г. в 14:23, Rex Dieter : > Rex Dieter wrote: > > > Rex Dieter wrote: > > > >> Mostly fyi/heads-up, > >> > >> kde-sig members imported Qt 5.8 into git over the weekend (kudos to > >> heliocastro for initial packaging/copr and kkofler for merging

Re: RPM boolean dependencies in Requires

2017-04-06 Thread Vascom
As maintainer you should make your choice between this two variants. For example: if some program can be compiled with Qt4 or Qt5 and you add BR: (Qt4 or Qt5) then this program will compiled with old version of Qt. чт, 6 апр. 2017 г. в 14:44, Richard W.M. Jones : > I have a package which needs G

Re: Conflicting gstreamer1-plugins packages in rawhide?

2017-04-12 Thread Vascom
gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free-1.11.90-1.fc27 now builded in rawhide. Try again. ср, 12 апр. 2017 г. в 17:49, Guido Aulisi : > I tried to build a new version of jalv package and I got a conflict > between gstreamer1-plugins-bad-free-1.11.2-1.fc26.x86_64 and > gstreamer1-plugins-base-1.11.90-1.fc27.x

Non responsive maintainer fab

2017-05-22 Thread Vascom
I am want co-maintain or admin package klavaro https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/rpms/klavaro/ And I make request in pkgdb. But it's admin fab not response https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/packager/fab/ What should I do? ___ devel mailin

Re: Non responsive maintainer fab

2017-05-23 Thread Vascom
Yes, I am tried few days ago. He is not response. вт, 23 мая 2017 г. в 11:11, Björn 'besser82' Esser < besse...@fedoraproject.org>: > Am 23.05.2017 um 08:48 schrieb Vascom: > > I am want co-maintain or admin package klavaro > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgd

Re: Non responsive maintainer fab

2017-05-23 Thread Vascom
OK. Thanks. вт, 23 мая 2017 г. в 12:41, James Hogarth : > On 23 May 2017 at 09:17, Vascom wrote: > > Yes, I am tried few days ago. He is not response. > > > > > Give him a time, life gets busy at times and we are but volunteers. > > The process to follow for

Re: pure-ftpd 1.0.46 released!

2017-07-11 Thread Vascom
Dominik, are you try communicate with it's maintainers? вт, 11 июл. 2017 г., 16:09 Dominik Kucher : > Hi! > > No longer maintains pure-ftpd? 1.0.46 is released on Apr. 24 2017 > > -- > Dominik Kucher > A-2130 Mistelbach, Ebendorferstraße 7/2/3 > p: +43 (0) 720 511 941 > f: +43 (0) 1 34242 289967

Re: pure-ftpd 1.0.46 released!

2017-07-12 Thread Vascom
-11, Vascom wrote: > > Dominik, are you try communicate with it's maintainers? > > > Surely they know about it > <https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1361928> but their package > is broken since Fedora 26 > <https://bugzilla.redhat.

Re: pure-ftpd 1.0.46 released!

2017-07-12 Thread Vascom
Rebuild with corrected systemd service file. https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=20472917 ср, 12 июл. 2017 г. в 11:21, Vascom : > I am builded it > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=20472651 > You can try this build and check it functionality. > >

Re: Add new application to repository

2016-11-24 Thread Vascom
Gregorio, you should read this https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers?rd=PackageMaintainers/Join чт, 24 нояб. 2016 г. в 12:11, Gregorio . : > Hi all, > > > I'm a newbie, so I don't know what are the steps to add a new application > to the official repository. I'm a

Re: octave 4.2 update in rawhide

2016-12-06 Thread Vascom
Thanks for your work. Hope we will see Octave 4.2 in f24, f25 too. ср, 7 дек. 2016 г. в 8:51, Orion Poplawski : > The hdf5 update prompted me to (perhaps too hastily) update octave to > 4.2 in rawhide as well. This unfortunately has led to the need to > rework the octave package build/install ma

Unblocking fuse-encfs for el6 in koji

2017-01-22 Thread Vascom
Hi. I am inretired fuse-encfs for el6. And need to unblock it in koji. Created pagure releng ticket https://pagure.io/releng/issue/6596 Please help with it. -- Best regards, Vasiliy Glazov ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsu

Updating libusbx

2020-03-25 Thread Vascom
Why libusbx still not updated to 1.0.23? Version 1.0.22 was released two years ago. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedorapro

Re: Updating libusbx

2020-03-26 Thread Vascom
BZ ticket already submitted and I wrote there. I will try email to maintainers directly now. чт, 26 мар. 2020 г., 15:22 Richard Shaw : > On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 1:28 AM Vascom wrote: > >> Why libusbx still not updated to 1.0.23? >> Version 1.0.22 was released two years ag

Re: Updating libusbx

2020-03-26 Thread Vascom
Thanks. чт, 26 мар. 2020 г., 15:50 Peter Robinson : > On Thu, Mar 26, 2020 at 6:28 AM Vascom wrote: > > > > Why libusbx still not updated to 1.0.23? > > Version 1.0.22 was released two years ago. > > Maybe it slipped through the cracks, maybe there wasn't anythi

Re: Specify debug build in qtmake?

2020-03-31 Thread Vascom
Why you not use macro %qmake_qt5? It contain all flags. вт, 31 мар. 2020 г., 15:25 Richard Shaw : > Has something changed with Qt 5.14? I'm trying to update klog to new > version but debuginfo is not being generated. > > Looking at the build log it's definitely missing "-g" during building but >

Re: Specify debug build in qtmake?

2020-03-31 Thread Vascom
So this spec not follow Fedora's packaging guidlines and need to be fixed according them. вт, 31 мар. 2020 г., 15:57 Richard Shaw : > On Tue, Mar 31, 2020 at 7:34 AM Vascom wrote: > >> Why you not use macro %qmake_qt5? >> It contain all flags. >> > > Good que

Re: Fedora 32 FTBFS packages to be orphaned in 1 week

2020-04-06 Thread Vascom
I would like to take arduino. I can make buildable again 1.8.5 version and may be update it to latest. My FAS name: vascom -- Best regards, Vasiliy Glazov ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le

Re: Fedora 32 FTBFS packages to be orphaned in 1 week

2020-04-06 Thread Vascom
I would like to take arduino. I can make buildable again 1.8.5 version and may be update it to latest. My FAS name: vascom -- Best regards, Vasiliy Glazov вс, 29 мар. 2020 г. в 14:15, Miro Hrončok : > > According to the Fedora's Fails To Build From Source policy

boost package in fedora

2020-04-20 Thread Vascom
Will Boost ever be updated on Fedora again? https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1558278 ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://d

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: laxathom (Xavier Lamien)

2020-04-22 Thread Vascom
I already built it. But you can update to 6.0.5 :) ср, 22 апр. 2020 г. в 22:04, Xavier Lamien : > > Oh hi, > > Looks like your email get lost in the pile if you tried to reach me > personally or my bugzilla's filter is too efficient I'd say. > > Any way, I'll have a look at your ticket asap. > A

Re: boost package in fedora

2020-04-25 Thread Vascom
Thank you. пт, 24 апр. 2020 г., 14:40 Jonathan Wakely : > On 20/04/20 15:43 +0300, Vascom wrote: > >Will Boost ever be updated on Fedora again? > > > >https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1558278 > > Yes. > ___

Re: Review request

2020-05-04 Thread Vascom
I will do it. пн, 4 мая 2020 г., 11:03 Bob Hepple : > Hello, > > Although I'm new here, I've had a few packages go through review > already and I'm very grateful for the help and education provided by > the reviewers. > > But there is one package that I put up for review about a month ago > and I

Re: qt5-devel dropped?

2020-05-11 Thread Vascom
Now we must use qt5-qtbase-devel. пн, 11 мая 2020 г., 12:01 Susi Lehtola : > Hi, > > > I just noticed that qt5-devel has been dropped. Is the idea to force > all other packages to change > > Requires: qt5-devel > > into > > Requires: qt5-qtbase > Requires: qt5-qtbase-gui > Requires: qt5-qtbase-my

Re: Boost packages conflict

2020-05-14 Thread Vascom
No one try to install it now. New boost will be in F33 only. But if boost not installed in system and user want install for example libreoffice he will get this error and can't install any package requires boost. boost169 must be removed from F32 repos at all. чт, 14 мая 2020 г. в 22:19, Samuel

Re: Boost packages conflict

2020-05-14 Thread Vascom
Hm, now work. But it was... чт, 14 мая 2020 г. в 23:56, Samuel Sieb : > > On 5/14/20 1:34 PM, Denis Arnaud wrote: > > So, should I add the obsoletes clauses for every package, or is it fine to > > leave it as it is now? > > I believe it's fine to just leave it as it is. I did a couple of > insta

Re: Boost packages conflict

2020-05-14 Thread Vascom
I just could reproduce it. Steps: 1. Run KDE spin F32 in virt-manager. 2. dnf install toolnix Result: mkvtoolnix x86_64 46.0.0-1.fc32 updates 5.2 M Installing dependencies: boost169-filesystem x86_64 1.69.0-6.fc32 fedora53 k boost169-syste

Re: Boost packages conflict

2020-05-14 Thread Vascom
Yes, after system installed on hard drive the same error. But after upgrading boost* error is gone and packages normal installed. пт, 15 мая 2020 г. в 00:33, Vascom : > > I just could reproduce it. > > Steps: > 1. Run KDE spin F32 in virt-manager. > 2. dnf install

Re: Speed up bash starting time (slow scripts in profile.d, /etc/bash_completion.d)

2020-05-16 Thread Vascom
Are you use SSD? I have 0.087s on it. сб, 16 мая 2020 г., 13:57 Dominique Martinet : > Hi, > > once in a while I get annoyed at how slow bash is to startup; using a > tiling wm poping a new shell is supposed to be quite fast but I'm > staring at a new empty window for ~1s everytime and it gets a

Orphaning kchildlock

2020-05-21 Thread Vascom
kchildlock orphaned. It is for KDE4 and has dead upstream. -- Best regards, Vasiliy Glazov ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.f

libbappstream-glib icon type=stock not supported

2020-05-25 Thread Vascom
Hi all. Some packages has string ... And appstream-util validate-relax show error ? tag-invalid : stock icon is not valid There exist bugreport one year old! https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1584944 Please pay attention to it. No I don't know what to do: 1. Remove this str

Re: Presentation

2020-05-27 Thread Vascom
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers#Create_Your_Review_Request ср, 27 мая 2020 г., 20:53 Yann Collette : > > Le 27/05/2020 à 17:39, Peter Lemenkov a écrit : > > Hello Yann! > > > > ср, 27 мая 2020 г. в 15:05, : > >> Hello, > >> > >> I just registered the Fedora

ABI change announce svt-vp9

2019-10-10 Thread Vascom
ABI changed in svt-vp9 0.1.1 release. All changes https://taskotron.fedoraproject.org/artifacts/all/6720382c-ebf1-11e9-904f-52540077ca13/tests.yml/svt-vp9-0.1.1-1.fc32.log ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an ema

Re: List of Python 2 packages to be removed mid-November

2019-10-29 Thread Vascom
klavaro fixed in rawhide. ср, 30 окт. 2019 г. в 08:53, Luya Tshimbalanga : > > On 2019-10-29 8:24 a.m., Miro Hrončok wrote: > > > > luya > > scribus-generator > > (→ scribus → PY2) > > > Already switched to python3 : > > https://apps.fedoraproject.org/packages/scribus-generator/sources/spec/

bibutils change soversion anounce

2019-11-07 Thread Vascom
Bibutils 6.8 change soversion to 6.8. I am update it for rawhide, F31, F30. As I see no one package not require it so I will no rebuild anything else. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@li

Re: rpmbuild signature check failure

2019-11-09 Thread Vascom
May be you need use sha256sum instead gpg? вс, 10 нояб. 2019 г., 9:17 Baxi : > Hi. I am trying to package a program. The upstream provided sha256sum.asc > file. Verifying tarball with that signature says, Can't check signature: No > public key. I found his public key in key directory by searching

Re: rpmbuild signature check failure

2019-11-09 Thread Vascom
rg/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_source_file_verification > > On Nov 10, 2019 10:05, Vascom wrote: > > May be you need use sha256sum instead gpg? > > вс, 10 нояб. 2019 г., 9:17 Baxi : > > Hi. I am trying to package a program. The upstream provided sha256sum.asc > file. Veri

Re: Paul Grosu

2019-11-19 Thread Vascom
You need to add your public ssh key at FAS page https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts And login via ssh. Read all information on https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Machine_Resources_For_Package_Maintainers ср, 20 нояб. 2019 г. в 09:54, Paul Grosu : > > Hello Fedora Development Community, > >

Re: Paul Grosu

2019-11-19 Thread Vascom
pgrosu - is your FAS name? Are you in packager group? ср, 20 нояб. 2019 г. в 10:20, Paul Grosu : > > Hi Vascom, > > Thank you for the quick reply. I already added the SSH public key, but when > I try to ssh with my private key and enter the username pgrosu at the > (l

Re: Review swap

2019-12-05 Thread Vascom
I can review it without swap. пт, 6 дек. 2019 г. в 03:03, Jerry James : > > One of my upstreams picked up a new documentation dependency. Who would like > to swap reviews? This one should be quick and easy. > > python-sphinx-copybutton: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1780426 > > Th

Unretire linuxconsoletools package

2019-08-13 Thread Vascom
Please approve review of linuxconsoletools package https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1740634 It was retired due to FTBFS but needed for gpm, fpc, lazarus to build pascal programs. Situation same as with gettext. -- Best regards, Vasiliy Glazov ___

Re: Intent to unretire ladspa-swh-plugins

2019-09-10 Thread Vascom
It is not dependency for pulseeffects. пн, 9 сент. 2019 г. в 20:10, Guido Aulisi : > > I'd like to unretire ladspa-swh-plugins in rahwide, f31 and f30, > because it is a dependency of some packages I maintain: > > ams > jamin > > It's a dependency of pulseeffects too. > > I will file a review requ

Re: Fedora package in EPEL

2019-09-16 Thread Vascom
fedpkg request-branch --repo fctxpd epel7 вт, 17 сент. 2019 г. в 09:26, Muneendra Kumar M via devel : > > Hi All, > > > > I want to have the fctxpd fedora package into the EPEL. > > Iam the maintainer of this fctxpd package in fedora. > > Can anyone help me how can I have the same package in EPEL

Re: Intent to unretire ladspa-swh-plugins

2019-09-18 Thread Vascom
Can you also unretire and build lv2-mdala-plugins? It is needed for pulseeffects but lv2-mdala-plugins use python2 in build script and I do not have knowledge how to rewrite it to python3. I can only add python2 to BR and correct shebang but it seems wrong because python2 will be erased soon. --

Re: specfile dependecy to pip package

2019-09-19 Thread Vascom
python3-sphinx not removed. Look at https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/packageinfo?packageID=6297 чт, 19 сент. 2019 г. в 16:03, Marek Tamaskovic : > > Hi, > I'm maintainer of libcbor package and in fedora 30 has been removed > python3-sphinx package which is required to build documentation for l

New packager: girst

2020-01-09 Thread Vascom
Welcome new Fedora's packager - girst. He is already rpmfusion packager and I am sure will be good in Fedora. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Condu

Re: Fedora 32 Mass Rebuild

2020-01-28 Thread Vascom
Are s390x builders ready for Mass Rebuild? I see many fail builds only on s390x without logs. вт, 28 янв. 2020 г. в 11:39, Mohan Boddu : > > We are starting the mass rebuild now. > > Thanks. > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 5:38 PM Jeff Law wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2020-01-27 at 21:23 +0100, Fabio Valen

Re: Fedora pagure confusion wrt EPEL

2020-01-30 Thread Vascom
No way. You can add comaintainer for EPEL builds of your packages. чт, 30 янв. 2020 г. в 12:13, Michael Schwendt : > > I don't do EPEL packaging. I never signed up as an "owner" of EPEL packages. > I don't want to be the new default owner of EPEL bugzilla tickets. > Where may I be able to stop thi

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

2020-02-17 Thread Vascom
Please help me understand why I am marked? vascom: perl-Compress-LZF I can't find any package requires perl-Compress-LZF. This always empty: dnf repoquery --whatrequires perl-Compress-LZF --alldeps dnf repoquery --whatrequires "perl(Compress::LZF)" --alldeps вт, 18 февр. 2020 г.

Re: co-maintainer wanted for fuse-sshfs in EPEL8

2020-03-08 Thread Vascom
You can add me as comaintainer. FAS name: vascom вс, 8 мар. 2020 г., 19:32 Dusty Mabe : > The current maintainer of fuse-sshfs is looking for a co-maintainer for it > in epel8. It's currently not in EPEL 8 so if you go from RHEL or CentOS > 7->8 > you'll lose it. I ha

bibutils soname bump to 6.9

2020-03-23 Thread Vascom
I go to update bibutils in rawhide. It update lib to version 6.9. Nothing require it as BR and only kbibtex as Requires. So I will not rebuild any packages. ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le.

Re: bibutils soname bump to 6.9

2020-03-23 Thread Vascom
Updated to 6.10. Can I update it in F32 now? пн, 23 мар. 2020 г. в 21:56, Vascom : > > I go to update bibutils in rawhide. It update lib to version 6.9. > > Nothing require it as BR and only kbibtex as Requires. > So I will not rebui

Re: Octave 4.4 update coming soon to rawhide

2018-12-04 Thread Vascom
What about Octave 4.4. for F29? пн, 12 нояб. 2018 г. в 03:51, Orion Poplawski : > > I've planning on building octave 4.4 soon (next day or two) in rawhide. > I've been building dependent packages here: > > https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/scitech/octave4.4/packages/ > > Anyone in the scite

Re: Octave 4.4 update coming soon to rawhide

2018-12-04 Thread Vascom
I am want rpm, not module. ср, 5 дек. 2018 г. в 00:38, José Abílio Matos : > > On Tuesday, 4 December 2018 13.09.16 WET Vascom wrote: > > What about Octave 4.4. for F29? > > It is already there, although hidden (in a sense). :-) > BTW the same applies for F28. > Octave 4.

Broken el7 ppc64 koji

2018-12-13 Thread Vascom
Hi. Whats wrong with ppc64 in koji? https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=31454970 https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/4970/31454970/root.log DEBUG util.py:439: Error: Package: wxGTK3-3.0.2-15.el7.ppc64 (build) DEBUG util.py:439: Requires: libmspack.so.0()(64

Re: Broken el7 ppc64 koji

2018-12-14 Thread Vascom
But it was here in previous build few months ago. https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/mediainfo/18.08.1/1.el7/data/logs/ppc64/root.log пт, 14 дек. 2018 г. в 16:49, Stephen John Smoogen : > > On Fri, 14 Dec 2018 at 01:47, Vascom wrote: > > > > Hi. > > > >

Re: Broken el7 ppc64 koji

2018-12-14 Thread Vascom
Thanks. пт, 14 дек. 2018 г., 17:30 Stephen John Smoogen smo...@gmail.com: > On Fri, 14 Dec 2018 at 08:53, Vascom wrote: > > > > But it was here in previous build few months ago. > > > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/mediainfo/18.08.1/1.el7/data/logs/ppc64/r

Re: Kernel 4.20 rebase plans

2019-01-08 Thread Vascom
Do you mean STIBP? It is alreasy disabled by default in 4.19 and 4.20. ср, 9 янв. 2019 г. в 01:55, Joseph D. Wagner : > > IIRC, there is major performance degradation (anti-Spectre) in 4.20 that will > be turned off by default 4.21. > > Will it be turned off by default in the 4.20 rebase? > > Jos

Re: Fw: Re: OUTAGE: Koji system 2019-01-11 -> 2019-01-14

2019-01-13 Thread Vascom
How about switch build rpms for exotic and slow arches (arm, s390...) from hardware to cross-compile on x86_64? mock can do it via qemu-user-static пн, 14 янв. 2019 г. в 10:37, Dan Horák : > > On Sun, 13 Jan 2019 20:52:30 -0500 > Neal Gompa wrote: > > > On Sun, Jan 13, 2019 at 8:50 PM Neal Gompa

Re: Fw: Re: OUTAGE: Koji system 2019-01-11 -> 2019-01-14

2019-01-14 Thread Vascom
It must produce the same results as real hw. Or mock parameter --forcearch must be removed. пн, 14 янв. 2019 г. в 12:02, Dan Horák : > > On Mon, 14 Jan 2019 10:48:59 +0300 > Vascom wrote: > > > How about switch build rpms for exotic and slow arches (arm, s390...) > > arm

Re: [HEADS-UP] gcc(-c++) builds are broken in Rawhide buildroot

2019-01-21 Thread Vascom
Why package gcc has version 9.0.0 but in changelog - 9.0.1? пн, 21 янв. 2019 г. в 14:48, Björn 'besser82' Esser : > > The update to GCC 9 broke the Rawhide buildroot for any package that > (Build)Requires: gcc{,-c++} and/or libtool. > > I've already successfully rebuilt annobin and the rebuilt of

Re: Fedora 30 Mass Rebuild

2019-02-05 Thread Vascom
No. If count as many times as many maintainers it has it will be about 3300 fails. вт, 5 февр. 2019 г. в 14:32, Vít Ondruch : > > > Dne 04. 02. 19 v 21:48 Mohan Boddu napsal(a): > > Hi all, > > Per the Fedora 30 schedule[1] we started a mass rebuild for Fedora 30 > on Jan 31st 2019. We did a mass

Retire kchildlock package

2019-02-26 Thread Vascom
Hi all. I am plan to retire package kchildlock from Fedora. It is KDE4 application long time unsupported and FTBFS on rawhide and F30. If no one need it I will retire package in one week. https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/kchildlock https://store.kde.org/p/1127875/ https://sourceforge.net/proje

Re: Qt 5.12 coming to rawhide

2019-03-01 Thread Vascom
Will it be in F29? пт, 1 мар. 2019 г. в 17:05, Rex Dieter : > > Continuing work in master branch (aka fc31), pending > > fc30 work will continue when > https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7966 > is processed for a f30-kde koji target. (Hopefully with enough time prior to > beta freeze) > > -- Rex > _

Re: Self introduction: Barry Scott

2019-03-04 Thread Vascom
Hi and welcome. I am sorry but you can't became fedora maintainer with already existing package. You should suggest new package for that. https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Join_the_package_collection_maintainers Also you can send Pull Requests or talk with python-pycxx maintainer directly. пн, 4 ма

Re: Chromium C++ help needed

2019-03-11 Thread Vascom
Look at chromium-vaapi build in rpmfusion. пн, 11 мар. 2019 г., 20:17 Tom Callaway : > Hi folks, > > I spent some time this weekend trying to get Chromium 72 building on > Fedora, but I kept running into a C++ issue that I was not able to resolve. > This happened with gcc-9.0.1-0.8.fc30.x86_64 an

Re: Orphaning kdesvn

2019-04-18 Thread Vascom
I can take it. FAS name: vascom пт, 19 апр. 2019 г. в 05:37, Orion Poplawski : > > I'm going to orphan kdesvn as I no longer use it. It needs updating: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1519347 > > Let me know if you are interested in taking it over. &

Re: Orphaning kdesvn

2019-04-19 Thread Vascom
I am already updated spec and build version 2.0.95 for rawhide in mock. пт, 19 апр. 2019 г. в 09:02, Vascom : > > I can take it. > FAS name: vascom > > пт, 19 апр. 2019 г. в 05:37, Orion Poplawski : > > > > I'm going to orphan kdesvn as I no longer use it.

Re: update-desktop-database in %post snippet

2019-04-26 Thread Vascom
No. It must be removed from %post. пт, 26 апр. 2019 г. в 12:30, Petr Mensik : > > Hi! > > Is it still valid request to add update-desktop-database into %post, > like mentioned by fedora-review tool [1]? Almost at the end of the > comment. I were not able to find any information about it in Package

Re: Review swap - zeal

2019-05-28 Thread Vascom
I can review it without swap. вт, 28 мая 2019 г. в 13:55, Lumir Balhar : > > Hello. > > I'd like to claim ownership of retired package zeal, which is currently > in weird state not available in F30. > > Original bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1701666 > Review request: https://bug

Include qt5pas subpackage to lazarus package

2018-08-02 Thread Vascom
Hi. Can anyone contact with maintainers of lazarus https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/lazarus ? Because they unresponsive to my requests few month. I just want add qt5pas subpachage by this pull-request https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/lazarus/pull-request/3 -- Best regards, Vaasiliy Glazov ___

Re: Non responsive maintainer - Wolnei Cândido Tomazelli Junior

2018-08-03 Thread Vascom
Pagure issue created https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/1964 сб, 28 июл. 2018 г. в 13:42, Vascom : > I hope too. > But I was reviewer of kio-gdrive and want see it good in repos. > > сб, 28 июл. 2018 г., 10:58 Silvia Sánchez : > >> >> I know Wolnei Junior but it's bee

Re: Include qt5pas subpackage to lazarus package

2018-08-06 Thread Vascom
Thanks. пн, 6 авг. 2018 г. в 14:55, Artur Iwicki : > I asked Igor Gnatenko and Neal Gompa, as they're both experienced > packagers, of their opinion and they said that introducing a new package > this way is ok. I will merge the PR today in the evening or sometime > tomorrow. > > A.I. > _

Re: Updates to mathematical software

2018-08-06 Thread Vascom
Hi Jerry, You're doing a good job. Thanks. Are you plan update Octave to 4.4.0? -- Best regards, Vasiliy Glazov ср, 1 авг. 2018 г. в 12:25, Paul Howarth : > Hi Jerry, > > On Tue, 31 Jul 2018 19:09:02 -0600 > Jerry James wrote: > > > On Tue, May 29, 2018 at 4:36 AM Paul Howarth > > wrote: > >

  1   2   >