Are s390x builders ready for Mass Rebuild? I see many fail builds only on s390x without logs.
вт, 28 янв. 2020 г. в 11:39, Mohan Boddu <mbo...@bhujji.com>: > > We are starting the mass rebuild now. > > Thanks. > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 5:38 PM Jeff Law <l...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2020-01-27 at 21:23 +0100, Fabio Valentini wrote: > > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 4:46 PM Jeff Law <l...@redhat.com> wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2020-01-27 at 16:34 +0100, Jakub Jelinek wrote: > > > > > On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 10:25:50AM -0500, Mohan Boddu wrote: > > > > > > Hi all, > > > > > > > > > > > > Per the Fedora 32 schedule[1] we will be starting a mass rebuild for > > > > > > Fedora 32 today. We are doing a mass rebuild for Fedora 32 for all > > > > > > the > > > > > > changes: > > > > > > > > > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GLIBC231 > > > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/32/ChangeSet#Binutils_2.33 > > > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FontLangProvidesToLangpacks > > > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/golang1.14 > > > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GCC10 > > > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Free_Pascal_Compiler_3.2.0 > > > > > > > > > > > > we will start the mass rebuild on 2020-01-27 > > > > > > > > > > I thought the mass rebuild should be also for > > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/LTOByDefault > > > > > but the required changes AFAIK haven't landed into redhat-rpm-config > > > > > yet. > > > > > > > > > > CCing Jeff on the current state. > > > > > > (snip) > > > > > > > After finally starting looking at the LTO vs GDB issues last week, I > > > > think we should defer LTO until F33. There's just too many GDB > > > > failures when used with LTO that aren't understood yet. > > > > > > Since the mass rebuild starts today (or has already started), you're > > > cutting it pretty close there ... > > > > > > So you'll either need to postpone to F33 or request a second mass > > > rebuild - soon. > > > > > > Can you comment on the FESCo ticket with the current status? Just to > > > keep us in the loop > > Umm, Ben and I were already discussing the situation this morning. I > > believe the page and fesco ticket both have current state (deferring to > > F33). > > > > jeff > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > > Fedora Code of Conduct: > > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > > List Archives: > > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > _______________________________________________ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > Fedora Code of Conduct: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ > List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines > List Archives: > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org _______________________________________________ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
