On Tue, Jan 12, 2010 at 01:45:07AM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Charley Wang wrote:
> > Please note that many of the packages may be failing because of a few
> > DSO's. Further exploration is needed to evaluate this possibility so
> > we can apply one patch to the source of the problem instead of d
On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 07:25:23AM -0800, Elio Maldonado wrote:
> On 01/12/2010 10:42 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
> > My f12 + updates + updates-testing box is unhappy with the current state of
> > the repo.
> > Yum complains..
> >
> > Transaction Check Error:
> >package nss-3.12.5-2.fc12.x86_64 (wh
On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 04:56:23PM -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> python3 is in rawhide and I'm hoping to build out the Python 3 stack
> (help would be most welcome!)
>
> I've run into a snag with the plan of building out parallel python 2 and
> python 3 stacks [1]: What do we do about executables
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 12:31:41PM +0100, Thomas Spura wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 14.01.2010, 22:54 -0500 schrieb Toshio Kuratomi:
> > On Thu, Jan 14, 2010 at 04:56:23PM -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> > > python3 is in rawhide and I'm hoping to build out the Python 3 sta
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 11:45:05AM -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 10:55 -0500, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > This reasoning (needed for testing) doesn't appeal to me at all. The
> > general case should be that we switch applications in rawhide from python2
&
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 01:12:14PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-01-15 at 00:00 -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
>
> > xqilla-2.1.3-0.6.fc11.src.rpm
> > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511425
>
> This one also has a major policy breach issue:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/s
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 10:39:17PM -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 05:13:29AM +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > On 01/15/2010 08:17 PM, Matt Domsch wrote:
> > Unfortunately, this has proven to be hard/impossible so far.
> >
> > >> perl-Class-InsideOut-1.09-2.fc11.src.rpm
> > >>
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 11:12:03AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
>
> >> widelands-0-0.13.Build13.fc11.src.rpm
> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511430
> >> xpilot-ng-4.7.2-16.fc11.src.rpm
> >> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=511717
>
> Ah, how nice, these 2 are orphaned
On Sat, Jan 16, 2010 at 12:45:24PM +0200, Ville Skyttä wrote:
>
> But what's the benefit of alternatives for this? Is the intent to provide
> sysadmins a way to change which python version of an app would be the system
> default?
>
> If not, why not just pick what we want to be the default for
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 11:55:13AM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-01-18 at 20:44 +0100, Till Maas wrote:
> >
> > Imho the only real problem from your list is, if a package is
> > unmaintained, because if it is maintained, the maintainer usually uses
> > it, otherwise he would just drop
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 12:31:11AM +0200, Manuel Wolfshant wrote:
> On 01/19/2010 12:18 AM, Till Maas wrote:
> > Hiyas,
> >
> > now that F12+ is built for i686, can I expect that all Fedora x83
> > supported CPUs in F12+ support MMX? I have a package (john) that can
> > then be made simpler.
> >
>
We have a few packages that need to build themselves from their sources
twice. For instance, vim builds three times (a minimal version for /bin/vi,
and two versions with more dependencies for /usr/bin/vim and
/usr/bin/gvim). Working on the python3 Guidelines, it looks like we'll have
some more wi
On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 10:27:04PM -0800, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-01-18 at 11:55 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > On Mon, 2010-01-18 at 20:44 +0100, Till Maas wrote:
> > >
> > > Imho the only real problem from your list is, if a package is
> > > unmaintained, because if it is maintain
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 02:47:54PM +, Joe Orton wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 18, 2010 at 11:10:34PM -0500, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > We have a few packages that need to build themselves from their sources
> > twice. For instance, vim builds three times (a minimal version for /bin/
Good day all,
As a side effect of looking into the xqilla FTBFS bug, the new xqilla
maintainer and I found that xerces-c is terribly out of date. We're
shipping xerces-c-2.8 and Apache has been shipping xerces-c-3.x since 2008.
The last 2.x release was in 2007.
The xqilla maintainer is also goin
Sorry for the empty message I was going to say:
I've changed the pkg owner to jonathanrobie as per the message earlier in
this thread. I was going to look into the bug that's at the root of this
yesterday but too many other projects came up so I didn't get around to it.
Looking at that today.
-
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 08:57:25AM +0200, Sergey Rudchenko wrote:
> On 01/28/2010 03:03 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > Taking ownership of an orphan on the devel collection will prevent them
> > from being blocked. Remember, it is OK to let software die. Don't view
> > this as a list of things that
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 09:01:25AM +0200, Alexander Kurtakov wrote:
> How can I take jna-posix? I need it for one of my projects but I don't see a
> way to take it in pkgdb. I'm speaking for the devel branch because it is
> possible to take F-12 branch.
>
jna-posix has been retired rather than s
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 09:19:05AM +0200, David Juran wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-01-27 at 17:03 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > It's that time of the release cycle again, to purge the orphans before
> > we get to feature freeze. Any unblocked orphans will be purged by the
> > feature freeze. A list of
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 09:03:21PM +0100, Christian Krause wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 01/28/2010 08:25 AM, David Juran wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-01-27 at 17:03 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> >> Unblocked orphan gtk-sharp
> >
> > Was gnome-common and gtk-sharp really intended to be orphaned? Removing
> > t
On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 03:04:20PM -0600, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> Colin Walters wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 3:24 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> >
> >> On Thu, Jan 28, 2010 at 09:01:25AM +0200, Alexander Kurtakov wrote:
> >>
> >>> How can I tak
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:13:06PM -0500, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 12:10 PM, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> >> I have no idea if it actually requires them to be alongside the
> >> executables, but hopefully the link will help.
> >
> > It doesn't. Also, ugh. I'm the one who actually rev
On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 01:38:13PM -0500, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>
> 1) The present packages need to be fixecd. Sounds like fipscheck, hmaccalc,
> and openssh. They are violating the FHS which is prohibited by the
> Guidelines. Ralf, have you opened bugs?
>
> 2) We need
On Mon, Feb 01, 2010 at 08:39:15AM -0600, Adam Miller wrote:
> On Mon, Feb 1, 2010 at 2:23 AM, Debarshi Ray wrote:
> > I have orphaned ldtp and pida. However there is something wrong wiwht
> > glade3. Pressing the "release ownership" button is not orphaning it.
> > Any ideas?
> >
> > Cheers,
> > D
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 09:47:13AM -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Feb 2010, Till Maas wrote:
>
> > On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 09:01:25AM -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
> >
> > > It's not automatically enforcable that's true but we catch you doing it
> > > (and we have) and we'll do something abou
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 10:28:37AM -0600, Adam Miller wrote:
> Hello all,
> I wanted to bring a few things up and I wanted to bring them up on
> de...@lists.fp.o because this is where most people spend their time.
>
> First off: "Does letting thousands of contributors do what they
> want h
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 10:28:01AM -0700, Robyn Bergeron wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 9:54 AM, inode0 wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 10:45 AM, Mike McGrath wrote:
> >> And to answer your question about what "isnt' broken". I suggest you look
> >> at our http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Statis
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 09:15:15AM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 11:02 -0600, Adam Miller wrote:
> > I will agree with that, I can see an application space for certain
> > decisions when presented with conflict, but how often does this happen
> > and how is it currently, as we
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 01:54:37PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Toshio Kuratomi (a.bad...@gmail.com) said:
> > I think that the Fedora Project's target audience needs to be people who
> > want to work on open source operating systems. If you want to market the
> >
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 03:17:30PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Toshio Kuratomi (a.bad...@gmail.com) said:
> > My other mail suggests that one way to work with this is to create new
> > conflicting packages that are optimized for the different usages. There's
> >
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 11:43:32AM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 13:15 -0600, Adam Miller wrote:
> >
> > Your example doesn't work, Xubuntu is still bound to the package set
> > in the Ubuntu repositories in the same sense that the Xfce Spin is
> > bound to the package set in
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 01:11:47PM -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-02-02 at 14:36 -0600, Adam Miller wrote:
> > On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> >
> > > Take a random downstream app. (Firefox is an example, but there are many
> > > others.) Right now, it only ne
On Tue, Feb 02, 2010 at 04:16:30PM -0600, Mike McGrath wrote:
> On Tue, 2 Feb 2010, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> >
> > > Not to reduce the debate to too much of a soundbite, but it almost
> > > seems like attempting to decide whether we want Fedora to be Debian,
> >
On Wed, Aug 04, 2010 at 10:17:27AM +0100, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 4, 2010 at 9:55 AM, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> > On Tue, Jul 27, 2010 at 08:32:07PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> >> Rawhide (dist-f14) now has python 2.7
> >
> > I have a machine which run rawhide since F11 times. Rec
On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 01:23:24PM -0400, seth vidal wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 19:56 +0300, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> > So I'm syncing up our school's local mirror over our rather slow
> > internet connection and I notice that the root-doc subpackage (which is
> > part of the root package) has
On Thu, Aug 05, 2010 at 03:19:46PM -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 5, 2010 at 3:11 PM, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-08-05 at 14:24 -0400, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> >> I don't think we could just say don't package documentation that's
> >&g
On Fri, Aug 06, 2010 at 01:45:08AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > I don't think we could just say don't package documentation that's
> > ridiculously large but perhaps we could make some sort of guideline about
> > not duplicating forma
On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 12:27:20AM +0800, Chen Lei wrote:
> 2010/8/10 Remi Collet :
> > Le 09/08/2010 09:38, Chen Lei a écrit :
> >> It seems silvercity is packaged in many distributions, e.g. gentoo
> >> freebsd mandriva PLD.
> >
> > It fact, RPM I found only provide the python library.
> >
> > Fr
I'll reply here but I'm also bringing together some things in the rest of
the thread... sorry about that.
On Thu, Aug 12, 2010 at 01:19:29PM -0500, Mike McGrath wrote:
>
> Since 2006 I counted 18 slips (I think one or two of those may just be a
> single slip listed twice). Lets not yell, lets no
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 08:20:04PM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Chris Adams wrote:
> > What if it isn't a bug, but just different behavior?
>
> Do you really think it's acceptable for a library to terminate the whole
> application when an error happens??? There's a reason rpmlint complains
> lou
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 07:21:50PM +0200, Martin Sourada wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-08-13 at 17:17 +0200, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > On Friday, August 13, 2010 05:09:17 pm Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > > Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > > > Then we have to push broken updates, policy says so and it's ok, so
> > >
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 02:20:51PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> (Sorry about the length of this email)
>
> Python 2.7 deprecated the PyCObject API in favor of a new "capsule" API.
> http://docs.python.org/dev/whatsnew/2.7.html#capsules
>
> The deprecations are set to "ignore" by default, so in
On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 08:24:07PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-08-13 at 19:38 -0400, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 02:20:51PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> > > Possible ways forward:
> > > (a) don't fix this; treat enablin
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 02:03:51PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-08-13 at 21:57 -0400, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 02:20:51PM -0400, David Malcolm wrote:
> > If this is okay, then I'd modify your point (a) to be this plan:
> &g
On Mon, Aug 16, 2010 at 02:10:16PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> As I mentioned briefly on IRC, I think the problem is that we're kinda
> stuck between two models:
[snip]
>
> For instance, right now, according to the Ideal Plan, everyone should
> have started on their Big Plans for F15 in Ra
On Sun, Aug 22, 2010 at 04:31:08PM +0200, Thomas Spura wrote:
> On Sat, 21 Aug 2010 18:48:31 -0400
> David Malcolm wrote:
> [snip]
> >
> > So you'll need to update the %files for python3 subpackages, listing
> > something like:
> > foo/__pycache__
> > to capture the directory and the bytecode fi
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 01:19:53AM -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
>
> That sounds like the only place where this convention is useful.
>
> How about .py files in /usr/bin/ ? We currently don't byte-compile the
> .py files in standard PATH, but maybe since they will go into a
> __pycache__ subdirecto
On Mon, Aug 23, 2010 at 11:08:24PM +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Mon, 23.08.10 13:59, Jesse Keating (jkeat...@j2solutions.net) wrote:
>
> > On 8/23/10 1:17 PM, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > > I understand your desire to get your code out there in the real world. But
> > > Fedora really can't a
On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 12:20:34PM +, Rawhide Report wrote:
> python3-PyQt4-4.7.4-2.fc14.i686 requires python(abi) = 0:3.1
> python3-PyQt4-4.7.4-2.fc14.x86_64 requires python(abi) = 0:3.1
> python3-PyQt4-devel-4.7.4-2.fc14.i686 requires python(abi) = 0:3.1
> python3-PyQt
On Wed, Sep 01, 2010 at 09:02:43PM -0400, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> FESCo has heard a few complaints of cases where packages were newer (in
> some cases several versions newer) in F-14 than in rawhide. So this is
> just a friendly reminder that you should be updating rawhide
> (dist-f15
On Thu, Sep 02, 2010 at 10:43:40AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Toshio Kuratomi writes:
> > When you do an update in F-14 and rely on inheritance to get the package
> > into rawhide, there is a problem. That package will not go to rawhide until
> > it hits stable in F-14.
&g
On Tue, Sep 07, 2010 at 11:56:23AM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> I just hit this on an f13 box.
>
> Transaction Check Error:
> package libgcc-4.4.4-11.fc12.x86_64 (which is newer than
> libgcc-4.4.4-10.fc13.i686) is already installed
>
>
> Could the buildsystem be changed to prevent newer NVRs
On Tue, Sep 14, 2010 at 07:02:33PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Sep 2010 20:48:13 -0400
> Máirín Duffy wrote:
>
> > Hi FESCo members,
>
> ...snip...
>
> > Only 5 of the 9 FESCo members voted on this issue. If all 9 had voted,
> > even with the current 3 for / 2 against vote, systemd c
On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 01:31:50PM +0100, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-09-15 at 14:27 +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
>
> > Personally, I'm very sad because of deferring systemd to F15. It may
> > cause slipping of SysV-free Fedora to F16, full year wait from now. And
> > integration as ses
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 09:59:51PM +, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Sep 2010 15:13:42 -0500, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> > No, I'm not advocating PgSQL 9 for F14, however, it shouldn't be so
> > far-fetched that Fedora could have any software at any time.
>
> A Fedora update poli
On Mon, Sep 20, 2010 at 10:35:47PM -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 01:51:03 +0200,
> Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> >
> > Setting up "official" backport repo will avoid repos fragmentation.
> > Keeping all cool updates in one place appears to be a reasonable idea.
> > Am I r
On Tue, Sep 21, 2010 at 03:25:25PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, 21 Sep 2010 10:06:09 -0700
> Eric Smith wrote:
>
> > A bug was filed against meshlab because of an FTBFS for Fedora 14. I
> > added a patch to resolve it and submitted an update. After seven
> > days with no feedback, I was
On Wed, Sep 22, 2010 at 12:38:50PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, 22 Sep 2010 13:37:44 -0400
> Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>
> > For (unreleased) F14, I think that the arugment that future work on
> > the package is better off starting with something that works than
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 02:44:34PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 07:01:16PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > Is it really necessary to include entire package change logs in the
> > rpm changelog? What is wrong with referencing either the included
> > changelog or a URL
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 05:43:47PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 02:44:34PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> >> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 07:01:16PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> >>
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 07:55:08PM +0200, Björn Persson wrote:
> Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > I would much prefer to generate the git log from the rpm changelog than
> > vice-versa, though. THe git log is going to contain more entries than the
> > rpm changelog as little thing
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 02:19:02PM +0200, Sven Lankes wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 06:37:33PM +0900, Takanori MATSUURA wrote:
>
> > If someone implement
> > --enable-system-libvpx
> > --enable-system-vorbis
> > --enable-system-ogg
> > --enable-system-theora
> > into the mozilla source, we can
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 01:29:38PM -0400, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
>
> I yelled pretty loudly when Fedora first packaged libvpx because
> fedora took a _known vulnerable_ version which Mozilla and opera were
> patching around but where the upstream hadn't yet merged the fixes.
>
> Things are more m
On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 02:22:36PM -0400, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2010 at 01:29:38PM -0400, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> >
> > I yelled pretty loudly when Fedora first packaged libvpx because
> > fedora took a _known vulnerable_ version which Mozilla and op
On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 02:56:34PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> Kevin Kofler wrote on 02.10.2010 00:56:
> > Sven Lankes wrote:
> >> https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=577653
> >> Looking at how rigorous new packages with bundled libs are fought we
> >> should really stop shipping fir
On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 08:22:57AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 08:34 -0400, Brandon Lozza wrote:
> > On Mon, Oct 4, 2010 at 6:37 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > that's the entire point of having trademarks. Free software projects are
> > > obliged to allow you to access
On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 11:59:44AM -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
> mercurial has hard-wired to install .mo files under python_sitearch, and
> i18n.py has hard-coded to look there.
>
> On fedora, find-lang.sh is usually used to find these files, but expects to
> find them in e.g., /usr/share/locale
>
At todays FPC meeting, the FPC approved several guideline changes.
= Rationale for Conflicts Guideline =
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/18
6 +1, no 0, no -1.
This was purely informational and requires no changes to how you package
= Appropriate Content in Changelogs =
https://fedorahosted
There's 2 more Guidelines that were approved in past meetings that have just
been written up.
= Directory ownership update =
https://fedorahosted.org/fpc/ticket/5
6 +1 votes , no 0 votes, and no -1 votes
This update makes it clearer that packages like gtk-doc do not need to be
required simply to
On Wed, Oct 06, 2010 at 04:55:46PM +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> I give +1 to this. On the other hand Fedora also is (was?) a project
> where individual package maintainers had the biggest influence on what
> packages ship if they do not cross some fundamental legal limits. This
> changed in many ways
On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 02:00:50PM +1000, Brendan Jones wrote:
> On 10/07/2010 12:10 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > But I agree that having a strict requirement because it's felt that the
> > issues that are raised by allowing the requirement to be violated are very
> &g
On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 08:54:12PM -0400, Paul Wouters wrote:
>
> I have one and I've played with it in fedora. There is however an important
> catch. The server and the yubikey share the same AES symmetric key. This means
> that if the yubikey is used for multiple sites by one user, that user is
On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 12:07:34AM -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Thu, Oct 07, 2010 at 11:30:43PM -0400, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > The newer yubikey hardware has provision for two AES keys but I'm not sure
> > how that works and whether it actually allows you to us
On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 10:57:58AM -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 10/8/10 10:52 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
> > rhel-6 beta2's
> > nss-3.12.6-3.el6.x86_64
> > anyway yesterday morning i was not able to build, but afternoot after a
> > new cert ie
On Fri, Oct 08, 2010 at 08:09:32PM +0200, Farkas Levente wrote:
> On 10/08/2010 07:57 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > On 10/8/10 10:52 AM, Farkas Levente wrote:
> >> rhel-6 beta2's
> >> nss-3.12.6-3.el6.x86_64
> >> anyway yesterday morning i was not able to build, but afternoot after a
> >> new cert i
On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 03:57:07PM +0200, Thomas Spura wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Oct 2010 09:22:14 -0400
> Neal Becker wrote:
>
> > Thomas Spura wrote:
> >
> > > On Wed, 20 Oct 2010 08:36:23 -0400
> > > Neal Becker wrote:
> > >
> > >> I have started porting to python3. So far I have a patch for
> > >
On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 02:45:38PM +0200, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> On 10/20/2010 04:11 PM, Rex Dieter wrote:
> > Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> >
> >> On 10/20/2010 02:38 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
> >>> Has anyone attempted a pyqt for python3?
> >>
> >> I did. It failed (not on Fedora though and
For those who aren't also subscribed to the python-dev mailing list :-),
Dave and Neal's posts about fpconst sparked some interest in porting work
there. Talking with Barry Warsaw we'd like to use the
python-port...@python.org mailing list to coordinate efforts to port so that
distros can help eac
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 04:47:21PM +0200, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> On 10/22/2010 03:51 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> >> Thanks for sharing this! I've added a page on python.org's wiki for
> >> porting tips for python3 and pyqt:
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 11:02:41AM +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote:
> On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 12:59:22PM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > > The current build needs untagging anyway.
> >
> > I've untagged it and mailed Jindrich.
> >
> > Updating a rpm dep is not easy. You will need to rebuild rpm static,
On Tue, Nov 02, 2010 at 07:40:59PM +1100, Bojan Smojver wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-10-31 at 13:45 +1100, Bojan Smojver wrote:
> > I have a viewvc install in F-14, behind mod_python, that keeps
> > segfaulting Apache through segfaults
> > in /usr/lib64/libpython2.7.so.1.0.
>
> Could someone please patch
On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 12:28:22PM -0400, Dave Jones wrote:
> If we go ahead and do something about that problem, what about just using
> -fno-omit-frame-pointer during rawhide builds, and then switching it off
> at branch time ?
>
Just figuring out what this entails: would this mean doing two ma
On Thu, Nov 04, 2010 at 11:58:21PM +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 11/04/2010 10:22 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> > 2- ABRT should keep track of unresponsive users. If a user has an
> > outstanding "needinfo?" flag for the bugs sent through ABRT, he
> > shouldn't be able to send a new bug
On Sat, Nov 06, 2010 at 05:20:02PM -0400, Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Should gpg 1.x be installed as /usr/bin/gpg1, gpg 2.x be installed as
> /usr/bin/gpg2 (as is already the case), and /usr/bin/gpg replaced
> with a symlink managed by alternatives?
>
If you check the list archives, this has come up
On Wed, Jul 13, 2011 at 06:06:37PM +0800, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 05:10:01PM -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> > Each release, before branching, we block currently orphaned packages.
> > It's that time again for Fedora 16.
> >
> > New this go-round is that we are also blocki
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 01:20:30PM +0100, Damian L Brasher wrote:
> Hi List
>
> Referring to sections of Packaging Guidelines:
>
> No longer necessary to explicitly include %defattr at the beginning of %
> files.
>
> and the fact that the BuildRoot tag, eve if defined, is ignored.
>
> After rev
On Sat, Jul 16, 2011 at 06:27:50PM -0700, Travis Davies wrote:
>
> Hi Everyone,
>
> Fellow Linux enthusiast here.
> I am working on developing the netperf rpm package for Fedora. I use
> this software
> daily at work and thought why not be the package maintainer, right?
> Will of course need you
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 02:14:48PM -0500, Jason L Tibbitts III wrote:
> >>>>> "TK" == Toshio Kuratomi writes:
>
> TK> They are now optional but there's no need to force people to be rid
> TK> of them. In particular, some people like to build a pa
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 07:45:57AM +0200, Olivier Sallou wrote:
> Hi,
> I have in my package config (/etc) a large list of files.
> Is there a way to define the %config from a list of file rather than
> listing individually each of the file ?
>
> Something like:
>
> %config -f list_of_my_etc_file
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 03:27:58PM +0200, David Tardon wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 02:34:45PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > Dne 22.7.2011 14:31, Dmitry Butskoy napsal(a):
> > > Ding Yi Chen wrote:
> > >> Hi list,
> > >> I recently ran into an interesting problem related to time zone.
> > >>
>
On Fri, Jul 22, 2011 at 10:26:34PM +0530, Praveen Kumar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am planning to package funnel, a software for online submissions and
> voting of talks as part of the FUDCon India effort. One if its
> dependencies is flask-mail[0] and in turn, lamson[1] is a dependency
> for it which was
On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 02:00:24PM -0700, Douglas Myers–Turnbull wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just something I wanted to bring to attention:
>
> Java 7 is slated for release (after years of hassle and heated debate)
> on 28 July, 2011.
> I think this would be an important feature to include for the Fedora
>
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:30:23AM -0400, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> * Toshio Kuratomi [2011-07-23 20:03]:
> > The alpha change deadline is a week and three days away so this is very
> > likely too late. If you want to try to get an exception to get this in, you
> > need to get
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 03:07:25PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>
> What's seeming like a better option is to bump the package's Epoch
> for the systemd-native release.
>
> Discuss.
Epoch would work for this. We didn't put Epoch into the guidelines because
there's a general consensus that epoch is ea
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 11:22:08PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-07-23 at 14:00 -0700, Douglas Myers–Turnbull wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Just something I wanted to bring to attention:
> >
> > Java 7 is slated for release (after years of hassle and heated debate)
> > on 28 July, 2011.
>
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 10:37:43AM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> Matthias Saou
> writes:
> > Toshio Kuratomi wrote :
> >> Regarding the fragility argument in reply to notting's clarification; do
> >> note that the fragility there only lasts until that Fedora release
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 01:56:36PM +0200, Marc Grimme wrote:
> - "Bill Nottingham" wrote:
>
> > Each release, before branching, we block currently orphaned packages.
> > It's that time again for Fedora 16.
> >
> > New this go-round is that we are also blocking packages that have
> > failed t
1 - 100 of 923 matches
Mail list logo
