2010/11/5 Jeff Spaleta
> [...]
> I'm more than happy to give Shuttleworth the benefit of the doubt
> about the sincerity of his interest and I will be watching the Wayland
> commit logs closely looking for Canonical sponsored contributions to
> _start_ trickling in.
> [...]
>
What does this mean
Hi @all,
I've setup a F14 box (minimal install) on a Supermicro server. So far, so
good. After some configuration (mainly automtic stuff done by puppet) and a
reboot I noticed that only the 1Gb network cards where configured but not
the 10Gb cards. I didn't even see eth2 and eth3 using ifonfig -a.
2011/3/25 Andy Gospodarek
> [...]
> Your devices are not showing up because the driver is failing to load.
>
That is one strange thing, modprobe didn't report any error and you can see
the driver in the lsmod list.
> Erroe -15 is IXGBE_ERR_RESET_FAILED, so it seems there is either
> something
2011/3/25 Thomas Bendler
> [...]
>
One remark, the error occured with the standard ixgbe module (2.0.62-k2), so
> I upgraded the module to the latest version (3.2.10-NAPI) but still have the
> same error.
>
And another remark, the network card work without problems when using
2011/3/26 Gilboa Davara
> [...]
> Have you tried using the latest ixgbe drivers from intel.com [1]?
> It's far newer (v3.2.10) than the one shipped with the kernel and in the
> past, I've had far less issues with it.
> [...]
>
Yep, compiled and installed this one as well but same error.
Regards
2011/3/26 Andy Gospodarek
> [...]
> I don't have any great suggestions about why this is broken, but I would
> suggest you open a bug at bugzilla.redhat.com with the full details of
> this failure. If you let me know what the bug # is (email is fine)
> after you open it, I'll make sure the right
2012/1/30 Mike Pinkerton
> [...]
If (1) we mount /usr ro over the network, and (2) we want /usr to be
> reserved for managed software (for a variety of reasons), then /usr/local
> really doesn't fit anymore.
>
Why doesn't /usr/local fit anymore? It was especailly designed for this
kind of setup
2014-06-23 17:51 GMT+02:00 Gerald B. Cox :
>
> This has got to be the silliest thing I've ever seen, but whatever. You
> enter the command dnf remove dnf, and guess what? It removes dnf. You enter
> the command dnf remove kernel, and guess what, it removes the kernel. What a
> concept, it d
2014-06-24 11:36 GMT+02:00 Richard Hughes :
> On 24 June 2014 10:31, Thomas Bendler wrote:
> > you need to unlock the gun before you can shoot in your foot...
> > ...and modern systems ask you up to four, five times
>
> How many different locks does a gun have? Last time
2014-06-24 11:40 GMT+02:00 Florian Weimer :
> On 06/24/2014 11:31 AM, Thomas Bendler wrote:
>
>> Hopefully you don't write professional software with this kind of
>> attitude.
>
> Please don't try to win arguments by labeling the opposition as
> incompeten
2012/6/27 Ken Dreyer
> I was looking briefly into packaging some Puppet modules, and I was
> curious if anyone else has gone down this road.
> [...]
> Does anyone have suggestions for package naming conventions? It looks
> like the upstream modules include the creators' names as part of the
> pac
2012/11/12 Matthew Miller
> [...]
> Yeah: if we get to the point where every real install has to add the same
> subset of packages to core, I don't think we've succeeded in doing anything
> except make more work for the whole world.
> A cron daemon and (at least basic) MTA fall in the same area,
2012/11/13 Christopher Meng
> I don't know Fedora minimal looks like...FOR SERVER USE the Minimal
> includes:
>
> [...]
>
BUT FOR DESKTOP USE,I think it should also have a desktop based on server
> version...That's what is troubling me...If it [...]
This is something we shouldn't mix. When we a
2012/11/13 Bill Nottingham
> [...]
>
- Minimal tools for admins
> less
> man-db
> procps-ng
> vim-minimal
>
Is man-db really necessary? In the man pages included in the man-db package
are not really helpful for a core system ... from my point of view.
> [...]
> - Get ma
2012/11/14 Matthew Miller
> [...]
> I'd like to go back a step here to the question starting the thread.
> There's
> plenty of time to go over each package, but the basic question is intent.
> Clearly man pages aren't necessary for a super-minimal JEOS image, but
> that's not *historically* been
2012/11/14 Chris Adams
> [...]
>
Well, as soon as you have cron, you'll have things wanting to send
> email, and even sendmail mail to "root" on the local system requires
> some type of MTA in most cases.
>
True, but then you need a mail client as well otherwise you won't see the
local mails. So
2012/11/14 Matthew Miller
> default install of a small set of packages necessary for a consistent
> Fedora experience including minimal admin tools
>
I was just surprised that there was no discussion about your proposal,
instead, there was immediately a discussion about the packages that should
2012/11/14 Chris Adams
> [...]
> Ehh, for local "root" mails from failing cron jobs, "less
> /var/mail/root" works just fine. :)
>
Sending mails with telnet also works fine but I don't think that this is
the question ;). We work on the definition of core and what will be inside.
If we say, mail
2013/7/15 Lennart Poettering
> [...]
>
>
Well, assuming that bash is entirely in memory. And also, note that
> neither cat, nor cp, nor tail are actually bash builtins and will not
> work. It's pretty hard (though certainly possible) viewing files with
> just bash builtins.
>
echo $(< /var/log/
2012/12/18 Adam Williamson
> Just for interest, here's the current (and likely final) state of
> minimal install package set for f18 vs. f17.
> [...]
>
Can you also point to a page with the hole list of packages in minimal?
Otherwise you need to know what was allready in minimal back in f17.
Re
2012/12/19 Adam Williamson
> [...]
> Oh dear, sorry, I just rebooted and lost that data (I tend to keep this
> kind of file in /tmp). I could re-generate it if you're really
> interested.
> [...]
>
I think this would be a nice to have on the wiki page to document the
outcome of the discussions.
2013/1/29 Olav Vitters
> [...]
> I've seen the changes that various GNOME developers as well as Red Hat
> employees have made. I've seen GNOME developers trying to understand
> issues and make changes. I've even tried to summarize this in various
> release notes.
> Now I'm not sure who you mean w
22 matches
Mail list logo
