On 02/10/2012 10:05 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
> You're not supposed to be running Fedora on production servers. That is
> not what it's for.
>
Sez who?
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Server
-Scott
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailm
On 02/10/2012 10:44 AM, Jef Spaleta wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 9:39 AM, Scott Doty wrote:
>> Sez who?
>>
>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/SIGs/Server
> I don't see the word "production" on that page.
>
> I can imagine the existence of "no
On 02/10/2012 10:57 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-02-10 at 10:39 -0800, Scott Doty wrote:
>> On 02/10/2012 10:05 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>> You're not supposed to be running Fedora on production servers. That is
>>> not what it's for.
>>&
On 02/10/2012 11:08 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-02-10 at 11:02 -0800, Scott Doty wrote:
>> On 02/10/2012 10:57 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>> On Fri, 2012-02-10 at 10:39 -0800, Scott Doty wrote:
>>>> On 02/10/2012 10:05 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
&
On 02/29/2012 08:46 AM, David Malcolm wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 07:02 -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
>> I think he's got a point
>>
>> http://www.osnews.com/story/25659/Torvalds_requiring_root_password_for_mundane_things_is_quot_moronic_quot_
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeaturePolicy
On 03/02/2012 03:21 AM, Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) wrote:
For printers, currently installing printers does not require superuser
privileges, but managing those printers installed by that user does.
Is it possible to make it so that printers installed by that user can
be managed by the user without
On 03/03/2012 02:19 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On Sat, Mar 3, 2012 at 11:10 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Mar 3, 2012, at 1:00 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
-> Don't ask for re-auth for an action that isn't really potentially harmful
(e.g., adding a printer)
Depends. What if what's being added is a rem
On 03/02/2012 04:16 AM, Tim Waugh wrote:
On Fri, 2012-03-02 at 05:21 -0600, Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) wrote:
For printers, currently installing printers does not require superuser
privileges, but managing those printers installed by that user does.
Is it possible to make it so that printers installed
On 03/03/2012 03:22 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
On Sun, Mar 4, 2012 at 12:03 AM, Scott Doty wrote:
How about allowing all printer management of local printers (including
adding a network printer, as Linus& his daughter were dealing with) with
two factors:
1) user password
2) physical ac
On 03/03/2012 11:07 AM, David Zeuthen wrote:
Hi,
- Original Message -
On Fri, 2012-03-02 at 08:42 -0600, Greg Swift wrote:
This sounds pretty straightforwardly like a bug probably in
PolicyKit, to me. It's obviously more correct to use the current
user's authorization if it's sufficie
On 03/03/2012 03:32 PM, Scott Doty wrote:
On 03/02/2012 04:16 AM, Tim Waugh wrote:
Yes, it's a policy.
Also see this bug which I filed nearly two years ago on just this
subject:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596711
Tim.
*/
They closed it as an upstream bug. Then ups
On 03/02/2012 04:16 AM, Tim Waugh wrote:
Yes, it's a policy.
Also see this bug which I filed nearly two years ago on just this
subject:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596711
Tim.
*/
New bug report filed: "security policy: root password needed when it
shouldn't be".
htt
On 03/05/2012 06:44 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
If you would like to add something to this agenda, you can reply to
this e-mail, file a new ticket at https://fedorahosted.org/fesco,
e-mail me directly, or bring it up at the end of the meeting, during
the open floor topic. Note that added topics m
On 03/05/2012 07:13 AM, Scott Doty wrote:
> On 03/02/2012 04:16 AM, Tim Waugh wrote:
>> Yes, it's a policy.
>>
>> Also see this bug which I filed nearly two years ago on just this
>> subject:
>>https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596711
>&g
14 matches
Mail list logo
