Re: git branch help?

2010-08-09 Thread Robert Relyea
On 08/02/2010 06:06 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: > Jesse Keating wrote: > >> Here is where you should have done a fedpkg or git push >> > [snip] > >> There is nothing to commit, since all the changes are already committed. >> > The joys of DVCSes. People are NOT used to commit and push b

Re: Name that Tree!

2010-02-12 Thread Robert Relyea
On 02/12/2010 04:45 PM, Jesse Keating wrote: > As part of no frozen rawhide, we'll have a new tree on the mirrors, > pub/fedora/linux/development/13 That's where we'll be putting things > that are tagged for the release after they get through testing. We > don't yet have a clever name for this co

orphaning ifd_egate

2010-04-15 Thread Robert Relyea
This package has no effective upstream. The package supports the old Schlumberger/Axalto egate token which has a built-in USB reader. This token has not been available for about 5 years. I've orphaned the package in case someone who is using the tokens still needs it. Currently there is one packag

Re: Updating SSL keys on fedoraproject.org 2011-03-10

2011-03-10 Thread Robert Relyea
On 03/10/2011 09:17 AM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > On Thu, Mar 10, 2011 at 01:07, Petr Pisar wrote: >> On 2011-03-10, Stephen Smoogen wrote: >>> We have already updated fedorahosted.org and will now be updating the >>> cert for the main site: fedoraproject.org. >>> >>> The old certificate came

Re: Orphaning and retiring HAL

2011-03-15 Thread Robert Relyea
On 03/15/2011 01:30 PM, Andy Lawrence wrote: > More packages using/tagged for hal-libs? Or perhaps just dependencies > that will need to be fixed. > > > coolkey Coolkey depends on pcsc-lite (see below). > pcsc-lite > pcsc-lite-ccid Kalev just fixed these two in rawhide by updating to 1.7.0 >

Re: Increase grub timeout

2010-05-18 Thread Robert Relyea
On 05/18/2010 07:43 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 10:34:22AM -0400, Jon Masters wrote: > > >> Of course it shouldn't be zero. This is what I was saying yesterday. Now >> if Fedora is really targeting end users who are non-technical (can we >> decide this finally, sometime,

Re: FC13 nss-softokn-freebl update issues

2010-06-02 Thread Robert Relyea
On 06/01/2010 11:48 AM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > Elio Maldonado (emald...@redhat.com) said: > >> Not sure but I strongly suspect a change made to nss.spec to be the cause. >> See https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=596840#c7 >> > It's due to the fact that nss-softokn-freebl (actu

Re: Fedora 34 System-Wide Change proposal: NSS CK_GCM_PARAMS change

2020-05-29 Thread Robert Relyea
Oops, this reply was supposed to be a "reply list" rather than a "reply". I've incorporated most of your feedback into the Change page now. Thanks. bob On 5/29/20 12:23 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Thu, May 28, 2020 at 03:46:25PM -0400, Ben Cotton wrote: https://fedoraproject.o

Re: dropping NSS DBM format support in F33+

2020-06-11 Thread Robert Relyea
On 4/23/20 11:16 AM, Brian C. Lane wrote: On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 10:11:25AM +0200, Daiki Ueno wrote: Hello, I am not sure if this deserves a Fedora Change proposal, so I'd like to hear any opinions first before proceeding with the process. NSS (the crypto library used by Firefox) historically

Re: dropping NSS DBM format support in F33+

2020-06-11 Thread Robert Relyea
On 6/11/20 8:37 AM, Robert Relyea wrote: On 4/23/20 11:16 AM, Brian C. Lane wrote: On Wed, Apr 22, 2020 at 10:11:25AM +0200, Daiki Ueno wrote: Hello, I am not sure if this deserves a Fedora Change proposal, so I'd like to hear any opinions first before proceeding with the process. NSS

Re: Fedora 33 System-Wide Change proposal: Make nano the default editor

2020-06-26 Thread Robert Relyea
On 6/25/20 12:58 PM, Jonathan Wakely wrote: Anyway, I find it hard to believe that serious developers are unable/unwilling to set their own choice of EDITOR. A systemwide default EDITOR=nano shouldn't cause them any real difficulty. I second that. I'm the guy who gets annoyed at non-vi edito

Re: prelink performance gains

2013-10-16 Thread Robert Relyea
On 10/15/2013 11:52 AM, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > On Tue, 15 Oct 2013 20:25:10 +0200, Paul Wouters wrote: >> - complexity >> - complicated prelink blacklists >> - complicated cron job exclusion with sysconfig > You can always make your software development life more simple by giving up on > some usef

Re: prelink performance gains

2013-10-18 Thread Robert Relyea
On 10/17/2013 06:48 AM, Jan Kratochvil wrote: > On Thu, 17 Oct 2013 00:16:35 +0200, Robert Relyea wrote: >> prelink throws rocks at a lot of packages that have to check the >> integrity of the shared libraries they are using. It provides no real >> useful way of assisting

Re: F19 DVD over size - what to drop?

2013-05-01 Thread Robert Relyea
> Thunderbird is new? Drop it. Hardly new since I've been using it on Fedora for 8 years now. bob smime.p7s Description: S/MIME Cryptographic Signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: RPM Sequoia: A Sequoia-based backend for the RPM Package Manager

2023-04-27 Thread Robert Relyea
On 4/27/23 3:51 AM, Neal H. Walfield wrote: Hi all, A year and a half ago, I began working with Panu on using Sequoia as RPM's OpenPGP parser. I wrote up our journey from the initial analysis, to adding the code to RPM, and to getting it into Fedora 38 (yay!) in a blog post. I'm mentioning it

Re: F41 Change Proposal - Reproducible Package Builds (System-Wide)

2024-04-18 Thread Robert Relyea
On 4/17/24 12:54 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: On Wed, Apr 17, 2024 at 09:38:30AM +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote: Dne 17. 04. 24 v 9:20 dop. Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek napsal(a): By adding this functionality to Mock itself. It can be optional (--add-determinism). And then Mock can call

Re: ca-certificates latest updates and Mozilla NSS certdata.txt modifications

2022-08-19 Thread Robert Relyea
On 8/19/22 6:08 AM, Alexander Sosedkin wrote: On Thu, Aug 18, 2022 at 1:45 PM Yann Droneaud wrote: I've noticed ca-certificates package was updated recently, and went looking at the changes, and I have some questions. Not Bob Relyea, but I'll try to answer to the best of my knowledge: Alexan

Re: RFC7919 Diffie-Hellman parameters in Fedora

2020-08-25 Thread Robert Relyea
On 8/22/20 7:26 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote: Christopher Engelhard wrote: tl;dr should we make it easier/automatic for users to use the Diffie-Hellman parameters defined in RFC7919? While I understand the motivation behind the RFC (interoperability, safety against intentionally or unintentionally ba

Re: Thunderbird with mail.corp.redhat.com does not work on Fedora 33

2020-10-02 Thread Robert Relyea
On 10/1/20 11:05 AM, Simo Sorce wrote: On Thu, 2020-10-01 at 14:01 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: On Thu, 2020-10-01 at 19:47 +0200, Miro Hrončok wrote: On 01. 10. 20 19:20, Simo Sorce wrote: and the policy affects all software on the system, not just thunderbird ... Is it possible to workaround th

Re: How to handle ABI breakage in Rawhide

2021-12-07 Thread Robert Relyea
On 12/6/21 7:11 PM, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote: Florian Weimer wrote: That's not actually true, though, and it does not make much sense. If upstream commits to an ABI, versioning is not even required technically. Hardly any upstream actually commits to an ABI *forever*. Even if the ABI has n

Re: Landing a larger-than-release change (distrusting SHA-1 signatures)

2022-03-15 Thread Robert Relyea
On 3/9/22 1:56 AM, Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: On Wed, Mar 09, 2022 at 10:46:21AM +0100, Alexander Sosedkin wrote: On Wed, Mar 9, 2022 at 10:20 AM Daniel P. Berrangé wrote: On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 07:40:15PM +0100, Alexander Sosedkin wrote: We've been disabling it in TLS, but its usage is much

Re: F37 proposal: Build all JDKs in Fedora against in-tree libraries and with static stdc++lib (System-Wide Change proposal)

2022-05-10 Thread Robert Relyea
On 5/10/22 6:29 AM, Ben Cotton wrote: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/JdkInTreeLibsAndStdclibStatic This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented i