On Wed, 2011-07-20 at 15:28 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Orphan igraph
Since I took the python binding I guess I should take this one to :)
Pierre
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 13:59 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> A provenpackager jumping in for just one FTBFS would be a short-term
> solution only.
I will do that for the time being. I know Xavier is quite busy have you
tried to contact him directly ?
Pierre
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fed
On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 10:51 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> For packagers, developers, and sysadmins needing python-fedora client
> code,
> this should mean you need to make no changes. yum install
> python-fedora
> or Requires: python-fedora will continue to get you python-fedora and
> the
> mini
On Sun, 2011-08-21 at 13:24 +0200, Olivier Sallou wrote:
>
> There are Fedora "core", EPEL, JPackage... it is not really clear for
> newcomers to see several repository, and what are their
> relationships...
Since your are french, I would invite do check out the french
documentation on http://ww
On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 20:16 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
>
> > It's not being enforced in bodhi, but it should be:
> >
> > https://fedorahosted.org/bodhi/ticket/277
>
> It is somehow sad that nobody took the time to write a two line patch
> to
> fix this 3 year old bug report:
>
> https://fedorahos
On Mon, 2011-09-12 at 09:22 -0400, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
> Someone pointed out an interesting Ruby gem [1] to me recently that I
> thought about packaging for Fedora. The gem has a dependency tree that
> includes several other gems that aren't in Fedora as well [2], so I'd
> love it if a few peop
On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 22:14 +0200, Johannes Lips wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I tried to reach the maintainer of elementary-icon-theme.noarch for
> several times now.[1] So far I didn't receive any notice if he even read
> the mails from bugzilla.
> I don't feel the need to take over the package but if n
On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 15:00 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > The right solution is for the user to just uncheck the kernel from
> the list
> > of packages to update in the PackageKit GUI of choice (be it gnome-
> > packagekit, KPackageKit or Apper) if the kmod doesn't show up along
> with it.
> > It'
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 13:24 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>
> I just sent an email directly to his archlinux.us email address asking
> if he wishes to resign from his maintainer duties or if he is just
> busy.
> Let's see if he replies.
tajidinabd still hasn't repl
On Fri, 2011-10-07 at 17:49 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 10/07/2011 02:49 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
>
> > I know a lot of people wanted to have a discussion about this first,
> > but since we had the opportunity to hack on this we did. I believe
> > there are still many of us still inte
On Fri, 2011-10-07 at 11:39 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-10-07 at 17:49 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > On 10/07/2011 02:49 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> >
> > > I know a lot of people wanted to have a discussion about this first,
> > > but since we had the opportunity to hack
On Fri, 2011-10-07 at 10:03 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> Should we request a separate mailing list? I don't expect it to be
> high volume obviously but it could make communication easier since
> people live across multiple time zones. Also, it would make subjects
> easier since right now on the
On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 22:12 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 13:24 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> >
> > I just sent an email directly to his archlinux.us email address asking
> > if he wishes to resign from his maintainer duties or if he is just
&g
On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 16:27 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 12:55 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 21:45 +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> >
> > > That's a nonsense. Simply said. If I have a properly generated random
> > > ssh private key with a strong passphrase t
On Tue, 2011-11-01 at 17:56 -0300, James Bowes wrote:
> python-vobject -- A python library for manipulating vCard and
> vCalendar files
I have taken this one.
Pierre
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Tue, 2011-11-01 at 17:56 -0300, James Bowes wrote:
> gitg -- GTK+ graphical interface for the git revision control system
This one seem to already have found a new owner: nacho.
Pierre
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Tue, 2011-11-01 at 17:04 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> For f15 through rawhide and epel 6 there is a new update coming for fedpkg
> (part of fedora-packager).
>
> This build is a pretty major rewrite to make use of a shared pyrpkg backend.
> Coming along for the ride is a new build of GitPyt
On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 10:00 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> Anonymously checking doesn't help:
> $ fedpkg clone R-widgetTool -a
Never-mind this part, I had a typo (R-widgetTool*s*).
Pierre
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailm
On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 09:47 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Nov 2, 2011, at 2:00 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> >
> > It seems it is not reading the username from the certificate.
>
> That's right, it does not just yet. I plan on working on user discovery code
&
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 14:11 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 03/30/2011 02:10 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> > 2011/3/30 Ralf Corsepius:
> >> On 03/30/2011 01:54 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> >>> Heya,
> >>>
> >>> I just uploaded a new version of systemd into F15, which
> establishes a
> >>> dir
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 10:38 +0200, Petr Sabata wrote:
> I've been putting something similar together [1], to simplify the
> process.
> It doesn't do much at the moment (a checklist with mock/koji rebuild
> support)
> and is quite ugly :)
>
> I like your config files idea. I currently just use CSV
On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 15:10 -0400, Allen S. Rout wrote:
> When I try to build from a local source, it fails to find the source
> file.
[...]
> [root@troll-2 cran]# R2rpm -s /var/tmp/cran/plyr_1.2.1.tar.gz
(Do you always build as root ? I was always told that it should be
avoided)
[...]
> * Building
On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 15:06 -0400, Allen S. Rout wrote:
> >
> > R2spec remains a project designed to make the life of Fedora's R
> > packager's easier, so it has to remain guideline compliant. That is
> > a reason why putting the source0 as URL also is not *in my opinion*
> > a good approach (whi
Hi,
With the help and advices from abadger1999, akurtakov and Haikel I put
together some code for a project called PackageDB-cli [1]*.
The idea is to provide packagers with a way to do in CLI what they do at
the moment on the website (so allowing them to manage their ACL without
going on the webs
On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 10:34 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> SOAPpy
I'll take this one.
Pierre
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 15:28 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Orphan python-igraph
I'll take this one, looks like something I could play with.
Pierre
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 17:23 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Nov 1, 2011, at 5:04 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > For f15 through rawhide and epel 6 there is a new update coming for fedpkg
> > (part of fedora-packager).
> >
> > This build is a pretty major rewrite to make use of a shared pyrpkg
> >
On Mon, 2011-11-21 at 13:25 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 11/21/2011 01:14 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> > Hello fellow devs,
> >
> > I am sure quite a few of you have done some reviews and thought "Hey,
> > a,b,c and d could be automated. For E I could use some more
> > informatio
On Sat, 2011-12-03 at 16:13 +0100, Giovanni Campagna wrote:
> curl -H "Accept: application/json"
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/applications/Terminal results in
> 500 Internal error
This one is not that is true and that can be fixed.
For an example of the json output see:
https://admin.
On Mon, 2011-12-05 at 17:06 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> On 11/21/2011 02:14 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> >- Any ideas, bugreports etc will be much appreciated
>
> I would be very interested in feature, which instead of mock, will run
> Koji scratch build and then will download resulti
Hi,
Once in a while comes back the question: "is
around ?"
Normally followed by: "I have opened and pinged him several time on
".
And there the hunt for the last trace of activity starts. Some days ago
someone on the list was asking if there wasn't such a program that would
help identifying if s
On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 11:07 +0100, Thomas Spura wrote:
>
> 2011/12/5 Pierre-Yves Chibon :
> > - koji ➙ last build...
>
> This doesn't seem to work correctly. My last build was 2 days ago:
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/userinfo?userID=988
>
> And the scri
On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 10:18 +0100, Matthias Runge wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 05/12/11 23:08, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Once in a while comes back the question: "is
> > around ?" Normally followed
On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 10:53 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> But this might find some people who were active in say bugzilla but
> missed the fas changes, etc.
Just for reference, the bugzilla check doesn't work on F16, something
changed between the version 0.6.0 and 0.6.2 and what's returned has
chan
On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 13:52 -0500, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> On 12/06/2011 05:26 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 11:08:32PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> >>
> > It might be interesting to run this script across every single user
> > in t
On Mon, 2011-12-05 at 23:08 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> (download via git clone
> http://ambre.pingoured.fr/cgit/fedora-misc.git/ )
Move to its own repo on:
http://ambre.pingoured.fr/cgit/fedora-active-user.git/
Mirrored on github at:
https://github.com/pypingou/fedora-active-user
Hi,
Some time ago I was speaking with Tibbs who mentioned such a tool, so I
wrote a small script this week-end called fedora-create-review. The idea
is simple:
- from a spec and srpm
- start a koji scratch build
- if build worked
- upload to fedorapeople.org
- create the bugzilla ticke
On Mon, 2012-01-09 at 21:56 +0100, Matthias Runge wrote:
>
> I don't think this should belong to fedpkg. Maybe more to the great
> fedora-review-tool (to make a tool/package bundling all review-related
> tools).
That would be also my feeling.
> I would like to see this packaged it sooner than l
On Mon, 2012-01-09 at 16:04 -0500, Tom Callaway wrote:
> On 01/09/2012 11:44 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Some time ago I was speaking with Tibbs who mentioned such a tool, so I
> > wrote a small script this week-end called fedora-create-review. The ide
Hi all,
Although using the latest version of R from updates-testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-0119/
I could however recompile successfully R-zoo (arch specific) and
R-widgetTools (noarch) from their latest git version without errors. I
think this is worth noting.
Good d
On Fri, 2012-01-13 at 21:51 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 03:47:47 +,
> "Wei, Gang" wrote:
> > Login as gwei3, and enter tboot package
> > url(https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/tboot), press "take
> > ownership" buttons for Fedora devel/15/16, wait f
On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 14:16 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> users who have no use for vala.
Are users having no use of vala really installing -devel packages or
vala program ?
Pierre
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 14:25 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 14:16 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > users who have no use for vala.
>
> Are users having no use of vala really installing -devel packages or
> vala program ?
Err, I meant "-devel
On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 12:47 +, Rawhide Report wrote:
> 0x-0.3.9-5.fc15
> ---
>
> 389-admin-1.1.25-1.fc17
> ---
>
> 389-admin-console-1.1.8-2.fc17
> --
>
> 389-adminutil-1.1.14-2.fc17
> ---
I'm goin
On Thu, 2012-02-09 at 10:36 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Continuing an annual tradition ...
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-August/141191.html
>
> For an F17 build I'm getting:
>
> $ fedpkg update
> [...].fc17 not tagged as an update candidate
>
> This was built in f
On Sat, 2012-02-11 at 13:52 +0100, Matej Cepl wrote:
> c) If we want to have as many Python packages packaged in RPMs (the
> terminology is going to kill me soon) do we have some pip2spec (in the
> same manner as there is cpan2spec)?
Reading this I wrote that: https://github.com/pypingou/pypi2sp
On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 19:22 +0530, elison.ni...@gmail.com wrote:
> 1) yum should maintain status of installed packages locally. And it
> should not need to fetch repository information when user tries
> yum info
> Reason to have this feature : It seems logical to have information
> about an instal
On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 19:21 +, José Matos wrote:
>
> After almost two months going on what is the outcome of this project?
Well the structure is there and a number of rpms available.
I have started on the update mechanism but I have only got around the
first round.
The spec are on github and
On Sat, 2012-03-10 at 09:04 -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
> What do I need
> to do to update my copy to include f17 branch?
git pull ?
Pierre
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 13:37 +0100, Clément David wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does someone know how to contact lkundrak ?
$ ./fedora_active_user.py --user lkundrak --email lkund...@v3.sk
Last login in FAS:
lkundrak 2012-03-20
Last action on koji:
Tue, 21 Feb 2012 package list entry created: perl-OpenOf
FYI :-)
Pierre
--- Begin Message ---
I've rolled up R-2.12.2.tar.gz a short while ago. This is an update release,
which fixes a number of mostly minor issues, and one major issue in which
complex arithmetic was being messed up on some compiler platform.
You can get it from
http://cran.r-projec
On Fri, Jul 03, 2015 at 02:59:48AM -0400, Jan Kurik wrote:
> = Proposed System Wide Change: Layered Docker Image Build Service =
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Layered_Docker_Image_Build_Service
>
> Change owner(s):
> * Colin Walters
> * Adam Miller
> * Tomas Tomecek
> * Tim W
>
> maven-resources-plugin (maintained by: huwang, akurtakov, java-sig,
> mizdebsk, pingou, weli, yyang)
> maven-resources-plugin-2.7-3.fc23.noarch requires
> mvn(org.apache.maven:maven-core) = 3.3.3,
> mvn(org.apache.maven:maven-plugin-api) = 3.3.3
> maven-res
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 04:07:31PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am facing a bizarre f23-koji build breakdown:
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=10366596
>
> The interesting part seems to be hidden in this file:
> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/6598/10
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 01:58:49PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> What is wrong with the reports? Why broken dependencies are not
> checked/reported? Why there is no Rawhide report at all?
When we have branched and have the two reports they can run
a/ maybe not at the same time
b/ maybe not at the sa
Good morning,
Recently David Gay aka oddshocks has left Red Hat and we have not been able to
contact him since.
There are two packages for which he is Point of Contact:
- python-fedimg (Fedora & EPEL)
- python-cpio (EPEL 5 & 6)
We would like to ask anyone that can contact him to ask him what he w
On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 10:30:37PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> Good morning,
>
> Recently David Gay aka oddshocks has left Red Hat and we have not been able to
> contact him since.
> There are two packages for which he is Point of Contact:
> - python-fedimg (Fedora &
On Sun, Aug 02, 2015 at 02:39:24AM +0300, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Igor Gnatenko
And this is sent to devel because?
From the look of it, it belongs to the mailbox of the package maintainers or in
bugzilla, but I'm not sure I understand why sending it to devel.
Pierre
--
devel mail
On Sun, Aug 02, 2015 at 01:26:17PM +, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
>Hi, Peter did bump to 0.18 in f23 to fix building on aarch64, but haven't
>did the same for rawhide. Therefore we have older version in rawhide which
>is not good. Please fix it.
Hi Igor,
I have to ask the same question a
On Sun, Aug 02, 2015 at 12:33:39PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 12:30 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon
> wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 02, 2015 at 01:26:17PM +, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> >>Hi, Peter did bump to 0.18 in f23 to fix building on aarch64, but
> &g
On Wed, Aug 05, 2015 at 05:45:59PM +0100, Jonathan Underwood wrote:
> Dear All,
>
> I have orphaned the python-ufc package. This package has been
> superceded by python-ffc, and upstream have abandoned python-ufc.
> FWIW, python-ffc is under review[0], but it seems the submission has
> been abando
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 02:03:15AM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Aug 2015 01:35:52 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>
> > I just discovered requests in pkgdb, which I haven't been notified
> > about. I'm also not sure that I still receive dist git commit
> > notifications as usual.
> >
On Tue, Aug 11, 2015 at 08:20:39PM -0600, Jerry James wrote:
> I've got a question about that. The last time I went out of town,
> about a month ago, I visited that page and set everything to
> "disabled" to spare myself from coming home to thousands of
> notification emails. And ... I cam home t
On Wed, Aug 12, 2015 at 01:35:52AM +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> I just discovered requests in pkgdb, which I haven't been notified
> about. I'm also not sure that I still receive dist git commit
> notifications as usual.
>
> Where would I learn about any infrastructure changes related to
> thi
On Sat, Aug 15, 2015 at 05:21:21PM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
> And some people contributed a lot in the past, after this result will
> you request revoking their sponsorship and wipe them out?
>
> My thought is some of these above can be dropped since they indeed no
> longer work in Fedora Pr
On Sun, Aug 16, 2015 at 07:40:21PM -0400, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 6, 2015 at 11:30 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> > On Thursday, August 06, 2015 08:29:50 AM Rex Dieter wrote:
> >> Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> >> > What makes you think a site that is poisoning or abusing the metadata
> >>
On Wed, Aug 26, 2015 at 03:21:52PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 26.8.2015 v 15:19 Stephen John Smoogen napsal(a):
> > On 26 August 2015 at 02:40, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >> Dne 25.8.2015 v 20:33 opensou...@till.name napsal(a):
> >>> and will be retired when they are orphaned for six weeks
> >>>
>
On Mon, Aug 31, 2015 at 01:17:56AM +0200, Matěj Cepl wrote:
> On 2015-08-29, 21:27 GMT, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > Hi, folks. So I've been maintaining ownCloud for the last little
> > while. Unfortunately I sat down today to try again and update the
> > package to the latest upstream (8.1.1), and s
On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 03:09:07PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> I think that wrapping up ruby and python packages into rpms seems to be of
> dubious benefit. These projects have their own package management systems
> (that at least in ruby's case can handle multiple versions). I'm very much
>
On Sat, Sep 19, 2015 at 03:54:12PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sun, 2015-09-20 at 00:15 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > On Fri, Sep 11, 2015 at 03:09:07PM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > > I think that wrapping up ruby and python packages into rpms seems
> >
On Tue, Sep 22, 2015 at 10:40:13AM +0200, Marco Driusso wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a question about the right name to give to a package of the IT++
> library (package review request here ->
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1264686, any review - and also
> sponsorship, I need one! - i
Good Morning everyone!
In the version 1.13 of pkgdb2 a new API endpoint has been added that just
provide the list of pending ACL requests:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/api/pendingacls
I just wanted to share with you the first line of its output:
# Number of requests pending: 5492
N
On Tue, Jul 15, 2014 at 02:40:13AM -0430, Eduardo Javier Echeverria Alvarado
wrote:
>I think not there any command that do that. But you can take a look to the
>output of the pkgdb api [1] and make your own script
>
>[1]
>https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/api/packager/package/
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 11:00:16AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 16.7.2014 07:03, Orion Poplawski napsal(a):
> >On 07/07/2014 06:48 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >>Dne 27.6.2014 18:34, Juan Orti Alcaine napsal(a):
> >>>El Sábado, 28 de junio de 2014 00:31:26 Christopher Meng escribió:
> On Sat, Ju
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 10:08:13AM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> On 07/16/2014 03:10 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> >On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 11:00:16AM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >>
> >>Well, I contacted kanarip off-list and he responded that somebody else
> &g
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 11:02:57AM +0200, Johannes Lips wrote:
>On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 7:54 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon
>wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 10:08:13AM -0600, Orion Poplawski wrote:
> > On 07/16/2014 03:10 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> &g
On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 10:05:25AM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> Good Morning everyone!
>
> In the version 1.13 of pkgdb2 a new API endpoint has been added that just
> provide the list of pending ACL requests:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/api/pendingacls
>
Dear all,
Pkgdb2 is now running for a little over two months. It seems that most of you
like it which is appreciated :)
However, one of the annoyance from Pkgdb1 has not disapeared. Pkgdb2 sends you
an email for each action you do.
So if you request 3 ACLs on two packages, you receive six emails.
On Fri, Jul 18, 2014 at 12:59:12PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 17.7.2014 16:22, Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
>
> Why is the filter called filter? Isn't filter supposed to remove something?
> These filter seems to cause that email is sent, so that is probably not
> approp
On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 03:28:56PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 10:05:25AM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > Good Morning everyone!
> >
> > In the version 1.13 of pkgdb2 a new API endpoint has been added that just
> > provide the l
On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 04:25:54PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 03:28:56PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 10:05:25AM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > > Good Morning everyone!
> > >
> > > In
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 08:53:53PM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
> Hi,
>
> As upstream didn't seriously consider the API breakage, json
> 0.11->0.12 brings an issue of one function which is deprecated from
> now on. This has caused bug 1123785
> so I will bump the soname manually
I'm sorry, wat
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 04:25:11PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 24.7.2014 11:46, Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
> >On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 04:25:54PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> >>On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 03:28:56PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> >>>On W
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 03:10:20PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 09:01:48AM +0200, Gregor Tätzner wrote:
> > unison240 -- Multi-master File synchronization tool ( master f21 f20 f19 )
>
> I tried to take this one, but the new pkgdb UI is incredibly
> non-intuitive and
On Thu, Aug 07, 2014 at 01:39:57PM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
> When is it possible to let updates pushed by robots?
Technically it could but since we are signing the packages manually and I don't
think we want to move away from this for stable releases, then no it's not
possible.
Pierre
--
On Thu, Jul 31, 2014 at 03:10:20PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 30, 2014 at 09:01:48AM +0200, Gregor Tätzner wrote:
> > unison240 -- Multi-master File synchronization tool ( master f21 f20 f19 )
>
> I tried to take this one, but the new pkgdb UI is incredibly
> non-intuitive and
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 11:46:02AM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 04:25:54PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 03:28:56PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 10:05:25AM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon w
On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 04:25:11PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 24.7.2014 11:46, Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
> >On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 04:25:54PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> >>On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 03:28:56PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> >>>On W
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 02:15:30PM +0200, Fabio Alessandro Locati wrote:
>Hi,
>Something seems to be wrong:
>onA https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acl/pending/ I have 14 approve
>requests from xls2csv
>(https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/package/xls2csv/) 7 from myself an
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 02:28:06PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 18.8.2014 12:31, Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
> > On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 04:25:11PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> >> Dne 24.7.2014 11:46, Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
> >>> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at
On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 02:44:59PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 18, 2014 at 02:28:06PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > Dne 18.8.2014 12:31, Pierre-Yves Chibon napsal(a):
> > > On Mon, Jul 28, 2014 at 04:25:11PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> > >> Dn
On Thu, Aug 21, 2014 at 11:24:01AM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote:
> I haven't seen any efforts from Claudio or whosoever to rebuild all
> mono packages (it's a MUST as Mono is not a _small_ package, he could
> use koji or his personal computer to do that) and feedback the results
> (most of status
On Thu, Jul 24, 2014 at 11:46:02AM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 23, 2014 at 04:25:54PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > On Thu, Jul 17, 2014 at 03:28:56PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 09, 2014 at 10:05:25AM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon w
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 11:35:43AM +0200, Johannes Lips wrote:
>On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 10:44 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>
> Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses for two package
> maintainers are no longer valid.A I'm starting the unresponsive
> maintainer policy to
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 11:38:52AM +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 11:35:43AM +0200, Johannes Lips wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 10:44 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > > Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses for two package
> > > maintainers are no longer vali
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 08:08:47AM -0400, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> - Original Message -
> > Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses for two package
> > maintainers are no longer valid. I'm starting the unresponsive
> > maintainer policy to find out if they are still interested
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 02:01:41PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 09/04/2014 01:35 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> BTW: Though this threat started with FAS, one should also consider to take
> into account bugzilla accounts.
There are two aspects to consider here:
* bugzilla is managed
On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 03:56:20PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 09/04/2014 02:26 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> >On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 02:01:41PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> >>On 09/04/2014 01:35 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> >>BTW: Though this threat starte
Dear all,
In the last months, Till and I together with infrastructure and
release-engineering have been thinking and working on how we could improve the
current workflow for new package and new branch.
To give you an idea, this is the current workflow:
Current new-package procedure:
On Fri, Sep 05, 2014 at 06:35:45PM +0200, Haïkel wrote:
> 2014-09-05 17:08 GMT+02:00 Pierre-Yves Chibon :
> > Dear all,
> >
> > In the last months, Till and I together with infrastructure and
> > release-engineering have been thinking and working on how we could i
1 - 100 of 1004 matches
Mail list logo
