On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 11:38:52AM +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote: > On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 11:35:43AM +0200, Johannes Lips wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 10:44 PM, Kevin Fenzi <ke...@scrye.com> wrote: > > > > > Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses for two package > > > maintainers are no longer valid. I'm starting the unresponsive > > > maintainer policy to find out if they are still interested in > > > maintaining their packages (and if so, have them update their email > > > addresses in FAS). If they're not interested in maintaining or we > > > can't locate them I'll have FESCo orphan the packages so that others > > > can take them over. > > > > > Hi all, > > > > wouldn't it make sense to integrate a check into the processes, when people > > leave Redhat, that the packages in fedora are properly orphaned or get a > > new owner? > > Why would even someone's employment status matter? Fedora is a community > project.
And much like anyone else, people come and go. The difference is that here, when they leave, we know about it before emails start to bounce. Pierre -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
