On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 10:53 -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> R-pls: [u'538957']
Pending for stable
Regards,
Pierre
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 10:56 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 18:07 +0100, Pierre-Yves wrote:
> > On Wed, 2010-01-13 at 10:53 -0600, Matt Domsch wrote:
> > > R-pls: [u'538957']
> > Pending for stable
> >
> > Regards,
> > Pie
On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 11:59 -0500, David Malcolm wrote:
> Here's where it gets weird:
> 0.6.10-1 then 0.6.10-2 then 0.6.9-4 then 0.6.9-2 seems an arbitrary
> ordering:
It is only weird/inverted when the date are the same.
Pierre
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.f
On Fri, 2010-01-29 at 12:08 -0500, Paul Wouters wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I just heard I might be put through the "unresponsive maintainer process"
> in Fedora? I'm a little confused as I've never received emails on this,
> and I'm always on irc and read fedora-devel and still perform very regular
> packag
Hi,
Small question, when I did fedpkg clone R2spec this morning to update to
3.0.3 I saw that the changelog entry for the rebuild for python 2.7 was
not present.
Shouldn't it be ?
Regards,
Pierre
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listin
On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 09:12 +0200, Tomasz Torcz wrote:
>
> Looks like it was rebuilt for Rawhide and Fedora 14. Are you sure
> you are not looking ong f13 branch?
I looked right after doing my fedpkg clone when I edited the spec file.
Pierre
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 11:44 +0200, Karel Zak wrote:
>
> The git package contains the /etc/bash_completion.d/git file where
> is defined function __git_ps1() which provides more usable strings
> (it's able to detect if you are rebasing, bisecting, merging, ...) and
> allows to use formatting for th
On Tue, 2010-08-03 at 09:39 -0400, Todd Zullinger wrote:
> Léon Keijser wrote:
> > You're probably on a different branch. Do a
> >
> > $ git branch -a
> >
> > to see on which branch you're working [1]. Then switch to the f14
> > branch if you're not already on it:
>
> It's also worth considering a
On Sat, 2010-08-07 at 10:09 +0100, Ilyes Gouta wrote:
> Where can I get such information? And is it possible to indicate where
> I can locate Fedora's kernel git tree?
rpm -q --changelog should be a start.
Pierre
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.or
On Wed, 2010-09-01 at 21:41 +0530, Shakthi Kannan wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I would like to know if something like the following exists or is it
> possible to display the following for each packager:
>
> Package EL-6 EL-5 F-14 F-13
>
> in a web-page (for example) that can be populated from K
On Mon, 2010-11-01 at 15:58 +0100, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> > I plan to put up some scripts to automate part of the review process
> > as soon as I have the time to finish them.
Some time ago I put this together:
http://project.pingoured.fr/reviewHelper/
The idea here is of course not to do
On Sat, 2010-02-13 at 07:48 +0530, Hiemanshu Sharma wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 02/13/2010 07:17 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > On Sat, 13 Feb 2010 11:39:45 +1000
> > Dave Airlie wrote:
> >
> >> On Fri, 2010-02-12 at 17:35 -0800, Josh Stone wrote:
> >>> On 02/12/2
On Tue, 2010-03-16 at 20:18 +, José Matos wrote:
> One request, would it be possible for R2rpm to read the personal
> rpmmacros
> instead of forcing a given directory layout?
I have just commit this change to the git, could you test it ?
Thanks,
Pierre
__
On Tue, 2010-03-23 at 16:23 +, José Matos wrote:
> On Tuesday 23 March 2010 16:06:46 Pierre-Yves wrote:
> > On Tue, 2010-03-16 at 20:18 +, José Matos wrote:
> > > One request, would it be possible for R2rpm to read the personal
> > > rpmmacros
> > >
On Fri, 2010-03-26 at 19:50 +, José Matos wrote:
> > For the rest, does it work properly for you ?
>
> OK, I am catching on all the mail after a busy week. I have not yet tried to
> apply the latest version 0.3 here are my comments from previous versions.
>
> I had to use the following patch
As proposed there is the monthly reminder about the version of the
packages in Fedora vs upstream.
I did not clean the known false positive so far.
spot -- R-nwsis outdated, 2.0.0.3 vs 1.7.0.0 upstream
denisarnaud -- R-msm is outdated, 0.9.5 vs 0.9.6 upstream
orion -- R-car
On Tue, 2010-04-06 at 16:18 +0100, José Matos wrote:
> On Saturday 27 March 2010 14:30:12 Pierre-Yves wrote:
> > I have just put together a version 0.7 which give the option to use mock
> > to build the rpm.
> > See R2rpm for the usage.
> >
> > Feel free to p
On Wed, 2010-04-28 at 10:28 +0200, josef radinger wrote:
>
> I prepared a handfull of R-subpackages and would need a reviewer.
> The packages should be rather easy to review, some have dependencies
> to
> other packages from my list. I noted that on the given
> bugzilla-entries.
Are-you already
On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 16:07 +0100, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> Obviously not every fedora maintainer has shell account so exact
> replica
> of [2] wouldn't work, but I was thinking some nicer interface could be
> provided. Maybe simple email with special subject line:
> > FAS-name - $messsage
>
On Wed, 2010-12-29 at 19:48 +0100, Johan Cwiklinski wrote:
> I'm going to orphan following packages:
> - homebank ([8], [9])
I will take this one if you orphan it as I am already comaintainer.
However I do not use it personally so if someone else is interested
please feel free.
Pierre
--
devel
On Thu, 2010-12-30 at 14:57 -0200, Filipe Rosset wrote:
>
> I use this software daily. I can take ownership or maintain this
> package as a co-maintainer.
Please take it then, I can stay co-maintainer if you wish though.
Thanks !
Pierre
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https:
Hi,
I have been looking into the review #668863 in which the packager for
this library (who also happens to be upstream) is actually removing the
flag "-fexceptions" from $RPM_OPT_FLAGS in the %build.
Asking this question on irc (on fedora-devel) as lead to a small
discussion without clear agreem
On Sat, 2011-02-05 at 16:36 +, Mat Booth wrote:
> [mbooth@mc ~]$ repoquery --alldeps --tree-whatrequires pmd
Just FYI, the --alldeps is not needed here as the current implementation
of --tree-* is recursive anyway.
Pierre
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedo
Hi,
Being the maintainer of Guake I have received a number of bug gconf
related [1]. Their common pattern is that they only appear the first
time guake is installed and run (and then again not always).
If the user restart X/the computer, the bug does not appear at all.
I am therefore quite unsur
On Thu, 2010-05-06 at 20:44 +0200, Pierre-Yves wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Being the maintainer of Guake I have received a number of bug gconf
> related [1]. Their common pattern is that they only appear the first
> time guake is installed and run (and then again not always).
>
> If t
On Fri, 2010-05-07 at 09:38 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Fri, May 7, 2010 at 7:06 AM, Pierre-Yves wrote:
> >
> > Would it be allowed to try to restart gconfd ?
>
> It would make sense to SIGHUP gconfd after new schemas are installed,
> yes. Note though we should r
On Fri, 2010-05-07 at 13:24 -0400, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>
> Something like this:
>
> %posttrans
> killall -HUP gconfd-2 > /dev/null || :
>
>
> You might want to switch to using the macros documented here at the
> same
> time::
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:ScriptletSnippets#GCo
On Fri, 2010-05-07 at 13:24 -0400, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> (Since this might be a regression in gconf2, you might need to still add the
> %posttrans scriptlet wth the new scriptlets. If Colin knows that this is
> %a bug that won't be fixed in some versions of Fedora I'll add the killall
> %to the
On Sun, 2010-05-09 at 14:04 -0400, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> I'm a bit unclear on the original problem report, actually. In
> addition to
> what you've said, the report also says that the user had to logout and
> log
> back in before it worked. That seems like a different symptom. 30
> seconds
>
On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 16:33 +0200, Xose Vazquez Perez wrote:
>
> JBoss is stalled because it depends on a package with:
>
> - incompatible license
> - six years old
> - dead upstream
>
How is this different from what is on the bug report ?
Pierre
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject
Hi all,
On the 12th of May I approved the package R-caTools [1].
Since, and despite 2 ping on the bugzilla, there has been no sign of
life from the original submitter.
The question is then, can I do the cvs request for this package and take
over its maintenance in place of the original submitter
Dear all,
Does someone know how to contact Cheese ?
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/cheese
I have tried to join him by the bugzilla:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=585817
He has two packages in updates-testing:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=584966
On Mon, 2010-06-28 at 09:22 +0200, Pierre-Yves wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> Does someone know how to contact Cheese ?
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/users/packages/cheese
>
> I have tried to join him by the bugzilla:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=5858
On Thu, 2010-07-01 at 11:16 +0200, Pierre-Yves wrote:
> Hi,
>
> If someone could have a look at this review I would be pleased. I need
> it to update R-BSgenome which is needed for R-hgu95av2probe.
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=609079
>
On Mon, 2010-07-05 at 12:30 +0100, Mark Chappell wrote:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers
>
> It takes three weeks which can be frustrating, the initial "can we
> push this update to testing" might count as the initial ticket
> creation, dropping it down
On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 10:51 +0200, josef radinger wrote:
> sorry for being offline. had some longer trouble in real life and am
> now
> wading through lots of mails which piled up since some weeks.
>
Good to hear you are back :-)
Pierre
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https:/
On Wed, 2010-01-20 at 08:37 +0100, Pierre-Yves wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 22:57 -0500, Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> > Is there any interest in helping me maintain and review these new R
> > packages in Fedora? The packages are already done, its just the
> > revie
On Tue, 2010-07-06 at 13:23 +0100, Dan Bolser wrote:
> Sorry for the dumb question, but can you link me to a step by step
> review process?
>
> I'd like to do an 'internal review' if not a propper review.
Hi Dan,
Indeed you will not be able to do an official review until you have been
approved a
On Tue, 2010-07-13 at 12:36 +0300, Manuel Wolfshant wrote:
> On 07/13/2010 12:27 PM, Jens Petersen wrote:
> >> Should someone write up a draft for an official package review
> >> checklist, and have FPC update it when guidelines change? (I guess by
> >> writing this email I just volunteered myself.
On Tue, 2010-07-20 at 22:38 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> $ make tag
> Make system retired, please use fedpkg. See fedpkg --help
>
> Suggestions on what to put in here?
Might be nice to already print the equivalent command:
$ make tag
Make system retired, please use fedpkg.
The equivalent funct
On Wed, 2011-07-20 at 15:28 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Orphan igraph
Since I took the python binding I guess I should take this one to :)
Pierre
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Mon, 2011-07-25 at 13:59 +0200, Michael Schwendt wrote:
> A provenpackager jumping in for just one FTBFS would be a short-term
> solution only.
I will do that for the time being. I know Xavier is quite busy have you
tried to contact him directly ?
Pierre
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fed
On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 10:51 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> For packagers, developers, and sysadmins needing python-fedora client
> code,
> this should mean you need to make no changes. yum install
> python-fedora
> or Requires: python-fedora will continue to get you python-fedora and
> the
> mini
On Sun, 2011-08-21 at 13:24 +0200, Olivier Sallou wrote:
>
> There are Fedora "core", EPEL, JPackage... it is not really clear for
> newcomers to see several repository, and what are their
> relationships...
Since your are french, I would invite do check out the french
documentation on http://ww
On Thu, 2011-09-08 at 20:16 +0200, Till Maas wrote:
>
> > It's not being enforced in bodhi, but it should be:
> >
> > https://fedorahosted.org/bodhi/ticket/277
>
> It is somehow sad that nobody took the time to write a two line patch
> to
> fix this 3 year old bug report:
>
> https://fedorahos
On Mon, 2011-09-12 at 09:22 -0400, Darryl L. Pierce wrote:
> Someone pointed out an interesting Ruby gem [1] to me recently that I
> thought about packaging for Fedora. The gem has a dependency tree that
> includes several other gems that aren't in Fedora as well [2], so I'd
> love it if a few peop
On Thu, 2011-04-21 at 22:14 +0200, Johannes Lips wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I tried to reach the maintainer of elementary-icon-theme.noarch for
> several times now.[1] So far I didn't receive any notice if he even read
> the mails from bugzilla.
> I don't feel the need to take over the package but if n
On Mon, 2011-09-26 at 15:00 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
> > The right solution is for the user to just uncheck the kernel from
> the list
> > of packages to update in the PackageKit GUI of choice (be it gnome-
> > packagekit, KPackageKit or Apper) if the kmod doesn't show up along
> with it.
> > It'
On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 13:24 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
>
> I just sent an email directly to his archlinux.us email address asking
> if he wishes to resign from his maintainer duties or if he is just
> busy.
> Let's see if he replies.
tajidinabd still hasn't repl
On Fri, 2011-10-07 at 17:49 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 10/07/2011 02:49 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
>
> > I know a lot of people wanted to have a discussion about this first,
> > but since we had the opportunity to hack on this we did. I believe
> > there are still many of us still inte
On Fri, 2011-10-07 at 11:39 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-10-07 at 17:49 +0530, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > On 10/07/2011 02:49 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> >
> > > I know a lot of people wanted to have a discussion about this first,
> > > but since we had the opportunity to hack
On Fri, 2011-10-07 at 10:03 -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
>
> Should we request a separate mailing list? I don't expect it to be
> high volume obviously but it could make communication easier since
> people live across multiple time zones. Also, it would make subjects
> easier since right now on the
On Mon, 2011-10-03 at 22:12 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-09-15 at 13:24 +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> >
> > I just sent an email directly to his archlinux.us email address asking
> > if he wishes to resign from his maintainer duties or if he is just
&g
On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 16:27 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 12:55 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
> > On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 21:45 +0200, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> >
> > > That's a nonsense. Simply said. If I have a properly generated random
> > > ssh private key with a strong passphrase t
On Tue, 2011-11-01 at 17:56 -0300, James Bowes wrote:
> python-vobject -- A python library for manipulating vCard and
> vCalendar files
I have taken this one.
Pierre
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Tue, 2011-11-01 at 17:56 -0300, James Bowes wrote:
> gitg -- GTK+ graphical interface for the git revision control system
This one seem to already have found a new owner: nacho.
Pierre
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Tue, 2011-11-01 at 17:04 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> For f15 through rawhide and epel 6 there is a new update coming for fedpkg
> (part of fedora-packager).
>
> This build is a pretty major rewrite to make use of a shared pyrpkg backend.
> Coming along for the ride is a new build of GitPyt
On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 10:00 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> Anonymously checking doesn't help:
> $ fedpkg clone R-widgetTool -a
Never-mind this part, I had a typo (R-widgetTool*s*).
Pierre
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailm
On Wed, 2011-11-02 at 09:47 -0700, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Nov 2, 2011, at 2:00 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> >
> > It seems it is not reading the username from the certificate.
>
> That's right, it does not just yet. I plan on working on user discovery code
&
On Wed, 2011-03-30 at 14:11 +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 03/30/2011 02:10 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
> > 2011/3/30 Ralf Corsepius:
> >> On 03/30/2011 01:54 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> >>> Heya,
> >>>
> >>> I just uploaded a new version of systemd into F15, which
> establishes a
> >>> dir
On Thu, 2011-04-07 at 10:38 +0200, Petr Sabata wrote:
> I've been putting something similar together [1], to simplify the
> process.
> It doesn't do much at the moment (a checklist with mock/koji rebuild
> support)
> and is quite ugly :)
>
> I like your config files idea. I currently just use CSV
On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 15:10 -0400, Allen S. Rout wrote:
> When I try to build from a local source, it fails to find the source
> file.
[...]
> [root@troll-2 cran]# R2rpm -s /var/tmp/cran/plyr_1.2.1.tar.gz
(Do you always build as root ? I was always told that it should be
avoided)
[...]
> * Building
On Wed, 2011-04-13 at 15:06 -0400, Allen S. Rout wrote:
> >
> > R2spec remains a project designed to make the life of Fedora's R
> > packager's easier, so it has to remain guideline compliant. That is
> > a reason why putting the source0 as URL also is not *in my opinion*
> > a good approach (whi
Hi,
With the help and advices from abadger1999, akurtakov and Haikel I put
together some code for a project called PackageDB-cli [1]*.
The idea is to provide packagers with a way to do in CLI what they do at
the moment on the website (so allowing them to manage their ACL without
going on the webs
On Mon, 2011-06-20 at 10:34 -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> SOAPpy
I'll take this one.
Pierre
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Tue, 2011-07-12 at 15:28 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Orphan python-igraph
I'll take this one, looks like something I could play with.
Pierre
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 17:23 -0800, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Nov 1, 2011, at 5:04 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > For f15 through rawhide and epel 6 there is a new update coming for fedpkg
> > (part of fedora-packager).
> >
> > This build is a pretty major rewrite to make use of a shared pyrpkg
> >
On Mon, 2011-11-21 at 13:25 +, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
> On 11/21/2011 01:14 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> > Hello fellow devs,
> >
> > I am sure quite a few of you have done some reviews and thought "Hey,
> > a,b,c and d could be automated. For E I could use some more
> > informatio
On Sat, 2011-12-03 at 16:13 +0100, Giovanni Campagna wrote:
> curl -H "Accept: application/json"
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/applications/Terminal results in
> 500 Internal error
This one is not that is true and that can be fixed.
For an example of the json output see:
https://admin.
On Mon, 2011-12-05 at 17:06 +0100, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> On 11/21/2011 02:14 PM, Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
> >- Any ideas, bugreports etc will be much appreciated
>
> I would be very interested in feature, which instead of mock, will run
> Koji scratch build and then will download resulti
Hi,
Once in a while comes back the question: "is
around ?"
Normally followed by: "I have opened and pinged him several time on
".
And there the hunt for the last trace of activity starts. Some days ago
someone on the list was asking if there wasn't such a program that would
help identifying if s
On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 11:07 +0100, Thomas Spura wrote:
>
> 2011/12/5 Pierre-Yves Chibon :
> > - koji ➙ last build...
>
> This doesn't seem to work correctly. My last build was 2 days ago:
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/userinfo?userID=988
>
> And the scri
On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 10:18 +0100, Matthias Runge wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 05/12/11 23:08, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Once in a while comes back the question: "is
> > around ?" Normally followed
On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 10:53 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> But this might find some people who were active in say bugzilla but
> missed the fas changes, etc.
Just for reference, the bugzilla check doesn't work on F16, something
changed between the version 0.6.0 and 0.6.2 and what's returned has
chan
On Tue, 2011-12-06 at 13:52 -0500, Clyde E. Kunkel wrote:
> On 12/06/2011 05:26 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > On Mon, Dec 05, 2011 at 11:08:32PM +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> >>
> > It might be interesting to run this script across every single user
> > in t
On Mon, 2011-12-05 at 23:08 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> (download via git clone
> http://ambre.pingoured.fr/cgit/fedora-misc.git/ )
Move to its own repo on:
http://ambre.pingoured.fr/cgit/fedora-active-user.git/
Mirrored on github at:
https://github.com/pypingou/fedora-active-user
Hi,
Some time ago I was speaking with Tibbs who mentioned such a tool, so I
wrote a small script this week-end called fedora-create-review. The idea
is simple:
- from a spec and srpm
- start a koji scratch build
- if build worked
- upload to fedorapeople.org
- create the bugzilla ticke
On Mon, 2012-01-09 at 21:56 +0100, Matthias Runge wrote:
>
> I don't think this should belong to fedpkg. Maybe more to the great
> fedora-review-tool (to make a tool/package bundling all review-related
> tools).
That would be also my feeling.
> I would like to see this packaged it sooner than l
On Mon, 2012-01-09 at 16:04 -0500, Tom Callaway wrote:
> On 01/09/2012 11:44 AM, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Some time ago I was speaking with Tibbs who mentioned such a tool, so I
> > wrote a small script this week-end called fedora-create-review. The ide
Hi all,
Although using the latest version of R from updates-testing:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2012-0119/
I could however recompile successfully R-zoo (arch specific) and
R-widgetTools (noarch) from their latest git version without errors. I
think this is worth noting.
Good d
On Fri, 2012-01-13 at 21:51 -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 14, 2012 at 03:47:47 +,
> "Wei, Gang" wrote:
> > Login as gwei3, and enter tboot package
> > url(https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/tboot), press "take
> > ownership" buttons for Fedora devel/15/16, wait f
On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 14:16 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> users who have no use for vala.
Are users having no use of vala really installing -devel packages or
vala program ?
Pierre
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 14:25 +0100, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-01-17 at 14:16 +0100, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> > users who have no use for vala.
>
> Are users having no use of vala really installing -devel packages or
> vala program ?
Err, I meant "-devel
On Wed, 2012-01-18 at 12:47 +, Rawhide Report wrote:
> 0x-0.3.9-5.fc15
> ---
>
> 389-admin-1.1.25-1.fc17
> ---
>
> 389-admin-console-1.1.8-2.fc17
> --
>
> 389-adminutil-1.1.14-2.fc17
> ---
I'm goin
On Thu, 2012-02-09 at 10:36 +, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Continuing an annual tradition ...
> https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-August/141191.html
>
> For an F17 build I'm getting:
>
> $ fedpkg update
> [...].fc17 not tagged as an update candidate
>
> This was built in f
On Sat, 2012-02-11 at 13:52 +0100, Matej Cepl wrote:
> c) If we want to have as many Python packages packaged in RPMs (the
> terminology is going to kill me soon) do we have some pip2spec (in the
> same manner as there is cpan2spec)?
Reading this I wrote that: https://github.com/pypingou/pypi2sp
On Mon, 2012-02-27 at 19:22 +0530, elison.ni...@gmail.com wrote:
> 1) yum should maintain status of installed packages locally. And it
> should not need to fetch repository information when user tries
> yum info
> Reason to have this feature : It seems logical to have information
> about an instal
On Wed, 2012-02-29 at 19:21 +, José Matos wrote:
>
> After almost two months going on what is the outcome of this project?
Well the structure is there and a number of rpms available.
I have started on the update mechanism but I have only got around the
first round.
The spec are on github and
On Sat, 2012-03-10 at 09:04 -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
> What do I need
> to do to update my copy to include f17 branch?
git pull ?
Pierre
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 13:37 +0100, Clément David wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Does someone know how to contact lkundrak ?
$ ./fedora_active_user.py --user lkundrak --email lkund...@v3.sk
Last login in FAS:
lkundrak 2012-03-20
Last action on koji:
Tue, 21 Feb 2012 package list entry created: perl-OpenOf
FYI :-)
Pierre
--- Begin Message ---
I've rolled up R-2.12.2.tar.gz a short while ago. This is an update release,
which fixes a number of mostly minor issues, and one major issue in which
complex arithmetic was being messed up on some compiler platform.
You can get it from
http://cran.r-projec
On Fri, Jul 03, 2015 at 02:59:48AM -0400, Jan Kurik wrote:
> = Proposed System Wide Change: Layered Docker Image Build Service =
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Layered_Docker_Image_Build_Service
>
> Change owner(s):
> * Colin Walters
> * Adam Miller
> * Tomas Tomecek
> * Tim W
>
> maven-resources-plugin (maintained by: huwang, akurtakov, java-sig,
> mizdebsk, pingou, weli, yyang)
> maven-resources-plugin-2.7-3.fc23.noarch requires
> mvn(org.apache.maven:maven-core) = 3.3.3,
> mvn(org.apache.maven:maven-plugin-api) = 3.3.3
> maven-res
On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 04:07:31PM +0200, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> Hi
>
> I am facing a bizarre f23-koji build breakdown:
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=10366596
>
> The interesting part seems to be hidden in this file:
> https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//work/tasks/6598/10
On Mon, Jul 20, 2015 at 01:58:49PM +0200, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> What is wrong with the reports? Why broken dependencies are not
> checked/reported? Why there is no Rawhide report at all?
When we have branched and have the two reports they can run
a/ maybe not at the same time
b/ maybe not at the sa
Good morning,
Recently David Gay aka oddshocks has left Red Hat and we have not been able to
contact him since.
There are two packages for which he is Point of Contact:
- python-fedimg (Fedora & EPEL)
- python-cpio (EPEL 5 & 6)
We would like to ask anyone that can contact him to ask him what he w
On Sat, Jul 25, 2015 at 10:30:37PM +0200, Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> Good morning,
>
> Recently David Gay aka oddshocks has left Red Hat and we have not been able to
> contact him since.
> There are two packages for which he is Point of Contact:
> - python-fedimg (Fedora &
On Sun, Aug 02, 2015 at 02:39:24AM +0300, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Igor Gnatenko
And this is sent to devel because?
From the look of it, it belongs to the mailbox of the package maintainers or in
bugzilla, but I'm not sure I understand why sending it to devel.
Pierre
--
devel mail
On Sun, Aug 02, 2015 at 01:26:17PM +, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
>Hi, Peter did bump to 0.18 in f23 to fix building on aarch64, but haven't
>did the same for rawhide. Therefore we have older version in rawhide which
>is not good. Please fix it.
Hi Igor,
I have to ask the same question a
On Sun, Aug 02, 2015 at 12:33:39PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 2, 2015 at 12:30 PM, Pierre-Yves Chibon
> wrote:
> > On Sun, Aug 02, 2015 at 01:26:17PM +, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> >>Hi, Peter did bump to 0.18 in f23 to fix building on aarch64, but
> &g
1 - 100 of 1051 matches
Mail list logo
