On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 1:56 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On 28/03/13 06:09 PM, Jens Petersen wrote:
>>>
>>> [gnome-applets]
>>> [gnome-panel]
>>
>>
>> Have these not been blocked yet?
>
>
> And according to repoquery, it looks like panel obsoletes applets, and
> classic-session obsoletes panel. I
On Fri, Mar 29, 2013 at 10:08 AM, Frantisek Kluknavsky
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Please correct me if I am wrong:
> Packagers do not have any real possibility to build and test packages on
> aarch64.
No they do not.
> Arm-koji is 32-bit arm.
> Packagers (some/many) do not even know their packages are sup
On Wed, Apr 3, 2013 at 10:22 PM, Paul Whalen wrote:
>
>
> Thanks to those that were able to join for the status meeting today, for
> those unable the minutes
> are posted below:
>
>
> Minutes:
> http://meetbot.fedoraproject.org/fedora-meeting-1/2013-04-03/fedora-meeting-1.2013-04-03-20.00.html
>
On Wed, Apr 17, 2013 at 2:03 AM, Adam Goode wrote:
> Is the Raspberry Pi firmware now ok to be packaged in Fedora proper?
Yes
> It looks like the Fedora guidelines for firmware can now include RPi stuff.
They now include ARM stuff and things like firmware required to boot a
device like the RPi
On Sat, Apr 20, 2013 at 12:47 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 12:51:05PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> On 19/04/13 10:18 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>>
>> >Last time, we've had this kind of discussions, people were claiming they
>> >were querying changelogs from _binary_ rpms
On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 1:05 PM, Dan Mashal wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 21, 2013 at 5:01 AM, Markus Mayer wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I have started developing for embedded devices (aka microcontrollers) lately
>> (mainly ARM cortex-M3 devices). Although fedora provides some of the needed
>> tools, there are st
On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 1:24 PM, Dan Mashal wrote:
> Seems like someone turned on a bot this morning. Just a heads up..
> these have [faf] in the subject line and seem to be filing bugs on old
> components (for me at least). Looks like it's just starting to make
> the rounds. Who owns this?
The a
On Tue, Apr 23, 2013 at 12:48 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Apr 2013 19:55:02 +0200
> Rave it wrote:
>
>> Am Mon, 22 Apr 2013 16:37:34 +
>> schrieb devel-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org:
>>
>> For me as compiz maintainer those info's are complete useless whithout
>> having more infomati
On 24 Apr 2013 01:22, "Adam Williamson" wrote:
>
> On 22/04/13 10:55 AM, Rave it wrote:
>>
>> Am Mon, 22 Apr 2013 16:37:34 +
>> schrieb devel-requ...@lists.fedoraproject.org:
>>
>> For me as compiz maintainer those info's are complete useless whithout
>> having more infomation what the user di
On Sat, Apr 27, 2013 at 3:45 AM, Sérgio Basto wrote:
> Hi,
> we have two kernels build on F18 that fix security problems and in F17
> kernel-3.8.8-100.fc17 still in updates-testing and kernel-3.8.8-102.fc17
> is not even in updates testing, shouldn't this kernels be push to
> stable , due a securi
On Thu, May 2, 2013 at 6:51 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Ravindra Kumar (ravindraku...@vmware.com) said:
>> (Batching a bunch of replies)
>>
>> > Install and uninstall looks a bit weird to me; what could be
>> > done is to make the package conditionally whether it's running
>> > in a VMware VM or
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 8:35 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> Heya,
>
> In Fedora 20, we'll be using BlueZ 5.x to manage Bluetooth devices.
>
> Bluez5 uses a D-Bus API that's not compatible with Bluez4[1] and as
> such, management applications and a number of libraries and daemons will
> need to be port
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 10:38 AM, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
> On 05/06/2013 11:13 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 8:35 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote:
>
>>> For GNOME 3.10 (due September 2013), Gustavo Padovan and I are going to
>>> be porting gnome
> > Compose finished at Wed May 8 12:20:02 UTC 2013
First please trim unneeded stuff from a reply.
> Umm hi,
>
> Who obsoleted gnome-panel? It is required by a ton of packages.
It was announced to the list as to why, it's dead upstream and doesn't
build with the current gnome and is in fact bro
On 15 May 2013 06:49, "Dan Mashal" wrote:
>
> On Tue, May 14, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> > We now appear to have *four* virtual provides for mail servers:
> >
> > MTA
> > smtpd
> > smtpdaemon
> > server(smtp)
> >
> > This seems a tad excessive. exim and postfix provide all four. se
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 12:50 PM, Daniel P. Berrange
wrote:
> On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 11:44:33AM +, Fedora Rawhide Report wrote:
>> Compose started at Mon May 20 08:15:03 UTC 2013
>>
>> Broken deps for x86_64
>> --
>> [entangle]
>>
On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 4:24 PM, Matthew Miller
wrote:
> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 09:11:32AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> Perhaps interested parties could get behind/revive:
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/NoMTA
>> and finish it out for f20?
>
> *nod*
>
> Hmmm -- "Percentage of completio
On Thu, May 16, 2013 at 12:17 AM, Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> On Wed, May 15, 2013 at 10:30 AM, Lennart Poettering
> wrote:
>> On Wed, 15.05.13 09:08, Chris Adams (li...@cmadams.net) wrote:
>>
>>> Once upon a time, Dan Mashal said:
>>> > Sanity: Switching to postfix?
>>>
>>> That's a long-time so
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 8:36 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 20.05.2013 21:30, schrieb Peter Robinson:
>>> I suggest not, because in most cases reviewing syslogs requires local
>>> root privilege. Alert or warning emails are easily configured with
>>> aliase
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 9:33 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 20.05.2013 22:27, schrieb Peter Robinson:
>> You still have to configure it so doing a "yum install
>> your-mta-of-choice" isn't hard and in fact in all environments I know
>> of that
On Mon, May 20, 2013 at 11:12 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Lots of things use /etc/aliases...
>
> I think we are drifting off point here.
>
> 1. If we ship no mta then things would be logged only and people would
> have to know to look there.
>
> 2. If we ship a non local delivery mta (ssmtp/esmtp, et
On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Kalev Lember wrote:
> 2013-05-17 12:20, Petr Hracek skrev:
>> Hi folks,
>>
>> in order that BZ (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=963113)
>> libpng library was bumped.
>>
> [snip]
>>
>> Please rebuild your packages with new libpng library
>> Here is the
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 4:05 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 09:39:06 +0100,
> Peter Robinson wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, May 17, 2013 at 12:17 PM, Kalev Lember
>> wrote:
>>
>> The way it was done last time on the 1.5 upgrade was to have a
&
On Wed, May 22, 2013 at 7:58 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2013-05-22 at 11:01 +0200, Petr Hracek wrote:
>
>> >> The issue is that once this is in, all the 306 packages above will have
>> >> broken dependencies. And it's not just simple rebuilds that are
>> >> required; we'd need _ordered_
On Thu, May 23, 2013 at 10:14 AM, Ismael Olea wrote:
>
> Hi:
>
> While fixing sugar-write[1] I needed to update Abiword/libabiword to recent
> versions[2]. I made this using a bunch of patches from SugarLabs, with
> special interests in the gtk3 and instrospection ones.
Please don't update this.
On Sat, May 25, 2013 at 8:59 AM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
> Il 23/05/2013 15:25, Peter Oliver ha scritto:
>> Arduino is an electronics prototyping board, and also a GNU
>> GPL2-licenced IDE for writing and uploading code to such boards. Fedora
>> has packages for the IDE.
>>
>> Recent versions of the
Hi Daniel,
Would just like to note the wiki needs to be updated as is says 13.1.0
is the devel release "upcoming".
Peter
On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 10:15 PM, Daniel Drake wrote:
> Hi,
>
> We're pleased to announce the release of OLPC OS 13.1.0 for XO-1,
> XO-1.5, XO-1.75 and XO-4. Details of new fe
On Fri, May 31, 2013 at 3:40 PM, Eduardo Mayorga Téllez
wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have the intention to pack a Python program that has python-espeak
> as dependency. I just found espeak at repos. Why is not it there?
Because no one has packaged it yet you could package it as well as
your other p
> Basically, we (as in, the people who do blocker review) need to know if
> remote auth at install/firstboot time is really important. Once we know
> that, we can go out and get the blocker decisions against anaconda, i-s,
> g-i-s, whatever else correct. Just trust us, and answer the initial
> ques
On Tue, Jun 4, 2013 at 8:06 AM, Jonathan Dieter wrote:
> On Mon, 2013-06-03 at 18:07 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> Whether this is a blocker or not comes down to a judgement call, because
>> it hinges on whether this is a significant inconvenience for a large
>> enough number of users. So we ne
On Thu, Jun 13, 2013 at 2:56 PM, Eugene Pivnev wrote:
> I want to create subj (VM server - minimal CentOS 6 x64 + libvirtd) but
> don't know - how to do this.
> Without locally installed CentOS.
> Anakonda? Koji?
Completely the wrong mailing list to discuss this... centos has their
own lists... I
On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 6:33 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2013-06-28 at 13:31 -0400, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> On 06/28/2013 01:24 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> > On Fri, 2013-06-28 at 13:19 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> >> On Fri, Jun 28, 2013 at 1:13 PM, Adam Williamson
>> >> wrote:
>>
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 9:16 PM, Kalev Lember wrote:
> 2013-07-02 22:00, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>
>> On Tue, 2 Jul 2013 20:18:06 +0100
>> Matthew Garrett wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 10:33:26AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>>>
Fedora ARM has all the features of the primary architectur
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 9:20 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 10:16:45PM +0200, Kalev Lember wrote:
>> 2013-07-02 22:00, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>> > I has them, they may not all work.
>>
>> In particular, the GNOME image is missing. I would not say it has all
>> the features of t
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 10:05 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 04:38:30PM -0400, Jared K. Smith wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 4:16 PM, Kalev Lember wrote:
>>
>> > In particular, the GNOME image is missing. I would not say it has all
>> > the features of the primary architect
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 10:36 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 10:28:03PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 10:05 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> > GNOME runs fine without hardware 3D support, but the llvmpipe code that
>> > makes
On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 10:49:18PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>
>> Not pretty but we're severely limited by resources and ability and
>> there's a reason we don't currently ship the a gnome build.
>
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> nnnOn Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
>> = Proposed System Wide Change: ARM as primary Architecture =
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ARM_as_Primary
>
> How many F19 packages currently fail to build (or are excl
> On 9 July 2013 10:57, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 5:54 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
>> > nnnOn Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 3:00 PM, Jaroslav Reznik
>> > wrote:
>> >> = Proposed System Wide Change: ARM as primary Architecture =
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 6:24 PM, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 01:00:27PM -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> >> = Proposed System Wide Change: ARM as primary Architecture =
>> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ARM_as_Primary
>> >
>> > How many F19 packages currently fail to build
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 6:43 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 06:33:53PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>
>> There's a number of people working on this but ultimately like all
>> problems we can handle as much as possible but we also need assistance
>&g
On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 10:11 PM, Till Maas wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 03:00:05PM +0200, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
>> = Proposed System Wide Change: ARM as primary Architecture =
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ARM_as_Primary
>>
>> Change owner(s): Denn
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Aleksandar Kurtakov
wrote:
> - Original Message -
>> From: "Josh Boyer"
>> To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
>>
>> Sent: Wednesday, July 10, 2013 2:45:53 PM
>> Subject: Re: F20 System Wide Change: ARM as primary Architecture
>>
>> On Wed, J
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 5:06 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 11:57 AM, Till Maas wrote:
>> On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 10:36:39PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>> On Tue, Jul 9, 2013 at 10:11 PM, Till Maas wrote:
>>
>>> > Which hardware is suppo
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 6:36 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 11:19:33AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>> armv7 has stack protector, aarch64 which is outside of this proposal
>> doesnt yet have it.
>
> Only i?86/x86_64/ppc/ppc64/s390/s390x/sparc/sparc64/tilegx/tilepro
> really hav
On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 9:43 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 06:14:24PM +0200, Björn Persson wrote:
>> Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> > I was working on adding 2 more SOC's for packagers earlier this week.
>> >
>> > I wanted to see how much call there was for these... should I try a
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 6:15 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 12:43:36AM -0400, DJ Delorie wrote:
>>
>> > Stack protector is not a new requirement in Fedora. It's been part of
>> > the distribution for years.
>>
>> xterm has been part of the distribution for years also, but it'
>> > I appreciate that some people cannot or don't want to buy hardware,
>> > but if you did have roughly $300 available, then you should probably
>> > get the Oct 2012 Samsung Chromebook or the Arndale development board.
>> > The Chromebook has the advantage IMHO that it's a decent netbook.
>>
>>
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 12:00 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 6:25 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
>>
>> Speaking about hardware - and that's more a question for Spot - could
>> be possible to organize another round of HW give away as we did with
>> Raspberries? With a different HW, th
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 11:55 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 2:04 AM, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
>> On 07/10/2013 09:13 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>>>
>>> Fedora is an operating system that supports a range of desktop
>>> environments, defaulting to the GNOME desktop environment. An
On Thu, Jul 11, 2013 at 12:28 PM, Caolán McNamara wrote:
> So, wondering...
>
> a) What is the fastest available arm hardware that works today with
> fedora ?
At the moment the build hardware we have is Calxeda quad core A9 with
4Gb of RAM and a local HDD.
> b) The fedora builders are currently
On Tue, May 31, 2016 at 12:21 AM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> Hi folks! The Final freeze kicks in soon, so time for another blocker
> bug update.
>
> 1. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1318045 - anaconda - NEW
>Incorrect keymap when decrypting encrypted partitions
>
> This one still n
>> On Sun, May 29, 2016 at 06:51:20PM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> > So there's tmux, screen, curl, wget, and probably quite a few others
>> > that don't necessarily get daemonized that are probably affected.
>>
>> I would really like to see a solution whereby tmux and screen _just
>> work_ withou
> We have a bug report for adding kdump anaconda addon to livecd:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1176483
>
> The bug was created in 2014, seems I can not reach the maintainer.
> What else can I do? Do we have other maintainers for this component?
It's now called fedora-kickstarts an
On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 4:59 PM, wrote:
> According to the schedule [1], Fedora 24 Candidate RC-1.1 is now
> available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
> testing! For more information on release validation testing, see:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/QA:Release_validation
On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 5:42 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 11, 2016 at 4:59 PM, wrote:
>> According to the schedule [1], Fedora 24 Candidate RC-1.1 is now
>> available for testing. Please help us complete all the validation
>> testing! For more information
On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 6:31 AM, Adam Williamson
wrote:
> On Wed, 2016-06-15 at 20:18 -0500, den...@ausil.us wrote:
>> Additionally everything is installable provides the minimal offering
>> and has anaconda's defaults rather than servers.
>
> In case you couldn't parse that, Dennis means the 'Eve
How about
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/enter_bug.cgi?product=Fedora&version=rawhide&component=ltrace
On Sat, Jun 18, 2016 at 12:31 AM, DJ Delorie wrote:
>
> Not sure where to send this, but...
>
> From 1280b78688baaf9a576af5a0a0a658fd0f0ea7e4 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: DJ Delorie
> Date: F
> I've never retired a package before, so I'm trying to figure out my way
> through it for nc6.
>
> Background:
>
> * nc was properly obsoleted by nmap-ncat, and retired (though, it hasn't
> been removed from comps entirely)
> * nc6 should also be obsoleted by nmap-ncat with nc, but it never wa
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 9:30 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> First thing you should do is to send your patch upstream. If upstream
> will say "it's good patch", I will help you to get it in Fedora before
> upstream will release new version. Unfortunately it's not possible in
> other way.
In the hadoop
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 9:14 AM, Mattias Ellert
wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I submitted a bugzilla report with a patch that implements an
> improvement of the hadoop package in Fedora, extending the current
> incomplete Fedora integration patch that only supports ix86 and x86_64
> to more architectures. The
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 2:53 PM, Jan Kratochvil
wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jun 2016 12:12:37 +0200, Dan Horák wrote:
>> For ppc64 (the big endian POWER) the base is set by the toolchain
>> default which is Power4/ppc970. When Power7 came we were asked what are
>> the options to take the advantage of thes
On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 5:01 PM, Jan Kratochvil
wrote:
> On Thu, 30 Jun 2016 16:13:59 +0200, Josh Boyer wrote:
>> On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 9:53 AM, Jan Kratochvil
>> wrote:
>> > But now there is ppc64le for >=Power8. So <=Power7 can use ppc64 but newer
>> >>=Power8 hardware does use ppc64le whic
On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Timely article in the Register today:
> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/07/05/linux_letting_go_32bit_builds_on_the_way_out/
>
> I've been thinking about this as i686 is so often broken that I've now
> stopped bothering to test it in the
On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 11:56 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 07/05/2016 10:57 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>
>> If you need to run an i686 virtual machine based on Rawhide, my
>> experience is that it's more likely than not that it won't boot, and
>> no one cares.
>
>
> Well, that's independent fo
> In older Fedora (at least Fedora 22) I could easily mount my ihphone
> in Nautilus. I could click on it in the left hand side of the File
> Manager and it would mount.
>
> I am having trouble getting this same behavior in Fedora 24. Can
> someone verify this works or does not work for them? You s
>> >>That patch is the answer to the (repeated) bug reports that relabelling
>> >>fails if enforcing=1 and the labels are sufficiently messed up.
>> >>Doing the relabel in permissive mode, without ever going to enforcing
>> >>mode, seems like the most reliable way out in this case. Starting in
>> >
> On 07/09/2016 12:04 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>> In older Fedora (at least Fedora 22) I could easily mount my ihphone
>>> in Nautilus. I could click on it in the left hand side of the File
>>> Manager and it would mount.
>>>
>>> I am having trou
> On Tue, Jul 5, 2016 at 9:57 AM, Richard W.M. Jones
> wrote:
>>
>> Timely article in the Register today:
>>
>> http://www.theregister.co.uk/2016/07/05/linux_letting_go_32bit_builds_on_the_way_out/
>>
>> I've been thinking about this as i686 is so often broken that
Huh, the phone should still be getting mounted, but as a camera, and just
as
a camera, and you can remove photos there without botching the phone's
internal
photo database.
That definitely works here.
--
>>>
>>> Yeah All I see are "documents on dusty's iphone
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 12:37 PM, Jonathan Wakely
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I messed up the change proposal for Boost 1.61 in F25, which means it
> isn't on the schedule.
>
> Given the huge amount of work involved in every Boost update, I'm not
> going to be too upset if I don't have to do it!
I'd leave i
On Wed, Jul 20, 2016 at 8:38 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> Well, I had same problem some time ago and after around 1 day it
> disappeared. I guess Jon might know better.
It's automated from a front end PoV but the list of packages still has
a semi manual back end review process.
> On Jul 20, 2016 9
> alsa-ucm contains routing information to setup sound codecs
> on some machines, usually SoC-based. It contains configuration
> that's mostly relevant to ARM devices, but also a few Atom (CherryTrail and
> Broadwell) related SoCs on Intel.
>
> Could we install alsa-ucm by default? As it is necessa
Hi All,
Fedora 25 has now been branched, please be sure to do a git pull
--rebase to pick up the new branch, as an additional reminder
rawhide/f26 has been completely isolated from previous releases, so
this means that anything you do for f25 you also have to do in the
master branch and do a build
>> Fedora 25 has now been branched, please be sure to do a git pull
>> --rebase to pick up the new branch, as an additional reminder
>> rawhide/f26 has been completely isolated from previous releases, so
>> this means that anything you do for f25 you also have to do in the
>> master branch and do a
On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 12:07 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 29, 2016 at 4:34 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> I have an idea to add RISC-V on FPGA as a Fedora "tertiary
>> architecture" (I made up that term), if anyone is interested in that.
>
> Small sidebar.
>
> I've used the same term in
On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 9:00 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Fedora 25 has now been branched, please be sure to do a git pull
> --rebase to pick up the new branch, as an additional reminder
> rawhide/f26 has been completely isolated from previous releases, so
> this m
Hi All,
We are planning to change the way Alternate Architectures (non x86_64)
are handled
in terms of "primary" vs "secondary". The definition of what is
primary or secondary
is already handled more in terms of the build artifact outputs (images, LiveCDs,
installers, containers etc) for i686 deli
>> All the details of the proposal along with FAQ have been put on a wiki
>> page here[1]
>> so please go and read it and ask any questions that aren't answered in
>> the FAQ here.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Peter
>>
>> [1]
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/RedefiningSecondaryArchitectures
>>
>> We are planning to change the way Alternate Architectures (non x86_64)
>> are handled
>> in terms of "primary" vs "secondary". The definition of what is
>> primary or secondary
>> is already handled more in terms of the build artifact outputs (images,
>> LiveCDs,
>> installers, containers etc)
>> [1]
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/RedefiningSecondaryArchitectures
>
> I skimmed all this and I'm still a bit confused.
>
> Will there be one Koji instance compiling for every (current primary +
> current secondary) arch? Or will there be two instances, one for all
> primary
>>> On the subject of RISC-V, I'm still plugging away at this. It's
>>> rather slow going, but you can take a look at:
>>>
>>> http://git.annexia.org/?p=fedora-riscv.git;a=summary
>>>
>>> There is nothing much usable at the moment, and many stumbling blocks.
>>
>>
>> Yes, but this is an "experim
>> > > Hello,
>> > > After Fedora 25 Mass Branching , should be mock update with
>> > > fedora-
>> > > 25
>> > > configurations ?
>> > > Other question where I should ask it ? bugzilla ?
>> > bugzilla +1
>> Thanks, https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1364754
>
> Hi,
> Anyone, can tell me h
> So, I misunderstood this issue. (I'll blame the cold medicine)
>
> In this case the problem is that arm images are made with
> appliance-creator from appliance-tools. That in turn uses livecd-tools
> (the old way we used to make live media but no longer do in favor of
> livemedia-creator from lor
On Sun, Aug 14, 2016 at 12:34 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>> * #1592 - Redefinition of what constitutes a secondary/alternate
>> ~ architecture in Fedora (sgallagh, 16:04:18)
>> ~ * AGREED: FESCo approves the new alternative architectures plan (+7,
>> ~0, -0) (sgalla
>> See that's where we disagree, there are 1000s of users that use those,
>> you could also argue that the vast majority of Fedora instances aren't
>> desktop platforms but servers/VMs and other non desktop usecases (I
>> know of one company running Fedora on over a million ARM devices) yet
>> we s
On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 7:05 PM, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
> I'm trying to build a new package. It completed with no issues on F26
> (rawhide) and F24. However, the build keeps failing on F25
I've done quite a few builds of late and had no issues at all.
> Here is the build link which is reporti
package list so see if there's differences.
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 11:25 AM, Peter Robinson
> wrote:
>>
>> On Wed, Aug 24, 2016 at 7:05 PM, Gerald B. Cox wrote:
>> > I'm trying to build a new package. It completed with no issues on F26
>> &g
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 6:21 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 2:10 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
>> I'm working on getting new luajit version for Rawhide. Affected packages:
>>
>> $ sudo dnf -q repoquery --alldeps --whatrequires luajit --srpm
>> --queryformat="%{name}"
>> cantor
> De
On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 7:52 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 8:38 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 6:21 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
>>> On Mon, Aug 29, 2016 at 2:10 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
>>>> I'm working on getting new l
>>> Please test and give karma again. A reminder that if you do find
>>> regressions please note on the bodhi update corresponding to the
>>> kernel you tested AND file a bugzilla with information.
>>>
>>
>> It's somewhat hard since the corresponding kernel-devel packages seems to be
>> missing. Is
Please test and give karma again. A reminder that if you do find
regressions please note on the bodhi update corresponding to the
kernel you tested AND file a bugzilla with information.
>>> It's somewhat hard since the corresponding kernel-devel packages seems to
>>> be
>>> miss
DNF-2 release candidate will land into rawhide. It will bring many new
features and bug fixes. DNF-2 is using libdnf instead of hawkey or
libhif. Unfortunately it brings some incompatibilities with previous
version which were either needed to preserve compatibility with yum
On Tue, Sep 6, 2016 at 2:32 AM, Ding Yi Chen wrote:
> As elementry and evas-generic-loaders are merged to efl after 1.8.0.
>
> The elementry and evas-generic-loaders will be orphanded.
Please actually actively retire them, rather than just orphaning then,
making sure you add the appropriate obsol
>>Sounds like this scope would warrant a Change?
>
> The components should be already prepared for DNF-2 and the changes
> are not huge. There's the FESCO ticket [5]. If it is not accepted then
> we will submit a Change.
Actually, the preferred approach would be fo
On Thu, Sep 8, 2016 at 11:21 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Recently, I updated http-parser from a 2.1 git prerelease snapshot to the
> latest
> stable release 2.7.1 in all supported Fedora branches. I didn't anticipate any
> issues because 1) the soname didn't change and 2) the project upstream
On Fri, Sep 9, 2016 at 10:00 PM, Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> If it requires actions from releng, then it's system-wide change. But
> it's not about changing existing process of building distro, it's just
> bugfixing releng tools.
No, the need of rel-eng's involvement does not define whether
something
>> We are in the process of importing aarch64 to the primary koji instance as
>> part of https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Architectures/
>> RedefiningSecondaryArchitectures The import and enablement of aarch64 is for
>> rawhide only, we expect to add power big and little endiian sometime before
>>
>> > blosc has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
>> > On aarch64:
>> > blosc-bench-1.10.1-1.fc26.aarch64 requires python-matplotlib
>> > Please resolve this as soon as possible.
>>
>> Hi,
>>
>> tl;dr: in case you see a similar message, I think it can be ignored for now.
>>
>> A few days
On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 3:08 PM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 16, 2016 at 03:00:13PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> >> > blosc has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
>> >> > On aarch64:
>> >> > blosc-bench-
601 - 700 of 1607 matches
Mail list logo
