On Tue, Jul 2, 2013 at 11:09 PM, Matthew Garrett <mj...@srcf.ucam.org> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 02, 2013 at 10:49:18PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote: > >> Not pretty but we're severely limited by resources and ability and >> there's a reason we don't currently ship the a gnome build. > > LLVM is part of Fedora, and to the extent that it contains ARM-specific > code it's the ARM porters' responsibility to deal with it. I don't think > it's excessive to say that you really need someone with the ability to > maintain something that's such a system-critical component.
I agree but it's not exactly maintainer on x86, ARM or otherwise which was the point I made previously. The LLVM problem isn't necessarily just an ARM problem. -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
