On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 4:52 AM, Moez Roy wrote:
> Mono is updated in Rawhide. Can a proven-packager run a script to
> rebuild all the packages that require mono.
I've untagged this, it needs to be done on a side tag and then tagged in.
Peter
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.or
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 7:06 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 11:52 PM, Moez Roy wrote:
>>
>> Mono is updated in Rawhide. Can a proven-packager run a script to
>> rebuild all the packages that require mono.
>>
>> -Thanks.
>> --
>> devel mailing list
>> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 9:40 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 4:52 AM, Moez Roy wrote:
>> Mono is updated in Rawhide. Can a proven-packager run a script to
>> rebuild all the packages that require mono.
>
> I've untagged this, it needs to be done on
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 4:52 AM, Moez Roy wrote:
> Mono is updated in Rawhide. Can a proven-packager run a script to
> rebuild all the packages that require mono.
I've rebuilt a few packages in the f23-mono4 side tag, some are broken
which causes some others to have failures, you'll need to fix/u
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 11:12 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 4:52 AM, Moez Roy wrote:
>> Mono is updated in Rawhide. Can a proven-packager run a script to
>> rebuild all the packages that require mono.
>
> I've rebuilt a few packages in the f2
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 11:37 AM, Dan Horák wrote:
> On Mon, 18 May 2015 09:57:14 +0100
> Peter Robinson wrote:
>
>> On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 9:40 AM, Peter Robinson
>> wrote:
>> > On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 4:52 AM, Moez Roy
>> > wrote:
>> >> Mo
>> Either way it looks like there is still quite a bit of work for the
>> change owners to do before we can tag anything over to f23.
>>
>> Peter
>
> Thanks for looking into this and creating that tag f23-mono4
>
> I received about 60 emails about failing packages.
>
> Claudio and myself have alrea
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 12:54 PM, Timotheus Pokorra
wrote:
> Hello Peter,
>
>> I've rebuilt a few packages in the f23-mono4 side tag, some are broken
>> which causes some others to have failures, you'll need to fix/update
>> nant/dbus-sharp. I'm also rebuilding mono itself as a post boostrap
>> bu
>> >> Mono is updated in Rawhide. Can a proven-packager run a script to
>> >> rebuild all the packages that require mono.
>> >>
>> >> -Thanks.
>> >> --
>> >> devel mailing list
>> >> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
>> >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>> >> Fedora Code of Cond
On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 4:52 AM, Moez Roy wrote:
> Mono is updated in Rawhide. Can a proven-packager run a script to
> rebuild all the packages that require mono.
Most of these are now built, sadly because all the bits needed weren't
actually committed it wasn't as simple as running a script.
Th
We are proud to announce the official release of Fedora 22 for aarch64,
the community-driven and community-built operating system now available
in Cloud, Server, and Workstation editions.
If that's all you need to hear, jump over to Get Fedora to download
-- or for current users, run the FedUp upg
We are proud to announce the official release of Fedora 22 for POWER,
the community-driven and community-built operating system now
available in Cloud and Server editions.
If that's all you need to hear, jump over to Get Fedora to download
-- or for current users, run the FedUp upgrade tool.
*
Hi,
> I have this request on bugzilla [0] for perl-less build of git due to large
> dependency on Perl modules, which is unwanted for atomic.
There's actually a number of other usecases where having git without
pulling in perl would be very useful, it's been on my todo list to
investigate but not
On Tue, Jun 16, 2015 at 2:03 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> I'm going to upload OCaml 4.02.2+rc1 to Rawhide. Mostly this is lots
> and lots of incremental compiler fixes, but there are a few
> highlights:
>
> - includes libasmrun_shared.so which makes it easier to build plugins
>written in
>> > I'm going to upload OCaml 4.02.2+rc1 to Rawhide. Mostly this is lots
>> > and lots of incremental compiler fixes, but there are a few
>> > highlights:
>> >
>> > - includes libasmrun_shared.so which makes it easier to build plugins
>> >written in native OCaml (RHBZ#1195025)
>> >
>> > - f
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 8:57 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> So I've been getting some failed build mails from the mass rebuild for
> F-23. I'm wondering how to fix these since the mass rebuild is happening
> inside a side-tag, do I just do a normal master build with the cause fixed,
> or shoul
On Wed, Jun 17, 2015 at 8:03 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Dne 16.6.2015 v 23:00 Dennis Gilmore napsal(a):
>> Hi all,
>>
>> Per the Fedora 23 schedule[1] we will be starting a mass rebuild for Fedora
>> 23
>> very shortly.
>
> Will it be done using DNF of YUM?
yum. the changes aren't all in place
>> Per the Fedora 23 schedule[1] we will be starting a mass rebuild for Fedora
>> 23
>> very shortly. It was requested in a trac ticket[2]
>> that we do a mass rebuild for Fedora 23 for
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GCC5
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Harden_All_Packages
>>
On Tue, Jun 23, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> I know this is a little off-topic, but why don't we use systemd-networkd in
> Fedora proper as a replacement for the ifcfg scripts when NetworkManager
> isn't desired? Or at least provide it as an alternative option to
> NetworkManager and ifcf
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 9:05 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> Dne 24.6.2015 v 01:37 Jan Kurik napsal(a):
>> -- Update v8
>>
>
> What the version of v8 will be? I am asking, since rubygem-therubyracer
> is using system version of v8 and I am bit afraid what impact it will have.
>
> How is Chromium compat
On Wed, Jun 24, 2015 at 12:52 AM, Jan Kurik wrote:
> = Proposed Self Contained Change: io.js Technology Preview =
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/iojs
>
> Change owner(s): T.C. Hollingsworth
>
> io.js is an npm compatible platform originally based on Node.js™ that
> supports version 6 o
On Wed, Jul 1, 2015 at 1:36 AM, Dave Young wrote:
> Pratyush,
>
> Thanks for the effort, let's cc Fedora devel list, see if we can get help
> from Fedora experts.
>
> Summary the problem:
> Latest kexec-tools koji build in rawhide results in a wrong kexec binary,
> kexec load fails with something
On Thu, Jun 4, 2020 at 11:07 AM Marius Schwarz wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> small(?) problem with automated testing in bodhi:
>
>
> Test Gating
>
> Failed to talk to Greenwave.
>
>
> at least with: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-0e5ada32f1
Is it explicitly down due to the DC migration,
> Is there someone that can help me convert my Fedora install from GRUB to
> systemd-boot and actually get it where kernel updates won't break it?
>
> The reason is that my MS Surface GO does not work with GRUB for some reason.
> Probably a non-standard UEFI implementation but I both found this t
> On 05.06.2020 12:50, Igor Raits wrote:
> > It does not work in some cases even today anyway.
>
> Okay, then the second point - zram will will cause a huge memory
> fragmentation and significantly decrease overall performance.
Have you got proof of that and can provide figures? Having been
runnin
> I'm not sure who is maintaining the Fedora shim pkg, if none of you,
> could you suggest who is the right person to ping.
>
> The bug below is not fixed yet for long time, can we get an update?
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1651016
pjones is the maintainer, I know there's some is
> > I noticed that kmod-wireguard is being updated on F31, even after
> > WireGuard became a part of Linux kernel since 5.6.0. Shouldn't
> > kernel>5.6.0 obsolete kmod-wireguard? Is it kept and updated because
> > it was originally installed via @commandline?
> >
> > We had a discussion about not r
> We did attempt to obsolete it in f32
>
> https://pkgs.rpmfusion.org/cgit/free/rpmfusion-free-obsolete-packages.git/log/?h=f32
>
> TBH I don't really like the idea much, removing peoples VPN isn't cool and
> leaves them exposed.
From what I understood of the thread it's purely removing the akmod
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 9:14 AM Leigh Scott wrote:
>
> > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/UseNanoByDefault
>
> > In contrast, Nano offers the kind of graphical text editing experience
> > that people are used to, and therefore doesn't require specialist
> > knowledge to use. It is already in
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 8:30 AM Jan Kratochvil
wrote:
>
> On Fri, 26 Jun 2020 02:25:24 +0200, Matthew Miller wrote:
> > But, if you don't like our offerings that are targetted that way, I suggest
> > you make a spin or remix that has all of defaults _you_ want.
>
> So FESCo has decided and there i
> > I agree with your points, but pressing ESC only reverses the "rhgb" part,
> > the kernel output is still "quiet".
>
> If the kernel really locks up it is locked up and no keys work anymore.
> Without "rhgb quiet" one can make a photo of the screen.
>
> A better solution would be to use serial c
> -1 for the change. If the so called 'end-user' (whatever does it mean)
> can learn git, she or he can also learn 'vi' or at least how to enable
> the preferred editor. Personally, I can see nothing special on the
> nano, for me it qualifies as very poor editor
I feel you're completely missing th
> > > Why not just patch vim-minimal to show the hint on the CTRL+C?
> > > Problem solved :)
> > Ctrl + C in vi will give you a
> > Type :qa and press to exit Vim
You can also do ZZ (two capital Zs) to exit
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedorapr
> I've been very clear from the outset that Facebook's fault tolerance is much
> higher than the average Fedora user. The only reason I've agreed to assist in
> answering questions and support this proposal is because I have multi-year
> data
> that shows our failure rates are the same that we se
> > By that metric, Btrfs qualifies, as it's the default filesystem on
> > SUSE Linux Enterprise (and has been since 2014). SUSE has built
>
> One thing I'd like to see addressed.
>
> Back in the RHEL7.4 days, btrfs was explicitly deprecated:
>
> "The Btrfs file system has been in Technology Previe
> On Saturday, June 27, 2020 12:34:17 PM MST Matthew Miller wrote:
> > On Sat, Jun 27, 2020 at 10:25:01AM -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> >
> > > Jesus Christ, this actually got approved. It's time to fork Fedora. This
> > > is really getting out of hand.
> >
> >
> >
> > As mentioned earlier, th
On Mon, Jun 29, 2020 at 11:09 AM Dridi Boukelmoune
wrote:
>
> Greetings,
>
> I'm not sure whether the minimization effort is still going on but I
> wanted to report the pitfalls I ran into moving from the fedora Docker
> container to fedora-minimal.
>
> For starters I was surprised by the absence
> The use of legacy or uefi are changes that users have to manually change
> themselves in their bios from manufactures default settings. There is no
> tool that can do that for them or migrate those settings however users
> should be able to change this for hardware around 2010.
>
> The Installer
On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 12:19 AM Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
wrote:
>
> On 30.6.2020 22:38, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
> >> sd-boot is already installed on end users system, is light weight
> >> compared to Grub ( sd-boot only supports uefi,smaller code size, easier
> >> to main
On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 3:29 PM Alek Paunov wrote:
>
> On 2020-06-30 14:34, Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote:
> > Share your thoughts and comments on how such move might affect you so
> > feedback can be collected for the future on why such a change might be
> > bad, how it might affect the distribution
On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 10:01 PM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 1, 2020 at 12:34 PM Jóhann B. Guðmundsson
> wrote:
> >
> > On 1.7.2020 16:10, Solomon Peachy wrote:
> > > On Wed, Jul 01, 2020 at 05:19:01PM +0200, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
> > >> I'm currently using BIOS, grub, grub2 basically everyw
> > If you need Secure Boot feature to be enabled, you must sign the
> > compiled kmod packages with your own CA.
> >
>
> This is what's wrong with everything. *This is not okay*. This is
> intentionally a poisonous user experience because we provide no
> automatic or easy way for this to be done.
> > I guess that shows how unfamiliar I am with UEFI boot Fedora. You would
> > encrypt /boot to ensure that your boot images have not been tampered with,
> > or
> > config files haven't been read by somebody other than the end user.
> >
>
> Encryption != integrity/authentication. The only thing e
> > It's less complex to maintain one solution for both types of boot, I'd
> > imagine. I'm not the one that'd be doing the work to support it, so far be
> > it
> > from me to prevent somebody from doing so, but that's just what it sounds
> > like. Right now, we have one solution that works well f
On Tue, Jul 7, 2020 at 11:17 AM Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>
> On Mon, Jul 06, 2020 at 01:26:31PM -0700, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
> > On Monday, July 6, 2020 5:24:32 AM MST Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> > > Default fedora disk layout in UEFI mode is partitions for ESP, /boot and
> > > LVM. If you ask for full
On Tue, Jul 14, 2020 at 2:45 PM Lennart Poettering wrote:
>
> On Di, 14.07.20 07:09, Chris Murphy (li...@colorremedies.com) wrote:
>
> > > > Why at boot time? Well if your default subvolume contains a recent
> > > > update that for some reason renders it unbootable, it might be nice to
> > > > be
On Sat, Jul 25, 2020 at 10:35 AM Neal Gompa wrote:
>
> Hey all,
>
> So I was trying to update libseccomp last night, and I was able to
> build it for everything except aarch64 on Rawhide because it says the
> compiler can't build executables[1].
>
> Looking a bit closer, it looks like the compiler
> > > > What would help would be if someone could untag that version of
> > > > binutils so that
> > > > it doesn't show up in the buildroots anymore. It's clearly fubar'd.
> > >
> > > Done.
> >
> > H. Yet my most recent build attempt, just now, failed with a
> > linker segfault on all arche
On Mon, Jul 27, 2020 at 1:19 PM Alex Scheel wrote:
>
> Not to pile on to what seems like a common topic... :-)
>
> Koschei notified me that one of my co-owned packages, pam_radius failed
> to build on aarch64 with the recent gcc update (10.1.1 -> 10.2.1). ppc and
> x86 built just fine.
>
> Looking
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 6:10 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On 3/20/12 9:30 AM, Jon Masters wrote:
>>
>> Hi again,
>>
>> I want to thank you, and everyone else in FESCo for talking with us
>> yesterday, and for looking over the proposal. Bear in mind, it's a work
>> in progress. We intend to have broa
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:36 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 13:39 -0400, Peter Jones wrote:
>
>> >> 4) when milestones occur, arm needs to be just as testible as other
>> >> primary architectures
>> >
>> > So we have a new hire (hi Paul) who is looking at autoqa, and we're
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 11:31 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Peter Jones wrote:
>> In yesterday's FESCo meeting I told you I'd make a list of specific issues
>> I have with the current proposal for ARM as a primary archictecture. There
>> are some places where I think the current proposal fails to deal
On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 11:46 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-03-20 at 12:08 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote:
>
>> 2) Updates. Submitting updates requires the entire build to be complete
>> which means you have to wait for the slowest thing to finish. Having to
>> wait for 12 hours effectively
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 11:39 AM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:41:33AM +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:58 PM, Matthew Garrett
>> wrote:
>> > I think you're looking at this in slightly the wrong way. Being a
>> > primary architecture isn't meant t
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 10:07 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> - Original Message -
>
>> Maybe it's worth to ask them (or look at for example Mer builds)
>> what's
>> the difference in build times.
>
> A few statistics from build.meego.com - using the OBS and building in
> qemu. These are real
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 7:13 AM, David Tardon wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 12:52:58PM -0700, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
>> On 03/20/2012 12:44 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>> >Now the ultra ridiculous: How about secondary architecture requirements
>> >demoted as-is to tertiary. And create substantiall
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 8:12 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>>>> 1) mechanisms need to be in place to get package maintainers access to
>>>>> fix
>>>>> arm-specific bugs in their packages
>&
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 1:52 PM, Peter Jones wrote:
> On 03/21/2012 09:21 AM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>
>> Except when people are forced to look at it, their solution was often
>> ExcludeArch for PPC. As I said in the other thread, you cannot force
>> people to care about an architecture they don't kno
2012/3/13 Michał Piotrowski :
> 2012/2/21 Jon Ciesla :
>> 2012/2/21 Michał Piotrowski :
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> Is there a chance to get httpd 2.4 in Fedora 17
>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/httpd/Announcement2.4.html
>>> ?
>>>
>>> This is the first major release from a few years and has some nice features
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:23 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 12:26 +0000, Peter Robinson wrote:
>
>> No, we've never said that ever! But then there are a lot of desktops
>> that run just fine without OpenGL. 3D really wasn't in a great state
>>
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 13:32 +0100, drago01 wrote:
>
>> Even though I disagree with Kevin that we should block on "does not
>> have 3D drivers" .. OpenGL is imo
>> even more important on ARM (non server systems) then on x86.
>>
>> A tablet or s
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:31 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 02:28:10PM +0000, Peter Robinson wrote:
>
>> What about all the other xorg-x11-drv* video cards, admittedly they're
>> generally considered legacy but there are a lot that don't do 3D
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:58 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 01:27:04PM +0000, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > All sorts of things can speed it up, most of the Fedora builders are
> > currently loopback ext4 over NFS over 100Mb ethernet over USB. Not
> > optima
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 14:31 +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 02:28:10PM +0000, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>
>> > What about all the other xorg-x11-drv* video cards, admittedly they're
>>
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:49 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-03-21 at 10:38 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>> Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said:
>> > That's my point, I don't believe that working 3D should be a blocker
>> > to primary arch beca
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:52 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Peter Jones (pjo...@redhat.com) said:
>> In yesterday's FESCo meeting I told you I'd make a list of specific issues
>> I have with the current proposal for ARM as a primary archictecture. There
>> are some places where I think the current p
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 6:59 PM, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
> On 03/21/2012 11:18 AM, drago01 wrote:
>>
>> But there seems to be a huge oppositions against that in Fedora.
>> How does Ubuntu build there ARM builds? Native or using cross compilers?
>
>
> Native.
As do Debian I believe. I think, but ar
On Mar 21, 2012 12:47 AM, "Kevin Kofler" wrote:
>
> Avi אבי Alkalay אלקלעי wrote:
> > What are the legal tools that Ubuntu uses so it can ship H.264 ?
>
> It's based on the Isle of Man, not in the USA.
Which doesn't provide that much protection as a couple of online poker
companies recently disc
On Mar 21, 2012 2:30 AM, "Fedora Video" wrote:
>
> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 10:11 PM, Rahul Sundaram
wrote:
>>
>> Note that Debian does include a decoder by default for both MP3 and
>> H.264 but they can only do so because they are a non-profit and the
>> worst case scenario is a injunction until
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 2:50 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Chris Tyler wrote:
>> On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 02:38 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>>> And finally, for our build speed issue, the practical consideration will
>>> be whether the parallelism will actually speed our builds up. Right now
>>> our build
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 3:23 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Brendan Conoboy wrote:
>> Hypothetically speaking, if presented with an ARM system that builds
>> packages, on average, 3x faster than x86, will you advocate that x86 be
>> dropped to secondary and ARM be PA exclusively?
>
> Not if most comput
>>> Well people couldn't live without "dumbphones" either so this is
>>> natural progress.
>>
>> They could. They had desktops or laptops. Most people would replace their
>> phone in a day if it broke or were lost. A home computer? Weekend. Maybe
>> next weekend.
>>
>
> Most people that buy smart
> I see that this discussion has gone from ARM as a primary architecture
> for Fedora to a general Tablets vs PC market discussion. IMHO, While
> there is no doubt that the tablet/mobile market is growing rapidly,
> The desktop and laptops are there to stay.
>
> Considering ARM as a primary archite
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 9:02 AM, Andrew Haley wrote:
> On 03/22/2012 01:38 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
>> (but the "multi-core" ARM setups actually present themselves as a
>> multi-computer cluster, which is not supported by "make -j", not as
>> a multi-CPU computer)
>
> FWIW, I'm pretty sure this i
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-03-22 at 12:57 +0200, Nikos Roussos wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 20, 2012 at 7:54 PM, Kevin Kofler
>> wrote:
>> > What do people buy these days? Phones, tablets, and TVs. Not
>> desktop
>> > computers.
>>
>>
>>
On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 2:28 PM, drago01 wrote:
> On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 12:26 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>> I see that this discussion has gone from ARM as a primary architecture
>>> for Fedora to a general Tablets vs PC market discussion. IMHO, While
>>> the
On Mar 22, 2012 8:32 PM, "Michael Cronenworth" wrote:
>
> Adam Williamson wrote:
>>
>> I would still like you to consider the question of whether this holds
>> for the Fedora case, though. Is Fedora as a project in fact suitable -
>> either in current implementation, or in terms of our self-defini
On Mar 22, 2012 8:47 PM, "Michael Cronenworth" wrote:
>
> Adam Williamson wrote:
>>
>> It doesn't seem like a huge over-reach to assume that any RH interest in
>> ARM is more on the server side than a raging desire to take on Android
>> and the iPad:) (Note: I don't have any sekrit inside info on
On Mar 23, 2012 3:22 AM, "Kevin Kofler" wrote:
>
> Peter Robinson wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 22, 2012 at 2:28 PM, drago01 wrote:
> >> The only ones where this is possible right now are actually x86 based
> >> tablets. Even Windows 8 wont help here as M
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 5:19 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
> httpd 2.4.1 packages are ready for dist-f18 and will be built early next
> week. Rebuilds will be required for all packages containing httpd
> modules. There are API changes in 2.4, so module packages may need
> patches if upstream has not done
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 7:50 PM, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> On Thu, 22 Mar 2012 14:01:27 -0400
> DJ Delorie wrote:
>
>> Buy a trimslice and run it with iSCSI.
>
> This is not good enough for me to become involved with Fedora on ARM.
> Glad it works for you, but I need a real system, like a Netwinder.
On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 11:12 PM, Pete Zaitcev wrote:
> On Fri, 23 Mar 2012 22:05:39 +
> Peter Robinson wrote:
>
>> Trimslice has options of SSD or HDD as well so it would be no less of
>> a real machine like a netwinder.
>>
>> http://trimslice.com/web/
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 12:24 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> DJ Delorie wrote:
>> So buy a trimslice and use the internal SSD or sata disk. The
>> trimslice has everything the netwinder has (and more), and uses half
>> the power.
>>
>> http://trimslice.com/web/
>
> "Trim-Slice is the first desktop com
On Sat, Mar 24, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Ricardo Argüello
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I need to do a buildroot override for
> jboss-connector-1.6-api-1.0.1-0.1.20120310git9dc9a5.fc17, in order to
> compile picketbox-4.0.6-5 in F17:
>
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=3929166
>
>
> But when I try t
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 9:41 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
> Hi,
>
>>> they use a rather scary looking pile of development boards with very
>>> poor I/O.
>>
>> Buy a trimslice and run it with iSCSI. It's a very clean package, and
>> I can get 80 MB/sec to my file server's disks. That is neither
>> "
On Mon, Mar 26, 2012 at 11:52 AM, Richard Hughes wrote:
> At the moment the GNOME updates in Fedora are a bit of chaotic affair.
> They mostly work, but only because of people like mclasen who spend
> hours and hours building packages and putting everything together
> manually. For 3.3.92 I experi
On Mar 29, 2012 8:00 AM, "Paul Howarth" wrote:
>
> On Wed, 28 Mar 2012 22:16:25 +0200
> Reindl Harald wrote:
> > maybe the tone was minimal rude because i do absolutely
> > not understand why anyone can have the idea "hey let us
> > remove the whole custom partitioning and replace with
> > kickst
On Mar 30, 2012 6:34 PM, "Ankur Sinha" wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have two queries that I'd like clarified please:
>
> 1. Is the setup.py file to be included in the rpm? I was under the
> impression that this file is only required for building that package and
> therefore should not be part of the rp
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 12:58 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Apr 2, 2012 11:10 PM, "Brendan Conoboy" wrote:
>
>> All builds must occur on Fedora-maintained build servers.
>>
>> FYI, this will require an additional koji-hub for each architecture trying
>> to move to PA. Generally agree, though.
>
> No
2012/4/3 Miloslav Trmač :
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 5:10 AM, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
>>> as such there are various expectations that the overall Fedora
>>> experience will be consistent over all primary architectures.
>>
>> Can we quantify what the overall experience is that must be consistent? I
>
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 4:31 PM, Peter Jones wrote:
> On 04/03/2012 04:03 AM, "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" wrote:
>> On 04/03/2012 03:10 AM, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
>>>
>>> Let's make the list exhaustive; there needs to be a path to sure
>>> success. This means establishing a complete procedure where wh
2012/4/3 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson" :
> On 04/03/2012 07:29 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>>
>> I really don't care who pays for the hardware, just that we
>> have hardware that meets the requirements for being in the colo.
>> ongoing hardware costs will likely be from one of Fedora engineering,
>> Relea
On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 10:34 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 5:29 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
>>
>>> The rules are, it has to be rack mountable hardware
>>
>> Hmmm... how many Raspberry Pis can we fit in a rack?
>>
>> And at $35 each, spares would be cheaper than a warranty ;-)
>
> I don
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 11:09 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Peter Robinson wrote:
>> It's already been stated that 3D isn't a blocker for PA, but that the
>> needs to be reasonable GUI support similar to that of the mainline
>> project.
>
> "reasonable GUI
On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 11:26 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 08:10:12PM -0700, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
>
>> > as such there are various expectations that the overall Fedora
>> > experience will be consistent over all primary architectures.
>>
>> Can we quantify what the overall
On Thu, Apr 5, 2012 at 12:57 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 4, 2012 at 6:26 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 02, 2012 at 08:10:12PM -0700, Brendan Conoboy wrote:
>>> > All supported platforms must have kernels built from the Fedora
>>> > kernel SRPM and enabled by default in the spe
On Fri, Apr 13, 2012 at 1:59 AM, Anthony Green wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I recently release libffi 3.0.11, and ABI changes are mandating a .so
> number change. Despite the ABI change, I suspect that simple rebuilds
> are all that will be required for dependent packages.
>
> The ABI changes are si
On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Joe Orton wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2012 at 02:21:36PM +0200, Jindrich Novy wrote:
>> So the plan is:
>> 1) remove 4.5, 4.6 and 4.7 from compat-db
>> 2) put 4.8 to compat-db
>> 3) make db4 a dead package
>> (db4 package name is not very descriptive any more as we
On Wed, Apr 25, 2012 at 2:35 PM, Miroslav Suchy wrote:
> On 25.4.2012 15:05, Peter Jones wrote:
>>
>> On 04/24/2012 05:14 AM, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
>>
>>> I can keep only 3-5last releases in my poor head.
>>
>>
>> Then just *don't*. F14 is the past. Let it go.
>
>
> Tell it to Mythdora which is ba
On Thu, May 3, 2012 at 8:26 AM, Paul Howarth wrote:
> On 05/01/2012 07:30 PM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>>
>> the fedora 17 schedule
>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/17/Schedule lists the final
>> change freeze as 2012-05-07 this means that you need to make sure that
>> any changes you want i
301 - 400 of 1607 matches
Mail list logo
