> gnome-shell-2.29.1-4.i686 requires gjs >= 0:0.6
> gnome-shell-2.29.1-4.i686 requires mutter >= 0:2.29.1
I've tagged the newer gjs/mutter builds to go through to stable for
the next push. If the gnome-shell people ping me I can coordinate the
updates if they think it would make it e
On Mon, Apr 12, 2010 at 3:31 PM, James Antill wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-04-11 at 10:33 -0700, Chris Weyl wrote:
>> On Sun, Apr 11, 2010 at 2:27 AM, Nicolas Mailhot
>> wrote:
>> > Le dimanche 11 avril 2010 à 10:06 +0400, Peter Lemenkov a écrit :
>> >> Hello!
>> >>
>> >> 2010/4/10 Nicolas Mailhot :
>>
On Tue, Apr 13, 2010 at 1:46 PM, Ankur Sinha wrote:
> hey,
>
> I've had this issue for quite a while now.
>
> I have a HP pavilion laptop that runs a Fedora 12 (up to date) and vista
> (the original that came with the laptop). I'm using GNOME as of now.
>
> When a power cut occurs, the power apple
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 5:49 PM, Rawhide Report
wrote:
> Compose started at Fri Apr 16 08:15:04 UTC 2010
>
> Broken deps for i386
> --
> cpanminus-0.9935-1.fc14.noarch requires perl(App::cpanminus::script)
> evolution-couchdb-0.
On Fri, Apr 16, 2010 at 10:51 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-04-16 at 22:30 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>
>>
>>
>> Why all of a sudden are we including the modern history of Fedora in
>> the changelogs?
>>
>>
>
> repodiff changed rece
On Tue, Apr 20, 2010 at 8:55 AM, Huzaifa Sidhpurwala
wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> Hi All,
> I maintain usb-modeswitch in fedora. Recently upstream divided the main
> tar ball into two parts, the code which builds into the usb_modeswitch
> binary and the data part wh
On Thu, Mar 25, 2010 at 10:36 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Colin Walters (walt...@verbum.org) said:
>> > Speaking of changes to comps for the desktop I think it would be
>> > worthwhile breaking down the hardware support group into a couple of
>> > groups. I was thinking something along the lines
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 2:40 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 7:08 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>
>>
>> I've spent a little time looking at the hardware side of things and
>> done a basic patch for some of the hardware stuff based on the current
>&
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 3:48 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said:
>> > Honestly, I could see exploding it into a variety of smaller, more focused
>> > groups. Perhaps I'll whip up a proposal based on some comps files I have
>>
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 4:17 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-04-21 at 09:40 -0400, Colin Walters wrote:
>
>> This looks like a good start. I think the way this kind of thing
>> should work in general is that the system detects if you have the
>> hardware, and dynamically installs suppor
On Wed, Apr 21, 2010 at 4:12 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said:
>> > Splitting it by functionality makes a bit more sense; for example,
>> > you'd want a 'smart card support', not just merging it in with other
>> &
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 2:45 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 09:37 -0500, Martin Langhoff wrote:
>
>> What's the plan for rather old, limited hardware? Have you personally
>> got XO-1, XO-1.5 units to test? We'll be testing it (with some
>> trepidation) at OLPC, but it's always bett
On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 9:05 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 14:55 +0000, Peter Robinson wrote:
>
>> Details of rawhide builds for them here[1], the XO-1 build isn't
>> tested but the XO 1.5 one works fine, I'll be testing further and
>> likely th
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On 11/8/11 12:09 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>> 2011/11/8 Richard Hughes:
>>> 2011/11/7 Michał Piotrowski:
Out of curiosity I wanted to ask, why do I need colord on my system?
>>>
>>> Checkout http://www.freedesktop.org/software/colord/ f
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On 11/8/11 1:08 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>
>> Yea, but a lot of people don't have those either. I have around 5K
>> servers in DCs with not a single printer or scanner in site. The vast
>> majority of the 4 mi
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 18:08 +0000, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
>> > On 11/8/11 12:09 PM, Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>> >> 2011/11/8 Richard Hughes:
>> >>
On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 7:34 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On 11/8/11 1:59 PM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>
>> On Tue, Nov 8, 2011 at 6:53 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
>>>
>>> On a server like that, you won't have cups installed, so nothing will be
>>> pu
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 9:32 AM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 13, 2011 at 01:17:41PM +, Rawhide Report wrote:
>> Compose started at Sun Nov 13 08:15:32 UTC 2011
>>
>> Broken deps for x86_64
>> --
>> i3-4.0.1-1.fc17.x86_64
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 4:11 PM, David Shaw wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Bug 737387 fixes a race condition that can cause fork() in a multithreaded
> program to lock up.
>
> I can confirm that the issue fixed in bug 737387 exists in Fedora 14 as well.
> Fedora 14 isn't at end of life just yet (though it's
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 4:15 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Something that was brought up at the last fesco meeting is that
> fesco membership is currently restricted to members of the packaging
> group. That's arguably overly restrictive - fesco is intended to be the
> body with technical oversight
On Mon, Nov 14, 2011 at 4:49 PM, Lucas wrote:
> Dear All
>
> Have anyone here tried to compile cisco vpn for Fedora 16 - 32 or 64 bit?
> I need it sometimes and it should support ipsec over tcp, unfortunately
> nothing in unix can provide it.
Have you ever tried NetworkManager-vpnc (and the unde
On Wed, Nov 16, 2011 at 8:28 AM, Julian Sikorski wrote:
> Dear all,
>
> I have a working package of evolution-ews (Exchange Web Services client
> for evolution). If there is demand, I can put it up for review, but
> co-maintainers are welcome.
Already in Fedora 16+ and working fine for me in most
On Tue, Nov 29, 2011 at 10:29 AM, Johannes Lips
wrote:
> Why did you retire gnome-colors-icon-theme?
They're not retired, they're orphaned. It means he doesn't have time
to maintain them or doesn't use them anymore. Package maintainers that
are interested are able to pick up the maintenance of th
On Fri, Dec 2, 2011 at 10:37 AM, Bojan Smojver wrote:
> Does anyone know why F-16 testing updates to the kernel, gtk3 etc. are
> stuck in pending state in bodhi for such a long time?
Because there hasn't been a compose/sign/push process done.
Peter
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraprojec
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 10:18 PM, Eric Smith wrote:
> Kevin Fenzi wrote about gdk-pixbuf:
> > It failed the mass rebuild, not much left that depends on it, and
> > nothing I need. ;)
> [...]
>
>> So, if anyone really really really wants to keep it alive, feel free to
>> take it and fix it so it
On Mon, Dec 5, 2011 at 5:41 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-11-04 at 13:12 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>
>> I did test rebuilds in mock of all rawhide packages that are reported to
>> be dependent on libpng. Out of 964 packages with dependencies on libpng,
>> we have:
>>
>> Packages that rebuil
David,
> polkit-0.103-1.fc17
> ---
> * Tue Dec 06 2011 David Zeuthen 0.103-1.fc17
> - Update to upstream release 0.103
> - Drop upstreamed patch
> - Drop Fedora-specific policy, it is now upstream (fdo #41008)
There's some issues with the obsoletes on this, its pulling in 32bit
p
On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 11:54 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
> http://lxer.com/module/newswire/ext_link.php?rid=159737
Actually that's not entirely correct. They're removing the Sun Java
closed source variant due to changes in licensing from Oracle
preventing them from shipping security fixes. They also
2011/12/21 Sérgio Basto :
> On Wed, 2011-12-21 at 11:37 +, Rawhide Report wrote:
>> pida-0.6.2-2.fc17.x86_64 requires gnome-python2-gtkhtml2
>
> I also have this problem on F16 .
gtkhtml2 is long dead. The pida upstream needs to migrate it to
something else, likely webkit.
Peter
--
d
On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
> On Sat, Dec 31, 2011 at 08:55:53AM -0600, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>> if we plan to do a mass rebuild for gcc 4.7 we need to start it next week.
>
> IMHO a mass rebuild is highly desirable, but (with the exception of
> a few gcj/objc dependent p
2012/1/3 Pádraig Brady :
> On 01/02/2012 06:03 PM, Jim Meyering wrote:
>> Nils Philippsen wrote:
>> ...
>>> I've attached a list of packages and (co)maintainers, to easily find if
>>> one of your packages is affected or not.
>> ...
>>> iwhd: meyering - clalance,zaitcev
>>
>> Thank you for the list.
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Dennis Gilmore writes:
>> El Thu, 05 Jan 2012 12:16:34 -0500
>> Tom Lane escribió:
>>> So I submitted a routine bodhi request for updating mysql, and was
>>> astonished to find that it's marked as critpath. It was never that
>>> before. Who dec
On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 5:51 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Peter Robinson writes:
>> On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 5:36 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
>>> That answer doesn't make me any happier. I've got a problem with being
>>> saddled with an extra layer of bureaucracy without an
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 4:18 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 04:55:10PM +0100, Marc-André Lureau wrote:
>> On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 4:22 PM, Richard W.M. Jones
>> wrote:
>> > I agree with Ralf. Vala files are meaningless except for people who
>> > care about vala, so they
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 6:21 PM, Emmanuel Seyman
wrote:
> * Christophe Fergeau [17/01/2012 19:16] :
>>
>> By that reasoning, shouldn't we also fold python bindings in the -devel
>> package? They are small, python is already implicitly installed, so this
>> should be fine too.
>
> This is going to
On Wed, Jan 18, 2012 at 2:30 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Following up with notes from FUDCon.
>
> Bill Nottingham (nott...@redhat.com) said:
>> == Distribution construction ==
>>
>> For this, we will continue to use groups in comps.
>>
>> PRO:
>> - Don't have to change any distribution tools
>> -
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 1:54 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said:
>> Great idea, I would also love to see a clear out of the packages that
>> aren't core/part of particular categories. MTAs in minimal would be
>> one that comes to mind
On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 10:56 PM, Greg wrote:
> will BTRFS be default in F17? going by a story posted on Phoronix there's
> likely to be a fsck next month?
> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTA0Njk
I've heard that for months now. It's also post alpha and feature
freeze so I ver
On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 7:22 AM, drago01 wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 24, 2012 at 12:04 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 10:56 PM, Greg wrote:
>>> will BTRFS be default in F17? going by a story posted on Phoronix there's
>>> likely t
Hi All,
So I saw a rpm update and a number of other builds today when dealing
with various packaging bits. Checking the update [1] and reading the
attached bug [2] I was a little shocked to find that "yum upgrade"
between releases would be explicitly broken due to this feature.
Yes, I know that i
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 1:34 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 25, 2012 at 10:48:27PM +0000, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> So I saw a rpm update and a number of other builds today when dealing
>> with various packaging bits. Checking the update [1] and
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 8:24 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Reindl Harald wrote:
>> i made several HUNDRET of dist-upgrades with yum since FC3 and
>> upgrade via DVD/Preupgrade is simply UNACEPPTABLE
>
> +1
>
> IMHO this is a showstopper and approval for UsrMove should be withdrawn and
> the "feature"
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 2:43 PM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
> Am 25.01.2012 23:48, schrieb Peter Robinson:
>> Hi All,
>>
>> So I saw a rpm update and a number of other builds today when dealing
>> with various packaging bits. Checking the update [1] and reading the
>>
On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 3:22 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 09:25:31AM +0000, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> On Thu, Jan 26, 2012 at 1:34 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>> >
>> > IIRC from the discussion in FPC meetings, there should be a way to make yum
&
On Sat, Feb 4, 2012 at 2:50 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-02-03 at 18:10 -0800, darrell pfeifer wrote:
>
>> If you want to respect people who are testing, then maybe there is
>> something better than "we don't have to exercise any care and we don't
>> care, wink, wink, grin."
>>
>>
>>
On Thu, Feb 16, 2012 at 11:43 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-02-16 at 22:47 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> Bill Nottingham wrote:
>> > Ian Pilcher (arequip...@gmail.com) said:
>> >> Anaconda in Fedora 17 Alpha RC2 cannot upload tracebacks to Bugzilla,
>> >> because Bugzilla doesn't think
On Mon, Feb 27, 2012 at 2:34 AM, Paul Wouters wrote:
>
>
> I was asked to look into this. libglfw is retired, but has dependancies
> that need it. It was added to Fedora on Nov 16, and retured by notting
> on July 25th, but it does not say why.
>
> Can this package be revived? If needed, I'll take
Hi Bill,
It was my understanding that packages that are FTBFS prior to F-15 (ie
not had a successful build in F-15 or later) were suppose to be
retired/blocked as well. The following list are FTBFS from at least
the F-15 mass rebuild and in some cases even the F-12 one but haven't
been blocked and
Hi Rich,
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 1:03 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 05:26:02PM -0600, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>> On Sun, Mar 04, 2012 at 17:46:45 +0000,
>> Peter Robinson wrote:
>> > freetennis-0.4.8-18.fc12
>>
>> Note that freete
On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said:
>> It was my understanding that packages that are FTBFS prior to F-15 (ie
>> not had a successful build in F-15 or later)
>
> It's done off the F15FTBFS bug. If these don
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 6:02 PM, Till Maas wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 05, 2012 at 06:36:23PM +0000, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> On Mon, Mar 5, 2012 at 4:13 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>> > Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said:
>> >> It was my understanding that package
On Wed, Mar 7, 2012 at 7:06 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said:
>> > At least for aircrack-ng from your list no FTBFS bug has been filed,
>> > therefore I do not see any reason to remove it from Fedora. And in case
>> > it really
On Wed, Mar 14, 2012 at 12:24 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> I wrote:
>
>> Brian C. Lane wrote:
>>> I am going to be leaving parted at 3.0 for F17, I don't want to
>>> introduce a large change at this stage.
>>
>> This is really unhelpful, it's going to leave frontends with no way to
>> readd support f
On Fri, Mar 16, 2012 at 9:41 PM, Muayyad AlSadi wrote:
> hi,
>
> I made a spin with gimp pre-installed and found that webkitgtk and
> webkitgtk3 both installed
>
> the old webkitgtk is installed only because of gimp
>
> is there any plan to port gimp to webkitgtk3
It would require the entire app
On Mar 19, 2012 4:19 PM, "Petr Machata" wrote:
>
> Hi there,
>
> we (the Boost maintainers) intend to bump boost to a more recent version
> in course of Fedora 18 development.
The Fedora 18 feature process is already open so I suggest you submit all
these details to there so Fresco can review
Pe
On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 10:01 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 4:13 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 15, 2010 at 08:43:39PM +0100, Karel Klic wrote:
>>> Dne 12.11.2010 17:35, Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
>>> > Any other exciting work in progress that might land in F15 that pe
On Thu, Nov 18, 2010 at 9:16 PM, Matt Domsch wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 09:32:37AM -0500, Jon Masters wrote:
>> I've had a few off-list conversations with various community members
>> about this. One thing that came up was that the alternative namespace is
>> necessary, but also that "lom" i
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 5:22 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-11-18 at 14:15 -0700, Linuxguy123 wrote:
>> I realize that most people on this mailing list are focused on
>> infrastructure and server/desktop usage.
>>
>> But some of us are looking forward to using future Fedora releases on
On Sat, Nov 20, 2010 at 9:53 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Sat, 20 Nov 2010 18:32:26 +0100
> Michał Piotrowski wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> 2010/11/12 Kevin Fenzi :
>> > Any other exciting work in progress that might land in F15 that
>> > people are actively working on?
>>
>> How about removing some old u
> Here is a list of the current known potentially bad builds and what
> action could be or has been taken:
The below I either maintain or co-maintain.
Ignore, I have another build that needs to be pushed:
> syncevolution - update in testing
Fine to tag for F-14, its obsolete in F-15 (I thought i
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Petr Pisar wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Few days ago I started to get very usefull notifications that my
> critical package, mingetty-1.08-6.fc13, `has been in 'testing' status
> for over 2 weeks, and has yet to be approved.'
>
> I doubt such mails help me as the package ma
On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 1:36 PM, Petr Pisar wrote:
> On 2010-11-29, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> On Mon, Nov 29, 2010 at 9:56 AM, Petr Pisar wrote:
>>
>> Proven testers do get copies of these emails (dozens of them) and its
>> also summarised in the updates-testing report
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 11:31 AM, Rudolf Kastl wrote:
> After installing the complete stack yesterday and trying to login i
> figured that it doesent work in the current state. Havent deeply
> analyzed it but the first errors in the logs are related to consolekit
> [00.67]
>
> [11545] user "rka
On Fri, Dec 3, 2010 at 1:21 PM, Milan Crha wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-12-03 at 12:47 +0200, Debarshi Ray wrote:
>> > I know I'm not following the NonResponsiveMaintainer policy closely, but
>> > I believe, in this particular case, it would be with no gain.
>> >
>> > I'm fine to take ownership of the li
On Sat, Dec 4, 2010 at 11:02 AM, Debarshi Ray wrote:
>> I see [1] the libical is not orphaned yet, neither in devel, nor in F14,
>> as I "only" can add myself to the package, but not take ownership as
>> with other orphaned packages.
>
> I think what happens is when the owner orphans a package one
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 1:12 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Wed, 08 Dec 2010 01:05:06 +
> Bastien Nocera wrote:
>
> ...snip...
>
>> > The
>> > lists may be broken down by when they last did build. With 3
>> > exceptions, these 110 bugs are all still in NEW state as well, so
>> > they haven't h
On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 8:50 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-12-08 at 01:05 +, Bastien Nocera wrote:
>
>> And I'll go back to fixing actual bugs encountered by people instead of
>> random bot-driven bugs.
>
> every abrt report, ever, is an actual bug encountered by an actual
> person.
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 8:58 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-12-09 at 09:45 +0100, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
>
>> One use of features (and I don't want to say the only one!!!) is for
>> marketing
>> purposes. And actually - it works! I read several Fedora reviews, people
>> talking
>> abou
On Thu, Dec 9, 2010 at 12:43 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Wed, Dec 08, 2010 at 11:48:26AM +0000, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> On Wed, Dec 8, 2010 at 8:50 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> > so are all these bugs, for that matter: they're actual bugs encountered
>> >
On Wed, Jan 5, 2011 at 6:51 PM, Siddhesh Poyarekar wrote:
> Hi,
>
> The upstream shotwell does not build with vala 0.11.* since there are
> a bunch of incompatible changes between vala-0.10.x and 0.11.x. Is
> there a plan to have a parallel installable vala-0.10.x in
> rawhide/f15?
I was looking
On Sun, Jan 16, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Jason D. Clinton wrote:
> There's a twenty second pause in my boot sequence, shown below, before GDM
> starts and I'm not certain if it's in NetworkManager waiting on org.bluez,
> bluez itself or the bluez systemd unit file. (Or maybe I'm completely off.)
> Later o
On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 6:54 AM, Garrett Holmstrom
wrote:
> It seems that the "core" yum group pulls in X11 libraries, at the very
> least on x86_64, via the following dependency chain:
>
> policycoreutils
> dbus-glib
> gobject-introspection
> cairo
> libX11
>
> Does that much seriously need to be
On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 5:45 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> On Mon, Jan 24, 2011 at 09:25:45AM -0800, John Reiser wrote:
>> On 01/24/2011 07:43 AM, drago01 wrote:
>> > It is the only 32bit only CPU still being sold,
>>
>> There are plenty of machines with 32-bit only CPUs (such as early Celeron,
Hi Milan,
On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 4:16 PM, Milan Crha wrote:
> Hi,
> Evolution team drops support for gtk2 in 2.91.6 release of
> evolution-related packages (gtkhtml3, evolution-data-server and
> evolution) which might make trouble for dependent packages which are
> still gtk2. I expect th
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 7:52 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
>> it's a design feature, we are told. the intent is that applications
>> should offer the option to set themselves as the default, instead of the
>> desktop providing a central config point.
>
> To the GNOME developers (
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 5:11 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> (Attempting to CC relevant spins/groups maintainers)
>
> I'm looking to do some rework of the base-x comps group. Right now, its
> main purpose in life is to provide the X server that is used by the
> various desktops (and the window-manager
On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 6:00 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> for gcc-4.6, xz compression changes, and to a lesser extent we will be doing a
> mass rebuild starting monday. it will be done in a side tag with a lower than
> normal priority so that you can still submit builds and not have to w
> Orphan libfakekey
I grabbed this one.
Peter
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi Hans.
I'll get this one done for you, can you do
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=663926
Peter
On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 10:17 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've a package in need of a review, I'll happily swap another review in
> return:
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug
On Mon, Feb 7, 2011 at 8:59 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Each release, we undergo the effort to track down owners for orphaned
> packages in the release, and block those orphaned packages where
> necessary. It's that time again for Fedora 15.
>
> The following packages are currently orphaned and e
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 10:58 PM, Ben Boeckel wrote:
> John Reiser wrote:
>> The mass rebuild has broken the dependencies of packages in rawhide,
>> and I'm upset about it.
>>
>> For instance, fresh install General Desktop from DVD made just after
>> the mass rebuild, then boot the new system and
On Sat, Feb 12, 2011 at 11:52 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>
>> On Friday, February 11, 2011 04:16:44 am Christoph Wickert wrote:
>>> On IRC you said it is ok to just push a build. Do I now need to submit
>>> them through bodhi?
>>
>> yes you need to push them though bodhi.
>
>
On Wed, Feb 16, 2011 at 7:46 AM, Paul Howarth wrote:
> On Mon, 14 Feb 2011 11:51:21 -0600
> Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Feb 14, 2011 at 18:35:54 +0100,
>> Ralf Corsepius wrote:
>> >
>> > I was looking into fixing the 10-15 perl-packages, which have made
>> > it into current f15, even t
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Ric Wheeler wrote:
> On 02/24/2011 08:44 AM, Matej Cepl wrote:
>> Dne 23.2.2011 20:49, Matthew Garrett napsal(a):
>>> btrfs does the former without anywhere near as much of the latter.
>> BTRFS so far only makes my kernel panicking as it did anytime I have
>> been
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 1:31 PM, Ric Wheeler wrote:
> On 02/25/2011 04:06 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 7:54 PM, Ric Wheeler wrote:
>>>
>>> On 02/24/2011 08:44 AM, Matej Cepl wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Dne 23.2.2011 20:
On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 9:07 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On 2/25/11 12:51 PM, Chris Lumens wrote:
This was the same realization that
led to the removal of the labeled "minimal" install, too many people
just wanted to argue over the meaning of the term "minimal".
>>>
>>> ? There's sti
On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 9:51 PM, Paul Johnson
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm just in the process of a final package for mono-2.10.1 and would like to
> garner some opinions before the final spin.
>
> Currently, there is a mono-4-preview sub-package which is an optional extra.
> The .NET 4 stuff is pretty sta
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 6:44 AM, Paul Johnson
wrote:
> Hi,
>
>> I'd like to see the contents of the package moved around so that when
>> I install something like banshee I don't need to install mono-devel
>> and have it pull in all the dev packages that I don't need on a
>> netbook that I never use
On Tue, Mar 8, 2011 at 3:55 PM, Jason D. Clinton wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 7, 2011 at 08:56, Christian Weiß
> wrote:
>>
>> Consider an installation of about ~600 low budget thin-clients (with
>> almost no 3D support from the graphics chip) running as X-Terminals. Those
>> thin-client stations are serv
On Tue, Mar 15, 2011 at 8:41 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Andy Lawrence (dr.die...@gmail.com) said:
>> More packages using/tagged for hal-libs? Or perhaps just dependencies that
>> will need to be fixed.
>
> This is a cascade via gnome-vfs2; most all of these don't require HAL
> directly.
That p
On Fri, Apr 30, 2010 at 2:43 PM, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> I'd like to update the gpsd package to the latest version 2.94. If
> there will be no objections, probably sometimes next week.
>
> Unfortunately, there were non-trivial API changes since version 2.39
> that break most of the dependent pac
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 9:21 PM, James Laska wrote:
> Greetings folks,
>
> According to the schedule [1], Fedora 13 is scheduled to enter the
> release candidate phase this Thursday, May 4, 2010. In order to enter
> this phase, all OPEN F13Blocker bugs must be in MODIFIED or ON_QA.
>
> At the time
On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 11:46 PM, Mathieu Bridon
wrote:
> On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 00:36, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
>>> Hmm, this is what I did this a couple times, i.e. I forward the
>>> backtrace to upstream without including any other information, since
>>> the user does not pro
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 10:02 AM, Mike Chambers wrote:
> The "mark the selected messages as not junk" icon is now missing after
> this morning (last night?) 's updates.
I think its fixed in updates-testing in the push that was just
published to the list.
Peter
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.f
On Wed, May 5, 2010 at 10:48 AM, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-05-04 at 22:22 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> On Tue, May 4, 2010 at 9:21 PM, James Laska wrote:
>> > Greetings folks,
>> >
>> > According to the schedule [1], Fedora 13 is scheduled to en
On Tue, May 11, 2010 at 6:01 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-05-11 at 10:57 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
>> Does that have anything to do with me adding 2 bugs to the blockers the
>> day before the go/no-go meeting?
>
> Nope, not at all. It's very important that everybody still be able to
2010/5/20 Conan Kudo (ニール・ゴンパ) :
> On Thu, May 20, 2010 at 3:25 PM, Adam Miller
> wrote:
>>
>> +1
>>
>> -AdamM (from Android )
>>
>> On May 20, 2010 1:50 PM, "Jesse Keating" wrote:
>>
>> On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 11:28 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> > On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 23:51 +0530, Rahul...
>>
On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 8:14 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-05-21 at 13:47 -0400, Andy Gospodarek wrote:
>> On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 11:21:01AM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> > Peter Robinson wrote:
>> > > I don't see when the support la
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 11:34 PM, Lennart Poettering
wrote:
> On Sun, 23.05.10 02:40, Rahul Sundaram (methe...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
>>
>> On 05/23/2010 02:36 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>> >
>> > (And as a side note: systemd by default puts a tmpfs to both /var/run
>> > and /var/lock).
>> >
>>
>>
Arriving fashionably late the Fedora Moblin spin is now here.
Its based on the Moblin 2.1 UX.
You can download it from its spin page here
http://spins.fedoraproject.org/moblin/
With MeeGo 1.0 Netbook out I'm now reviewing what is required to get
the UX into Fedora. Details and updates regarding
101 - 200 of 1607 matches
Mail list logo
