On Wed, Jan 13, 2010 at 6:08 PM, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
> Hello All!
>
> 2010/1/13 Mike McGrath :
>> I'm orphaning nagios, nrpe and nagios-plugins. I just don't use them
>> anymore. If you use them and want to help out, get too it!
>
> I can take nagios and nagios-plugins. Anyone else volunteerin
On Tue, Jan 19, 2010 at 10:06 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-01-19 at 11:44 +0100, Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
>
> > > Package updates to ABRT
> > > should receive a lot of testing in order to avoid rushed "stable"
> > releases
> > > that result in less useful bz tickets.
> >
> > I agree, we
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 4:11 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 01/22/2010 04:24 PM, Przemek Klosowski wrote:
> > On 01/22/2010 07:53 AM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> >> On 01/22/2010 01:22 PM, Tomas Mraz wrote:
> >
> >>> These are checksums required by FIPS-140-2 integrity verification
> checks
> >>> of
> anjuta-2.31.90.0-1.fc14
> ---
> * Sun Aug 22 2010 Debarshi Ray - 1:2.31.90.0-1
> - Version bump to 2.31.90.0.
> * Initial support for Python plugins.
> * Language support for Vala got a major update.
> * Python is now fully supported.
> * Snippets plugin from Google Summe
On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 5:34 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 24, 2010 at 02:44:34PM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 23, 2010 at 07:01:16PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> > Is it really necessary to include entire package change logs in the
>>
On Sun, Sep 26, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Peter Lemenkov wrote:
> Hello All!
>
> I would like to exchange review requests - someone may pick up each of
> these three easy-to-review Erlang-related applications, and I will
> finish your stalled review request. One mine package for one yours -
> that's quite
On Tue, Sep 28, 2010 at 6:18 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Adam Williamson wrote:
>> Why do you think it's a good idea to except netbooks?
>
> The netbook issue can be solved by a simple "Download Netbook Version" link
> (along with a clear warning on the default download that it's only for
> desktop/
Hi All,
I ran a session with a group of interested people at FUDCon Zurich
titled "Fedora Mini, Moblin, MeeGo, Sugar. oh my!" and there was a
great and interesting conversation between a number of parties
interested in Fedora on small devices. There were representatives from
Fedora people inte
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 11:22 AM, Richard Hughes wrote:
> On 5 October 2010 09:55, FlorianFesti wrote:
>> Sorry for my may be naive question: Why do we need to know if we are
>> docked or not. Isn't there exactly the same situation if the external
>> Monitor is directly connected to the laptop? If
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 7:28 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-10-05 at 19:20 +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 11:18:32AM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>
>> > don't we already have default behaviours based on the lid switch,
>> > anyway? So why don't we have this pr
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 7:36 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 07:31:54PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 7:28 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> > So we could at least cover the case where you plug in an external
>> > monitor, the
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 8:00 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 05, 2010 at 07:53:25PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 7:36 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> >> The BIOS generally manages to get that one correct, can we not query
>> >> a
On Tue, Oct 5, 2010 at 11:27 PM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> As you might be aware, there was a period of roughly two weeks where a
> gcc build (gcc-4.5.1-3.fc14) in the buildroots for both Fedora 14 and
> Fedora 15. Items built with this could have
> PPS I did not modify my bump script yet to attempt a commit to master
> and merge to the f14 branch. In the interest of time, I took the easy
> route and just did commits to the f14 branch. Maintainers can do a
> merge and fixup after the builds have been done if they wish to have
> their bran
On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 11:52 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-10-25 at 17:55 -0400, Bill Nottingham wrote:
>> Colin Walters (walt...@verbum.org) said:
>> > On Mon, Oct 25, 2010 at 5:21 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
>> > >
>> > > Unfortunately we didn't notice this dependency until pretty lat
On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 6:01 PM, Lars Seipel wrote:
> On Sunday 24 October 2010 20:24:30 Kalev Lember wrote:
>> KDE is pretty much self contained, whereas a Qt upgrade affects a much
>> larger number of packages. I don't think updating Qt to a new major
>> version in a stable Fedora release is a g
2010/11/5 Marcela Mašláňová :
> On 11/04/2010 08:32 PM, Michael Schwendt wrote:
>> On Thu, 4 Nov 2010 17:41:34 + (UTC), Daniel wrote:
>>
>>> Release of libxml2-2.7.8
>>>
>>> libxml2.spec | 10 --
>> Seems to break the koji build root due to ABI incompatibility.
> Dependent packag
On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 9:35 PM, Petr Machata wrote:
> Hi there,
>
> in accordance with the announced Fedora feature[1][2], we (the Boost
> maintainers) plan to rebase Boost to 1.47.0 really soon now. Boost
> 1.47.0 has been released recently and Denis Arnaud kindly did the
> packaging, so it is
On Wed, Jul 20, 2011 at 8:28 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Each release, before branching, we block currently orphaned packages.
> It's that time again for Fedora 16.
>
> New this go-round is that we are also blocking packages that have
> failed to build since before Fedora 14.
>
> The following p
On Mon, Jul 25, 2011 at 4:30 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
> * Toshio Kuratomi [2011-07-23 20:03]:
> > On Sat, Jul 23, 2011 at 02:00:24PM -0700, Douglas Myers–Turnbull wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Just something I wanted to bring to attention:
> > >
> > > Java 7 is slated for release (after years of h
On Tue, Jul 26, 2011 at 8:13 PM, Fabian Deutsch wrote:
> Am Dienstag, den 26.07.2011, 11:28 -0400 schrieb Bill Nottingham:
> > Fabian Deutsch (fabian.deut...@gmx.de) said:
> > > It seems as if my first mail (from 12 days ago) got lost:
> > > I can take
> > >
> > > > Orphan link-grammar
> >
> > It'
On Tue, Aug 2, 2011 at 6:07 PM, Adam Miller
wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 02, 2011 at 11:00:43AM -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > Abiword is currently broken in f16/rawhide due to the retiring of
> > link-grammar (a FTBFS retiree).
> >
> > This is currently breaking the Xfce, LXDE, and soas spins.
> >
> > Wou
> mesa-7.11-1.fc17
>
> * Tue Aug 02 2011 Adam Jackson 7.11-1
> - Mesa 7.11
> - Redo the driver arch exclusion, yet again. Dear secondary arches: unless
> it's an on-motherboard driver like i915, all PCI drivers are to be built
> for all PCI arches.
>
>
Dear X maintainers,
We w
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 6:31 PM, Farkas Levente wrote:
> On 08/08/2011 04:07 PM, Josef Bacik wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 9:22 AM, Genes MailLists wrote:
>>> On 08/08/2011 08:55 AM, Josef Bacik wrote:
On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 8:53 AM, Matej Cepl wrote:
> On 8.8.2011 14:44, Josef Bacik
I've done rawhide. It seems I don't have the permissions to do a
builld override even though I'm a proven packager and secondary arch
maintainer.
If you could submit the build-override for the package I'll rebuild
abiword for f-16.
Peter
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 6:30 AM, Johannes Lips
wrote:
> Ju
hope this was in line with the general guidelines of this process.
>
> Johannes
> On 08/09/2011 10:36 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> I've done rawhide. It seems I don't have the permissions to do a
>> builld override even though I'm a proven packager and secondary ar
On Tue, Aug 9, 2011 at 3:51 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, 09 Aug 2011 15:40:58 +0200
> Johannes Lips wrote:
>
>> Ok, did that now. If you need any further action from my side, just
>> let me know.
>
> Please note that I have a update with no link-grammar in as:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.or
Hi All,
I'm going to orphan and block from F-16/rawhide google-gadgets and
ethos unless anyone is interested in picking them up. They're both
pretty dead upstream.
google-gadgets needs to be ported to the latest xulrunner and while
meego has a fork that fixes and improves it quite a bit I don't
b
On Thu, Aug 11, 2011 at 5:32 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-08-10 at 09:02 -0400, Doug Ledford wrote:
>> Can we please either disable these nag messages or give developers the
>> ability to push a package regardless of testing when it reaches nag age?
>
> You have that ability for non-c
On Tue, Aug 16, 2011 at 9:45 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
> I have a package in the F16 branch (copied from F15) that ended up
> having a dependency issue with the boost libraries. I have rebuilt the
> package for F16 to take care of this but I couldn't find anything on
> the wiki[1] to tell me if I sh
2011/8/19 Matěj Cepl :
> Dne 9.8.2011 00:24, Adam Williamson napsal(a):
>>
>> A bit of detective work led to:
>>
>> https://bugs.archlinux.org/task/24615
>>
>> apparently Arch has been seeing the same thing. They've addressed it by
>> reverting the following upstream glibc commit:
>>
>>
>> http://s
On Mon, Aug 22, 2011 at 1:42 AM, Noriko Mizumoto
wrote:
> Dear Fedora package maintainers
>
> To have Fedora 16 high standard in non-English versions, Fedora
> Localization will have our review packages process using the image
> composed specifically for this purpose. This image will be composed
>
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:13:48PM -0700, Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
>> Neither bodhi nor mash appears to consider systemd to be in the critical
>> path. Why is this? Is that the way we want it to be?
>>
> We should get that corrected. not
On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 4:36 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-08-25 at 15:43 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> On Thu, Aug 25, 2011 at 7:32 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>> > On Wed, Aug 24, 2011 at 10:13:48PM -0700, Garrett Holmstrom wrote:
>> >> Neither bodh
On Fri, Aug 26, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Andy Grimm wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 3, 2011 at 6:00 PM, Deepak Bhole wrote:
>> * Douglas Myers–Turnbull [2011-07-25 20:53]:
>>> > I was planning to do this myself .. glad you started it :) I can take
>>> > over the Feature and doing all the work if you're fine with i
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 4:06 AM, Jon Masters wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-08-26 at 09:51 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
>
>> To participate, visit the following link:
>>
>> http://scotland.proximity.on.ca/fedora-arm/f15hardfp/bootstrap/rootfs_stage4_20110825/
>
> Just a quick update that we've had mock builde
On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 7:22 PM, Jon Masters wrote:
> On Mon, 2011-08-29 at 19:13 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> On Mon, Aug 29, 2011 at 4:06 AM, Jon Masters wrote:
>> > On Fri, 2011-08-26 at 09:51 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
>> >
>> >> To participate, vis
On Tue, Aug 30, 2011 at 12:43 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/libtalloc-2.0.6-1.fc15
>
> This CRITPATH package has been in update-testing for 20 days without any
> karma. The same package went to stable in F16 a week ago with karma
> automatism.
>
> If you us
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 2:47 PM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 2:16 AM, Christoph Frieben
> wrote:
>> 2011/9/8 "Jóhann B. Guðmundsson":
>>> On behalf of the systemd convertion team Just wanted to say thanks to
>>> Tom "Spot" Callaway he's been on fire today packaging submitted unit
On Fri, Sep 30, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-09-30 at 15:47 +0200, Nicolas Mailhot wrote:
>
>>
>> There's nothing to do apart from waiting for enough complains to pile up the
>> people in charge get past their reality denial phase.
>>
>
> This thread could have let to so
On Sat, Oct 1, 2011 at 9:29 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi All,
>
> Please note that I'm not claiming that the critpath process is broken
> in general. But it does not work for certain components. To be specific
> it does not work for Xorg drivers for non common hardware.
>
> This morning bodhi sen
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 8:40 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Sat, 08 Oct 2011 14:14:50 -0500
> Michael Cronenworth wrote:
>
>> On 10/08/2011 01:15 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> > If Ubuntu is doing a better job than us of shipping an updated
>> > version of OUR OWN FEATURE, we're failing very badly.
>> >
On Sat, Oct 8, 2011 at 2:43 PM, Gilboa Davara wrote:
> Hello all,
>
> Short question:
> PA 1.0 was released ~1 month ago.
> According to the wine developers, the updated mmdevapi layer (the wine
> layer that emulates the Windows sound system) more-or-less requires
> current PA (1.0?) to work relia
On Tue, Oct 11, 2011 at 3:35 PM, Nathan O. wrote:
> I am curious or maybe giving an idea, but I have my package listed there and
> currently there is an update for the package I have added to the list. Well
> I have the package in bodhi, which I believe is in testing right now. The
> problem is t
Hey Adam,
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 2:17 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hey, folks. There's a grub update in updates-testing atm (being pushed
> stable soon) which splits the EFI stuff off into a new grub-efi
> subpackage. If you have an EFI install of F16 you will need to have
> grub-efi installed o
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 4:26 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 12:29 +0300, Kalev Lember wrote:
>> On 10/12/2011 04:17 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> > Hey, folks. There's a grub update in updates-testing atm (being pushed
>> > stable soon) which splits the EFI stuff off into a new
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 6:51 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 18:41 +0100, Richard Hughes wrote:
>> On 12 October 2011 17:44, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> > All existing users of the Fedora Account System (FAS) at
>> > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts are required to change the
On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 7:01 PM, drago01 wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 7:53 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>> On Wed, 2011-10-12 at 13:45 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote:
>>
>>> I have no problem with changing the password, but leave my ssh keys
>>> alone, unless there is a real reason to ask people to ch
2011/10/12 Henrik Nordström :
> The password change is understandable, but why force an SSH key change
> with such short notice?
>
> And what if the SSH key is a hard token (smartcard) which can not be
> copied or trivially changed? Switching to a soft key would be mostly
> counter-productive from
On Fri, Oct 14, 2011 at 9:39 AM, Panu Matilainen
wrote:
> On 10/13/2011 01:30 AM, Bojan Smojver wrote:
>> This is probably not worthy of a bug report, but may still be useful to
>> confirm a problem that someone else may have experienced.
>>
>> I resurrected an old notebook (HP Pavilion ZE4201) to
On Tue, Oct 25, 2011 at 8:17 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-10-25 at 18:54 +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
>> It's rather too complex to explain the change here, so I suggest
>> you go and read these first:
>>
>> http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.comp.version-control.git/184205
>> http:
On 2 Nov 2011 07:57, "Paul Johnson" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> For some reason, Evolution is not finding any of the plugins or anything.
It'll start but has on the title bar
>
> (null) Evolution.
>
> From the command line, I'm getting this
>
> [paul@PB3 ~]$ evolution
>
> e-utils-WARNING **: /usr/lib64/evo
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 2:53 PM, Kaleb S. KEITHLEY wrote:
> Tell us again where to find that "gnome shell for dummies" doc?
The cheat sheet? http://live.gnome.org/GnomeShell/CheatSheet
> I tried to give it a fair trial, but I found it so
> non-intuitive/counter-intuitive that I gave up after an h
On Tue, Mar 22, 2011 at 4:57 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> Jon Ciesla wrote:
>> nucleo wrote:
>>
>>> There are some other packages was orphaned today by thomasj:
>>>
>>> e_dbus
>>> ecore
>>> edje
>>> eet
>>> efreet
>>> embryo
>>> enlightenment
>>> epeg
>>> epsilon
>>> evas
>>> ewl
>>> freeciv
>>>
>>>
>>
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 1:27 AM, Tom Lane wrote:
> For the past several days I've been getting daily nagmails about the
> fact that libtiff hasn't been pushed into f13 (example attached).
> Because it's a critpath package, I as the lowly maintainer do not have
> privileges to push it stable, not ev
On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 11:36 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 04/11/2011 04:02 PM, Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> Now that Vala 0.12 is out, Renich has inquired whether we can update the
>> F-14 package.
>>
>> I wouldn't push an update unless all packages that require Valencia ca
On Tue, Apr 12, 2011 at 5:34 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-04-12 at 12:12 -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
>
>> And input is even briefer (evdev, synaptics, wacom, vmmouse). I'd like
>> to chop the -drivers metapackage down to just this set, and either make
>> a new metapackage in optional
Hi All,
Anyone wish to swap a review. It should be a fairly simple Sugar Activity.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697697
Peter
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Thanks,
Peter
On Tue, Apr 19, 2011 at 10:05 AM, Sergio Pascual wrote:
> Hi
>
> I will take it. Here is mine
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=654583
>
> Regards
>
> 2011/4/19 Peter Robinson :
>> Hi All,
>>
>> Anyone wish to swap a review
On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> I noticed that gnome-applets is obsoleted by gnome-panel, but is still in
> the F15 repo. It probably shouldn't be. There are at least a few other
> gnome-applet related packages in the same boat, so it might be worth doing
> a search for a
On Mon, May 16, 2011 at 7:00 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Peter Robinson (pbrobin...@gmail.com) said:
>> On Sat, May 14, 2011 at 3:37 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>> > I noticed that gnome-applets is obsoleted by gnome-panel, but is still in
>> > the F15 repo. It proba
I will be unable to attend tomorrow but I have concerns of making btrfs
default without a well tested fsck. I'm aware one is due soon but I don't
believe 3-4 months is enough time to test it well enough. On 2.6.38.x I
still get regular kernel abrt crashes on resume. Is it even marked stable in
the
On 1 Jun 2011 19:44, "Josef Bacik" wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jun 1, 2011 at 11:15 AM, Peter Robinson
wrote:
> > I will be unable to attend tomorrow but I have concerns of making btrfs
> > default without a well tested fsck. I'm aware one is due soon but I
don't
&g
On 1 Jun 2011 21:54, "Ville Skyttä" wrote:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=709647
>
> I'd like to have bash-completion included in F-16's default install. In
> my opinion it's in a good enough shape for that already now, and with my
> upstream hat on I expect things to further imp
On Jun 2, 2011 9:26 PM, "Josh Stone" wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Our dtrace script in systemtap-sdt-devel starts "#!/usr/bin/python".
> Usually this leads to an implicit "Requires: /usr/bin/python", but for
> some reason our rawhide build did not get this. The F15, F14, and F13
> builds from the same spec
On 2 Jun 2011 15:32, "Michael Cronenworth" wrote:
>
> On 06/02/2011 09:07 AM, seth vidal wrote:
> > +1 - I've found the impact of bash completion on disconnected machines
> > to be negative. I don't install it anymore for that reason.
>
> Sounds like a bug instead of a con.
I believe it has to r
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 2:10 AM, Chris Tyler wrote:
> On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 20:53 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
>> [0] We're making a "one time" incompatible ABI switch in F-15 bringup to
>> the "hard float" ABI defined in section 6 of the ARM AAPCS (commonly
>> referred to as the ARM EABI - but that d
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 12:18 PM, Gordan Bobic wrote:
> On 06/05/2011 02:10 AM, Chris Tyler wrote:
>> On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 20:53 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
>>> [0] We're making a "one time" incompatible ABI switch in F-15 bringup to
>>> the "hard float" ABI defined in section 6 of the ARM AAPCS (co
On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 12:22 PM, Gordan Bobic wrote:
> On 06/05/2011 09:54 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
>> On Sun, Jun 5, 2011 at 2:10 AM, Chris Tyler wrote:
>>> On Sat, 2011-06-04 at 20:53 -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
>>>> [0] We're making a "one time&quo
On Thu, Jun 9, 2011 at 11:37 PM, Dave Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 02:00:57PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 08:01:06PM +1000, Chris Jones wrote:
> >
> > > I agree. As virtualization technology becomes more and more involved
> > > and frequent on users syst
On 11 Jun 2011 03:35, "Rahul Sundaram" wrote:
>
> On 06/11/2011 05:20 AM, Genes MailLists wrote:
> > Lets be blunt here - he pushed very very very hard on these very lists
> > to get systemd in - now its in F15 and there are problems - so no
> > punting please. Upstream and fedora are the same f
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 9:17 AM, drago01 wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 10, 2011 at 3:07 PM, Denys Vlasenko
> wrote:
> > Hi Lennart,
> >
> > systemd is eating a lot more memory than any other init process
> > I ever played with.
> >
> > Granted, systemd does a bit more that "typical" init, but I think
> >
On Sat, Jun 11, 2011 at 12:50 AM, Genes MailLists wrote:
> On 06/10/2011 03:13 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>
>
> > what would be really nice is to redirect systemd discussions to its
> > upstream mailing list. Fedora devel is hardly the best place for it.
> >
> > Rahul
>
> Beg to differ - rather v
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 1:29 PM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> Now you need to persuade Red Hat to fund a bigger ARM build server
> than the one Canonical are building :-)
>
>
> http://thetanktheory.squarespace.com/this-8-bit-life/2011/6/10/ubuntu-linux-pandabuilder.html
> https://dmtechtalk.wordpre
On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 5:05 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 13, 2011 at 06:01:22PM +0200, Denys Vlasenko wrote:
> > On Mon, 2011-06-13 at 17:29 +0200, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> > > We load a couple of kernel modules which systemd needs, and are
> > > sometimes compiled as module only a
Hey All,
Sorry for the late notice but there was a soname bump in gssdp/gupnp that I
missed. Most of the broken packages have now been rebuilt and it should be
cleaned up for the next rawhide run.
Cheers,
Peter
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/m
On Sat, Jun 18, 2011 at 1:13 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> In terminal
>
> systemctl status plymouth*
> returns no units.
>
> systemctl list-units
> returns too much
>
> What woul I use to list just a subsection,
> like plymouth* or any other similar services.
>
>
How about "systemctl list-units| gre
On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) <
fo...@hubbitus.com.ru> wrote:
> **
> 23.06.2011 19:09, Matt Domsch wrote:
>
> Below are the of packages which have outstanding FTBFS bugs from
> earlier Fedora releases. I've split them up by their 'dist' tag which
> shows when
On Wed, Jun 22, 2011 at 1:12 AM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> rstrode took over gdm and gnome-screensaver this morning.
>
> On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 03:39:28PM -0600, Andrew McNabb wrote:
> > On Tue, Jun 21, 2011 at 10:24:08AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> > > Excellent. Let me know. We're plannin
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 2:32 PM, Jochen Schmitt wrote:
> Hallo,
>
> I have a spcial question about secirity update of Firefox 4 on F-15.
>
> On
>
> http://www.heise.de/newsticker/meldung/Diskussionen-um-Versionspolitik-von-Firefox-1268009.html
> you could read, that upstream doensn't release the s
On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 5:26 PM, Camilo Mesias wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 25, 2011 at 2:04 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > ...snip...
> >
> > Can we move this back to technical, Fedora development related
> > discussion?
>
> I am slightly disappointed with this response, after all, to quote the
> original
On Fri, Jul 8, 2011 at 2:13 PM, Kevin Wilson wrote:
> Hello,
> I have biosdevname-0.3.8-1.fc15.x86_64 on fedora 15 machine.
>
> I see from
> man biosdevname , that the name of the devices should be:
> ..
> em
> for embedded NICs
>
> pci#_
> for cards in PCI sl
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 10:44 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 05:31:09PM -0400, Jon Masters wrote:
>
> > It doesn't just benefit bootstrap either. Take (random example) the
> > recent CFLAGS change in redhat-rpm-config. What should happen at that
> > point is that every packag
On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 11:49 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 11:11:52PM +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 10, 2011 at 10:44 PM, Matthew Garrett >wrote:
> > > It's certainly true that we could do more to identify ftbfs situations
> &g
On Tue, Feb 2, 2010 at 11:15 PM, Christoph Wickert <
christoph.wick...@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Sindre Pedersen Bjørdal was declared to be MIA in a fast track
> nonresponsive maintainer procedure [1, 2]. This means that we had to
> orphan all his packages, 25 in total:
>
> * DMitry -- Deepmag
Hi All,
Just to let you know I'm about to push clutter 1.1.6 to rawhide. soname
major hasn't changed so there shouldn't be an issue and it all seems fine
from the testing I've done on my local rawhide system.
Peter
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.o
On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 9:11 PM, Alain Portal wrote:
> Le mardi 09 février 2010 21:40:04, Till Maas a écrit :
> > On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 09:06:47PM +0100, Alain Portal wrote:
> > > The last available version of libplist is 0.13-2.
> > > I get the last libplist spec file which say that libplist sh
On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 2:47 PM, Jeffrey Ollie wrote:
> So is anyone going to submit a review of desktopcouch? I've been
> messing with it for a personal project so I figured I'll at least get
> the review done and get it into the repos. Long-term I'd appreciate
> some co-maintainers...
Is that
>> hornsey-1.5.2-0.1.fc13.i686 requires libclutter-gst-0.10.so.0
This is a known issue and should be resolved shortly. Its part of
'Moblin' and well the whole state is in 'flux'. watch this (well
maybe not this one) space basically more will be known soon!
>> pyclutter-gst
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 12:50 AM, Christoph Wickert
wrote:
> Why has Fedora become so fat in the F13 development cycle?
>
> * The LXDE Spin has grown from 464 MB to 509 MB [1] without a
> single change in the Spin. There actually was a change, SLIM was
> replaced with LXDM, but
On Mon, Mar 22, 2010 at 1:20 PM, Adam Miller
wrote:
> On Sun, Mar 21, 2010 at 7:50 PM, Christoph Wickert
> wrote:
>> Why has Fedora become so fat in the F13 development cycle?
>>
>> * The LXDE Spin has grown from 464 MB to 509 MB [1] without a
>> single change in the Spin. There actua
Hi All,
I've created a mailing list for fedora mini to allow more directed
discussions relating to Sugar, Moblin and anything else that people
think they would like to see in that arena. For those interested you
can join the discussions here:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/mini
>> hornsey-1.5.2-0.1.fc13.i686 requires libclutter-gst-0.10.so.0
>
> hornsey has build issues:
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2075984
Should be fixed shortly. Known issue due to some of the upstream
project changes. I'm watching it all very closely.
>> pyclut
On Tue, Mar 23, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Colin Walters wrote:
> As you may or may not know I've been unhappy with how the Live image
> path has diverged from the automated install path (standalone anaconda
> + @gnome-desktop) for the desktop.
>
> Attached is a series of patches to both comps and spin-kick
On Fri, Mar 26, 2010 at 9:39 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Peter Robinson wrote:
>>>> hornsey-1.5.2-0.1.fc13.i686 requires libclutter-gst-0.10.so.0
>>>
>>> hornsey has build issues:
>>> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2075984
>>
>
On Mon, Mar 29, 2010 at 12:03 AM, Paul wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've been away from my pc for the last couple of days and have come back
> to find a problem.
>
> When I try to do an update from yum, I'm getting the following error
>
> Error: Cannot retrieve metalink for repository: rawhide. Please verify
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 1:54 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
> Despite a heroic effort by developers and testers, we have not been able
> to reach Beta release criteria by the time of the Go / No Go meeting.
> There are still unresolved bugs and unknown test results. Because of
> this we've enacted a 1 w
On Thu, Apr 1, 2010 at 10:14 AM, Mike Chambers wrote:
> On Thu, 2010-04-01 at 08:46 +0100, Peter Robinson wrote:
>
>> I fully agree with not pushing things to stable unless they go towards
>> stabilising the beta but can we please resume pushes to testing. At
>> the
> pyclutter-gst-0.9.2-1.fc12.i686 requires libclutter-gst-0.10.so.0
This package and pyclutter-gtk have been split out into separate
packages. I've submitted the following package reviews to fix this
problem:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=579288
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/sh
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 1:48 PM, Dan Horák wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I was trying to install i686 variant of F-13 to an Alix board (2D13 with
> Geode LX) and got into troubles. The kernel boots fine, but when it
> should start initramfs the kernel panics. Everything works well when
> using complete F-12
1 - 100 of 1606 matches
Mail list logo
