> Am 03.12.2024 um 19:32 schrieb Aoife Moloney via devel-announce
> :
>
> Wiki - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SplitOpendmarcTools
> Discussion Thread -
> https://discussion.fedoraproject.org/t/f42-change-proposal-split-opendmarc-with-tools-subpackage-self-contained/138989
>
> This is
Hi Adrian,
> Am 31.01.2025 um 02:33 schrieb Adrian Edwards :
>
> Hello Fedora Devel!
>
> . .
> Ideally I would be interested in small projects or issues within Fedora, are
> approachable to people who are relatively new, and ideally have avenues for
> students to get help and learn from the
> Am 13.02.2025 um 12:05 schrieb Jiri Vanek :
>
>
>
> On 2/13/25 11:50 AM, Mario Torre wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 13, 2025 at 11:40 AM Peter Boy Uni wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Am 13.02.2025 um 10:25 schrieb Jiri Vanek :
>>>
> Am 13.02.2025 um 10:25 schrieb Jiri Vanek :
>
>
>
> On 2/12/25 10:06 PM, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
>> Mario Torre wrote:
>>> On Tue, Feb 11, 2025 at 2:11 AM Kevin Kofler via devel
>>> wrote:
Mario Torre wrote:
> OpenJDK 11 is EOL in Fedora regardless of the Fedora version
> Am 25.02.2025 um 09:09 schrieb Alexander Bokovoy :
>> ...
>> == Detailed Description ==
>> We are going to build OpenSSL without engine support. Engines are not
>> FIPS compatible and corresponding API is deprecated since OpenSSL 3.0.
>> The engine functionality we are aware of (PKCS#11, TPM) i
> Am 09.03.2025 um 00:44 schrieb Chris Adams :
>
> Once upon a time, Peter Boy Uni said:
>> We have a Forgejo rpm in the Fedora f41 repository, version 10 for x86_64. A
>> aarch64 variant is currently missing (there is, however, a version 9 in
>> COPR).
>
>
We have a Forgejo rpm in the Fedora f41 repository, version 10 for x86_64. A
aarch64 variant is currently missing (there is, however, a version 9 in COPR).
I tried to install it on my Fedora Server test instance to check how it goes.
The rpm doesn’t create a working directory, e.g. /var/lib/for
