Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 39 Python 3.12 rebuilds to start in a side tag this week

On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 11:20 AM Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 13. 06. 23 14:02, Tomas Hrnciar wrote: > > Hello, > > > > in order to deliver Python 3.12, we are running a coordinated rebuild in > a side > > tag. > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.12 > >

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 39 Python 3.12 rebuilds to start in a side tag this week

On Fri, Jun 16, 2023 at 12:11 PM Miro Hrončok wrote: > On 16. 06. 23 12:07, Nikita Popov wrote: > > We have a conflicting python-lit build sitting in another side tag -- > we'll > > discard that one and rebuild once your side tag is merged. > > If it's already

Re: F41 Change Proposal - Python Built with gcc -03 (self-contained)

On Sat, Apr 13, 2024 at 5:55 PM Richard W.M. Jones wrote: > On Fri, Apr 12, 2024 at 07:08:36PM -0500, Neal Gompa wrote: > > I would like for us to consider evaluating a global change to -O3. I > > am not convinced that there's a good reason anymore to remain at -O2. > > FYI here are the optimizat

Fedora CI for large RPMs?

Hi! The llvm rpm (https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/llvm) has recently been struggling with Fedora CI, by which I mean the CI that produces scratch builds and runs dist-git tests on merge requests. The llvm rpm has a combination of long build times (typically 3-8 hours on koji, depending on arch

Re: Copr Modularity, the End of an Era

On Wed, Oct 23, 2024 at 5:32 PM Jakub Kadlcik wrote: > Hello everybody, > I'd like to announce that all Modularity features in Copr (except for > module hotfixes) are now deprecated, and we have a plan to slowly remove > them from our codebase. > > For more reasoning and the retirement schedule,

Re: Fedora CI for large RPMs?

On Wed, Nov 13, 2024 at 12:38 PM František Lachman wrote: > Hi Nikita, > > I can't speak on behalf of Fedora CI or Zuul but I want to mention that in > the Packit team[0], we are trying to help in this situation of not having > much capacity to maintain existing CI solutions for dist-git. > > Sin

Rawhide-only gating?

Hi! Is it possible to somehow limit some gating rules in gating.yml only to Fedora rawhide? For example, to gate on rpmdeplint (which is only available for rawhide), we've tried something like this: --- !Policy product_versions: - fedora-rawhide decision_contexts: - bodhi_update_push_stable

Re: Rawhide-only gating?

On Thu, Feb 27, 2025 at 5:48 PM Adam Williamson wrote: > On Thu, 2025-02-27 at 09:32 +0100, Nikita Popov wrote: > > Hi! > > > > Is it possible to somehow limit some gating rules in gating.yml only to > > Fedora rawhide? For example, to gate on rpmdeplint (which