This is the second time in a row, generating backtrace seems to run forever.
Something wrong?
abrt-1.0.3-1.fc12.x86_64
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Matthew Saltzman wrote:
> I have two F12 systems with texlive-2009 installed. On one of them,
> pdflatex works fine. On the other, I get this error:
>
> $ pdflatex simple.tex
> This is pdfTeX, Version 3.1415926-1.40.10 (Web2C 2009)
>
> kpathsea: Running mktexfmt
1. I just want to update mercurial in whatever way is easiest. I don't know
git. I was trying to follow the documented procedure, but I guess it's a
bit early and docs are sketchy.
2. What I used to do with cvs is a) update devel b) clone this to stable
releases. The devel and stable were al
This sounds interesting:
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=ODQ3OQ
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Linuxguy123 wrote:
>
> http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=ODQ3OQ
>
>
I'm interested in this. I have noticed that for the past (several months?)
my system would freeze at apparently random times, while disk goes busy, for
periods of 20-30 seconds. This did not used to happen
abrt-1.1.13-1.fc13.x86_64
The only choice is 'log', no bugzilla! Why?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Neal Becker wrote:
> abrt-1.1.13-1.fc13.x86_64
>
> The only choice is 'log', no bugzilla! Why?
>
In abrt-gui, click on edit/plugins lists bugzilla under 'not loaded
plugins'.
In /etc/abrt/plugins,
I have Bugzilla.conf:
Enabled = yes
#
Jiri Moskovcak wrote:
> On 08/17/2010 02:42 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
>> abrt-1.1.13-1.fc13.x86_64
>>
>> The only choice is 'log', no bugzilla! Why?
>>
>
> Can you please run:
>
> rpm -qa | grep abrt
>
> to check if you have installed
$ fedpkg push
Everything up-to-date
$ fedpkg build
Could not initiate build: There are unpushed changes in your repo
Clue?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Neal Becker wrote:
> $ fedpkg push
> Everything up-to-date
> $ fedpkg build
> Could not initiate build: There are unpushed changes in your repo
>
> Clue?
>
Here's what I tried to do.
After clone, then build for F15 OK.
git merge -m "Initial pseudo merge for
Andreas Schwab wrote:
> Neal Becker writes:
>
>> $ fedpkg push
>> Everything up-to-date
>> $ fedpkg build
>> Could not initiate build: There are unpushed changes in your repo
>>
>> Clue?
>
> $ git status
>
> Andreas.
>
git status
# O
Till Maas wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 25, 2010 at 03:57:31PM +0200, Andreas Schwab wrote:
>> Till Maas writes:
>>
>> > git config --add push.default tracking
>>
>> push.default can only have one value, so --add does not make sense.
>
> Ok, I adjusted it here:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Using_F
Michael Cronenworth wrote:
> Neal Becker wrote:
>> No idea what this means.
>
> It means it has been 10 commits since you have pushed ("synced") with
> the git repo living on pkgs.fedoraproject.org. Remember that you have
> your own unique git repository living o
Updating mercurial (stop laughing) to 1.6.3. I updated master, f14, f13.
Made some mistake on f12. Now:
git status
# On branch f12
# Your branch is ahead of 'origin/f12/master' by 1 commit.
#
nothing to commit (working directory clean)
git merge master
Already up-to-date.
fedpkg build
Could
Jochen Schmitt wrote:
> Am 26.08.10 20:58, schrieb Neal Becker:
>> Updating mercurial (stop laughing) to 1.6.3. I updated master, f14, f13.
>> Made some mistake on f12. Now:
>>
>> git status
>> # On branch f12
>> # Your branch is ahead of 'origin
I need to make a minor edit to one of the sources of a package. I want the
sources on my machine in a state so that emacs will recognize the files are
under git control and act accordingly, so I can do my edits and use emacs
vc-mode stuff to commit, diff, etc. I tried using fedpkg clone + fedp
This article:
http://labs.mwrinfosecurity.com/notices/security_mechanisms_in_linux_environment__part_1___userspace_memory_protection/
seems to say that fedora is ranking poorly in deployment of various
userspace memory protection mechanisms. Is this information accurate?
--
devel mailing list
Updating igraph to 0.5.4. Success for devel and f14. Then for f13 I get:
> fedpkg switch-branch f13
Branch f13 set up to track remote branch f13/master from origin.
> git merge master
CONFLICT (rename/delete): Rename .cvsignore->.gitignore in HEAD and deleted
in master
Automatic merge failed;
Todd Zullinger wrote:
> Neal Becker wrote:
>> Updating igraph to 0.5.4. Success for devel and f14. Then for f13 I
>> get:
>>
>>> fedpkg switch-branch f13
>> Branch f13 set up to track remote branch f13/master from origin.
>>
>>> git merge ma
Any help here? I'm still stuck.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
I've pushed an update to f14 testing for igraph. Now I need to update
python-igraph.
DEBUG util.py:255: No Package Found for igraph-devel = 0.5.4
What is the procedure to make igraph-0.5.4 available so I can build python-
igraph-0.5.4 which needs it? I've forgotten, and a quick search of
htt
FAILED: BuildrootError: could not init mock buildroot, mock exited with
status 30; see root.log for more information
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2506706
DEBUG util.py:260: Error: Package: 4:perl-5.12.2-137.fc15.x86_64 (build)
DEBUG util.py:260: Requires: libp
Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Neal Becker (ndbeck...@gmail.com) said:
>> FAILED: BuildrootError: could not init mock buildroot, mock exited with
>> status 30; see root.log for more information
>>
>> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2506706
>>
>
mercurial has hard-wired to install .mo files under python_sitearch, and
i18n.py has hard-coded to look there.
On fedora, find-lang.sh is usually used to find these files, but expects to
find them in e.g., /usr/share/locale
Not sure what's the best way to fix this. Either leave .mo files where
Dennis Jacobfeuerborn wrote:
> On 10/12/2010 10:28 AM, Gerd Hoffmann wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>>> Striving for usability and pleasantness for the untechnical users
>>> certainly is a good thing. It gets problematic when you choose to make
>>> things technically inferior just to please those kind of us
Has anyone attempted a pyqt for python3?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
I have started porting to python3. So far I have a patch for fpconst. I
have not so far been able to contact upstream.
Maybe we should start a SIG for this?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Thomas Spura wrote:
> On Wed, 20 Oct 2010 08:36:23 -0400
> Neal Becker wrote:
>
>> I have started porting to python3. So far I have a patch for
>> fpconst. I have not so far been able to contact upstream.
>>
>> Maybe we should start a SIG for this?
>>
Rex Dieter wrote:
> Stanislav Ochotnicky wrote:
>
>> On 10/20/2010 02:38 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
>>> Has anyone attempted a pyqt for python3?
>>
>> I did. It failed (not on Fedora though and I didn't investigate at the
>> time). I seem to remember
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=645079
Various dirs are created by the install process. These dirs under hgext
could vary depending on whatever extensions upstream decides to package.
I'd prefer not to have to keep changing the spec to reflect those changes,
but to automate the pr
Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 17:07 -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
>
>> BTW, it's annoying that rpm allows only 1 %files -f.
>
> http://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.8.0
>
> %files now accepts multiple filelists through -f (ticket #70,
> RhBug:475359)
>
Ville Skyttä wrote:
> On Thursday 21 October 2010, Neal Becker wrote:
>
>> Right now I have:
>> %dir %{python_sitearch}/mercurial
>> %dir %{python_sitearch}/hgext
>>
>> I guess owning the parent dirs is not sufficient?
>
> Right.
>
>> I c
Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 5:14 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
>> On Wed, 2010-10-20 at 17:07 -0400, Neal Becker wrote:
>>
>>> BTW, it's annoying that rpm allows only 1 %files -f.
>>
>> http://rpm.org/wiki/Releases/4.8.0
>>
>> %fi
I no long use these and do not wish to continue as maintainer:
qct
igraph
python-igraph
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Sorry to be so stupid. I don't really have a lot of time to spend on this,
maybe someone can give me a clue.
I updated unuran master just fine.
Then I did my usual dance:
fedpkg switch-branch f14
git merge master
fedpkg push
fedpkg build
bohdi ...
fedpkg switch-branch f13
Branch f13 set up to
I have no idea what these messages I've received mean:
root has broken dependencies in the rawhide tree:
On x86_64:
root-unuran-5.26.00e-1.fc15.x86_64 requires libunuran.so.14()(64bit)
On i386:
root-unuran-5.26.00e-1.fc15.i686 requires libunuran.so.14
Please resolve this as soon as
This article recommends ending /etc/sysconfig
http://0pointer.de/blog/projects/on-etc-sysinit.html
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676335
Can someone see if they also hit this problem when building on F15?
(configure: error: unrecognized options: --disable-dependency-tracking)
If so, any hints? I'm stuck.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedorap
Nathan Owens wrote:
> Does it still compile? I would think that it would compile even though
> it says that. If so I would ignore it I believe
>
> On 07/24/2011 12:31 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
>> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676335
>>
>> Can someone see
Trying to help packaging dmtcp. There are 2 shared libs installed. They are
stripped by the rpm install, and then fail when attempting to dlopen them (or 1
of them).
1. Is that normal behaviour?
2. How can I avoid it?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedorapr
Jerry James wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 9:48 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
>> Trying to help packaging dmtcp. There are 2 shared libs installed. They are
>> stripped by the rpm install, and then fail when attempting to dlopen them (or
>> 1 of them).
>
> Fail how? Wh
>Jerry James wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 12:06 PM, Jerry James wrote:
>> It isn't strip. If I run strip on the version of libmtcp.so left in
>> the build dir and copy it over /usr/lib64/dmtcp/libmtcp.so, then it
>> also works. But that version is different from the one installed by
>> rpm.
Thomas Spura wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I just build ipython-0.11 in rawhide, which changed pretty much
> anything internally, so *ALL* dependant packages will be possible
> broken.
>
> repoquery just reports 2 packages, but it should be more...:
> python-networkx
> python-polybori
>
> Missing packa
Here's what I got trying to use retrace server for crash of inkscape:
Retrace job failed
Analyzing crash data OK
Initializing virtual root OK
Generating backtrace Error
Unable to chmod the executable
(exited with 1)
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraprojec
le.
> What package are you trying to retrace? AFAIK there seems to be a
> problem with gnome-related packages.
>
> Thanks a lot.
>
> Michal
>
> On 09.08.2011 19:40, Neal Becker wrote:
>> Here's what I got trying to use retrace server for crash of inkscape
http://news.opensuse.org/2011/10/11/opensuse-announces-first-public-release-of-
openqa/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676335
is waiting for a sponsor.
I'd like to sponsor it.
What is the procedure? Do I change the
Assigned To:
Timothy St. Clair (edit) (take)
By selecting 'take'? It is not clear if 'take' if for sponsoring the package,
or for the review.
--
Sorry, I'm using the wrong terms. A BR was already opened by
Kapil Arya
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=676335
I have discussed with upstream, and the asked me to take ownership of this
package, which I have agreed to.
What do I need to do?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fed
3 or my packages are now parentless:
qct
igraph
python-igraph
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Sounds interesting:
http://digitizor.com/2011/05/12/ubuntu-11-10-lightdm/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
3083146 build (dist-f14-updates-candidate,
/uncrustify:6a8dd0eea2183240177154f27c10a730f20994eb) completed successfully
Creating a new update for uncrustify-0.58-1.fc14
ServerError(https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/save, 200, Error returned
from json module while processing https://admin.fe
Luke Macken wrote:
> Excerpts from Neal Becker's message of Fri May 20 07:40:41 -0400 2011:
>> 3083146 build (dist-f14-updates-candidate,
>> /uncrustify:6a8dd0eea2183240177154f27c10a730f20994eb) completed successfully
>> Creating a new update for uncrustify-0.58-1.fc14
>> ServerError(https://admin
I'm trying to use nvidia cuda 4.0. It refuses to even try to compile with
gcc>4.5.
Any chance of a compat-gcc4.4 on f15?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
koji watch-task 3103524
Watching tasks (this may be safely interrupted)...
3103524 build (dist-rawhide,
/mercurial:cd1aebcad31e13ea42fdf0d51be65eb7230ffc66): free
nothing happening...
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
How can I apply a patch only if the version of a dependency is < x?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Sam Varshavchik wrote:
> Neal Becker writes:
>
>> How can I apply a patch only if the version of a dependency is < x?
>
> You mean you want to specify the dependency's version in a macro, that you
> put into Requires:? If so, just use the macro in your build script,
Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Neal Becker wrote:
>> How can I apply a patch only if the version of a dependency is < x?
>
> I generally do something like:
>
> %if 0%{?fedora} > NN
> %global have_foo_MMM 1
> %endif
>
> %if 0%{?have_foo_MMM}
> BuildRequires: foo
Nathanael D. Noblet wrote:
> On 06/03/2011 05:19 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
>> So it is ultimately conditioned on fedora version, not foo-devel version.
>
> Just curious, why don't you require the version that doesn't require the
> patch?
>
In the future, let&#
I just compiled 'hello world.go' with gccgo on F15 and got selinux alert about
mmap_zero when executable was run.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Dave Jones wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 02:00:57PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 08:01:06PM +1000, Chris Jones wrote:
> >
> > > I agree. As virtualization technology becomes more and more involved
> > > and frequent on users systems, particularly with advanced
Neal Becker wrote:
> Dave Jones wrote:
>
>> On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 02:00:57PM +0100, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>> > On Thu, Jun 09, 2011 at 08:01:06PM +1000, Chris Jones wrote:
>> >
>> > > I agree. As virtualization technology becomes more and m
Gilboa Davara wrote:
>
>> > 1. Easy setup of networking (bridged).
>> Just to followup, to setup bridged net on kvm I need to reboot my server.
>> That's a non-starter.
>
> And long as you're will to do the hard work yourself, there's no need to
> reboot your machine.
>
> 1. Create a bridge co
Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 20, 2011 at 01:00:10PM -0500, Richard Shaw wrote:
>> I'll take "google-droid-fonts".
>>
> Done.
>
> -Toshio
I hope someone picks up stix-fonts!
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
A little OT perhaps, but would installation of numpy1.6 onto fedora15 be
expected to break anything?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
0. F15 x86_64
1. yumdownloader --source atlas
2. rpmbuild -D 'enable_native_atlas 1' atlas.spec
error: line 75: Bad Requireflags: qualifiers: Requires(posttans):
chkconfig
How can it be that my system fails rpmbuild but fedora build is OK?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.
Will there we a switch to give me the old behavior? I might want this for
my own legacy code.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Any truth here?
http://www.osnews.com/story/22872/Linux_Not_Fully_Prepared_for_4096-
Byte_Sector_Hard_Drives
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Felix Miata wrote:
> On 2010/02/14 20:58 (GMT+0100) nodata composed:
>
>> On 14/02/10 17:59, Neal Becker wrote:
>
>>> Any truth here?
>
>>> http://www.osnews.com/story/22872/Linux_Not_Fully_Prepared_for_4096-
Byte_Sector_Hard_Drives
>
>> Yep.
Updating : selinux-policy-targeted-3.6.32-92.fc12.noarch
64/215
libsepol.scope_copy_callback: audioentropy: Duplicate declaration in module:
type/attribute entropyd_var_ru\
n_t (No such file or directory).
libsemanage.semanage_link_sandbox: Link packages failed (No such file or
di
mercurial and tortoise-hg need (generally) to be pushed in sync. They
are maintained by 2 different people. What are suggested ways to make sure
pushes are synchronized?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
leigh scott wrote:
> On Mon, 2010-03-08 at 08:20 -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
>
>> The maintainers should coordinate, and one of them should bundle both
>> packages
>> into a single bodhi update. It's the only way to guarantee they get
>> pushed at the same time.
>>
>> josh
>
> They would need com
On Monday 08 March 2010, Daniel J Walsh wrote:
> On 03/07/2010 09:48 AM, Neal Becker wrote:
> > Updating : selinux-policy-targeted-3.6.32-92.fc12.noarch
> >
> > 64/215
> > libsepol.scope_copy_callback: audioentropy: Duplicate declaration in
> > modul
BJ Dierkes wrote:
>
> On Mar 8, 2010, at 10:59 AM, Steve Traylen wrote:
>
>>>
>> It is true that the separate .spec files are maintained separately. What
>> many people try and do is maintain them as identical, at least at the
>> start. Have a look at:
>> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packagin
fc13 and fc12 are shown here:
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/search/mercurial?_csrf_token=9d135a7a59b1892cc911a5f075633fb7dd4ef993
But not fc11. So I tried to rebuild, and got:
2046149 build (dist-f11-updates-candidate,
/cvs/pkgs:rpms/mercurial/F-11:mercurial-1_5-2_fc11): open
(ppc03.p
Still trying to sort out coordination of our 2 packages by 2 different
maintainers that must be kept in sync. Surprise, one was automatically
pushed to stable due to karma.
Can that feature be selectively disabled?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraprojec
Kalev Lember wrote:
> On 03/13/2010 03:57 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
>> Still trying to sort out coordination of our 2 packages by 2 different
>> maintainers that must be kept in sync. Surprise, one was automatically
>> pushed to stable due to karma.
>>
>> Can tha
My cert was expired. I D/L new cert and rename to ~/.fedora-cert. Then run
fedora-packager-setup and it crashes:
fedora-packager-setup
Setting up Fedora packager environment
You need a client certificate from the Fedora Account System, lets get one
now
Traceback (most recent call last):
Fil
A file has been added to the lookaside cache for mercurial:
22eac5602d777f9601e23700e641503f mercurial-1.5.1.tar.gz
OK, so why:
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=2095322&name=build.log
says:
error: File /builddir/build/SOURCES/mercurial-1.5.1.tar.gz: No such file or
directory
What is plan to introduce gcc 4.5 into fedora?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
I noticed this post:
http://forums.fedoraforum.org/showthread.php?t=22
What would be the process to add mercurial to development group?
How can I see what packages are in which groups?
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/deve
Bill Nottingham wrote:
> Rex Dieter (rdie...@math.unl.edu) said:
>> fyi, comps is in git now, instructions are referenced in the
>> aforementioned document.
>
> ... and mercurial's already an optional package there. Or is this
> a request to make it a default one?
>
> Bill
IMO, mercurial should
Just tried (and failed) update f15->f16. Using dvd (most reliable method).
Went fine until I hit an error, trying to update ipython. At this point,
anaconda just quit. No hints given what the issue was. No offer to try to
report the error.
It mentioned that it _might_ be caused by a problem
I just had to setup a new machine, and new ssh keys.
I visited
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/user/edit/
I chose my new id_rsa.pub to upload.
But I get:
git push --verbose
Pushing to ssh://nbec...@pkgs.fedoraproject.org/mercurial
Permission denied (publickey).
fatal: The remote
Neal Becker wrote:
> I just had to setup a new machine, and new ssh keys.
>
> I visited
>
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/user/edit/
>
> I chose my new id_rsa.pub to upload.
>
> But I get:
>
> git push --verbose
> Pushing to ssh://nbec
Tony Breeds wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 15, 2011 at 07:22:53PM -0500, Neal Becker wrote:
>> I just had to setup a new machine, and new ssh keys.
>>
>> I visited
>>
>> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/user/edit/
>>
>> I chose my new id_rsa.pub
Is it possible to push this update direct to stable to close this bug?
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=754741
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/kdiff3-0.9.96-5.fc16
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
I don't want to change my ssh key that I use for many other purposes. What is
the suggested method to generate a new key to be used only for fedora?
Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Just a friendly reminder: If you are a Fedora account system account
> holder, and haven't changed your password and uploade
http://lxer.com/module/newswire/ext_link.php?rid=159737
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
drago01 wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 18, 2011 at 12:54 PM, Neal Becker wrote:
>> http://lxer.com/module/newswire/ext_link.php?rid=159737
>
> So? They are removing the non free Sun JDK ... which we never shipped.
Sorry, I was confused - shouldn't post so early in the morning.
--
I was reading about kmod on LWN. Sounds like it might be good for a future
fedora, to optimize boot time
http://www.politreco.com/2011/12/announce-kmod-1/
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
How do I use fedpkg push with a non-default key? fedpkg push --help gives no
clue. I need to use id_rsa.fedora.pub.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Jan Kratochvil wrote:
> On Mon, 02 Jan 2012 00:57:07 +0100, Neal Becker wrote:
>> How do I use fedpkg push with a non-default key? fedpkg push --help gives no
>> clue. I need to use id_rsa.fedora.pub.
>
> Using in ~/.ssh/config:
> IdentityFile ~/.ssh/id_dsa
>
Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 02.01.2012 01:10, schrieb Neal Becker:
>> Well looks like I had this working before - I see this in my config:
>>
>> HOST *.fedoraproject.org fedorapeople.org *.fedorahosted.org IdentityFile
>> ~/.ssh/id_rsa.fedora
>>
&g
Hopefully this is being addressed:
http://www.phoronix.com/scan.php?page=news_item&px=MTA0NTA
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
sudo service cupsd restart
...
Redirecting to /bin/systemctl restart cupsd.service
Failed to issue method call: Unit cupsd.service failed to load: No such file or
directory. See system logs and 'systemctl status cupsd.service' for details.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
h
I've seen this repeatedly, with often very serious consequences (complete
failure of update from f15->f16 for example).
Between packages installed via pip, and packages installed via yum, some
packages seem to switch between
e.g.,
numpy-1.6.1-py2.7.egg-info
being installed as a file and the sa
80 wrote:
> 2012/2/10 Neal Becker :
>> I've seen this repeatedly, with often very serious consequences (complete
>> failure of update from f15->f16 for example).
>>
>> Between packages installed via pip, and packages installed via yum, some
>> packages se
80 wrote:
> 2012/2/10 Neal Becker :
>>
>> Really? This is the only answer? Can't we tweek rpm/yum to accomodate this?
>> Does anyone understand what is causing it? Why would pip install the
>> egg-info differently than rpm?
>>
>> --
>> d
Haïkel Guémar wrote:
> Le 10/02/2012 19:20, Neal Becker a écrit :
>>
>> Yes, but trying to be helpful to users is a fedora packaging/rpm issue.
>>
>
> Generally speaking, mixing RPM packages with development platform here> native packages is not doing a favor to ou
Matej Cepl wrote:
> On 10.2.2012 18:09, 80 wrote:
>> Python guidelines recommends that packagers installs python eggs using
>> distutils (python setup.py install as recommended in guidelines) while
>> pip use the same install method as easy_install (provided by
>> setuptools/distribute). The forme
1 - 100 of 318 matches
Mail list logo
