Re: new packages review tickets

Il 24/05/20 15:41, Igor Raits ha scritto: > > This is great idea! If you need any help with bugzilla API or anything > like that - let me know. > > Yeah, I think I need some help in getting flags resetted. I would like to reset the 'needinfo' flag and the 'fedora-review' flag. Accordingly to htt

Re: new packages review tickets

Il 28/05/20 19:04, Fabio Valentini ha scritto: > > Since bugzilla keeps track of which user set which flag, do you maybe > need to specify which user's needinfo flag you want to clear? > > Fabio > I'm already passing all the flag object properties, id included: >>> bug = bz.getbug(1730464) >>> f

Re: new packages review tickets

Thanks for all the comments and ideas you posted. I have opened a pull request [1] to automate some of the processes against review-stats. If accepted it will: - Set NEEDINFO against submitter on tickets not assigned and not updated for more than one year - Set NEEDINFO against reviewer on tick

Re: Bodhi: "how to install" is supposed to work?

Il 02/06/20 10:26, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek ha scritto: > > Ideally, that message would be sent out only after mirrors have been > synchronized. > > Zbyszek > ___ That would be great, unfortunately it's simply impossible... Do you think adding a noti

Re: Orphaned packages looking for new maintainers

Re-posting to astronomy list: Il 08/06/20 11:00, Miro Hrončok ha scritto: > astronomy-backgrounds orphan 1 weeks ago > astronomy-bookmarks orphan 1 weeks ago Do we want to continue maintaining these two? They're fancy, b

Unretire python-sqlalchemy_schemadisplay

I'd like to unretire python-sqlalchemy_schemadisplay since it's needed by Bodhi to produce its documentation. I know upstream isn't very active, but the only alternative I see is eralchemy, which is even less maintained... Any objections/alternative suggestions? Mattia ___

Re: Update ejected from the push

Il 16/06/20 03:47, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto: > > Can you file a releng ticket and we can sort out whats going on. > https://pagure.io/releng/new_issue > > It seems like the sidetag setup has some issues still. ;( > > kevin There have been some improvements in sidetag workflow in Bodhi master branch

Re: Bodhi 5.4.0 in production

Il 22/06/20 17:42, Richard Shaw ha scritto: > I couple of observations after recently submitting some buildroot > overrides and updates: > > Buildroot overrides: > 1. The new auto-search with partial build names is nice but clicking > on the builds it findes has no effect. > 2. When I manually pa

Re: Autoclosure of review requests?

Il 26/06/20 16:27, Ben Cotton ha scritto: > > Nope! The lukewarm reaction and subsequent *guestures at the state > of the world* moved this to the bottom of the stack. It's still on my > todo list for some point in the future. > Ben, the review-stats app is ready to do some automatic "cleanup":

Re: lazarus and fpc-srpm-macros: "no matching arches were found" on EPEL8

Il 27/06/20 19:20, Artur Iwicki ha scritto: > So I'm trying to package the Free Pascal Compiler and Lazarus (the most > popular IDE + GUI framework for FPC) for EPEL8. I have requested an epel8 > branch for fpc and for fpc-srpm-macros; both of those have been built, > submitted to bodhi, and are

Re: Packagers with no corresponding valid bugzilla accounts

Il 06/07/20 22:04, Pierre-Yves Chibon ha scritto: > > Good Morning Everyone, > > The list is slowly going down, we have now 38 accounts that are still > problematic, they have all received several personal emails over the last few > weeks and none but one reacted. > I will likely start to ping FESC

Re: Bodhi 5.4.0 in production

Il 09/07/20 15:12, Miro Hrončok ha scritto: > > Finally I got to testing this. > > The bugzilla was added to the update: > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-c1be13ded8 > > But it was not closed: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1851519 > > Should I report this as

Re: Cannot push F32 update: None of ['f32-updates-pending'] are in [...]

Il 24/03/20 17:48, Sandro Mani ha scritto: > Hi > > I have this big update [1] which I cannot submit to stable because > > Cannot find relevant tag for bes-3.20.6-2.fc32. None of > ['f32-updates-pending'] are in [...] > > (and also for other builds, if I just try to remove bes from the > update). I

Updated review trackers pages

Hi all, we have updated the script which provides the cached review trackers pages at https://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/ (thanks to cverna for the assistance). Nothing too impressive, the main changes in frontend are: - A search field in list pages to filter tickets. Since these pa

Re: Updated review trackers pages

Il 07/04/20 16:01, Ankur Sinha ha scritto: > > The list says that there aren't any trivial tickets, but easyfix does > show one (only one): > https://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/trivial.html > vs > https://fedoraproject.org/easyfix/ > > Could you check this please? > Yeah, that's because

Re: Updated review trackers pages

Il 07/04/20 17:31, Till Hofmann ha scritto: > > It looks like 1821497 [1] is displayed incorrectly (currently at the > bottom of the page), maybe bccause of the unusual title ("Review > Request: - ")? > > [1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1821497 Thanks, I've just pushed the fix for

Re: Updated review trackers pages

Il 07/04/20 16:52, Mattia Verga ha scritto: > Il 07/04/20 16:01, Ankur Sinha ha scritto: >> The list says that there aren't any trivial tickets, but easyfix does >> show one (only one): >> https://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/trivial.html >> vs >> https://fedoraproject.org/easyfix/ >> >> C

Re: Fedora 32 FTBFS packages to be orphaned in 1 week

Il 29/03/20 13:13, Miro Hrončok ha scritto: > pam_url herlo icon > python-robosignatory abompard ralph > reg cverna It turned out on infra mailing list that those are required to infrastructure, so I've taken them before they are retired. However, I will need some a

Re: Fedora 32 FTBFS packages to be orphaned in 1 week

Il 10/04/20 21:18, Ian McInerney ha scritto: > On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 8:06 PM Mattia Verga via devel > wrote: > >> For pam_url I need help from someone with C skills, since there's an >> error at build time: >> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID

Re: ProtonMail Bridge rpm build request

Il 22/04/20 00:22, Maximiliano Sandoval via devel ha scritto: > Hi everyone, I would like to request a rpm build for > [protonmail-bridge](https://protonmail.com/bridge/), which recently released > its source at [github](https://github.com/ProtonMail/proton-bridge). I have > been unable to produ

Re: LibRaw 0.20 Beta; soname bump

Il 11/05/20 22:33, Gwyn Ciesla via devel ha scritto: > I'm building LibRaw 0.20 Beta 1 for rawhide, along with all direct > consumers, in a multi-stage chain build, today, including the following: > > ... > > FYI Also kstars has BR on LibRaw. I've triggered a rebuild just now. Mattia __

new packages review tickets

Hi all, now that we have new detailed statistics about new package review tickets ( https://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/ ) I would like to make some cleanings... at the time I'm writing, there are 517 tickets listed as new, many of them are older than 5 years! The first steps I would

Re: new packages review tickets

Il 26/05/20 14:33, Ben Cotton ha scritto: > > I like it. I'm happy to help and take the ongoing "enforcement" work > as part of the Program Manager's role if you don't want to stay on top > of this forever (although I'd probably do it once per release cycle, > which is still a big improvement on "o

Re: Fedora 32 Self-Contained Change proposal: Free Pascal Compiler 3.2.0

Il 10/10/19 16:35, Ben Cotton ha scritto: > == Scope == > All packages depending on `fpc` should be rebuilt with the new `fpc` > once it hits F32, or, if there is not enough time for that, just all > packages built after the new `fpc` hits the buildroots. > > * Proposal owners: > ** Update the `fpc

Re: Fedora 32 Self-Contained Change proposal: Free Pascal Compiler 3.2.0

Il 11/10/19 11:39, Artur Iwicki ha scritto: > Yes, dependent packages should use %{fpc_arches}. FPC itself doesn't do that. > Ah, I misunderstood the phrase `Add AArch64 and ppc64le to the `ExclusiveArch:` tag in the package spec.`. I thought you were saying to add those ExclusiveArch to all pack

Re: calibre and hedgewars missed in qt5 5.12.5 update

Il 13/10/19 03:26, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto: > On Sat, Oct 12, 2019 at 05:49:15PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > Except sadly, it doesn't build: > > https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=38248022 > ... > * Running build > * > Fatal Python error: PyQt5.QtCore: Unable to embed qt.conf > /

Re: Bodhi Outage Ongoing - Deploying 5.0

Il 12/11/19 16:46, Jerry James ha scritto: > On Tue, Nov 12, 2019 at 8:27 AM Jerry James wrote: >> 2. It is not possible to create a newpackage update with the GUI. >> I've got a brand new package, gap-pkg-fining, with a brand new build >> for F31. I type "gap-pkg-fining" into the "Name" field, a

Re: Allow comments and discussion even though an update was pushed to stable

Il 06/12/19 07:34, Johannes Lips ha scritto: > Hi all, > > I was recently bit by a bug, which was caused by a mismatch between > texlive-biblatex and biber. The technical side is not so important, only so > much that they need each other in a pretty specific version, which is not > reflected on

Re: Allow comments and discussion even though an update was pushed to stable

Il 06/12/19 21:51, Johannes Lips ha scritto: >> "Johannes Lips" > >> >> We already have a tool for reporting issues and problems, and it's not >> bodhi. If there's a problem with an already pushed update, it needs to >> be in bugzilla - where it's actually discoverable - not in bodhi, where >> it

Re: Allow comments and discussion even though an update was pushed to stable

Il 07/12/19 17:49, Fabio Valentini ha scritto: > I'm curious about this. I do get email notifications for all changes and > comments for all my own bodhi updates plus for every update that I commented > on. Have you turned this off, or do you mean to say you're going to ignore > bodhi emails? >

Re: Allow comments and discussion even though an update was pushed to stable

Il 07/12/19 19:32, Adam Williamson ha scritto: > But we already explained this. Comments on stable updates are not > primarily for the maintainer, they are for *users*. Users tend to refer > to Bodhi notes, if anything, more than maintainers do. > ...and that's exactly the behavior that the change

peek package

The `peek` package has been approved in Fedora repositories [1], but it doesn't even start without ffmpeg installed [2], which is not distributed in Fedora repositories (but is available in rpmfusion): $ peek Error: Child process exited with code 1 Unable to create default screen recorder. The

Re: 15 nonresponsive maintainers

Il 19/07/19 19:17, Miro Hrončok ha scritto: > ape...@gmail.com apevec > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731531 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1705932 > > athoscribe...@gmail.com athoscr > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1731532 > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/s

Re: 15 nonresponsive maintainers

> Il 19/07/19 19:17, Miro Hrončok ha scritto: > Aurélien Bompard is active on > github in fedora-infrastructure: > https://github.com/abompard > http://aurelien.bompard.org I've forgot to add he's also on #devel and #bodhi as abombard_ ___ devel mailing l

skychart package updates broken after module retirement

Recently, I requested to retire Skychart module and this has been done in F31 and F32: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8640 Now I'm trying to push an update to Skychart classic RPMs, Koji shows it as tagged both in F30-updates-testing and F31-updates-testing, but there's no sign of them in the r

Re: skychart package updates broken after module retirement

Il 03/09/19 01:15, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto: > > It seems in testing ok on the master mirrors... > > https://dl.fedoraproject.org/pub/fedora/linux/updates/testing/30/Everything/SRPMS/Packages/s/skychart-4.1.1-5.4000svn.fc30.src.rpm > Interesting, so the package IS in the mirrors, but metadata doesn't

Re: Upcoming change for adopting orphaned packages and anitya integration

Il 13/09/19 12:32, Pierre-Yves Chibon ha scritto: > ## Orphan packages > > Currently if a package is orphaned there is no way to adopt it easily on > dist-git (https://src.fedoraproject.org). You need to open a ticket on the > releng issue tracker and wait for someone to process that ticket. > > Th

Re: peek package

Il 02/01/20 09:52, Artem Tim ha scritto: > Perhaps OP should not sneaky asking for retiring functional package? Maybe he > should instead file a bug and ask maintainer first about this and discuss > with it? I might have miss this thread and didn't even notice it. TBH all > this just demotivatin

Re: peek package

Il 02/01/20 12:05, Michael Schwendt ha scritto: > On Thu, 02 Jan 2020 10:02:25 +0000, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: > >> In my original post I had CC'ed `peek-maintai...@fedoraproject.org` and >> I supposed this would have reached you directly. I did not know this >> i

Re: koji / bodhi issues status update

> On Fri, Jan 03, 2020 at 11:55:27PM +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > Yes, they are all because bodhi started composing them, moved their tags > and then failed (because koji wasn't tagging things in a timely manner). > > So, they need to be retagged back and resubmitted, or bodhi tweaked to > see

Re: koji / bodhi issues status update

Il 05/01/20 10:54, Pierre-Yves Chibon ha scritto: > > You may also want to print/check when these updates were created, I suspect a > number of them may be older than this outage. > > Also, this has been problematic in the past but since bodhi now simply ignores > these updates when doing the compo

Re: peek package

Il 08/01/20 08:09, Artem Tim ha scritto: > vokoscreenNG packaged now. Nice to have such app available in official repos. > > F31: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-a489a2436a > F30: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-aa27dbce21 > __

Fedora review tickets tracker pages

I have rewritten from scratch [1] the code behind the Fedora review tickets tracker [2] so that it can now be deployed with setuptools and make use of some python standard libraries. You can find an example of how it looks at https://mattia.fedorapeople.org/review_stats/ I've added some featur

Re: Fedora review tickets tracker pages

Il 02/02/20 12:43, Mattia Verga ha scritto: > You can find an example of how it looks at > https://mattia.fedorapeople.org/review_stats/ > BTW I think that any ticket with a last changed date before 2016 should be closed to do some cleanup: there are tickets never reviewed, as well as tickets app

Re: Fedora review tickets tracker pages

Il 04/02/20 10:29, Miroslav Suchý ha scritto: > > People are asking for this for years. No one ever had time to do this. This > make you most competent guy :) Just do it. > Well, I only have experience about some really small and simple django projects, nothing big like this. I see Fedora apps ar

Re: Want to claim vault

Il 24/02/20 23:12, Dave Dykstra ha scritto: > I made a ticket (bug #1806737) for the maintainer of the existing vault > package in Fedora to see if he'd be willing to give it up so it can be > used for Hashicorp vault (https://vaultproject.io) and he decided to > mark it EOL so I could claim it. >

Re: Autoclosure of review requests?

Il 24/02/20 23:04, Ben Cotton ha scritto: > In the weekly Fedora program update that I publish on > communityblog.fedoraproject.org, I have started to include a count of the > open package review requests. As of this moment, there are ~1300 open review > requests. Some of these were opened in 2

Review Swap

Hi, does anyone want to swap a review? I need https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1813563 in order to upgrade libpasastro. Thanks Mattia ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.

Re: Review Swap

Il 14/03/20 15:13, Yongkui Han (yonhan) ha scritto: > Hi Mattia, > > I would like to swap review with you, however, I am new to Fedora packager, > not sure if I am qualified. I am still reading the Fedora packaging > guidelines: > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/ > > Any

Re: Intent to request a FESCo exception for python2 for ardour5

Il 15/03/20 11:22, Guido Aulisi ha scritto: > Hi, > > I’m going to ask a FESCo exception for python2 for package ardour5. > Python2 is only needed to build the package using the WAF build system. > > Ardour has been undergoing a complete rewriting for 2 years, no stable > versions have been releas

Re: What to do when packagers "forget" bodhi updates for branched (f32)?

Il 16/03/20 21:30, Fabio Valentini ha scritto: > > Any suggestions what we could do to make sure f32 updates aren't > forgotten after the beta freeze? > Ideally, I think that Bodhi should not allow someone to create an update with a build which nvr is higher than what is available in a later rele

Announcing libkpmcore upgrade

Hi all, I'm planning to upgrade kpmcore and kde-partitionmanager to version 4.0.0 in rawhide. This will bring a soname bump to libkpmcore, which is used only (as far as I know) by kde-partitionmanager and calamares. I'll take care of rebuilding calamares. BTW, calamares in Fedora repo is a bit

Re: orphaning bleachbit

Il 18/05/19 10:47, Silvia Sánchez ha scritto: > > Hello, > > I don't have experience maintaining packages but I'm willing to > maintain Bleachbit as I use it a lot, it's the first programme I > install when I do a fresh install.  Let me know what I need to do and > I'll take care. > > Kind regar

Re: htdig: about to orphan due to license issues, how to?

Il 11/03/23 14:58, Petr Menšík ha scritto: > Hi! > > I own htdig package, which got recently discovered license issue with > bundled libdb version ~3.x [1]. I think the only reason it is still in > Fedora is that just compiled for years back. I doubt anyone is using it > at the moment and I have ne

Re: JPEGXL SONAME Bump

Il 19/03/23 10:18, Robert-André Mauchin ha scritto: > Hello everyone, > > I am planning a soname bump of jpegxl to 0.8.1 next week Saturday the 25th. > > Some of you will be affected by these changes. > > Fedora side we have: > > geeqie > gthumb > seamonkey > vips > > I can take care of these one

Re: F39 proposal: Changes of defaults in createrepo_c-1.0.0 (System-Wide Change proposal)

Il 23/03/23 19:52, Ben Cotton ha scritto: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/createrepo_c_1.0.0 > A quick look about this change impact on bodhi-server, as I understand from the relevant module at https://github.com/fedora-infra/bodhi/blob/develop/bodhi-server/bodhi/server/metadata.py : > ==

Re: F39 proposal: Changes of defaults in createrepo_c-1.0.0 (System-Wide Change proposal)

>> - Stop generating metadata in sqlite database format by default. It >> will still be possible to create them using a --database switch or via >> sqliterepo_c tool. (It looks like the only user left is mdapi: >> https://github.com/fedora-infra/mdapi/issues/97). > I think this haven't got > impac

Re: F39 proposal: Changes of defaults in createrepo_c-1.0.0 (System-Wide Change proposal)

Il 25/03/23 21:34, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto: > On Fri, Mar 24, 2023 at 05:25:17PM +0000, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: >> Il 23/03/23 19:52, Ben Cotton ha scritto: >>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/createrepo_c_1.0.0 >>> >> A quick look about this ch

Upcoming Bodhi upgrade and notable change to update notes field

Hello folks, Bodhi will probably be upgraded to 7.1.1 before the F38 final freeze and I want to highlight a notable change which may impact update submissions. The change is that update notes field will now be limited to 10k characters length. The request came from https://github.com/fedora-infra/

Re: Upcoming Bodhi upgrade and notable change to update notes field

Il 30/03/23 01:26, Miro Hrončok ha scritto: > On 28. 03. 23 10:57, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: >> Most of the updates which have notes longer than 10k characters are >> rawhide automatic updates which copies the RPM changelog over and over, > What will happen now, when an auto

Re: F39 proposal: RPM 4.19 (System-Wide Change proposal)

Il 31/03/23 17:27, Florian Festi ha scritto: > On 3/31/23 15:40, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 3:42 PM Ben Cotton wrote: >>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RPM-4.19 >>> == Detailed Description == >>> RPM 4.19 contains various improvements over previous versions. Many

Re: F39 proposal: RPM 4.19 (System-Wide Change proposal)

Il 02/04/23 18:42, Fabio Valentini ha scritto: > On Sun, Apr 2, 2023 at 5:37 PM Mattia Verga via devel > wrote: >> Il 31/03/23 17:27, Florian Festi ha scritto: >>> On 3/31/23 15:40, Stephen Gallagher wrote: >>>> On Thu, Mar 30, 2023 at 3:42 PM Ben Cotton wrote

purpose of dummy-test-package-* updates?

Hello, I've recently introduced the cap of 10k characters in Bodhi updates notes and made automatic updates avoid copying the RPM changelog in notes if it's too big. This was causing some updates, especially those created for `dummy-test-package-gloster` package [1], to clog Bodhi's query replies.

Re: purpose of dummy-test-package-* updates?

Il 10/04/23 17:01, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto: > > I've not seen any errors from it in a long while... but I'm not sure if > thats because everything has been working or because it isn't erroring > properly. > > Anyhow, I think we should/can adjust it to not make big changelogs... > Well, now the probl

Re: purpose of dummy-test-package-* updates?

Il 10/04/23 17:50, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto: > On Mon, Apr 10, 2023 at 03:18:22PM +0000, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: >> Il 10/04/23 17:01, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto: >>> I've not seen any errors from it in a long while... but I'm not sure if >>> thats because ever

Re: Change my new package name in src.fedoraporject.org ?

Il 13/04/23 10:27, Miro Hrončok ha scritto: > > In http://bugzilla.redhat.com/2130607 the reviewer should have noted this and > not approve the package. > Why? The "full lowercase naming" is no more a MUST: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/Naming/#_general_naming Mattia

Re: Test upgrades from F37 to F38 - it will take you just a minute

I've just tried a 'dnf system-upgrade' and got: Errore: Errore test di transazione:   il file /usr/lib64/libheif/libheif-libde265.so dell'installazione di libheif-freeworld-1.15.1-4.fc38.x86_64 entra in conflitto con il file del pacchetto libheif-hevc-1.15.1-2.fc37.1.x86_64   il file /usr/lib64/

Re: Non-responsive maintainer - rkuska

Il 17/04/23 17:39, Jakub Kadlcik ha scritto: > Hello, > per the Non-responsive maintainer policy > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers > > I am sending this email. We (copr-sig) would like to (co)maintain the > python-flask-whooshee package but @r

Re: It’s time to transform the Fedora devel list into something new

Il 21/04/23 17:37, Simo Sorce ha scritto: > On Fri, 2023-04-21 at 10:44 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote: >> On Thu, Apr 20, 2023 at 08:24:48PM -0500, Chris Adams wrote: >>> Once upon a time, Matthew Miller said: I am proposing that over the course of 2023, starting with the Changes process,

Re: RFC: No koji builds during mass branching and updates-testing enablement

Il 22/04/23 23:46, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto: > On Fri, Apr 21, 2023 at 09:03:11PM +0200, Fabio Valentini wrote: >> On Thu, Mar 9, 2023 at 8:56 PM Kevin Fenzi wrote: >>> * Cancel all builds that are in progress. Maintainers can resubmit after >>> the outage with the appropriate branches. >>> * unpush

Re: SPDX Statistics - ZX Spectrum edition

Il 23/04/23 11:09, Miroslav Suchý ha scritto: > > The list of packages needed to be converted is again here: > > https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/packages-without-spdx-final.txt > > List by package maintainers is here > > https://pagure.io/copr/license-validate/blob/main/f/packag

Re: Broken gcc 13.0.1-0.15.fc39 (missing )

Il 23/04/23 11:17, Tomasz Kłoczko ha scritto: > Hi, > > Looks like with latest gcc 31.0.1-0.15.fc39 many packages builds are failing > with: > > /usr/lib/gcc/x86_64-redhat-linux/13/include/immintrin.h:135:10: fatal error: > amxcomplexintrin.h: No such file or directory > 135 | #include > | ^~~~

Re: It’s time to transform the Fedora devel list into something new

Il 23/04/23 17:01, Björn Persson ha scritto: > > You let the quarrel go this far before you even bothered to mention > that? You're clearly not serious about selling the email features of > Discourse. > > You're trying to convince email users that your preferred communication > program is better th

Re: It’s time to transform the Fedora devel list into something new

Il 20/04/23 23:20, Matthew Miller ha scritto: > It’s time to transform the Fedora devel list into something new > === > > ... > Matthew Miller > > Fedora Project Leader I've tried to follow up all the replies this post has caused, but it

Re: A new FMN will arrive this week

Il 24/04/23 11:47, Aurelien Bompard ha scritto: > Hi folks! > > The FMN replacement team has finished writing the new version of our > notification system, and we are ready to deploy! We plan on deploying > the new version on https://notifications.fedoraproject.org this week, > we'll keep the old o

Orphaning python-simplemediawiki

I'm going to orphan python-simplemediawiki. Upstream is long time dead and the github repository was archived in 2018. It was used by Bodhi backend to fetch TestCases information from Fedora Wiki, but Bodhi 7.1 switched to python-pymediawiki. I cannot find any other use in fedora infrastructure.

Re: Orphaning python-simplemediawiki

Il 25/04/23 20:40, Adam Williamson ha scritto: > On Tue, 2023-04-25 at 08:06 +0000, Mattia Verga via devel wrote: >> I'm going to orphan python-simplemediawiki. Upstream is long time dead >> and the github repository was archived in 2018. >> >> It was used by

Re: A new FMN will arrive this week

Il 24/04/23 11:47, Aurelien Bompard ha scritto: > Hi folks! > > The FMN replacement team has finished writing the new version of our > notification system, and we are ready to deploy! We plan on deploying > the new version on https://notifications.fedoraproject.org this week, > we'll keep the old o

Re: How to drop 32bit support from the scientific Python stack

There is already an ancient similar request upstream with some hints how to achieve that (it was to disable s390 buikders for noarch packages, though): https://pagure.io/koji/issue/2229 Inviato da Proton Mail mobile Messaggio originale Il 5 Mag 2023, 18:19, Kevin Fenzi ha scrit

Re: F39 Change Proposal: Flatpaks without Modules (System-Wide Change)

Il 10/05/23 12:54, Aoife Moloney ha scritto: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FlatpaksWithoutModules > > I've never tried to make a flatpak because I was scared by the need of firstly build modules and I'm really happy to see this change moving on. However, there's something I can't under

Re: F39 Change Proposal: Flatpaks without Modules (System-Wide Change)

Il 13/05/23 03:04, Owen Taylor ha scritto: > On Fri, May 12, 2023, 1:03 PM Mattia Verga via devel > wrote: > >> Il 10/05/23 12:54, Aoife Moloney ha scritto: >>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FlatpaksWithoutModules >>> >>> >> I've

Re: Election Status?

Il 24/05/23 21:19, Josh Boyer ha scritto: > On Wed, May 24, 2023 at 2:55 PM Peter Boy wrote: >> >> >>> Am 24.05.2023 um 20:30 schrieb Chris Murphy : >>> >>> I'm pretty sure we no longer have a program manager? >> What’s that about? > Red Hat recently announced a round of layoffs[1] and the Fedora

Re: employment related packager groups

Il 26/05/23 19:39, Kevin Fenzi ha scritto: > FESCo has been asked about creating company related groups. > ( https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2966 and https://pagure.io/fesco/issue/2929 ) > ie, foocorp-sig / foocopr-packagers. These groups would then be used to > help maintain packages that foocorp fi

Re: Deprecation of the aspell package

Il 27/05/23 11:56, Peter Oliver ha scritto: > > If we’re going to recommend migration to anything, shouldn’t it be enchant2? > Users would be able to configure their preferred spellchecking engine per > language (which I imagine is more important for some languages than others), > and we wouldn

Re: Obsolete of DNF by DNF5 in RAWHIDE

Il 24/05/23 09:40, Jaroslav Mracek ha scritto: > Hello, > > I have great news that the upcoming release of DNF5 will obsolete DNF > in rawhide (Fedora 39). The release is planned not before the end of > May.  The change was already announced in > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ReplaceDnf

Re: Obsolete of DNF by DNF5 in RAWHIDE

Il 29/05/23 23:33, Adam Williamson ha scritto: > On Mon, 2023-05-29 at 12:20 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: >> On Mon, 2023-05-29 at 17:08 +, Leigh Scott wrote: Il 24/05/23 09:40, Jaroslav Mracek ha scritto: I've started to see failing tests upon Bodhi update submission like

Re: Old stalled bodhi updates

Il 30/05/23 22:15, Adam Williamson ha scritto: > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-f563346d4d is > similar, but this time it was ejected from its push *to stable* (not to > testing), again allegedly for a missing tag. The builds have now > actually been deleted(!), so that updat

Re: Old stalled bodhi updates

Il 30/05/23 22:15, Adam Williamson ha scritto: > > https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-2b17e1e469 is stuck > because it was ejected from its initial push to testing, > which means the 7 day push to stable timer never really kicks in > (it needs to be *in testing* for seven days). I

Re: F39 Change Proposal: Build JDKs once, repack everywhere (System-Wide Change)

Il 30/05/23 20:37, Aoife Moloney ha scritto: > This document represents a proposed Change. As part of the Changes > process, proposals are publicly announced in order to receive > community feedback. This proposal will only be implemented if approved > by the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee.

Re: LibreOffice packages

Il 02/06/23 01:55, Sandro ha scritto: > > However, it surprises me that for a package, that is part of the > deliverables of Fedora releases, no coordination effort was made to > transition the package from Red Hat maintenance to Fedora maintenance. I > would even go as far as that this should have

Re: LibreOffice packages

> If I understand the announcement correctly, future RHEL will not include > LibreOffice > anymore. That’s the reason, why the maintainers have withdrawn. > > > Instead of Flatpak I would prefer to pick up the software directly from the > project. LO > provides a rpm. Maybe we have to change ou

Re: LibreOffice packages

Il 02/06/23 09:22, Jiri Vanek ha scritto: > Damn thats a long list. > > Indeed. I can help and pick up a couple of packages, but what about the hunspell*, hyphen*, mythes*? I think those will require more work than what a volunteer packager can bring. Yet, I suspect dropping them will blow up qu

Re: LibreOffice packages

Il 05/06/23 17:00, Michael J Gruber ha scritto: > I've taken up hyphen and the orphaned hyphen-* packages. They don't appear to > be high maintenance, but co-admins welcome, of course. Similarly, feel free > to admin as co-admin to other hyphen-* in case something needs coordinations. > The lang

Re: LibreOffice packages

Il 05/06/23 19:51, Roberto Ragusa ha scritto: > On 6/5/23 19:13, Demi Marie Obenour wrote: > >> Are you willing to do the packaging work? Asking upstream to create >> packages for every distribution is not reasonable. > I would never want upstream to do packaging, as experience teaches, > they wou

Re: Issue with Rawhide docker image?

Il 05/06/23 22:12, Ron Olson ha scritto: > Hey all, I am using docker and pulled the latest version of rawhide to > use interactively. Sitting in the container I ran `dnf -y update` and > got: > > Config error: Parsing file "/etc/dnf/dnf.conf" failed: Parsing file > '/etc/dnf/dnf.conf' failed: I

SIG proposal: libreoffice-sig

I'm forking this proposal off from the other thread, as it got buried under tons of posts. Shall we set up a libreoffice-sig to coordinate and ensure that libreoffice and all dependencies are properly maintained and updated as RPMs? Are there enough users which, like me, don't like the idea to

Re: SIG proposal: libreoffice-sig

Il 06/06/23 21:16, Fabio Valentini ha scritto: > On Tue, Jun 6, 2023 at 9:01 PM Gwyn Ciesla via devel > wrote: >> I would honestly prefer ownership be transferred to the libreoffice -sig, of >> which I am more than happy to be a member. > This is not possible, the "main admin" needs to be a perso

Re: Issue with Rawhide docker image?

Il 07/06/23 21:10, Adam Williamson ha scritto: > On Wed, 2023-06-07 at 14:55 -0400, Daniel Walsh wrote: >> On 6/7/23 13:31, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >>> On Wed, Jun 07, 2023 at 07:19:32PM +0200, Iñaki Ucar wrote: On Wed, 7 Jun 2023 at 19:15, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Tue, Jun 06, 2023 at 12:30:56

Re: SIG proposal: libreoffice-sig

I've filed the request to set up a libreoffice-sig: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/issue/11372 If I forgot something in the request, please correct it. I've also quickly set up a wiki page which can be enhanced in many ways... ;-) Mattia ___

Re: [HEADS UP] Fedora 39 Python 3.12 rebuilds to start in a side tag this week

Il 17/06/23 11:50, Miro Hrončok ha scritto: > On 13. 06. 23 14:02, Tomas Hrnciar wrote: >> Hello, >> >> in order to deliver Python 3.12, we are running a coordinated rebuild in a >> side >> tag. >> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python3.12 >>

  1   2   3   4   5   >