On 04/08/10 00:10, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> Heya,
>
> just a little heads up for when you upgrade a rawhide system that is a
> few weeks old to current rawhide: since we changed the way how some of
> the default symlinks of systemd are created you will end up with an
> installation that lacks m
Hello all,
currently I'm looking for a review for two of my packages:
lockfile-progs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=601115
is a dependency of
logcheck: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=589867
liblockfile (needed for lockfile-progs) is included in rawhide and in
updates-t
On 08/14/2010 02:19 PM, pbrobin...@gmail.com wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 13, 2010 at 9:19 PM, Matthias Runge
> wrote:
>> Hello all,
>>
>> currently I'm looking for a review for two of my packages:
>> lockfile-progs: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=60111
On 20/08/10 03:31, Reindl Harald wrote:
> Will 2.6.34 pushed to stable?
>
> My question is because there were also some> 2.6.30 builds for
> F11 which never rolled out and it could possible relax some things
> in combination with VMware / open-vm-tools
>
> https://bugzilla.rpmfusion.org/show_bug.c
On 04/11/10 04:23, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 11:10 PM, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
>> On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 10:59 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>> On Wed, 2010-11-03 at 22:12 -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
On Wed, Nov 3, 2010 at 9:55 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-11-03
ten to this list, please stop
affronts on him. This has nothing to do with systemd's quality,
however do you rate it.
Thanks
- --
Matthias Runge
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http:
xtra-form-fields * multi-registry * import-utils *
> django-authenticator==0.1.4
>
> If anyone wants to help out, reply here and file a review request.
> Thanks.
>
> Rahul
>
>
>
Hi,
just submitted
* django-authenticator https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=
xtra-form-fields * multi-registry * import-utils *
> django-authenticator==0.1.4
>
> If anyone wants to help out, reply here and file a review request.
> Thanks.
>
> Rahul
>
>
>
Hi
another one,
* django-extra-form-fields
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 20/09/11 09:53, Matthias Runge wrote:
> On 20/09/11 08:11, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
>> Hi,
>
>> The upcoming release of Askbot (used for
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Ask_fedora) has a number of
>> additional depe
t.
>
Thinking some time about this:
Would it help to have a person (per branch), responsible for
rebuilding packages with broken deps? The person may rebuild himself
or try to force package maintainers to rebuild, retire packages, when
they stay in broken state since .. days/releases/...?
Che
e no branch mod_wsgi for epel6?
Matthias
- --
Matthias Runge
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOsPccAAoJEOnz8qQwcaIW6uMH/jEsVwBvVcBWdvXUD3DUE1A
arlier, before
asking)
- --
Matthias Runge
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQEcBAEBAgAGBQJOsbSlAAoJEOnz8qQwcaIWiVIH/Apq0SHl591zPQRS7FmmMTxR
nPJco1W1iSJ4Vem8XLhlIHd1SBbFtOZZAfYxQN9CkqY
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/04/11 09:00, Ben Boeckel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> After upgrading my F15 netbook today, it failed to boot again. It
there are (at least) two known bugs regarding systemd-21 and booting.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=692573
https://bugzil
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
the subject says it: Is someone able to reach Douglas Warner?
I hope, he's ok, but it looks like, he's very busy.
He sought help for maintenance of syslog-ng [1], which I offered. This
was his last post on devel-list (dated Feb. 2, 2011), but I m
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 20/04/11 20:18, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Apr 2011 14:54:49 +0200
> Matthias Runge wrote:
>
Thank you for your offer.
Doug answered my mail and approved me. Recently I built latest versions
of eventlog and syslog-ng for rawhide
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
a few minutes ago I ran into two issues regarding bodhi feedback
- - I tried to submit feedback via fedora-easy-karma and got a 500
internal server error.
- - afterwards I submitted my vote via web interface and (probably)
produced this:
bodh
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Greetings,
we all know, the final change freeze arrives tomorrow, May 9th.
I would like to ask you, if you could provide some (positive) karma for
syslog-ng. It is the latest stable version and I'd like to pull it into
F15 before change freeze.
Than
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 20/06/11 13:27, Heiko Adams wrote:
> Hi,
> what does rpmlint's warning "file-not-in-%lang" mean? Searching google
> doesn't realy help.
I would try
rpmlint -i
It is much more informative than rpmlint (without paramet
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
I'll take these:
> django-contact-form
> django-notification
> django-pagination
> django-sct
> django-tagging
Matthias
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.o
o-pagination
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/django-notification
>
> If you want the EPEL branches, go ahead and take them in the pkgdb.
>
> -Toshio
>
Thank you!
I grabbed those EPEL branches just a few minutes ago.
- --
Matthias Runge
On 24/03/10 01:07, Brian C. Lane wrote:
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 03/23/2010 12:03 PM, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
>> Hello, all:
>>
>> I've been doing a poor job maintaining these. I'm sure someone else
>> can do a better job maintaining them and keeping them current
Hi,
who do I ask, to get the permission to set the fedora-cvs-flag in
bugzilla? I would like to import my recently approved package into cvs.
Or did I understood the procedure
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/CVS_admin_requests#New_Packages wrong?
(First wait for permission, then request a CVS modul
On 04/23/2010 08:47 PM, Jean-Francois Saucier wrote:
>> On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 11:44 -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
>> Devrim =?ISO-8859-1?Q?G=DCND=DCZ?= writes:
>>> On Fri, 2010-04-23 at 16:40 +0200, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=251805#c28
Should we have
tried to push it a few
minutes ago.
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/shared-mime-info
(it looks like proven-testers are able to submit any package to testing).
Is this correct?
Matthias
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
ra, #fedora-devel and
maybe in #fedora-(lang), if country is listed in fas.
There is a vacation list in wiki https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Vacation
which may be checked, too. Should vacation be moved to fas?
> Hope this helps and feel free to give suggestions, Pierre
- --
Matthias Runge
e this packaged it sooner than later. Are you going to
do this?
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
zilla as a link
>>> - otherwise:
>>> - warn user
could you also run rpmlint on spec and srpm and attach the output?
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
sub-package of bacula ?
>
>
This has been discussed earlier on fedora-packaging mailing list.
bacula-docs is rather large and doesn't change often. The plan is, to
make bacula-docs subpackage a real own package.
So, if the maintainer does it right, it won't pro
On Thu, Jan 19, 2012 at 6:50 AM, Dave Riches wrote:
django-dpaste -- dpaste is a code pastebin application using Django.
django-mptt -- Utilities for implementing Modified Preorder Tree Traversal
django-simple-captcha -- Django application to add captcha images to any
Django form
django-trackin
Am 24.01.2012 13:18, schrieb Bohuslav Kabrda:
Hi,
I think that you should follow the two guidelines that I mentioned in one of my
previous mails: [1], [2].
Therefore, you should use something like:
Provides: django-debug-toolbar = %{version}-%{release}
Obsoletes: django-debug-toolbar< 0.9.3-1
hias
[1]
http://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Packaging_guidelines#Bundling_of_multiple_projects
[2]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Bundling_of_multiple_projects
[3] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:No_Bundled_Libraries
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fe
On 31/01/12 01:44, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Matthias Runge wrote:
>> Maybe introducing a "testing"-release as concession to both sides is
>> acceptable?
>>
>> - newest versions, including risk of being broken -> rawhide
>> - (merely) stable versio
uld be mostly
unsupportable.
I also know, discussions about releases and packager policies
come and go (about once or even twice every release cycle), so let's
stop here.
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
I think this is really astonishing!
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
uch a good reason for me.
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
an 'everybody does it' is imho a bad reason.
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
anded in rawhide also, right?
Thanks,
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
, so
feel free and take any other ;-)
Matthias
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
package
maintainers getting commit rights automatically after a timespan,
right?
What about bug reporter being unable to fix the mentioned bug?
And does the bug-reporter get his right revoked after a time
(automatically?)
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@li
nsive process.
>
> Marcela
I'm thinking about how to support Jóhann with a proven packager (or
two). Since it seems not wanted by Fesco, to give him the corresponding
rights to commit his changes directly? This final target (all services
are supported by systemd) seems to be
ght
person to patch there. (You might substitute kernel with everything
you want, just to make the picture).
I'm a bit puzzled by quick-and-dirty 'fixes' which may lead to errors
somewhere else.
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
htt
en
packagers, they might jump in in this limited case.
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
ght way to propose
this change?
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
s
know, how to revert this.
What about: getting more proven packagers?
Make them more prominent, i.e. making it easier to contact
them?
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
throwing out people.
Ok, agreed, My question was merely academic. Who to contact, if...
I didn't ran into a limitation so far. Ok, once or twice. In total
the system works well. Changing a large number of packages is
surely a corner case.
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel m
easily be fixed.
[1}
https://docs.djangoproject.com/en/dev/releases/1.4-beta-1/#backwards-incompatible-changes-in-1-4
I'd support updating to 1.4 in fedora and creating a
python-django14-package for EL6.
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
e times larger than memory size to get
around file system caching. I guess, that's still valid.
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
can't really control, how your file system cache is filled.
Although I must say, measuring a the whole effort a few times
consecutively provides more reliable numbers (caution: but no
disk speed measurement).
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Hi,
currently, I'm the maintainer of logcheck. It parses system logs and
sends mails defined by regular expressions.
It's a package mostly adopted for debian. The README says, it is
recommended to create an own user and put it into adm group. This le
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/25/11 17:21, Till Maas wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 25, 2011 at 03:50:57PM +0100, Matej Cepl wrote:
>> Dne 25.2.2011 10:39, Mogens Kjaer napsal(a):
>>> create 640 root wheel
>>>
>>> to /etc/logrotate.d/syslog and have added bbuser to the wheel group.
>>>
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/28/11 17:46, Steve Grubb wrote:
> On Friday, February 25, 2011 03:13:31 am Matthias Runge wrote:
>> - change systems logs owners from root:root mode 600 to root:adm mode
>> 640 (or something similar)
>
> So, what would be
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 01/03/11 23:07, Cleaver, Japheth wrote:
>> On Friday, February 25, 2011 03:13:31 am Matthias Runge wrote:
>>> - change systems logs owners from root:root mode 600 to root:adm mode
>>> 640 (or something similar)
>>
sni
On 05/05/10 23:40, Warren Togami wrote:
> (10/12): samba-3.5.2-60.fc13.x86_64.rpm (71%) 73%
> [- ] 0.0 B/s | 3.7 MB
> 3340883129410265958989882401668816722716705737932:48 ETA
>
> Anyone else seeing this kind of behavior with F-13 yum within kvm or
On 06/05/10 10:47, James Cassell wrote:
> On Thu, 06 May 2010 09:02:06 +0200, Matthias Runge
> wrote:
>> On 05/05/10 23:40, Warren Togami wrote:
>>> (10/12): samba-3.5.2-60.fc13.x86_64.rpm (71%) 73%
>>> [
On 07/18/2010 11:05 PM, Till Maas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I cannot maintain my packages or handle anything else until further
> notice, because I had an accident.
>
> Regards
> Till
>
I'm sorry to hear and get well soon. I hope it's nothing serious.
Matthias
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproje
Am 27.07.2010 03:27, schrieb David Malcolm:
> Current status: 114 failing builds
> http://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/python-packaging/failures-2010-07-26-02.html
>
> See also the notes on:
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Python_2.7#Current_status
>
> Many of these appear to be pre-existing
Hello,
I'm orphaning python-xhtml2pdf. It has been more or less dead upstream
for years.
Matthias
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On 11/07/15 17:24, Haïkel wrote:
I fixed python-autopep8 as provenpackager.
Thank you! I had it on my plate and wanted to look at it today,
observing it was fixed already :D
Matthias
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
F
e Review.
There is this process to become a co-maintainer. I think this is quite
useful:
The way this is intended (IMHO), is, to get an upstream
developer becoming a package maintainer for the specific component. That
person at first might not be the best person to maintain an rpm package.
But this
On 03/09/15 02:51, Pete Walter wrote:
> On 09/02/2015 01:00 PM, Vít Ondruch wrote:
>>> I was advised to ask on this list for help regarding setting up a copr
>>> repository.
>>
>> Why Copr and not Fedora official package? Is there something which
>> conflicts with Fedora's Packaging Guidelines [1]
15-09-20 (0 weeks ago)
> python-django-tinymce (maintained by: yuwang, mrunge)
> python-django-tinymce-1.5.2-2.fc21.noarch requires tinymce =
> 3.5.10-3.fc23
Those 3 package should imho just go away.
Any takers? Otherwise I'd retire them in 2 weeks.
--
Matthias
st common issues and will report them.
HTH,
Matthias
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process
[2] https://github.com/derekp7/snebu/blob/master/snebu.spec
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
ng to older branches, please keep our stable updates policy in
mind [1].
Thanks,
Matthias
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Updates_Policy#Stable_Releases
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code
On 22/09/14 02:36, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> (Sorry for top-posting)
>
> I've been informed that there is an *official* poll coming shortly from the
> Flock Planning Committee. Please disregard this thread and await that poll.
>
>
To make it a bit more complicate: could we have more specifi
On 22/09/14 17:18, Haïkel wrote:
> Proposals are supposed to provide travel costs from pre-determined
> airports at the *targeted* period.
> If I trust informations from the proposals, SLC would be too expensive
> to cover travel expenses for EMEA folks.
>
A brief look revealed, a trip e.g. to Cap
On 23/09/14 14:23, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> Django 1.4 and 1.5 have been retired from the Fedora collection in
> Fedora 21 in favor of the two supported branches, 1.6 and 1.7.
>
Thank you Stephen,
I'm guilty to have missed to send this heads-up mail.
> On 09/23/2014 07:34 AM, Fedora Branched
On 24/09/14 19:54, Máirín Duffy wrote:
>> E.g. in June, flights to Boston are US$ 850 vs US$ 1400 in August. Maybe
>> it's a good idea to move the conference out of main holiday season?
>
> Are you located in EMEA or APAC? Because Flock alternates between North
> America and EMEA I think partially
On 24/09/14 19:01, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> ...snip...
>
> Fedora Infrastructure only runs it on RHEL6 currently.
>
> I don't know off hand if it runs on newer django, but can take a look.
>
> It would be nice to get it running on rhel7/epel7.
>
> kevin
>
>
Kevin, I totally agree.
askbot ups
On 24/09/14 21:36, Till Maas wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I noticed that mulitple packages own /etc/bash_completion.d/ even though
> it is nowadays part of the filesystem package. From what I read from the
> Guidelines, it is not clear to me whether it is prohibited or not.
> Should it be fixed? Here is a cur
Hello,
in Fedora 21, we have Django-1.6. Django-1.7 was released a few weeks
ago. As we're in feature freeze, but still pre-beta. I'd like to ask for
opinions, if an upgrade to Django-1.7 would be still acceptable.
I have a copr available containing Django-1.7 [1]
Thoughts?
Matthias
[1] https:
On 16/10/14 14:25, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> Hi
>
> On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 7:37 AM, Matthias Runge wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> in Fedora 21, we have Django-1.6. Django-1.7 was released a few weeks
> ago. As we're in feature freeze, but still pre-beta. I'd
On 16/10/14 14:40, Kalev Lember wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> We seem to have a number of broken dependencies in F21 that have gone
> unfixed for a quite some time. Not sure what's up with them; the
> maintainers are supposed to get daily notifications to make sure these
> don't go unnoticed.
>
> Does any
On 16/10/14 15:32, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> There are no Django applications that are part of the install sets of
> any of the Products or Spins so far as I am aware, so the risk to the
> Project deliverable dates would be minimal. I'd suggest bringing it to
> FESCo for a more complete risk-anal
nything in a week, we will be setting the point of
> contact on these packages to orphan.
I don't see a reason, why we need to wait for a week here, and I think,
we can solve this situation immediately.
Matthias
- --
Matthias Runge
-BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-
Versio
an error:
grubby fatal error; unable to find a suitable template
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
hat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806463
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 25/04/12 09:48, Vít Ondruch wrote:
> +1. I'd like to see this fixed before final.
Yes, me too. Afaik, SuSE supports btrfs even for their enterprise distro.
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/
ontend code. No-one has time
to substantially rewrite the oldui partitioning code just for btrfs, so
it's been taken out from the UI entirely just for this release.
Thank you Adam for this explanation! Sounds reasonable, and I'd say, let's
take another round and make it rock so
iew process for new packagers results in finding a
potential sponsor. This is some kind of suboptimal for helping people.
(To be clear, this never made a problem for me, but slows down the process.)
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
rrier is pretty high. There were a few proven
packager requests denied in the past.
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
to me. It would help in cases where new packagers vanish.
Paul
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
omething to check in fas? E.g. "congrats John Doe, this last week you
reviewed two packages, sponsoring one new packager"?
Or to report top 20 "Packagers/Reviewers/Sponsors of the week"?
Something like that works well in learning environments, why it should
work here?
--
On 26/04/12 20:57, Matthias Runge wrote:
Something like that works well in learning environments, why it should
work here?
should read:
... why it shouldn't work here?
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/ma
something to test
might work but is usually not a good strategy. There are about 700
packages waiting to get reviewed. Just start a few and the chances for
your packages will improve.
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
figuration in fedora is
IMHO left to the user. I think, this configuration snippet should be
dropped somewhere in the wiki as good example how to configure Xorg
The other problem, I see is, that there's no (real) upstream, and esp.
no issue tracker (other than bugzilla).
--
Matthias Runge
tly four days old.
In between, you should improve this situation by reviewing other packages.
Thanks,
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
. (tbd)
[1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_to_get_sponsored_into_the_packager_group
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
t makes sense to follow upstream here. The process is documented
here[1]. I'd inform the cloud WG, because they might be interested ;-)
Matthias
[1]
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Renaming_Process
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https:/
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 02/20/2014 08:19 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> Just to bring this thread back to life, we're getting to a point
> where support for Django 1.6 is becoming more and more necessary.
> Is there an ETA on its inclusion in Rawhide or COPR?
>
Whah,
django16, you'd still have the older Django installed, which
will produce a conflict. Thus the upgrade will fail.
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
a
python-django-1.5 version.
Matthias
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
fy all the packages; that
shouldn't be a big problem at all.
Matthias
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 01:28:54PM -0500, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> On 02/21/2014 01:14 PM, Matthias Runge wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 10:36:24AM -0500, Simo Sorce wrote:
> >> +1 I still have an application that is slowly moving to 1.5 but
> >> not there yet a
could be executed in a different phase, e.g before acutally
pushing to a repo. Separating from build would have another benefit:
being able to execute tests, e.g when required packages were updated.
That'd require significant changes in our infrastructure and in many
packages, as test suites and
nd for any package descriptions, patches etc.
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
patch
as well, so that we'll have sooner or later
2-3 Django versions installable in parallel.
Best,
Matthias
[1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1070230
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
urrently (still?)
owned by halfie.
The list of orphaned packages can be just a snapshot, as that's in
continuous flux. It's totally non obvious, why a package was orphaned
(by accident, because of upstream is dead, lack of time, ...)
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists
move their server from the server product
into the cloud?
Matthias
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
thias
--
Matthias Runge
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
kage anyways, as older Django versions will be retired sooner or
later.
If you require help, please contact me off list.
Thanks,
Matthias
[1] https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/python-django-1.6.2-1.fc20
[2] https://www.matthias-runge.de/2014/03/26/fedora-django-1-6/
--
M
1 - 100 of 245 matches
Mail list logo
