On Fri, Feb 21, 2014 at 08:40:52AM -0500, john.flor...@dart.biz wrote:
> I too would much prefer this approach. For somebody like me who wants to
> maintain company-private packages based on django, this affords more
> flexibility. I realize it may always mean more packaging work to keep
> several python-djangoXYs in the distro, but it makes for a less rigid
> coupling between the OS and what framework version you need to use.
The issue with this approach is, there is no upgrade, i.e. if your
fantasticApp-1.0 uses python-django15 and fantasticApp-1.1 requires
python-django16, you'd still have the older Django installed, which
will produce a conflict. Thus the upgrade will fail.
--
Matthias Runge <mru...@matthias-runge.de>
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
