Re: package kbackup is blocked for tag...

Alain Portal wrote, at 01/15/2010 01:50 AM +9:00: > Hi, > > I´m trying to build updates of kbackup but built failed with the following > error message : "package kbackup is blocked for tag dist-*". > > Can somebody tell me where is the problem? > > Regards, > Alain > Please file a ticket on

Re: gvfs causes hangs

Steve Grubb wrote, at 01/23/2010 10:42 PM +9:00: > Hello, > > I have been running into something on F-12 that is really annoying and was > wondering if anyone else is seeing this. When I use kmail and want to attach > a > file that is not in my Documents folder and go up one level to my homedir

Re: Non-responsive maintainer: Deji Akingunola

Robert Scheck wrote, at 08/09/2010 04:39 AM +9:00: > Hi, > as per non-responsive maintainer policy at >https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Policy_for_nonresponsive_package_maintainers > > I have filed: >https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=600992 > > Does somebody know how to contact D

Re: [HEADS-UP] adding missing systemd links in rawhide/F14 upgrades

Lennart Poettering wrote, at 08/12/2010 10:28 PM +9:00: > On Thu, 12.08.10 00:52, Jesse Keating (jkeat...@redhat.com) wrote: > >> >> Yes, that is correct. An already built version on f15 will always be >> "newer" than anything coming up from f14. > > Can I "undo" such a build? I did that mostly be

Re: Problems when compiling a package which uses boost::signals2.

Peng Wu wrote, at 08/17/2010 03:36 PM +9:00: > Hi, >I tried to rebuild ibus-pinyin package for Fedora 14 which uses > boost::signals2, but it failed. >Later I write a very simple test file, compiling use: >$g++ -c boost_test.cpp >And the test file content and compiling error log ar

Re: [gsettings-desktop-schemas] 0.0.1

Matthias Clasen wrote, at 08/25/2010 04:52 AM +9:00: > commit a29d94655cb277aec27bc0751f446d7934b8560b > Author: Matthias Clasen > Date: Tue Aug 24 15:43:57 2010 -0400 > > 0.0.1 > > .gitignore |1 + > gsettings-desktop-schemas.spec |7 +-- > sources

Re: Rawhide Koji borked??

Randall Berry wrote, at 09/05/2010 05:06 PM +9:00: > > I tried building a package on Koji against rawhide and got an error > before the build even began.[1] I tried to build the same package > locally with mock and it built just fine. Is there a problem with Koji? > > It bombs with: > BuildrootEr

Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-09-01 x86_64

Matt Domsch wrote, at 09/07/2010 11:24 AM +9:00: > Fedora Fails To Build From Source Results for x86_64 > using rawhide from 2010-09-01 > > Full rebuild of all packages. Each failed package was retried two > additional times. Those listed below have failed at least three > attempts to build. > >

Re: ImageMagick soname bump for F14

Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote, at 09/17/2010 05:10 PM +9:00: > 16.09.2010 18:35, Orion Poplawski wrote: >> Do we really want to do this, especially for a FTBS issue presumably >> against F15? >> >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/ImageMagick-6.6.4.1-13.fc14 >> > Please excuse m

Re: ImageMagick soname bump for F14

Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote, at 09/17/2010 10:26 PM +9:00: > 17.09.2010 12:56, Mamoru Tasaka пишет: >> Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote, at 09/17/2010 05:10 PM +9:00: >>>16.09.2010 18:35, Orion Poplawski wrote: >>>> Do we really want to

Re: libnotify issue on F14 and rawhide

Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote, at 09/24/2010 06:11 PM +9:00: > I have packaged xneur, which on review [1] and its build fine on Fedora 12 > and 13. On Fedora 14 it is failed [2] with error: > > /usr/include/libnotify/notification.h:28:21: fatal error: gtk/gtk.h: No such > file or dir

rawhide buildtree broken with the newest perl

Hello. Currently rawhide buildtree seems broken with the newest perl: http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2506686 http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=2506686&name=root.log DEBUG util.py:260: Error: Package: 4:perl-5.12.2-137.fc15.x86_64 (build) DEBUG util.py:260:

Re: Chain builds for non-rawhide

Jesse Keating wrote, at 10/06/2010 05:58 AM +9:00: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 10/5/10 1:36 PM, Severin Gehwolf wrote: >> Hi, >> >> I am maintaining eclipse-egit and eclipse-jgit. Since >> eclipse-egit depends on eclipse-jgit it makes sense to >> use chain-builds when b

Re: Package rebuilds for gcc bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634757

Jesse Keating wrote, at 10/06/2010 07:27 AM +9:00: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > As you might be aware, there was a period of roughly two weeks where a > gcc build (gcc-4.5.1-3.fc14) in the buildroots for both Fedora 14 and > Fedora 15. Items built with this could have unde

Re: Package rebuilds for gcc bug https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=634757

Hello: Jesse Keating wrote, at 10/06/2010 07:27 AM +9:00: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > As you might be aware, there was a period of roughly two weeks where a > gcc build (gcc-4.5.1-3.fc14) in the buildroots for both Fedora 14 and > Fedora 15. Items built with this could h

Re: mass rebuild of mysql packages in F-15

Tom Lane wrote, at 03/25/2011 12:23 AM +9:00: > =?UTF-8?B?TWFyY2VsYSBNYcWhbMOhxYhvdsOh?= writes: >>> Kevin Kofler writes: Probably needs BR flex-static. > >> I've applied BR and build ser >> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2940159 > > Thanks for that. As of now we have 75

Re: LD Changes To Implicit DSO Linking Update

Parag N(पराग़) wrote, at 02/10/2010 02:58 AM +9:00: > On Tue, Feb 9, 2010 at 11:18 PM, Jakub Jelinek wrote: >> On Tue, Feb 09, 2010 at 11:09:50PM +0530, Parag N(पराग़) wrote: >>> Anyway I find adding missing DSO to CFLAGS in SPEC is easy solution for >>> now. >> They don't belong to CFLAGS, those

Re: Fedora 13 has been branched!!

Jesse Keating wrote, at 02/17/2010 01:10 PM +9:00: > That's right folks, we are now branched for Fedora 13. What does this > mean to you? Well that depends on who "you" are, here are some "you"s > that we wrote about: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/No_frozen_rawhide_announce_plan#Use_Cases >Fr

Re: Orphaning some Ruby gems...

Darryl L. Pierce wrote, at 02/22/2010 10:37 PM +9:00: > Since I have little time and no use for the packages, I'm orphaning the > following items: > > * rubygem-activeldap > * rubygem-gruff > * rubygem-hoe > * rubygem-RedCloth > * rubygem-rubyforge > * rubygem-rufus-scheduler > * rubygem-st

Re: What happened to mercurial-1.5-2.fc11?

Neal Becker wrote, at 03/11/2010 09:52 PM +9:00: > fc13 and fc12 are shown here: > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/search/mercurial?_csrf_token=9d135a7a59b1892cc911a5f075633fb7dd4ef993 > > But not fc11. So I tried to rebuild, and got: > 2046149 build (dist-f11-updates-candidate, > /cvs/p

Re: How to become someone's sponsor when they are already sponsored

Jim Meyering wrote, at 03/18/2010 09:24 PM +9:00: > Dan Horák wrote: >> Richard W.M. Jones píše v Čt 18. 03. 2010 v 12:01 +: >>> Jim Meyering (FAS username: meyering) was sponsored by Warren Togami. >>> It seems that Jim can no longer set the fedora-review flag on packages >>> that he's reviewe

Re: review request - pre-review done, needing actual reviewer

David Timms wrote, at 03/18/2010 09:38 PM +9:00: > Hi, I would love to get tnef (an ms lookout email attachment lister / > extractor) review completed for F13 (ie before next week). Anyone > reviewer like to take a look (I can't convince every acquaintance to > stop sending ms "rich text" which

Re: help with build error : fixxref.py

Ankur Sinha wrote, at 03/26/2010 01:34 PM +9:00: > hey, > > I'm trying to build pyclutter from the latest git release. > > This is what I get from the tail of my build.log. > Can someone please tell me how to work around it? > > -- Installing ../docs/html/pt04.html > -- Installing ../docs/html

Re: help with build error : fixxref.py

Mamoru Tasaka wrote, at 03/26/2010 02:01 PM +9:00: > Ankur Sinha wrote, at 03/26/2010 01:34 PM +9:00: >> hey, >> >> I'm trying to build pyclutter from the latest git release. >> >> This is what I get from the tail of my build.log. >> Can

Re: help with build error : fixxref.py

Guidelines#Proper_posting_style ) On 2010-03-26 13:07:21??"Mamoru Tasaka" Wrote?? Mamoru Tasaka wrote, at 03/26/2010 02:01 PM +9:00: Ankur Sinha wrote, at 03/26/2010 01:34 PM +9:00: hey, I'm trying to build pyclutter from the latest git release. This is what I get from the t

Re: What are the rules for which package we build against in F-13?

Denis Leroy wrote, at 04/07/2010 03:20 PM +9:00: > On 03/08/2010 04:37 PM, Josh Boyer wrote: >> The buildroots are populated from packages in the: >> >> dist-f13 >> dist-f13-override >> dist-f12-updates >> >> tags. If a package isn't in one of those tags, it's not going to be in the >> buildroot.

Orphaning manedit

Hello, all: I've just released the ownership of manedit since I don't use this anymore. If you are interested in maintaining manedit, please take the ownership of this package. https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/name/manedit http://freshmeat.net/projects/manedit/ Regards, Mamoru -- deve

Re: How to control (or avoid) brp-python-bytecompile

Debarshi Ray wrote, at 04/30/2010 04:43 AM +9:00: > Anjuta carries a bunch of template sources which are filled up at > runtime to generate source files for various kinds of projects. These > are placed in /usr/share/anjuta/project. Now > /usr/lib/rpm/brp-python-bytecompile is trying to byte compil

Re: /lib64/libm.so.6: could not read symbols: Invalid operation

Eric "Sparks" Christensen wrote, at 11/21/2010 01:47 PM +9:00: > I'm working on updating the GPredict package for F13, F14, F15, and EL6. > The package builds fine on F14 and F15 but on F13 it fails with the > error '/lib64/libm.so.6: could not read symbols: Invalid operation'. > You can see the

koji server down?

Hello. It seems koji is currently down (no hosts seems enabled) http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/hosts and many tasks are hanging. Were there any announcement I may have missed or is the current status unexpected? Regards, Mamoru -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://adm

Re: Is there any value to per-Fedora branch ACLs?

Jesse Keating wrote, at 12/08/2010 03:20 AM +9:00: > While I'm looking into the git setup and ACLs and all this, I have a > question. > > Is anybody seeing any real value of having different commit ACLs per > Fedora branch? I've seen some argument for EPEL vs Fedora, but is there > real value in A

Re: g++ -shared -pthread doesn't link -lpthread ?

Rex Dieter wrote, at 12/08/2010 11:50 PM +9:00: > I'm trying to find the best solution to: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=661115 > > Where a shlib is generated using > g++ -shared -pthread ... > but the result is a library with undefined symbols to pthread_create (and > friends). > >

Re: [Guidelines Change] Changes to the Packaging Guidelines

Thomas Moschny wrote, at 12/10/2010 08:19 PM +9:00: > That seems by far the cleanest solution to me. Especially > development-oriented packages often contain example directories; > removing x-bits there only puts extra-burden on someone trying to play > with the examples. Indeed some examples/ dir

Re: [Guidelines Change] Changes to the Packaging Guidelines

Toshio Kuratomi wrote, at 12/11/2010 02:00 AM +9:00: > On Fri, Dec 10, 2010 at 08:40:23PM +0900, Mamoru Tasaka wrote: >> Thomas Moschny wrote, at 12/10/2010 08:19 PM +9:00: >>> That seems by far the cleanest solution to me. Especially >>> development-oriented pac

Re: help with build failure

gia...@gmail.com wrote, at 12/14/2010 06:50 AM +9:00: > Hi all, > I'm trying to fix the F15 build failure for gpointing-device-settings > reported here: > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=660864 > > and I'd need some help to understand what's going on. The main issue > was related to a n

Re: @core in F14 pulls in libX11

Garrett Holmstrom wrote, at 01/22/2011 03:54 PM +9:00: > It seems that the "core" yum group pulls in X11 libraries, at the very > least on x86_64, via the following dependency chain: > > policycoreutils > dbus-glib > gobject-introspection > cairo > libX11 > > Does that much seriously need to be in

Re: Problems with Perl in Rawhide?

Richard W.M. Jones wrote, at 01/27/2011 09:51 PM +9:00: > On Wed, Jan 26, 2011 at 10:04:45AM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >> Yes, perl was broken. I have untagged it and notified the maintainer >> (who was already looking at it). >> >> Things should work again as soon as the buildroot rebuilds. > > So

Re: apel -> emacs-apel

Michael Schwendt wrote, at 02/24/2011 08:48 PM +9:00: > On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 12:45:54 +0100, Michael wrote: > >> On Thu, 24 Feb 2011 12:46:09 +0900 (JST), Akira wrote: >> >>> BN> Orphan: apel >>> BN> ddskk requires apel = 10.7-4.fc12 >>> BN> emacs-common-w3m requires apel = 10.7-4.fc12 >>

Re: Bugs in debuginfo packages

Roland McGrath wrote, at 02/25/2011 10:16 AM +9:00: >> component: CCfits (sergiopr) >>file: >> CCfits-debuginfo-2.3-2.fc15.i686/usr/lib/debug/.build-id/da/7236759b8c63fab2925bd308123b9b277a238c >> - unused debuginfo, binary is not packaged: /usr/bin/cookbook > > The debuginfo is collected

Re: F-13 libtool broken by gcc update

Tom Lane wrote, at 05/04/2010 03:30 AM +9:00: > F-13 builds requiring libtool are now failing with > > DEBUG util.py:256: libtool-2.2.6-18.fc13.x86_64 from build has depsolving > problems > DEBUG util.py:256:--> Missing Dependency: gcc = 4.4.3 is needed by > package libtool-2.2.6-18.fc13.x8

Re: F-13 libtool broken by gcc update

Jakub Jelinek wrote, at 05/04/2010 05:17 AM +9:00: > On Mon, May 03, 2010 at 03:35:44PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote: >> Mamoru Tasaka writes: >>> $ TZ=UTC koji list-tag-history --build=gcc-4.4.4-1.fc13 >>> Sat May 1 00:57:24 2010: Tagged gcc-4.4.4-1.fc13 with >>&g

Re: F-13 libtool broken by gcc update

Mamoru Tasaka wrote, at 05/04/2010 05:31 AM +9:00: > Well, it seems usually koji runs 3 newrepo tasks at the same time, but > two of them were hanging for 9 hours (for dist-rawhide and dist-rawhide) small correction: for dist-rawhide and for dist-f14 -- devel mailing list

Re: Quake3 security issue and non-responsive maintainer: Xavier Lamien

Michael Schwendt wrote, at 05/11/2010 06:37 PM +9:00: > On Tue, 11 May 2010 14:37:22 +0530, Rahul wrote: > >> Hi >> >> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/pkgdb/acls/bugs/quake3 >> >> Quake 3 engine needs to be updated. The current version has security >> issues and breaks multiplayer in a couple of Q

Re: Errors in packaging kupfer

Ratnadeep Debnath wrote, at 05/26/2010 08:46 PM +9:00: > On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 2:05 PM, Chen Lei wrote: >> CFLAGS="$RPM_OPT_FLAGS" LDFLAGS="-lm" waf configure --prefix=%{_prefix} >> -> >> waf configure --prefix=%{_prefix} --no-runtime-deps >> >> >> All python modules are not needed in runtime, d

Re: ImageMagick update

Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus) wrote, at 05/30/2010 11:59 PM +9:00: > 22.05.2010 17:28, Hans de Goede пишет: >> This is not necessarily good advice either: >> 1) As these la files are for plugins which are located outside of %{_libdir}, >> they do no harm >> 2) In the past there have been cases

Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-05-27 i386

Nathanael D. Noblet wrote, at 06/01/2010 03:03 AM +9:00: > On 05/31/2010 11:44 AM, Matt Domsch wrote: >> Fedora Fails To Build From Source Results for i386 >> using rawhide from 2010-05-27 >> >> This is a full rebuild, the first for Fedora 14's rawhide. The >> builders all have Fedora 13 installed

Re: culmus-fonts packaging bug / Non-responsive maintainer

Michael Schwendt wrote, at 06/02/2010 06:49 PM +9:00: > http://bugzilla.redhat.com/570819 > > A ticket opened on March 5th, but Pravin Satpute just doesn't > respond. > > Does anyone know the languages involved here (lang=he, lang=yi) > and can fix this fonts package, please? Thanks in advance. I

Re: culmus-fonts packaging bug / Non-responsive maintainer

Mamoru Tasaka wrote, at 06/02/2010 08:12 PM +9:00: > Michael Schwendt wrote, at 06/02/2010 06:49 PM +9:00: >> http://bugzilla.redhat.com/570819 >> >> A ticket opened on March 5th, but Pravin Satpute just doesn't >> respond. >> >> Does anyone know t

Re: culmus-fonts packaging bug / Non-responsive maintainer

Toshio Kuratomi wrote, at 06/02/2010 11:51 PM +9:00: > On Wed, Jun 02, 2010 at 08:12:08PM +0900, Mamoru Tasaka wrote: >> Michael Schwendt wrote, at 06/02/2010 06:49 PM +9:00: >>> http://bugzilla.redhat.com/570819 >>> >>> A ticket opened on March 5th, but Pra

Re: Fedora rawhide FTBFS status 2010-06-01 x86_64

Hedayat Vatankhah wrote, at 06/04/2010 03:07 PM +9:00: > Hi, > My packages (rcsslogplayer and rcssmonitor) are being failed because of the > lack of Qt dependencies (QtNetwork requires ssl and crypto libraries from > openssl-devel package, and gobject-2.0 from glib2-devel). As these packages > a

Re: nss dependency bug seems to prevent any Koji Rawhide builds from working

Richard W.M. Jones wrote, at 06/09/2010 03:59 AM +9:00: > The error is: > > DEBUG util.py:256: nss-3.12.6-6.fc14.i686 from build has depsolving problems > DEBUG util.py:256:--> Missing Dependency: nss-softokn(x86-32) = 3.12.4 > is needed by package nss-3.12.6-6.fc14.i686 (build) > DEBUG util

Re: dist-git project update

Peter Robinson wrote, at 06/14/2010 05:58 PM +9:00: > On Mon, Jun 14, 2010 at 6:35 AM, Jesse Keating wrote: >> On Sat, 2010-06-12 at 08:22 +0200, Iain Arnell wrote: >>> On Fri, Jun 11, 2010 at 11:57 PM, Jesse Keating wrote: The current url is pkgs.stg.fedoraproject.org/and that work

Re: deluge and flags sub package

Rahul Sundaram wrote, at 06/15/2010 04:37 AM +9:00: > On 06/09/2010 09:08 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote: >> >> I'll check up this part and update the spec. >> > > Since Ankur doesn't have commit access to Deluge, I am going to be > doing the build by tom. Here is the latest spec > > http://ankursinha.fed

Re: deluge and flags sub package

Mamoru Tasaka wrote, at 06/15/2010 04:51 AM +9:00: > Rahul Sundaram wrote, at 06/15/2010 04:37 AM +9:00: >> On 06/09/2010 09:08 AM, Ankur Sinha wrote: >>> >>> I'll check up this part and update the spec. >>> >> >> Since Ankur doesn't ha

About mass-piled bugs for gtk-doc dependency

Dear all: Please don't fix your packages for this issue until enough discussion is done on fedora-packaging mailing list. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=604169 Regards, Mamoru -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: rawhide report: 20100622 changes

> Compose started at Tue Jun 22 08:15:10 UTC 2010 > Broken deps for i386 > -- > ruby-RMagick-2.13.1-1.fc14.2.i686 requires ImageMagick = 0:6.6.2.1 > ImageMagick-6.6.0.2-9.fc14 > -- > * Tue Jun 01 2010 Marcela M

Re: rawhide report: 20100622 changes

Ralf Corsepius wrote, at 06/23/2010 03:16 PM +9:00: > On 06/23/2010 06:50 AM, Jesse Keating wrote: >> On Wed, 2010-06-23 at 02:25 +0900, Mamoru Tasaka wrote: >>> Can we query what packages were "downgraded" due to this mass >>> perl-5.12.0-rebuild >>>

Re: Firefox conflicts xulrunner

Frank Murphy wrote, at 06/24/2010 05:13 PM +9:00: > Are these not symbiotic? > > > Resolving Dependencies > --> Running transaction check > ---> Package firefox.x86_64 0:3.6.3-4.fc14 set to be installed > --> Processing Conflict: firefox-3.6.3-4.fc14.x86_64 conflicts xulrunner >> = 1.9.2.4 > -->

Re: rawhide report: 20100625 changes

Richard Jones wrote, at 06/25/2010 10:40 PM +9:00: > Sorry, I'm away from the office this week and don't have access > to my email, but I noticed: > >> 1:libguestfs-1.3.8-2.fc14.i686 requires [etc] > > This is really strange because the latest libguestfs package built in > Rawhide is 1.3.21, see: >

Re: samba4 NVR koji issue

Ralf Corsepius wrote, at 06/28/2010 02:53 PM +9:00: > Hi, > > The samba4 package in rawhide would need a rebuild for perl-5.12.x. > However building fails with strange error message[1]: > > samba4-4.0.0-23.alpha11.fc14.2 (180065) failed on > ppc06.phx2.fedoraproject.org (noarch): > pg.DatabaseE

Re: who is Petr Pisar from redhat ?

Chitlesh GOORAH wrote, at 07/02/2010 04:09 AM +9:00: > Hello there, > > I would appreciate if someone else who is NEITHER a co-maintainer NOR > FESCo member don't version bump my packages, without notifying me. > > Petr Pisar seems to mess with my packages. > > It's simply disgusting !! > > Chitles

Re: who is Petr Pisar from redhat ?

Kalev Lember wrote, at 07/02/2010 05:51 PM +9:00: > On 07/02/2010 11:35 AM, Mamoru Tasaka wrote: >> Chitlesh GOORAH wrote, at 07/02/2010 04:09 AM +9:00: >>> Hello there, >>> >>> I would appreciate if someone else who is NEITHER a co-maintainer NOR >>>

Re: Need help for Gimp 2.7.1

Luya Tshimbalanga wrote, at 07/03/2010 07:10 PM +9:00: > Hello, > > I attempted to build a new version of Gimp 2.7.1 using Koji scratch method but > ended up with that result[1]. Here is attached spec file borrowed from Nils > as I > wanted to experiment that version along with Design. Can anyone

Re: rpms/shared-mime-info/devel shared-mime-info.spec,1.84,1.85

Colin Walters wrote, at 07/04/2010 03:23 AM +9:00: > Author: walters > > Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/shared-mime-info/devel > In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv21405 > > Modified Files: > shared-mime-info.spec > Log Message: > * Sat Jul 3 2010 Colin Walters - 0.71-3 > - Re

Re: rpms/shared-mime-info/devel shared-mime-info.spec,1.84,1.85

Colin Walters wrote, at 07/06/2010 11:29 PM +9:00: > On Sat, Jul 3, 2010 at 2:40 PM, Mamoru Tasaka > wrote: >> Colin Walters wrote, at 07/04/2010 03:23 AM +9:00: >>> Author: walters >>> >>> Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/shared-mime-info/devel >>> In

Re: Help with Koji error: "error: possibly undefined macro: AS_MESSAGE_LOG_FDdnl"

Richard W.M. Jones wrote, at 07/07/2010 02:42 AM +9:00: > I get this build failure trying to build vhostmd: > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=2298698 > > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=2298704&name=build.log > > + autoreconf > configure:11354: error: possibly

Re: webkitgtk abi bump

Michel Alexandre Salim wrote, at 07/05/2010 10:04 AM +9:00: > On Fri, Jul 2, 2010 at 4:36 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote: >> Just a headsup: I've just built webkitgtk-1.3.2 in rawhide, which >> changes library sonames, so things depending on it will have to be >> rebuilt. > ... >> seed > Does not build

Re: glibc heads up

Richard W.M. Jones wrote, at 07/22/2010 03:45 PM +9:00: > On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 10:54:32AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: >> right now a glibc build is going on that has --enablekernel=2.6.32 >> >> from Jakub >> >> Bumping that from 2.6.18 used currently means e.g. to get rid of compat >> bloat for

Re: Partial mass rebuild for Python 2.7 coming soon (I hope)

Jeff Spaleta wrote, at 07/22/2010 03:11 PM +9:00: > On Wed, Jul 21, 2010 at 10:00 PM, David Malcolm wrote: >> - numpy is segfaulting during %check; am waiting on a gdb build to >> finish (linked against 2.7) before I debug; this blocks pygtk2 which >> blocks various things > > Sigh... of course it

Re: Python 2.7 rebuild: maintainer help needed (please!)

David Malcolm wrote, at 07/24/2010 03:07 AM +9:00: > mtasaka (1): > wallpapoz Was waiting for gnome-python2 rebuild. Now succeeded. http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=186114 Regards, Mamoru -- devel mailing list d

Re: Seeking to merge python 2.7 into rawhide

David Malcolm wrote, at 07/27/2010 10:27 AM +9:00: > Current status: 114 failing builds > http://dmalcolm.fedorapeople.org/python-packaging/failures-2010-07-26-02.html > > See also the notes on: > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Python_2.7#Current_status > > Many of these appear to be pre-e

Re: rpms/python-sexy/devel python-sexy-gdk-pixbuf.patch, NONE, 1.1 python-sexy.spec, 1.15, 1.16

Orcan Ogetbil wrote, at 07/28/2010 02:44 PM +9:00: > Author: oget > > Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/python-sexy/devel > In directory cvs01.phx2.fedoraproject.org:/tmp/cvs-serv31418 > > Modified Files: > python-sexy.spec > Added Files: > python-sexy-gdk-pixbuf.patch > Log Message: > * Wed Jul

Re: rpms/python-sexy/devel python-sexy-gdk-pixbuf.patch, NONE, 1.1 python-sexy.spec, 1.15, 1.16

Orcan Ogetbil wrote, at 07/28/2010 03:19 PM +9:00: > On Wed, Jul 28, 2010 at 2:09 AM, Mamoru Tasaka wrote: >> Orcan Ogetbil wrote, at 07/28/2010 02:44 PM +9:00: >>> >>> Author: oget >>> >>> Update of /cvs/pkgs/rpms/python-sexy/devel >>> In dir

Re: fedora-packager and Python 2.7 problem

Richard W.M. Jones wrote, at 07/30/2010 09:22 PM +9:00: > > Because of the Python 2.7 transition, it's not possible at the moment > to install fedora-packager (or for me to fix the problems, because I > can't check in stuff). > > It appears there are only 1 package which is causing all the issues:

Re: fedora-packager and Python 2.7 problem

Mamoru Tasaka wrote, at 07/30/2010 09:30 PM +9:00: > Richard W.M. Jones wrote, at 07/30/2010 09:22 PM +9:00: >> >> Because of the Python 2.7 transition, it's not possible at the moment >> to install fedora-packager (or for me to fix the problems, because I >>

Re: fedora-packager and Python 2.7 problem

Orcan Ogetbil wrote, at 07/30/2010 09:36 PM +9:00: > On Fri, Jul 30, 2010 at 8:30 AM, Mamoru Tasaka wrote: >> Richard W.M. Jones wrote, at 07/30/2010 09:22 PM +9:00: >>> >>> Because of the Python 2.7 transition, it's not possible at the moment >>> to inst

Massive broken deps and tagging into dist-f14?

Hello, all: This morning I receided massive broken deps on F-14 and then received massive mails of tagging into dist-f14 tree. Can I assume that I can ignore these broken deps report or there is something I have to do for this? Regards, Mamoru -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Massive broken deps and tagging into dist-f14?

Jesse Keating wrote, at 07/31/2010 11:36 AM +9:00: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 7/30/10 7:13 PM, Mamoru Tasaka wrote: >> This morning I receided massive broken deps on F-14 and then received >> massive mails of tagging into dist-f14 tree. Ca

Re: Massive broken deps and tagging into dist-f14?

Michael Schwendt wrote, at 07/31/2010 05:44 PM +9:00: > On Sat, 31 Jul 2010 11:13:49 +0900, Mamoru wrote: > >> Hello, all: >> >> This morning I receided massive broken deps on F-14 and then received >> massive mails of tagging into dist-f14 tree. Can I assume that >> I can ignore these broken deps

Re: f14 boost-1.44.0 upgrade: pushed

Neal Becker wrote, at 08/01/2010 08:07 PM +9:00: > Benjamin Kosnik wrote: > >> >> The boost maintainers have updated the boost package to the current >> release (1.44.0) in rawhide for F14. More info here: >> >> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/F14Boost144 >> >> Rebuilds for devel packages t

Re: F-14 Branched report: 20100802 changes

Stephen Gallagher wrote, at 08/03/2010 01:24 AM +9:00: > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > >> python-recaptcha-client-1.0.5-3.fc14.noarch requires python(abi) = 0:2.6 > > This has been built in Koji since July 30th (1) > > Why is it not making it into composes? > > > (1) http

Re: Heads up: glibmm/gtkmm now requires -std=c++11

Kalev Lember wrote on 09/23/2015 09:35 AM: Hi, A quick heads up to anybody who might run into cryptic build errors when building apps that use glibmm/gtkmm: Latest glibmm/gtkmm stack in rawhide and F23 now uses C++11 features in header files. This means when building other programs that use tho

Re: Some orphaned packages

Hello: Toshio Kuratomi wrote on 08/15/2014 02:01 AM: As some of you may know from flock or following the FPC meeting minutes, I'm taking a break from Fedora. As part of that, I've reassigned most of my packages to others that can care for them. A few packages don't have obvious owners (mostly

RE: Versioning preloader

Hello: > I am packaging proxychains-ng[1] which make use of the .so file by its > preloader only, and is not for any usable development. Hence, the > upstream maintainer does not want[2] to version this .so file. > > To inhibit the rpmlint's unversioned so file warning, I have currently > written

Re: gdk-pixbuf2 package splitting

Hello: Richard Hughes wrote on 03/20/2015 11:51 PM: I've just pushed two new gdk-pixbuf2 builds to rawhide *not* F22. * The first splits out the modules (e.g. the ico, jpeg, gif loaders) to a separate subpackage called gdk-pixbuf2-modules -- which we'll certainly need on workstation but really

Re: Removing packages that have broken dependencies in F22 tree

Vít Ondruch wrote on 04/28/2015 11:52 PM: Dne 28.4.2015 v 11:35 Kalev Lember napsal(a): On 04/28/2015 10:16 AM, Vít Ondruch wrote: Dne 28.4.2015 v 00:45 Kalev Lember napsal(a): rubygem-rugged tdawson I am not maintainer of this, but please do not remove this. Rugged was broken by un

Re: Package name for EPEL7 branch

Hello: Greg Hellings wrote on 01/14/2016 01:30 PM: I'm working with a package (rubygem-minitest) which already exists in the core EL packages on the 4.x series. In order to enable a whole slew of new packages to be created in EPEL7, it will be necessary to package the 5.x series. However, since

Re: Retiring packages due to broken deps

Tom Callaway wrote, at 11/14/2012 02:26 AM +9:00: Since the following packages seem to be unmaintained and have broken deps in Fedora 18, I propose that they be retired and blocked before release: ruby-revolution Currently waiting for the upstream reply. Additionally, these packages are alre

RE: %ifarch note

> Since I hit this, I'd imagine other people might. > If your package has: > > BuildArch: noarch > > It will set %{_target_cpu} to "noarch". > > If you also use %ifarch in that spec file, you might be expecting it to > match %{_arch} (the architecture of the build server). It does not. It > matc

RE: RE: %ifarch note

> On Oct 11, 2013 1:55 PM, "Mamoru TASAKA" wrote: > > > > > Since I hit this, I'd imagine other people might. > > > If your package has: > > > > > > BuildArch: noarch > > > > > > It will set %{_target_cpu} to "noa

RE: Replies tearing threads apart [Was: %ifarch note]

> On 10/11/2013 09:26 AM, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: > > (Currently my reply seems to create new thread...) > Are you replying from a SmartPhone or other Android-Device? > > I have been observing this issue for quite a while and when ever asking > senders about their equipement

Re: abrt server report: 20130321

Josh Boyer wrote, at 03/21/2013 11:18 PM +9:00: On Thu, Mar 21, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Richard Marko wrote: On 03/21/2013 02:50 PM, Richard Marko wrote: In last two weeks these components were crashing the most: 1. kernel seen 45496 times (36% of all reports) http://retrace.fedoraproject.org/

Review swaps

Hello, all: I have 6 rubygems related review requests which need reviewers rubygem-unf_ext - Unicode Normalization Form support https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=892314 rubygem-unf Wrapper library to bring Unicode Normalization Form support to Ruby/JRuby (needs rubygem-unf_ext) https:

RE: Koji failure in f19: : tag requiresadmin permission

Hello: > Subject: libguestfs-1.21.25-1.fc19 unsuccessfully tagged into f19 by rjones > > Package: libguestfs > NVR: libguestfs-1.21.25-1.fc19 > User: rjones > Status: failed > Tag Operation: tagged > Into Tag: f19 > > libguestfs-1.21.25-1.fc19 unsuccessfully tagged into f19 by rjones > Operation

Re: bison, flex have broken deps in rawhide

Michael Schwendt wrote, at 04/04/2013 11:41 PM +9:00: On Thu, 4 Apr 2013 09:32:24 -0500, Bruno Wolff III wrote: On Thu, Apr 04, 2013 at 09:59:36 -0400, Tom Lane wrote: DEBUG util.py:264: Error: Package: bison-2.7-1.fc20.x86_64 (build) DEBUG util.py:264: Requires: m4 >= 1.4 DE

Re: Mission Impossible #1: qt without gtk

Adam Williamson wrote, at 05/12/2013 04:22 AM +9:00: On Sat, 2013-05-11 at 22:01 +0400, Eugene Pivnev wrote: Problematic dependencies that I found: xscreensaver_base -> libglade2 -> gtk2; These ones look a bit more significant. xscreensaver-base's dep on gtk2 in particular looks odd. The

Re: Mission Impossible #1: qt without gtk

Rahul Sundaram wrote, at 05/12/2013 12:59 PM +9:00: On 05/11/2013 11:19 PM, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: xscreensaver-demo, which is for configuring xscreensaver (daemon), requires gtk2. IIRC KDE can use xscreensaver modules and if so, the user has no real need of the demo command. It may be better

Re: Mission Impossible #1: qt without gtk

the xscreensaver daemon configuration tool. 12.05.2013 13:21, Mamoru TASAKA: Rahul Sundaram wrote, at 05/12/2013 12:59 PM +9:00: On 05/11/2013 11:19 PM, Mamoru TASAKA wrote: xscreensaver-demo, which is for configuring xscreensaver (daemon), requires gtk2. IIRC KDE can use xscreensaver

Re: Mission Impossible #1: qt without gtk

Eugene Pivnev wrote, at 05/12/2013 10:09 PM +9:00: 12.05.2013 13:21, Mamoru TASAKA: It seems that razorqt _really_ wants to launch xscreensaver daemon, so splitting out xscreensaver-demo from xscreensaver-base does not help here. You mean - xscreensaver daemon depends on glade and/or gtk2

RE: Koji doensn't resolve package dependency

Hello: > Hallo, > > I have got an odd issue with koji on building gnustep-base-1.24.4-7.fc19. > http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=419373 > > Koji told me, that the requirement gnustep-make >= 2.6.4-13 > could not been resolved. > > An research on bodhi told me, that gnustep-m

  1   2   3   4   >