On 02/25/2014 04:45 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 02/25/2014 08:28 AM, thierry bordaz wrote:
On 02/25/2014 04:17 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 02/25/2014 08:14 AM, thierry bordaz wrote:
On 02/25/2014 03:46 PM, Rich Megginson wrote:
On 02/25/2014 07:42 AM, thierry bordaz wrote:
On 02/25/2014 0
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/510
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/510/0001-Fix-for-ticket-510.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
Hi,
why do you want to keep the old rw locks in ifdefs ?
Regards,
Ludwig
On 11/15/2012 07:05 PM, Mark Reynolds wrote:
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/507
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/507/0001-Ticket-507-use-mutex-for-FrontendConfig-lock-instead.patch
--
389-devel m
o "cn=user
two,dc=example,dc=com" would require to normalize the two cn parts by
applying the directory string match.
Regards,
Ludwig
On 11/29/2012 02:27 PM, John Dennis wrote:
On 11/29/2012 06:06 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
Hello,
i would like to get comments on
Hi,
On 11/29/2012 03:37 PM, John Dennis wrote:
On 11/29/2012 08:47 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
Hi,
I found an older post by KurtZeilenga:
http://www.openldap.org/lists/openldap-software/200501/msg00102.html
and I think RFC4517, 4.2.15. distinguishedNameMatch can be read that
the comparison
Hi Mark,
for ticket 507 you replaced rw locks with mutex locks, now for the
backend you replace mutex locks with rw locks ? any reason why these are
better here ?
Regards,
Ludwig
On 12/07/2012 05:48 PM, Mark Reynolds wrote:
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/509
https://fedorahosted.org/3
justified to just change the lock type ?
Ludwig
Mark
On 12/07/2012 11:50 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
Hi Mark,
for ticket 507 you replaced rw locks with mutex locks, now for the
backend you replace mutex locks with rw locks ? any reason why these
are better here ?
Regards,
Ludwig
On 12/07
-ldapmodify-operation-time.patch
On 04/19/2013 04:57 PM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/346
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/346/0001-Ticket-346-version-3-Slow-ldapmodify-operation-time-.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https
ts of 389-devel digest..."
Today's Topics:
1. Re: RFC: New Design: Fine Grained ID List Size (Rich Megginson)
2. Re: RFC: New Design: Fine Grained ID List Size (Ludwig Krispenz)
--
Message: 1
Date: Tue, 10 Sep
The following fix does not provide a lock free syntax table, but
improves performance by drastically reducing the
syntax table lookups.
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/505
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/505/0001-Ticket-505-use-lock-free-access-name2asi-and-oid2asi.patch
Lud
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47521
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47521/0001-Ticket-47521-Complex-filter-in-a-search-request-doen.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47591
I have two versions of a fix, one correcting the calls to
PL_strncasecmp, one replacing them by PL_strcasecmp, which I think is
safe in str2entry_fast.
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47591/0001-Ticket-47591-v1-entries-with-empty-object
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/47527
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/47527/0001-Ticket-47527-Allow-referential-integrity-suffixes-to.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
13 matches
Mail list logo
