Hi,
On 12/07/2012 05:56 PM, Mark Reynolds wrote:
Hi Ludwig,
In Ticket 507, that change did not help after all, and will probably
be removed.
As far as I can tell, this is the only option we have for ticket 509.
yes, but the subject says lock free. So if we cannot make it lock free
is it justified to just change the lock type ?
Ludwig
Mark
On 12/07/2012 11:50 AM, Ludwig Krispenz wrote:
Hi Mark,
for ticket 507 you replaced rw locks with mutex locks, now for the
backend you replace mutex locks with rw locks ? any reason why these
are better here ?
Regards,
Ludwig
On 12/07/2012 05:48 PM, Mark Reynolds wrote:
https://fedorahosted.org/389/ticket/509
https://fedorahosted.org/389/attachment/ticket/509/0001-Ticket-509-lock-free-access-to-be-be_suffixlock.patch
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
--
389-devel mailing list
389-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/389-devel
