On Saturday, 30 May 2020 16.01.50 WEST Richard Shaw wrote:
> I'm working on updating FreeCAD both for Python 3.9 and coming VTK 9.0 and I
> noticed that something is pulling in a lot of texlive packages but I am not
> BR'ing any.
>
> First, how do I figure out which package is doing it? There's no
On Tuesday, 2 June 2020 15.57.14 WEST Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> The side tag is merging right now, you just have to wait for 100+
> packages to be signed, and they'll be in rawhide.
Oops, I submitted now a new lyx for rawhide. If for some reason it
picks the old boost I will rebuild it with 1.73.
On Tuesday, 2 June 2020 16.40.28 WEST Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> Yes, it used the old version:
>
> DEBUG util.py:602: boost-develx86_64
> 1.69.0-22.fc33 build 9.9 M
>
> But I don't think it depends on the shared libraries so it's not going
> to have
On Tuesday, 16 June 2020 03.41.09 WEST Neal Gompa wrote:
> CMake themselves do not recommend doing in-source builds (and they've
> already warned that this will eventually stop working). Meson doesn't
> even permit it. These days, Autotools is the weird exception that
> mostly mandates in-source bu
On Monday, 22 June 2020 20.05.45 WEST Martin Gansser wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am trying to compile bear-engine for rawhide, but this fails with the
> following error message [1]:
> /builddir/build/BUILD/bear-c873f289d860a2e11d36a2e619ea8c51167098c4/bear-en
> gine/core/src/net/code/client.cpp: In member
On Tuesday, 16 June 2020 07.09.17 WEST Lumir Balhar wrote:
> Hello.
>
> The change has been accepted and implemented in:
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2020-922b21ffde
>
> This means that the affected packages will FTBFS with the following error:
>
> %_python_bytecompile_extra
On Monday, 29 June 2020 22.23.00 WEST Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> This tends to take with it many things that it shouldn't, like gdb,
> dbus-x11, python3-pwquality, tigervnc-server-minimal and tmux - among
> others.
I noticed that before but at least on F32 it does not do it anymore. I have
rem
On Tuesday, 30 June 2020 00.56.23 WEST Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> I just tested it on F32 Workstation and for me it does. Have you
> cleaned dnf's databases by any chance? I think either that or having
> the packages as dependencies of something that was installed by the
> user would prevent the
On Tuesday, 30 June 2020 00.56.23 WEST Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
> I just tested it on F32 Workstation and for me it does. Have you
> cleaned dnf's databases by any chance? I think either that or having
> the packages as dependencies of something that was installed by the
> user would prevent the
On Thursday, 2 July 2020 21.38.46 WEST Eric Sandeen wrote:
> 3 files in lost+found, -1 files gone/unreachable
This last line from the xfs test seems suspicious (the -1 file gone). :-)
--
José Abílio
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.o
While calling "fedpkg build" I got the warning (error?) displayed in the
title:
...
Could not execute build: database outage
Apparently the build is over and well. :-)
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=46677172
This is just a report since everything is OK, I have used a side t
On Monday, 6 July 2020 18.55.11 WEST Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> I restarted the database server this morning. It usually takes about 1.5
> seconds to restart, so you must have just hit it in that window.
>
> kevin
My only concern was if there was any kind of (hidden) consequence of the
error. From yo
Hi,
I have submitted python-nikola to unretire the package for rawhide
since
it is available in the other branches.
A review swap is welcome.
Regards,
--
José Abílio
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraprojec
On Wednesday, July 6, 2016 4:58:14 PM WEST Igor Gnatenko wrote:
> Link to review request?
Oops, I knew something was missing. :-)
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353169
--
José Abílio
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/de
Hi,
I send this here in case someone has seen this and if not where to
report.
I want to configure the notifications to receive email for the messages I am
interested in.
I go to https://apps.fedoraproject.org/notifications/
and login.
Then I choose email and I add the email address I
On Tuesday, July 26, 2016 11:27:23 AM WEST Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> I've not seen it before. Best place would be:
>
> https://github.com/fedora-infra/fmn.web/issues
Thank you.
I submmitted https://github.com/fedora-infra/fmn.web/issues/75
> > The issue here is that I do not know if the problem lie
José AbílioOn Wednesday, July 27, 2016 3:43:20 PM WEST Matos wrote:
> Thank you.
>
> I submmitted https://github.com/fedora-infra/fmn.web/issues/75
Following Kevin and pingou's message I have switched browsers. I used QupZilla
and it worked. Strange...
Regards,
--
José Abílio
--
devel mailing
On Friday, July 29, 2016 11:21:38 AM WEST Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> emacs-common-ess (f23)
> emacs-common-ess (f24)
> emacs-common-ess (f25)
> emacs-common-ess (master)
I took these.
--
José Abílio
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@l
As the title says for version 7.800.1
According to repoquery the packages that require armadillo are:
mlpack (LGPLv3+)
gdal (MIT)
mmseq (GPLv2+)
so the license change will have no impact on derived packages.
I will build for rawhide first and then F2[4-6].
Regards,
--
José Abílio
On Wednesday, 24 May 2017 16.58.10 WEST Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
> > Isn't this because "Version" is the name of a tag? Just like Name and
> > Release. And Tag names are not case-sensitive, so you could write this
> > in your spec file:
> >
> > VERSION: 12.34
> >
> > Reusing those for your own macros
On Friday, 26 May 2017 17.29.38 WEST Adam Williamson wrote:
> Hi folks!
>
> If you ran into problems like RPM or dnf or related apps reporting
> database errors or unexpected crashes in the last few days, it is
> almost certainly due to a broken libdb update that was sent to updates-
> testing bri
On Sunday, 25 June 2017 16.38.00 WEST Steve Grubb wrote:
> For example, when I run RStudio, I get:
>
> R graphics engine version 12 is not supported by this version of RStudio.
> The Plots tab will be disabled until a newer version of RStudio is
> installed.
You need to update Rstudio to a newer
On Monday, 6 April 2020 15.21.18 WEST Nadav Har'El wrote:
> Hi, my name is Nadav Har'El. I'm here because I noticed that the
> "python-cassandra-driver" driver was orphaned. When asking to adopt it, I
> was told (https://pagure.io/releng/issue/9365) that because this package
> had already been orph
On Tuesday, 14 April 2020 14.47.15 WEST Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> Considering that rpmautospec is mostly a python module with two koji plugins
> and a small CLI, it seemed appropriate to us to follow the python naming
> guidelines, and this is how we understand them.
>
> Pierre
Sure. :-)
But s
On Friday, 17 April 2020 16.03.49 WEST Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> I guess personal taste is at issue here, so I will provide the complete
> opposite feedback. IMO our default wallpapers are at their best when
> they're abstract and geometric. The new version of the F32 wallpaper is
> one of my all-
On Friday, 17 April 2020 19.05.40 WEST Pierre-Yves Chibon wrote:
> I really do not see how you could construct this reply from Michael's.
> He clearly starts with IMO and the rest of is the expression of his opinion,
> he never calls anyone anything.
>
> I'm confused here.
>
> Pierre
I left this
On Monday, 4 May 2020 16.41.26 WEST Richard Shaw wrote:
> One thing that really bugs me is there's still a catch-22. When you're
> working on a new package there is no "git" to work with. I used to just
> install all the -devel packages and work with rpmbuild directly but you
> have to override the
On Monday, 11 May 2020 18.42.09 WEST Miro Hrončok wrote:
> The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
> are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
> that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
> https://fedorapr
On Monday, 11 May 2020 19.31.39 WEST Miro Hrončok wrote:
> Any code contribution to make the output work better is appreciated, but
> unfortunately, I am not available to work on this, sorry
Where is the code?
I search for it without success. :-)
--
José Abílio
On Friday, 22 May 2020 12.51.26 WEST Fabio Valentini wrote:
> Also, the build now fails with "! LaTeX Error: File `hanging.sty' not
> found.". graphite2 sources do not contain any .tex files, but
> graphite2 uses LaTeX / pdf output when building documentation /
manual
> with doxygen, so I'm pretty
On Thursday, 26 December 2019 16.07.01 WET Globe Trotter via devel wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I am tryingto repackage pdf-stapler with python3.
>
> My updated SPEC file is:
>
> https://paste.centos.org/view/b7477290
>
> This SPEC file builds the binary using
Something weird in your spec file is that it
On Friday, 27 December 2019 14.50.16 WET Globe Trotter via devel wrote:
> Thank you!
>
>
> Here is my updated spec file:
>
> $ fpaste pdf-stapler.spec
> Uploading (4.8KiB)...
> https://paste.centos.org/view/6ddc6eec
>
> However, I can not change the directory to a stapler directory. I get the
>
On Sunday, 29 December 2019 14.38.59 WET Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> Yes, should be all back now.
>
> kevin
Famous last words. ;-)
Even although it does not look like I am taking this occasion to thank you,
and the remaining Infra team, for all the work to get the wheels running
smoothly. The moments
On Wednesday, 26 June 2019 12.12.47 WEST Miro Hrončok wrote:
> jamatospython-natsort
Fixed. I have removed the dependency.
Thank you. :-)
--
José Abílio
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-
On Wednesday, 4 March 2020 15.24.58 WET Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Do you want to make Fedora 32 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
> try to run:
>
> # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
> # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again
> sudo
On Wednesday, 4 March 2020 15.24.58 WET Miroslav Suchý wrote:
> Do you want to make Fedora 32 better? Please spend 1 minute of your time and
> try to run:
>
> # Run this only if you use default Fedora modules
> # next time you run any DNF command default modules will be enabled again
> sudo
On Wednesday, 4 March 2020 16.05.14 WET José Abílio Matos wrote:
> OK, I have just 15 problems.
Now with module reset and removing (retext from F29):
Error:
Problem 1: package python2-pytest-cov-2.8.1-5.fc31.noarch requires
python2.7dist(coverage) >= 4.4, but none of the providers
On Thursday, 5 March 2020 21.11.37 WET Adam Williamson wrote:
> I mean, it shouldn't be too hard to standardize on having them all work
> both ways, even.
I agree with Adam. What would be the drawback from this change?
It is backwards compatible (an important issue in this context).
And there are
On Thursday, 12 March 2020 09.03.38 WET Carlos "casep" Sepulveda wrote:
> Error:
> Problem 1: package VirtualBox-6.1-6.1.4_136177_fedora31-1.x86_64
> requires python(abi) = 3.7, but none of the providers can be installed
> - python3-3.7.6-2.fc31.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade repository
For what it is worth while updating R-waveslim I noticed that the license is
wrong as it says GPLv2+ while it is BSD
on my defense I should point that the homepage of the package:
http://r-forge.r-project.org/projects/waveslim/
says GPL.
I am now fixing it in the update package.
--
José Abílio
Hi,
when entering a new update through the web interface of bodhi I do
not get the list of open bugs in bugzilla, no mater the wait. There is a
rotating symbol as it happens to select the build(s) but I continues without
any output.
If I try to insert the bug number by hand the number s
On Thursday, 19 March 2020 11.05.18 WET Tom Hughes wrote:
> Are you using a browser extension like uMatrix that may be blocking
> the cross domain query from bodhi to bugzilla?
>
> Tom
The only extension that I am using, and could potentially do that, is EFF's
Privacy Badger.
I will try a new u
On Tuesday, 4 December 2018 13.09.16 WET Vascom wrote:
> What about Octave 4.4. for F29?
It is already there, although hidden (in a sense). :-)
BTW the same applies for F28.
Octave 4.4 is available as module.
See http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/octave-maintainers/2018-11/msg00117.html
Basicall
On Friday, 25 January 2019 15.57.53 WET Jonathan Wakely wrote:
>
> I've done local builds of most of them, and 130+ build OK. Any that
> fail I'll create bugzilla FTBFS reports for.
FWIW lyx fails but a patch has already been committed upstream to solve the
issue.
The short version is to remove
On Tuesday, 29 January 2019 20.11.13 WET Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> Thanks! Do you want me to apply that patch for rawhide and rebuild it?
I have added the patch and changed accordingly the spec file and I am
expecting for it to be picked by the rebuild in course. :-)
Thank you. :-)
--
José Abíli
On Friday, 8 March 2019 11.28.43 WET Miro Hrončok wrote:
> There is a FedoraReview port to Python 3 that needs real word testing by
> packagers.
>
> When you use FedoraReview, please use the Python 3 port instead to help us
> find bugs.
>
> Instructions are at https://pagure.io/FedoraReview/pull-
On Thursday, 14 March 2019 16.26.06 WET Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> I don't think that should be the case, the build log at 1688565-R-ggplot2/
> build.log is a short non informative one, while the
> 1688565-R-ggplot2/results/ build.log is the actual detailed build output.
OK. This is not what I
On Monday, 18 March 2019 16.11.20 WET Sérgio Basto wrote:
> On Fri, 2019-03-15 at 14:21 +0000, José Abílio Matos wrote:
>
> > No matching package to install: 'R-mapproj'
>
> --
> Sérgio M. B.
Sure. I know/was aware of what the problem is/was. :-)
My point was
On Saturday, 1 June 2019 20.29.33 WEST Georg Sauthoff wrote:
> On Sat, Jun 01, 2019 at 11:28:37AM -0700, Samuel Sieb wrote:
> > On 6/1/19 10:40 AM, Georg Sauthoff wrote:
> > > $ mkdir -p o ; rpm2cpio dpm-copy-server-mysql-1.12.0-2.fc29.x86_64.rpm |
> > > cpio -di -D o -v>
> > Why are you going thr
On Sunday, 2 June 2019 00.37.19 WEST Nico Kadel-Garcia wrote:
> He wants to *read* the man page, not merely know that it exists. No
> idea why it might be a ghost file?
Oh, fair enough, it is my fault then. :-)
> But in the meantime, install it in
> a "mock" setup or a VM to read it or install it
On Monday, 10 June 2019 15.20.56 WEST Pavel Raiskup wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> for some reason (not yet known, tracked in fedora infra [1]) ppc64le
> builders fail to spawn, and what is even worse this issue also affects x86
> builders. So because of this, we temporarily disabled ppc64le
> architecture
On Tuesday, 11 June 2019 17.15.18 WEST Ben Cotton wrote:
> Reminder that voting is still open for two more days.
I think that you mean nine more days. No? :-)
That is what is written in the site and what I was expecting.
Best regards,
--
José Abílio
___
On Sunday, 16 June 2019 03.09.41 WEST Elliott Sales de Andrade wrote:
> Hi R-interested packagers and others,
>
> So now the question is how to apply this. I expect there are social
> concerns, i.e., discussing with the R maintainer, making a
> Self-contained Change, etc. But for this email, I am
On Tuesday, 18 June 2019 04.31.35 WEST Orion Poplawski wrote:
> Built in rawhide. Modular updates submitted for F30 and F29.
>
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-2019-917b958a40
> https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-MODULAR-2019-fe2f378273
In order to update in F
On Wednesday, 26 June 2019 13.03.44 WEST Vít Ondruch wrote:
> I agree with the "# Stop linting code in %%check and measuring coverage,
> this is upstream's business" reasoning. Shouldn't we mention that
> somewhere in guidelines?
>
>
> Vít
The funny part is that this consideration applies to mor
On Wednesday, 26 June 2019 19.07.27 WEST Adam Williamson wrote:
> Oh, man. I thought we'd decided against this in the past? I'm worried
> about the cost/benefit ratio on such a change.
If this were only related with python I would agree with you.
Yet this also applies to lots of other tools like
On Monday, 1 July 2019 18.59.42 WEST Björn Persson wrote:
> Porting a Python 2 program to Python 3 is not like switching to another
> version of GCC. It's more like converting a C program into C++ – and
> even then, my gut feeling is that the minimal changes necessary to turn
> a typical C program
On Tuesday, 31 July 2018 23.12.22 WEST Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> Hello,
>
>
> Today is my first year anniversary of contributing to Fedora, yay us!
Congratulations for all your (hard) work Robert-André. :-)
Regards,
--
José Abílio
___
devel maili
On Tuesday, 7 August 2018 07.29.24 WEST Vascom wrote:
> Hi Jerry,
> You're doing a good job. Thanks.
>
> Are you plan update Octave to 4.4.0?
>
> --
> Best regards,
> Vasiliy Glazov
Actually it is Orion who usually does that, also 4.4.1 should be out soon.
After there are a
batch of updates fo
On Sunday, 12 August 2018 00.02.19 WEST Iñaki Úcar wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I'm still seeking a sponsor. My first package review request was
> approved (thanks, Robert-André!), and I've been doing some informal
> reviews, which are linked in the comments here:
>
> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/sho
Hi,
armadillo 9.100.5 was released this week. The previous stable release
was
8.600.5. So we a major version bump from 8 to 9.
According to both the release notes and an email exchange with the upstream
maintainer "There are no API breakages, but there are subtle behavioural
differences
On Friday, 17 August 2018 16.53.37 WEST José Abílio Matos wrote:
> reveals that the only packages that require armadillo are:
> * gdal
> * mlpack
> * mmseq
OK, after following the prescribed procedure for rawhide I had only a problem
with gdal, that was already failing before
On Friday, 7 September 2018 18.01.17 WEST Adam Williamson wrote:
> > python-multiprocessing orphan 3 weeks ago
>
> This is a pretty significant and commonly-used lib...
Although you are right about the significance of the package IIRC this module
belongs to python
On Wednesday, 10 October 2018 14.45.22 WEST Kamil Paral wrote:
> That policy has been cancelled. Since the upgrade tools started doing
> basically "dnf distrosync (--allowerasing)" for upgrades, the upgrade path
> between distros stopped being a major issue and the policy has been
> dropped.
Even
On Wednesday, 10 October 2018 21.34.47 WEST David Timms wrote:
> Given Fedora runs on community power, have you tried rebuilding the
> packages that interest you under f29 to see/fix any problems that arise ?
Yes. As long as the time that I available allows.
> You can also use the web tools to se
On Monday, 13 March 2023 03.50.01 WET Yaakov Selkowitz wrote:
> This is a non-responsive maintainer check for jamatos (José Matos). Does
> anyone know how to contact José?
I am here and I will look into those issues.
The end of the first semester fallback took a lot longer than I was expecting.
On Monday, 26 August 2024 20:57:01 WEST Leslie Satenstein via devel wrote:
> Add to the following, "Aisleriot" and "Meld"
>
> I definitely need "Meld".
>
>
> Leslie Satenstein
Meld already has a (quite simple) patch:
https://src.fedoraproje
cp -a scripts/dump_osc.1 scripts/send_osc.1 %{buildroot}%{_mandir}/man1/
--
José Abílio Matos--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
,
--
José Abílio Matos
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https
have at least 320
GiB of RAM, they are clearly under-powered. ;-)
On a more serious, and boring, note does this warning rings a bell to anyone
who had a similar problem?
FWIW what is failing are the tests in x390x as they work for all other archs.
Best regards,
--
José Abílio Matos
On Monday, 17 October 2022 08.28.11 WEST Jaroslav Mracek wrote:
> Thank you for pointing this. Why DNF5 is not named as DNF and why we do not
> plan to name it as DNF? DNF5 is a completely new product.
That is where the irony is, it is a new product but you still keep the moniker
DNF in the name
On Friday, 9 February 2018 09.35.34 WET Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote:
> Hi José,
>
> are you still around? You activity suddenly stops around May 28th
> 2017, I hope nothing serious happened.
Hi,
I am alive. And I have been extremely busy, specially with classes and
related work
in
On Thursday, 16 June 2022 17.55.45 WEST Antonio T. sagitter wrote:
> Hi all.
>
> I need to downgrade python-reportlab in Fedora 35 for a missing runtime
> dependency. What's the most accurate way?
>
> Bug ticket: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2097817
> Update: https://bodhi.fedorapr
On Monday, 20 June 2022 12.45.07 WEST Tomas Hrnciar wrote:
> python-doit immanetize jamatos
Looking in to src I search for the build to understand why did it failed:
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=1989134
as far as I can see it built without any issue.
Does that m
using spamassassin). :-)
--
José Abílio Matos
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
Hi,
I found that postscript files that do not open with either evince or okular
in F33 (I am aware that they use poppler as backend so probably the culprit is
here). Evince tells me that it loading the file but it never ends. Okular
accepts the file if I open it using "Import PostScript as PDF
On Saturday, October 17, 2020 9:14:59 PM WEST Christian Dersch wrote:
> Same here, opening with Okular on F33 shows error messages such as
>
> (libspectre) ghostscript reports: fatal internal error
> -100org.kde.okular.generators.spectre: Generated image does not match
> wanted size: [0x0] vs requ
On Thursday, October 29, 2020 2:05:53 PM WET Tomas Hrnciar wrote:
> Hello everyone,
>
> I am just letting you know that we successfully replaced all 3.? globs
> yesterday.
>
> Regards,
> Tomáš Hrnčiar
Thank you for doing that, and also for the previous round.
But FWIW I still think that it would
On Thursday, October 29, 2020 10:49:27 PM WET Barry wrote:
> After the trauma of the 3.0 release it would be mad to do a python 4.0 for
> such a trivial reason as packagers that assumed, wrongly, that version can
> only have single digits.
>
> Barry
This now is an epistemological discussion. :-)
On Monday, November 2, 2020 2:44:39 PM WET Jakub Jelen wrote:
> I am looking for any kind of feedback from the idea through the
> usability, implementation. Is this something you would like to see in
> Fedora soon? Do you have something against this? Is your use case missing?
Hi Jakub,
if I am n
On Thursday, November 12, 2020 11:24:47 PM WET Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> This list is public, and archived by all sorts of different websites.
> So too late
Michael, everyone knows that the best way to keep a secret is to hide it in
plain sight. :-)
--
José Abílio___
On Sunday, November 15, 2020 3:10:03 PM WET Jason Edgecombe wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I want to rebuild some of the fedora 33 packages for EL8 (vagrant, for
> example), but I'm having trouble getting all of the build dependencies
> right. I ran dnf to download the SRPMS with the --resolve option,
On Monday, November 16, 2020 12:12:53 AM WET Jason Edgecombe wrote:
> Hello everyone,
Hi Jason,
welcome to Fedora. :-)
> I'm a Linux admin at a university supporting around 100+ EL7/8 and Ubuntu
> machines. I've been using Linux as a hobby since around 1994 and
> professionally since 1999. My
On Thursday, November 19, 2020 5:54:52 PM WET Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
> I'm not sure that message editing is a feature.
In fairness as long as the grace period is fixed and small that is not a bad
thing.
E.g it allows you to fix lots of cases where you found that the message was
incomplete aft
On Friday, November 20, 2020 4:26:53 PM WET Ben Cotton wrote:
> == Release Notes ==
> The GNU Compiler Collection version 11 will be released shortly. See
> https://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-11/changes.html.
>
> The GNU C Library version 2.32 will be released at the beginning of
> August 2020. The current N
On Sunday, November 29, 2020 3:20:34 PM WET Richard Shaw wrote:
> Never mind, it has been reported and "fixed" it just needs to propagate to
> the builders I suppose.
>
> Thanks,
> Richard
I am also in that queue. :-)
Thank you for letting us know that the problem is fixed.
--
José Abílio__
On Tuesday, December 8, 2020 1:31:15 PM WET Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Dec 8, 2020 at 1:10 PM Steve Dickson wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Hello,
> >
> >
> >
> > I realize this is probably not the most appropriate list
> > to ask this question... but
> >
> >
> >
> > I have a pair of Jabra Elite 45h he
On Tuesday, December 8, 2020 9:04:20 PM WET Steve Dickson wrote:
> Its a kernel problem... On the 5-9 kernel I tried
> bluez-5.53, bluez-5.54, bluez-5.5 all failed
> with Connection refused (111)
>
> Then I tried bluez-5.5 on the last 5.8 kernel
> (5.8.18-300.fc33)... everything worked again!
>
On Wednesday, December 9, 2020 3:40:47 AM WET Steve Dickson wrote:
> Its a kernel problem... On the 5-9 kernel I tried
> bluez-5.53, bluez-5.54, bluez-5.5 all failed
> with Connection refused (111)
>
> Then I tried bluez-5.5 on the last 5.8 kernel
> (5.8.18-300.fc33)... everything worked again
>
On Tuesday, December 15, 2020 7:17:21 PM WET Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> If you upgrade in f33 or rawhide to nss 3.59, all your firefox add-ons
> will stop working. Worse they will appear corrupted, so you will have to
> remove them and re-install them (after downgrading nss).
>
> For now, downgrade nss
On Tuesday, December 15, 2020 8:04:24 PM WET Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
>
> I'm running firefox 83.0-13.fc33.x86_64 with nss 3.59.0-2.fc33
> installed since it hit my local updates-testing mirror and all my
> add-ons are looking good. Could there be something else that's causing
> trouble? I have
On Wednesday, December 16, 2020 8:01:23 AM WET Tom Stellard wrote:
> Here is the list of packages for Dec 16:
> https://fedorapeople.org/~tstellar/br_make_day2.txt
>
> -Tom
Hi Tom,
I have two packages in your list: armadillo and emacs-common-ess.
My issue is with armadillo that it has BuildReq
On Wednesday, December 16, 2020 3:51:16 PM WET Tom Stellard wrote:
> I'm only excluding packages that invoke make through the %cmake_build or
> %cmake_install macros. armadillo invokes make directly, which is why it
> is on the list.
>
> -Tom
You are right, in the %check section.
OK I have adde
On Wednesday, December 16, 2020 7:15:21 PM WET Jonathan Wakely wrote:
> Creating the dependency graph by hand is fairly tedious, but maybe I'm
> missing an automated way. The point of creating that graph is to avoid
> wasting time and power doing and redoing builds that will fail until
> something
On Tuesday, 4 August 2020 12.42.30 WEST Neal Gompa wrote:
> Then you should do the following:
>
> %undefine __cmake_in_source_build
>
> %cmake
> %cmake_build
> %cmake_install
Would not it be more clean to place the %undefine line inside guards?
%if (0%{?rhel} || (0%{?fedora} && 0%{?fedora} < 33
On Saturday, 8 August 2020 16.26.39 WEST Andrea Musuruane wrote:
> Can someone please check?
>
> Thanks!
>
> Andrea
When that happens I issue another rebuild and the problem is solved. In other
words this is a transient problem.
--
José Abílio___
de
On Tuesday, September 8, 2020 5:32:30 PM WEST Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
> Please no, KWin Wayland makes my system crash as soon as I connect my second
> screen, and does not support essential functions like Kwin scripting, make
> Yakuake look terrible and the whole stuff feels buggy as hell.
> Ev
On Wednesday, September 9, 2020 4:30:54 AM WEST Tom Seewald wrote:
> Has anyone compiled a (non-exhaustive) list of known issues that are
> specific to KDE Plasma with Wayland?
https://community.kde.org/Plasma/Wayland_Showstoppers
--
José Abílio___
deve
On Saturday, September 12, 2020 5:52:14 PM WEST Sérgio Basto wrote:
> I agree , why not even have a count for starting to freeze ? , I though
> that freeze just start after we have first beta candidate.
It does not work that way. There is a freeze for beta and there is a freeze
for the final rele
On Monday, September 21, 2020 6:30:47 PM WEST Ankur Sinha wrote:
> I just updated to F33, and now I think I get the same issue with
> BitBucket.org:
>
> $ ssh -Tv g...@bitbucket.org
> ...
> send_pubkey_test: no mutual signature algorithm
>
> It works if I use:
>
> $ ssh -Tv -oPubkeyAcceptedKeyT
1 - 100 of 153 matches
Mail list logo
