Re: Git commit in all available branches

2010-10-11 Thread Jeffrey Fearn
Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 09:07:17 +1000 > Jeff Fearn wrote: > >> On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 13:56 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >>> On Fri, 08 Oct 2010 18:03:04 +0400 >>> "Pavel Alexeev (aka Pahan-Hubbitus)" wrote: >>> In most cases I try sync all branches if there no real reasons t

Re: Git commit in all available branches

2010-10-11 Thread Jeffrey Fearn
Chuck Anderson wrote: > On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 09:23:24AM +1000, Jeffrey Fearn wrote: >> Kevin Fenzi wrote: >>> On Mon, 11 Oct 2010 09:07:17 +1000 >>> Jeff Fearn wrote: >>> >>>> On Fri, 2010-10-08 at 13:56 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: >>>&

Re: Git commit in all available branches

2010-10-11 Thread Jeffrey Fearn
Matthew Garrett wrote: > On Tue, Oct 12, 2010 at 09:32:15AM +1000, Jeffrey Fearn wrote: > >> What do you mean "leave it alone"? The people using it WANT the changes. >> Why are you telling them how they can use their system? > > Because by pushing updates

Re: Git commit in all available branches

2010-10-11 Thread Jeffrey Fearn
Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Tue, 12 Oct 2010 09:32:15 +1000 > Jeffrey Fearn wrote: > >> What do you mean "leave it alone"? The people using it WANT the >> changes. Why are you telling them how they can use their system? > > Not at all. :) > >> They

Re: Proposed package blocking due to FTBFS

2010-12-06 Thread Jeffrey Fearn
Matt Domsch wrote: > I would like to propose blocking packages at the F15 alpha compose > point if they have not resolved their FTBFS from F14 or earlier. The > lists may be broken down by when they last did build. With 3 > exceptions, these 110 bugs are all still in NEW state as well, so they >

Re: Proposed package blocking due to FTBFS

2010-12-07 Thread Jeffrey Fearn
Ralf Corsepius wrote: > On 12/07/2010 06:41 AM, Matt Domsch wrote: >> On Tue, Dec 07, 2010 at 03:35:35PM +1000, Jeffrey Fearn wrote: >>> Matt Domsch wrote: >>>> I would like to propose blocking packages at the F15 alpha compose >>>> point if they have no

Re: Licensing Guidelines Update - Please Read

2010-07-07 Thread Jeffrey Fearn
Tom "spot" Callaway wrote: > Maintainers should look at the bottom of this email for the list. > [jfearn] publican: publican-doc-2.1-0.fc14.noarch publican-doc includes fdl.txt in it's %files, which is the GFDL 1.2 text previously sourced from http://www.gnu.org/licenses/fdl.txt Cheers, Jeff.