Proposed F19 Feature: KVM Device Failover

= Features/Virt Device Failover = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Virt_Device_Failover Feature owner(s): Michael S. Tsirkin , Gal Hammer , Cole Robinson , Laine Stump Support for transparent failover between an assigned and an emulated device, allows enabling the migration and overcomm

Proposed F19 Feature: Yesod Web Framework

= Features/YesodWebFramework = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/YesodWebFramework Feature owner(s): Jens Petersen , Michel Salim, Ben Boeckel Yesod is a Haskell web framework for productive development of type-safe, RESTful, high performance web applications. == Detailed description ==

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Apache OpenOffice

On Thursday 31 of January 2013 10:00:13 Andrea Pescetti wrote: > On 30/01/2013 Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > >>> = Features/ApacheOpenOffice = > >>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ApacheOpenOffice > >>> Feature owner(s): Andrea Pescetti > > Thank y

Proposed F19 Feature: Less Brittle Kerberos

= Features/LessBrittleKerberos = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/LessBrittleKerberos Feature owner(s): Stef Walter Make kerberos in Fedora simpler to use by removing some of the brittleness that are common failure points. In particular we remove the need for kerberos clients to sync th

Proposed F19 Feature: QXL/Spice KMS Driver

= Features/QXLKMSSupport = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/QXLKMSSupport Feature owner(s): Alon Levy Currently the QXL driver is X.org only, a KMS driver is required to move forward with projects like spice 3D, and also to allow more features to be show in virt environments like plymou

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Apache OpenOffice

On Thursday 31 of January 2013 14:02:44 Martin Sourada wrote: > On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 12:43:58 + > > Jóhann B. Guðmundsson wrote: > > On 01/31/2013 12:28 PM, Martin Sourada wrote: > > > Hi Marina, > > > > > > On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 13:14:41 +0100 > > > > > > Marina Latini wrote: > > >> Hi all, >

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Apache OpenOffice

On Thursday 31 of January 2013 15:01:00 Michael Scherer wrote: > Le jeudi 31 janvier 2013 à 14:20 +0100, Robert Mayr a écrit : > > I think that's not the point, one of the two suites will be dominant > > and you can't provide both of them on a live image for example. > > LibreOffice was introduced

Proposed F19 Feature: Virtio RNG

= Features/Virtio RNG = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Virtio_RNG Feature owner(s): Cole Robinson , Amit Shah Provide a paravirtual random number generator to virtual machines, to prevent entropy starvation in guests. == Detailed description == The linux kernel collects entropy fro

Proposed F19 Feature: Usermode Migration

= Features/UsermodeMigration = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/UsermodeMigration Feature owner(s): Harald Hoyer , Kay Sievers , Bill Nottingham Access control of privileged operations for ordinary users should be handled exclusively by a centrally managed authority. Usermode/consoleh

Proposed F19 Feature: System Configuration Shell

= Features/SystemConfigurationShell = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/SystemConfigurationShell Feature owner(s): Tom Schwaller The System Configuration Shell System provides an easy to use interactive command line interface with a standardized syntax to manage your system. == Detailed

Proposed F19 Feature: Virt Storage Migration

= Features/Virt Storage Migration = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Virt_Storage_Migration Feature owner(s): Cole Robinson , Paolo Bonzini Migrate a running virtual machine from one host to another, including in use storage, with no downtime. No need for a shared storage location betwe

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: QXL/Spice KMS Driver

On Thursday 31 of January 2013 09:19:56 Kevin Fenzi wrote: > On Thu, 31 Jan 2013 08:12:28 -0800 > > Adam Williamson wrote: > > I thought the feature deadline was yesterday; are we on late features > > now? > > The deadline was yesterday to have your feature submitted. Yep, the deadline to have

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: Simplify Java/Maven Packaging using XMvn

On Monday 28 of January 2013 09:51:42 Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > = Features/XMvn = > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/XMvn Feature has been moved by maintainer to https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Simplified_Maven_Packaging to have more descriptive URL. Jaroslav > Featur

Re: Proposed F19 Feature: More Mobile Broadband

On Saturday 09 of February 2013 11:37:15 Kevin Kofler wrote: > Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > In Scope I see "KDE's networking layers likely require an update to use > > the new API, as will any other direct client of ModemManager. However, the > > functionality that most networking applets require fro

Proposed F19 Feature: FreeIPA Two Factor Authentication

This Feature has been submitted *before* Feature Submission Deadline and it required input/changes from the owner or was queued. = Features/FreeIPA Two Factor Authentication = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/FreeIPA_Two_Factor_Authentication Feature owner(s): Nathaniel McCallum Provid

Proposed F19 Feature: Usermode Migration

This Feature has been submitted *before* Feature Submission Deadline and it required input/changes from the owner or was queued. = Features/UsermodeMigration = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/UsermodeMigration Feature owner(s): Harald Hoyer , Kay Sievers , Bill Nottingham Access contr

Proposed F19 Feature (exception): Kolab 3

This Feature has been submitted *after* Feature Submission Deadline and requires exception from FESCo to be accepted as Fedora 19 Feature. Owner(s), please, provide motivation why do you think the exception should be granted. = Features/Kolab3 = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Kolab3

Proposed F19 Feature: Scala 2.10

This Feature has been submitted *before* Feature Submission Deadline and it required input/changes from the owner or was queued. = Features/Scala210 = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Scala210 Feature owner(s): Jochen Schmitt Providing the most current relase of Scala a functional prog

Re: Fedora 16 EOL Bugzilla Closure - strange behavior?

- Original Message - > On 02/15/2013 05:41 AM, Tadej Janež wrote: > > Hi! > > > > Here is an example: > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=736498 > > I filled this bug during the F-16 Graphics test week. > > After the Fedora EOL reminder and before the bug was closed, I > > trie

Re: Mass closing EOL bugs should not close bugs with pending updates

- Original Message - > Am Sonntag, den 17.02.2013, 14:46 +0100 schrieb Tadej Janež: > > On Sun, 2013-02-17 at 12:02 +0100, Christoph Wickert wrote: > > > > > > I found that a couple of F16 bugs were closed by endoflife@fp.o > > > even > > > though there were pending updates for F17 and F18

Re: Mass closing EOL bugs should not close bugs with pending updates

- Original Message - > > > > NEXTRELEASE should be great. > > 28 days is not enough...Somebody never subscribe devel ,even their > email address is invalid. You don't have to subscribe to devel to get EOL notification. It's usually sent to every bug reported to the affected version an

Re: Mass closing EOL bugs should not close bugs with pending updates

- Original Message - > Hi Rezza, > > Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > > I removed the "clone" part as most people were screaming [1] - but > > for > > this case it's probably the best resolution - close F16 as WONTFIX, > > and > > properly

Re: Fedora 16 EOL Bugzilla Closure - strange behavior?

- Original Message - > Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > > - Original Message - > > > I wouldn't be surprised if whatever script is used to do the mass > > > closings > > > does a first pass generating the list of bugs that need closing, > > &g

Re: Mass closing EOL bugs should not close bugs with pending updates

- Original Message - > On Mon, Feb 18, 2013 at 10:52 PM, Christoph Wickert > wrote: > > Despite of the question whether it's right or wrong it's a manual > > process and we cannot rely it really happens. On the other hand > > changing > > the script to not close any bugs which are ON_QA is

Proposed F19 Feature: Resource Management Tools

This Feature has been submitted *before* Feature Submission Deadline and it required input/changes from the owner or it was queued. = Features/ResourceManagementTools = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ResourceManagementTools Feature owner(s): Daniel Berrange This feature will provide a

Fedora 19 schedule's new home & plans

Hi all! (and sorry for post to sooo many lists) As we already have a final schedule (for a three weeks now) and we're getting closer to release windmills - I'd like to make the schedule easy to use for everyone (and that means for me too), to be sure it makes sense etc. And inform you about recent

Re: Fedora 19 schedule's new home & plans

- Original Message - > On Fri, Mar 1, 2013 at 8:09 AM, Jaroslav Reznik > wrote: > > 5. new TJ3 > > And the main goal of the move, cleanups and so on is to jump on TJ3 > > board - I have initial port done, but a lot of changes are needed > > and I'd li

Re: Fedora 19 schedule's new home & plans

- Original Message - > > Dne 1.3.2013 14:09, Jaroslav Reznik napsal(a): > > > Hi all! (and sorry for post to sooo many lists) > > > As we already have a final schedule (for a three weeks now) and > > > we're > > > getting closer to release

Re: F16 and F18: bugzilla, bugs and EOL

- Original Message - > Hi! > > There an interesting thing happened in gugzilla recently. Some bug > (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=809773) is applied for > F16. There > are some (five, ten, twenty,...) simmilar bugs which are, ofcouse, > are marked > as dublicate. But. Last o

Re: F16 and F18: bugzilla, bugs and EOL

- Original Message - > Jaroslav, > > On Mon, 2013-03-04 at 06:38 -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > > Btw. as asked frequently in the previous EOL thread and to make it > > easier for me and upcoming guys responsible for EOL - the script is > > now available i

Re: RFC: Fedora revamp proposal

- Original Message - > On Mon, 4 Mar 2013 20:35:08 +0100 > Miloslav Trmač wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 4, 2013 at 7:50 PM, Josh Boyer > > wrote: > > ...snip... > > > >> Finally, the planning process will recognize the existence of > > >> these > > >> tiers by classifying each proposed change:

Re: RFC: Fedora revamp proposal

- Original Message - > On Mon, Mar 04, 2013 at 07:18:04PM +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote: > > Some of the things we want to achieve: > > * Make rawhide to be reliably installable and usable by developers > > by > > coherently introducing changes. > > Another factor is that on Fedora, it seem

Re: Fedora 18 and new version of Gnome (3.7.x)

- Original Message - > Am Dienstag, den 05.03.2013, 13:23 +0100 schrieb Dario Lesca: > > Il giorno mar, 05/03/2013 alle 19.33 +0800, Liang Suilong ha > > scritto: > > > Please upgrade to Fedora 19. > > > > Thank Liang, someone can tell to me what is the best way to upgrade > > my > > Fedor

Fedora 19 Feature/Branch Freeze coming in one week

Hi! As time flows really fast, we are getting closer to another important milestones for Fedora 19 [1] on 2013-03-12 (as agreed by FESCo): * Feature Freeze -- Planning & Development Ends * Branch Freeze -- Branch Fedora 19 from Rawhide Feature Freeze is in one week from now, please keep in mind t

Re: RFC: Fedora revamp proposal

- Original Message - > On Tue, 5 Mar 2013 03:48:29 -0500 (EST) > > From tooling perspective - that's the question if we want to > > enhance > > our tools, step into other similar project (for collaboration with > > our downstreams? other distros...). > > yeah, I don't know. > > Perhaps so

Re: New Fedora openid provider (fas-openid) in service

- Original Message - > On 05/03/13 10:39 PM, Kurt Seifried wrote: > > can I use my existing openid? kurt.seifried.org > > . > > That's not really a question that makes sense. Fedora runs an OpenID > provider which gives you an OpenID associated with your 'Fedora >

Re: [ACTION REQUIRED] Retiring packages for Fedora 19 - March 4 update

- Original Message - > On Wed, Mar 6, 2013 at 7:15 PM, Adam Williamson > wrote: > > On 06/03/13 04:39 AM, Dan Mashal wrote: > > > >> Took libindicator too. Is this deprecated upstream? > > > > > > No, there are commits right up to late Feb in launchpad. But then I > > don't > > immediately

Re: Unhelpful update descriptions

- Original Message - > On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 11:41 AM, Michael Catanzaro > wrote: > > Perhaps the update policy should have a guideline on the minimum > > amount > > of information required in this description. E.g. "update to latest > > upstream version" might be a perfectly acceptable

Fedora 19 Feature Freeze is tomorrow!

REMINDER: Tuesday, March 12 is the Feature Freeze for Fedora 19, the Planning & Development phase ends - that means tomorrow! At this point, all accepted features should be substantially complete, and testable. Additionally, if a feature is to be enabled by default, it must be so enabled at Featur

Re: Unhelpful update descriptions

- Original Message - > Adam Williamson writes: > > On 11/03/13 06:28 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > >> That's not readily apparent in the Updates Policy ... > > > Ah, you're right, I really should have checked it before posting > > (yet > > again). I was thinking that it discouraged *all* v

Re: Unhelpful update descriptions

- Original Message - > On 03/12/2013 01:30 AM, Dan Mashal wrote: > > Semantics. > > Providing a link is helpful to users isn't semantics. You as a > package > maintainer would be aware of where to look for reviewing the changes > before pushing an update. Users don't since it is differen

Re: Unhelpful update descriptions

- Original Message - > On Mon, Mar 11, 2013 at 11:57:00PM -0700, Dan Mashal wrote: > > I'm not doubting your technical skills. I'm making a few points. > > > > b) sometimes you have a LOT of packages to push out. > > c) sometimes even you yourself don't know what to put in the notes. > > d

Re: twinkle: Intent to retire

- Original Message - > On 2013-03-12, 22:28 GMT, Kevin Kofler wrote: > > The main showstopper there is that they almost all directly or > > indirectly (e.g. through libmediastreamer) depend on FFmpeg. Ekiga > > seems to be the only one using GStreamer. :-( > > And telepathy-rakia (I positi

Re: Unhelpful update descriptions

- Original Message - > > > On 03/12/2013 10:18 PM, Michael Catanzaro wrote: > > > Again, I'm disappointed in seeing that placeholder text in stable > updates. Clearly that plan failed---it'd be nice if Bodhi could > become > smart enough to reject updates with the placeholder descriptio

Re: Unhelpful update descriptions

- Original Message - > > unlike other major distros, other updates have less helpful > > descriptions: > > > > * "Update to latest upstream version" > > * "No update information available" > > * "Here is where you give an explanation of your update. Here is > > where > > you give an explan

Rawhide Bugzilla Rebase Warning

Hi, as decided on yesterday's (2013-03-13) FESCo meeting [1], we are going to restart the Rawhide Bugzilla Rebase process [2]. Historically, it was tight to the Branch day, but to give you more time to adjust your bugs, it will happen no sooner than in one week from now - it means 2013-03-21.

Re: Unhelpful update descriptions

- Original Message - > On 03/14/2013 05:02 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote: > > On 03/14/2013 04:33 PM, Przemek Klosowski wrote: > >> > >> I didn't realize that my method was 'relying on the kindness of > >> strangers' for including the relevant CVE data in the changelog, > >> but > >> it often gi

Re: f19 mass branching

- Original Message - > Dne 12.3.2013 16:30, Dennis Gilmore napsal(a): > > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > > Hash: SHA1 > > > > Hi All, > > > > F19 has been branched, please be sure to do a git pull --rebase to > > pick > > up the new branch, additionally rawhide/f20 has had inheritance

Re: fedora release name problem

- Original Message - > On 18/03/13 10:22 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > > On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 05:56:28PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > >> On Mon, 2013-03-18 at 18:34 -0600, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >>> On Mon, 18 Mar 2013 23:56:28 + > >>> Sérgio Basto wrote: > >>> > Hi, > For

Re: fedora release name problem

- Original Message - > On 03/19/13 01:56, Adam Williamson wrote: > > This bug just *smells* like one of those which will pop up again > > and > > again and again causing carnage wherever it shows up. > > Shouldn't be worse than F18 where we slipped how many weeks? Or was > it > even month

Re: fedora release name problem

- Original Message - > Once upon a time, G.Wolfe Woodbury said: > > I disagree. This particular problem points out a problem that is > > only > > going to become more of a problem as the internationalization of > > software increases. Not everything is ASCII or English, and not > > defen

Re: fedora release name problem

- Original Message - > > > > > On 19 Mar 2013 14:33, < john.flor...@dart.biz > wrote: > > > > > From: "Richard W.M. Jones" < rjo...@redhat.com > > > > > > > An interesting question is: Why don't we try out the new release > > > name > > > early on in Rawhide. ie. we would change the r

Re: [PATCH] Why not Zoidberg?

- Original Message - > This fixes all of our problems with punctuation and unicode. It may > introduce other problems. > --- > fedora-release.spec | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/fedora-release.spec b/fedora-release.spec > index 0791715..43eed3e 1

Re: [Base] Base Design WG agenda meeting 14 November 2014 15:00 UTC on #fedora-meeting

- Original Message - > Agenda: > - Status buildrequires cleanup work (davids & nils!) > - Update on factory-reset work > - Docker update > - Open Floor One more topic - generic network install images, there was a question raised, if Base WG would like to take care of it. I'll provide m

Re: Suspend/resume broken on Lenovo laptops (Fedora 21 beta)

- Original Message - > Guys and galls, > if you have Lenovo laptop please install latest Fedora 21 beta and > provide feedback because there are reported cases that suspend/resume > doesn't work on Lenovo laptops. The only issue with Carbon X1 I have with Fedora 21 Beta it, that it takes q

Re: Enable tapping by default

- Original Message - > Mustafa Muhammad wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 17, 2014 at 2:49 PM, Björn Persson wrote: > > > Perhaps demonstrate that it won't cause the rest of us to click on > > > random things by accident, instead of just thinking so? > > > > I didn't say that, I said, "I don't thin

Re: Are we rebasing xorg-x11 packages in F20?

- Original Message - > > There's an intel driver from 18th november, for example: > > > > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2014-15384/xorg-x11-drv-intel-2.21.15-9.fc20 > > > > This seems to be much more related to your issues. I don't had any output > > renaming recently in

Re: Suggested Freeze Policy change for Fedora 22+

- Original Message - > > > > On Tue, 2014-11-25 at 10:21 +0100, drago01 wrote: > > On Mon, Nov 24, 2014 at 8:46 PM, Stephen Gallagher > > wrote: > > > > > > > > > Yeah, that's a valid concern and one I'm not ignoring. I'm just > > > concerned that (going by F21 Alpha and Beta) the "hero

Re: Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo meeting (2014-11-26 at 18UTC)

- Original Message - > Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo > meeting tomorrow at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on > irc.freenode.net. > > Links to all tickets below can be found at: > https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9 > > = Followups = > > #topic ticke

Fedora 21 Final Go/No-Go Meeting, Thursday, December 04 @ 17:00 UTC

Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-2 for this important meeting, wherein we shall determine the readiness of the Fedora 21. Thursday, December 04, 2014 17:00 UTC (12 AM EST, 9 AM PST, 18:00 CET) "Before each public release Development, QA and Release Engineering meet to determine if t

Fedora 21 Final Release Readiness Meeting :: Thursday, Dec. 04, 19:00 UTC

Fedora 21 Final Release Readiness Meeting. date: 2014-12-04 place: irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-2 time: 19:00 UTC (2 PM EST, 11 AM PST, 20:00 CET) This Thursday, December 04, we will meet to make sure we are coordinated and ready for the Final release of Fedora 21 on Tuesday, December 09,

[Test-Announce] Fedora 21 Final status is Go, release on December 9, 2014

At the Fedora 21 Final Go/No-Go Meeting that just occurred, it was agreed to Go with the Fedora 21 Final by Fedora QA, Release Engineering and Development. Fedora 21 will be publicly available on Tuesday, December 09, 2014. Meeting details can be seen here: Minutes: http://bit.ly/1yjG357 Log: htt

Fedora 22 planning and changes submission deadline

Hi all! Fedora 21 is almost out of the doors (tomorrow!) and it's time to take a look closer on Fedora 22 plans. But before we move on, I'd like to ask you to help us with Fedora 21 retrospective [1]. We'd really like to know what you think went well and what did not. Fedora 22 starts with change

F22 System Wide Change: Change xorg input stack to use libinput

= Proposed System Wide Change: Change xorg input stack to use libinput = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LibinputForXorg Change owner(s): Hans de Goede Replace the current (low-level) input xorg drivers with libinput using the xorg-x11-drv-libinput wrapper. == Detailed Description == C

F22 System Wide Change: Perl 5.20

= Proposed System Wide Change: Perl 5.20 = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/perl5.20 Change owner(s): Jitka Plesníková , Petr Písař A new perl 5.20 version brings a lot of changes done over a year of development. See 5.20.0 perldelta [1] for more details. == Detailed Description == Ne

F22 Self Contained Change: Preupgrade Assistant

= Proposed Self Contained: Preupgrade Assistant = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Preupgrade_Assistant Change owner(s): Petr Hracek The Preugrade Assistant is a tool to help people upgrade from one release to another and be sure to track important manual configuration changes they perf

F22 System Wide Change: UEFI Secure Boot Blacklist Updates

= Proposed System Wide Change: UEFI Secure Boot Blacklist Updates = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/UEFISecureBootBlacklistUpdates Change owner(s): Peter Jones Currently our implementation of UEFI Secure Boot does not include a facility to apply blacklist ("dbx") updates enabled by defau

F22 System Wide Change: Ruby on Rails 4.2

= Proposed System Wide Change: Ruby on Rails 4.2 = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ruby_on_Rails_4.2 Change owner(s): Josef Stříbný , Vít Ondruch , ruby-...@lists.fedoraproject.org Ruby on Rails 4.2 is the latest version of well know web framework written in Ruby. Note: This change mig

F22 System Wide Change: Elasticsearch

= Proposed System Wide Change: Elasticsearch = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Elasticsearch Change owner(s): Jiri Vanek Goal of this change is to pack Elasticsearch into main Fedora repo. == Detailed Description == The Elasticsearch [1] is fully-featured self-standing opensource [2] in

F22 System Wide Change: wxPython 3

= Proposed System Wide Change: wxPython 3 = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/wxPython3 Change owner(s): Scott Talbert Get wxPython 3 packaged and into Fedora. == Detailed Description == This change proposal aims to get wxPython 3.0 (Python bindings for the wxWidgets GUI library) package

F22 System Wide Change: GHC 7.8

= Proposed System Wide Change: GHC 7.8 = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GHC_7.8 Change owner(s): Jens Petersen , Ricky Elrod , Haskell_SIG Update the GHC Haskell compiler to the major new 7.8 release, and update/rebuild all Haskell packages against it. == Detailed Description == * Th

Re: Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2015-01-07)

- Original Message - > > Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo > meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. > > To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto > > or run: > date -d '2

F22 System Wide Change: Fedora 22 Boost 1.58 Uplift

= Proposed System Wide Change: Fedora 22 Boost 1.58 Uplift = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F22Boost158 Change owner(s): Petr Machata This change brings Boost 1.57.0 or later to Fedora 22. We generally aim to ship 1.58.0, as that seems likely to make it (hence the Change name), but 1.5

F22 System Wide Change: Harden all packages with position-independent code

= Proposed System Wide Change: Harden all packages with position-independent code = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Harden_all_packages_with_position-independent_code Change owner(s): Till Maas , Moez Roy Harden all packages with position-independent code to limit the damage from certa

F22 Self Contained Change: Lohit2 Odia Telugu

= Proposed Self Contained: Lohit2 Odia Telugu = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Lohit2_Odia_Telugu Change owner(s): Pravin Satpute Lohit2 project aims to make open type tables of Indian fonts effective and efficient following various standard around font technology including Unicode, O

F22 System Wide Change: Ruby 2.2

= Proposed System Wide Change: Ruby 2.2 = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ruby_2.2 Change owner(s): Vít Ondruch Ruby 2.2 is the latest stable version of Ruby. Many new features and improvements are included for the increasingly diverse and expanding demands for Ruby. With this major upd

F22 Self Contained Change: New Default Console Font

= Proposed Self Contained: New Default Console Font = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/NewDefaultConsoleFont Change owner(s): Marko Myllynen , Mike FABIAN A new console font, eurlatgr, was recently added to kbd and it should be better default console font for European based languages w

Changes submission deadline and Fedora 22 scheduling changes

Hi everyone! Fedora 22 and especially Changes submission deadline [1] is coming pretty soon - in less than two weeks on January 20th. With Alpha release in March. Please, submit your System Wide Changes by this deadline, earlier better. There's one significant change FESCo agreed at yesterday's me

Re: F22 System Wide Change: Change xorg input stack to use libinput

- Original Message - > = Proposed System Wide Change: Change xorg input stack to use libinput = > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/LibinputForXorg > > Change owner(s): Hans de Goede > > Replace the current (low-level) input xorg drivers with libinput using the > xorg-x11-drv-libinp

F22 System Wide Change: Set sshd(8) PermitRootLogin=no

= Proposed System Wide Change: Set sshd(8) PermitRootLogin=no = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SSHD_PermitRootLogin_no Change owner(s): P J P and Fedora Security Team To disable remote root login facility in sshd(8) by default. == Detailed Description == Sshd(8) daemon allows remote us

Re: F22 System Wide Change: Change xorg input stack to use libinput

- Original Message - > > > > On Thu, 2015-01-08 at 08:54 -0500, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > > > - Original Message - > > > > > Thanks, Hans. We wanted to make sure that we didn't have another > > > instance of the bluetooth fiasco from a couple releases ago, where GNOME > > > cha

Re: Plasma 5

- Original Message - > Will F22 introduce plasma5 when it rolls out? Yes, it will. KDE SIG guys are working on the Change page for Fedora 22 [1]. It will be announced soon. Jaroslav [1] http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Plasma_5 > -- > Mike Chambers > Madisonville, KY > > "Best lit

Re: Hundreds of bugzilla mails on one day

- Original Message - > It has happened again. :-/ > > | This message is a notice that Fedora 19 is now at end of life. Fedora > | has stopped maintaining and issuing updates for Fedora 19. It is > | Fedora's policy to close all bug reports from releases that are no > | longer maintained. >

F22 System Wide Change: Default Local DNS Resolver

= Proposed System Wide Change: Default Local DNS Resolver = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Default_Local_DNS_Resolver This Change was already proposed as Fedora 21 Change but moved to Fedora 22 (and discussed as Fedora 22 Change), re-announcing it as more details were provided as request

FESCo and Env and Stacks WG upcoming elections nominations are open

Hello everyone! The nomination period for FESCo and Environments and Stacks Working Group Elections is now open. We will be selecting five seats on FESCo [1] and four seats on Env and Stacks Working Group [2]. If you are interested in these roles, please add yourself to the lists of nominees at [1

Re: FESCo and Env and Stacks WG upcoming elections nominations are open

> Hello everyone! > The nomination period for FESCo and Environments and Stacks Working > Group Elections is now open. > > We will be selecting five seats on FESCo [1] and four seats on Env and > Stacks Working Group [2]. If you are interested in these roles, please > add yourself to the lists of

F22 System Wide Change: RpmOstree - Server side composes and atomic upgrades

= Proposed System Wide Change: RpmOstree - Server side composes and atomic upgrades = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/RpmOstree Change owner(s): Colin Walters The rpm-ostree [1] tool provides a new way to deploy and manage RPM-based operating systems. Instead of performing a package-by-

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2015-01-07)

- Original Message - > On Tue, 2015-01-13 at 15:58 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > The Fedora 21 mass rebuild took about 40 hours. ;) > > BTW, https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_22_Mass_Rebuild is empty. > What are the goals of a mass rebuild now, given that we just had one > before F21 B

Re: Content of change announcements Was:F22 System Wide Change: RpmOstree - Server side composes and atomic upgrades

- Original Message - > On Tue, Jan 13, 2015 at 3:27 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote: > >> Jaroslav, there is a lot more information on the actual wiki page. > >> Like the fact that this is only for particular opt-in new installs and > >> that yum/dnf/RPM can only operate in read-only mode on such

F22 System Wide Change: GCC5

= Proposed System Wide Change: GCC5 = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GCC5 Change owner(s): Jakub Jelínek Switch GCC in Fedora 22 to 5.x.y, rebuild all packages with it. == Detailed Description == GCC 5 is currently in stage3, but in 3 days will move to stage4, in prerelease state with

F22 Self Contained Change: Gnome Shell - New Notifications

= Proposed Self Contained Change: Gnome Shell - New Notifications = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GnomeShell_NewNotifications Change owner(s): Florian Müllner Redesign the way in which notifications are shown and kept available in gnome- shell. == Detailed Description == The message

F22 Self Contained Change: Nautilus Improvements

= Proposed Self Contained Change: Nautilus Improvements = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Nautilus_Improvements Change owner(s): Carlos Soriano Tie up some of the loose ends that were leftover after the nautilus design refresh work that has happened a while ago. == Detailed Descriptio

F22 Self Contained Change: Wine to use mesa Direct3D

= Proposed Self Contained Change: Wine to use mesa Direct3D = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Wine_to_use_mesa_Direct3D Change owner(s): Igor Gnatenko Enhancing mesa and wine with Direct3D9 support will increase performance and reduce resource usage in applications which using D3D9 fram

Re: F22 System Wide Change: GCC5

- Original Message - > On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 02:55:15PM +0100, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek wrote: > > http://gcc.gnu.org/gcc-5/porting_to.html → 404 > > That will be added likely after the test mass rebuild with what we find > during that. Do you have any estimate when it will be done?

Re: Summary/Minutes from today's FESCo Meeting (2015-01-07)

- Original Message - > On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 4:32 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > > - Original Message - > >> On Tue, 2015-01-13 at 15:58 -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >> > The Fedora 21 mass rebuild took about 40 hours. ;) > >> &

Re: GUI applications writing garbage to stdout/stderr

- Original Message - > On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 11:22:57AM +0100, Marcel Oliver wrote: > When I run okular I see: > > Connecting to deprecated signal > QDBusConnectionInterface::serviceOwnerChanged(QString,QString,QString) > kbuildsycoca4 running... > okular(16844) KMimeTypeRepository::pare

Re: GUI applications writing garbage to stdout/stderr

- Original Message - > - Original Message - > > On Wed, Jan 14, 2015 at 11:22:57AM +0100, Marcel Oliver wrote: > > When I run okular I see: > > > > Connecting to deprecated signal > > QDBusConnectionInterface::serviceOwnerChanged(QString,QString,QString) > > kbuildsycoca4 running..

Re: GUI applications writing garbage to stdout/stderr

- Original Message - > - Original Message - > So it's kWarning, not kDebug and it can't be ignored by using kdebugdialog > settings. There are two options - fix the underlying issue or change > kWarning to kDebug - it just depends on how important it is and it seem > as Harald alrea

Change Checkpoint: Proposals submission deadline is tomorrow

Hi everyone! Tomorrow is the last day/chance to submit your system wide changes for Fedora 22 [1]! Your proposed change has to be at least in ready for Wrangler state. For policies, check out [2]. Empty template is available at [3]. All changes approved so far are available on the ChangeSet [4] wi

F22 Self Contained Change: Domain Controller Set Up Through Cockpit

= Proposed Self Contained Change: Domain Controller Set Up Through Cockpit = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/CockpitDomainController Change owner(s): Stephen Gallagher With Fedora 21, the rolekit project now provides a public D-BUS interface for creating a Domain Controller based on the

<    3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >