Summary of accepted Fedora 20 Changes - week 31

Greetings! This is a summary of accepted Fedora 20 Changes by FESCo for week 31 (in tickets). = System Wide Changes = * Web Assets - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Web_Assets discussed on https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-July/185638.html * Enable SELinux Labeled NFS

Re: Summary of accepted Fedora 20 Changes - week 31

- Original Message - > Greeting! > This is a summary of accepted Fedora 20 Changes by FESCo for week 31 > (in tickets). > > = System Wide Changes = > * Web Assets - https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Web_Assets discussed on > https://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2013-July/18

Re: BlueZ Status in Fedora.

- Original Message - > On 08/01/2013 07:36 PM, Peter Robinson wrote: > > I was kind of expecting this would have landed by now though, Bastien > > will be @ GUADEC this week so not sure if he'll respond quickly > > We'll discuss this at GUADEC and I'll follow up here once we figure out > a

Re: mass rebuild update

- Original Message - > On Mon, Aug 5, 2013 at 7:44 AM, Marcela Mašláňová > wrote: > > On 08/05/2013 04:35 AM, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > >> > >> There is a large number of failures[1] that need to be > >> addressed. > >> > >> Dennis > > > > > > Do you have also numbers how many FTBFS we had

Re: gdcm FTBFS: texlive broken in rawhide?

- Original Message - > On Mon, 05 Aug 2013 20:38:27 +0200, Mario Ceresa wrote: > > -- > > --> vtk-devel-6.0.0-7.fc20.x86_64 > > Error: Package: > > 3:texlive-dvips-bin-svn30088.0-0.3.20130608_r30832.fc20.1.x86_64 (build) > > Requires: texlive-kpathsea-lib = 3:2013-0.

Re: gdcm FTBFS: texlive broken in rawhide?

- Original Message - > > > could you please open a bug in bugzilla? > > i will take a look at this. Than, Jan referenced this FTBFS https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=992788 Jaroslav > > > thanks, > > > > Than > > > > > > > Dear all, > I'm trying to fix gdcm FTBFS

Re: BlueZ Status in Fedora.

- Original Message - > On 08/02/2013 10:15 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > > Let me know - I'd like to have this one as a Change if it's going to F20 > > I have been coordinating with various people and looks like all teams > are go. NetworkManager and PulseAudio

Re: BlueZ Status in Fedora.

- Original Message - > On 08/02/2013 10:15 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > > Let me know - I'd like to have this one as a Change if it's going to F20 > > I have been coordinating with various people and looks like all teams > are go. NetworkManager and PulseAudio

F20 System Wide Change: Migrate to Bluez 5

= Proposed System Wide Change: Migrate to Bluez 5 = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Bluez5 Note: post deadline exception to coordinate BlueZ 5 effort as upstreams were not clear to move to it in the time of submission deadline. Change owner(s): Bastien Nocera, Kalev Lember, and the deskto

Re: mass rebuild update

- Original Message - > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Hi all, > > I have merged perl info f20 and started the mass rebuild. Hi! A friendly reminder - "Branch Fedora 20 from Rawhide" is planned tomorrow (2013-08-20) and "Alpha Change Deadline" is also pretty soon as

Re: mass rebuild update

- Original Message - > On 08/19/2013 01:32 PM, drago01 wrote: > > On Mon, Aug 19, 2013 at 1:28 PM, Jaroslav Reznik > > wrote: > >> - Original Message - > >>> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > >>> Hash: SHA1 > >>> >

Fedora 20 Changes Freeze today & tracking bugs

Hi! All Changes Tracking bugs should be reported now [1] as a replacement for tracking changes/features in the wiki page and using usually meaningless percentage status. Please, use this tracking bug for bugs blocking your Change (if you already have a tracking bug, ignore this one and please ch

Re: Fedora 20 Changes Freeze today & tracking bugs

- Original Message - > Dne 20.8.2013 15:37, Jaroslav Reznik napsal(a): > > * What should I do with my Change now? > > According to the policy, the Change has to be substantially complete > > and in a testable state; enabled by default -- if so specified by the >

Re: slowing down the development schedule for a release.

- Original Message - > On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 8:57 PM, Matthew Miller > wrote: > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 06:47:31PM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > >> I need to update the documentation. But we need to get to the point > >> where the releng side is transparent and just happens. The crazy

Re: slowing down the development schedule for a release.

- Original Message - > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Kushal Das wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 1:36 PM, Chris Murphy > > wrote: > > > >> > >> What are the options? Push 21 back 3 months, and then 8 month instead of 6 > >> month intervals? > > > > May be pushing 21 for whole 6 mont

Fedora 20 Bugzilla Rawhide rebase

Greetings, This e-mail is intended to inform you about the upcoming Bugzilla changes happening the week after August 20, 2013 (Rawhide bug rebase) and what you need to do, if anything. We will be automatically changing the version for most rawhide bugs to Fedora 20. This will result in regular

Re: F21 schedule: what would you do with more time?

- Original Message - > On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 11:03 PM, Matthew Miller > wrote: > > What things we do _now_ could be > > improved with the investment of some effort? > > Perl rebuild always take a lot of time, and as a result it will affect > the mass rebuild. It's unfortunately about P

Re: F21 schedule: what would you do with more time?

- Original Message - > work on a composedb that gives easier insight into where things are in > the release cycles. where releases are in their cycle, i.e end of life, > stable or in development, for stable releases when updates where last > pushed, or if updates push is in progress, for i

Re: F21 schedule: what would you do with more time?

- Original Message - > Dne 23.8.2013 10:24, Peter Robinson napsal(a): > > > > On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 4:12 PM, Matthew Miller < mat...@fedoraproject.org > > wrote: > > > > On Thu, Aug 22, 2013 at 11:08:18PM +0800, Christopher Meng wrote: > > > What things we do _now_ could be > > > im

Reminder: Fedora 20 Alpha Change Deadline in one week

Greeting! This is a reminder, that the Alpha Change Deadline is coming in one week, on Sep 03, according to the schedule approved by FESCo [1]. After the freeze, you will have to use Bodhi for any updates to branched Fedora 20. Updates will land in updates-testing after being pushed. Updates that

Re: Unresponsive maintainer of plasma-widget-menubar

- Original Message - > Oh? The Changes wrangler? Yeah, me and sorry about that :( Problem solved. Jaroslav > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: COPR

- Original Message - > Hi, > I would like to get your feedback about COPR [1] > > [1] http://miroslav.suchy.cz/blog/archives/2013/08/29/what_is_copr/index.html > > We are the beggining and there are two options of where we can go: > http://miroslav.suchy.cz/blog/archives/2013/08/29/copr_a

Re: GNOME 3.9.91 megaupdate

- Original Message - > On Mon, Sep 02, 2013 at 05:44:46PM +0200, Kalev Lember wrote: > > It's that time of the year again -- F20 is going into the Alpha freeze > > tomorrow and new builds will have to go through Bodhi for verification. > > The GNOME 3.9.91 release is coming as well, with a

Fedora 20 schedule updates

Hi, as a few people has asked me for clarification - the schedule is on track, we are Alpha frozen now from Sep 03. Based on FESCo decision [1], "no earlier than" part from official schedules has been already removed. High level schedule: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/20/Schedule Detail

[Test-Announce] Fedora 20 Alpha Go/No-Go Meeting, Thursday, September 12 @ 17:00 UTC

Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-1 for this important meeting, wherein we shall determine the readiness of the Fedora 20 Alpha. Thursday, September 12, 2013 17:00 UTC (1 PM EDT, 10 AM PDT, 19:00 CEST) "Before each public release Development, QA and Release Engineering meet to determ

[Test-Announce] Fedora 20 Alpha to slip by one week

Today at Go/No-Go meeting it was decided to slip Fedora 20 Alpha release by one week due to two unresolved blocker bugs, see the blocker tracking app [1]. Otherwise we think we have pretty solid foundation for Alpha. More details in meeting minutes [2]. As a result, ALL MAJOR MILESTONES, and the

Re: Fedora 20-Alpha RC2 AMIS

- Original Message - > On Thu, Sep 12, 2013 at 04:46:17PM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote: > > ami-1bb5fc72 : us-east-1 image for i386 > > This still doesn't boot. (We're working on it.) Matt, any news on this? Thanks Jaroslav > -- > Matthew Miller ☁☁☁ Fedora Cloud Architect ☁☁☁ > -- >

Fedora 20 Alpha Go/No-Go Meeting #2, Thursday, September 19 @ 17:00 UTC

Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-2 for this important meeting, wherein we shall determine the readiness of the Fedora 20 Alpha. This is the second attempt to release Fedora 20 Alpha. Thursday, September 19, 2013 17:00 UTC (1 PM EDT, 10 AM PDT, 19:00 CEST) "Before each public relea

[Test-Announce] Fedora 20 Alpha status is Go, release on September 24, 2013

At the Fedora 20 Alpha Go/No-Go Meeting #2 that just occurred, it was agreed to Go with the Fedora 20 Alpha by Fedora QA, Release Engineering and Development. Fedora 20 Alpha will be publicly available on Tuesday, September 24, 2013. Meeting details can be seen here: Minutes: http://bit.ly/16chiA

Re: Red Hat and Fedora Working Groups

- Original Message - > On 10/05/2013 07:08 AM, Mathieu Bridon wrote: > > > > So every time you say that, I can't help thinking you're just jealous > > they took someone « outside the community » instead of you. > > > > It might not be what you're thinking, but it's really how you sound. > >

Fedora 20 Schedule reminders - Changes 100% Complete in one week

Hi! This is a friendly reminder - all Changes has to be 100% complete in one week - by Tue Oct 15 2013, see the current schedule [1]. Please make sure to update state of yours Change(s) bug(s) on time. In case of any problems, let me know, we will try to find solution. Expected bug state is ON_QA

F21/F22 System Wide Change: Python 3 as the Default Implementation

= Proposed System Wide Change: Python 3 as the Default Implementation = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python_3_as_Default Note: Change requested by FESCo in advance for targeted Fedora. Change owner(s): Slavek Kabrda , Matej Stuchlik Up until now, Fedora has used Python 2 as the defau

Re: Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2013-10-15)

- Original Message - > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo > meeting Wednesday at 18:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net. > > To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at > http://fedorapro

Re: Bug 950189: Missing icon for qt-creator

- Original Message - > Hi, > > I apologize for escalating this to devel, but I think that after 6 > months it is time this [1] finally got fixed: it is just a matter of > changing the icon name in the desktop file of qt-creator to reflect the > new icon name. This is one of those trivial t

[Test-Announce] Fedora 19 Alpha Go/No-Go Meeting, Thursday, April 11 @ 17:00 UTC

Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-1 for this important meeting, wherein we shall determine the readiness of the Fedora 19 Alpha. Thursday, April 11, 2013 17:00 UTC (1 PM EDT, 10 AM PDT, 19:00 CEST) "Before each public release Development, QA and Release Engineering meet to determine

Re: Fedora 19 Alpha status: blockers, karma requests etc

- Original Message - > Hi folks! Time for the first blocker status mail of the Fedora 19 cycle. > The tl;dr summary: Hi Adam, thanks for summary. Updates follows. > Input needed from blocker voters and developers on: > > * https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=947142 Three more ar

Fedora 19 Alpha to slip by one week

Today at Go/No-Go meeting it was decided to slip Fedora 19 Alpha release by one week due to unresolved UEFI bugs, see the blocker tracking app [1]. Otherwise we think we have pretty solid foundation for Alpha, please help us to identify the real impact of the UEFI issues. More details in meeting

[Test-Announce] Fedora 19 Alpha Go/No-Go Meeting #2, Thursday, April 18 @ 17:00 UTC

Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-2 for this important meeting, wherein we shall determine the readiness of the Fedora 19 Alpha. Thursday, April 18, 2013 17:00 UTC (1 PM EDT, 10 AM PDT, 19:00 CEST) "Before each public release Development, QA and Release Engineering meet to determine

Re: F19 DVD over size - what to drop?

- Original Message - > On 05/01/2013 06:37 PM, Pádraig Brady wrote: > > > Why are we tied to DVD-5, 4.7GB (4.3GiB) at all? > > Do we distribute DVDs? > > Yes. Check with Fedora Ambassadors in EMEA. No. For Fedora 18, we did not have installation DVD media produced. One reason was missin

Re: F19 DVD over size - what to drop?

- Original Message - > FWIW I agree with the general trend of discussion so far: let's find > things to drop that don't really need to be on the DVD so we can keep > MATE and Cinnamon. You can install those from live images or from repos > of course, just like anything else, but they are th

Re: F19 DVD over size - what to drop?

- Original Message - > On 05/01/2013 10:03 PM, Bill Nottingham wrote: > > 2) The web server environment > > > > Contains web server and web server runtimes (PHP, JBoss, Mongo, perl, > > python, rails) > > +1 > > If you are running web server, then you probably have internet > connection.

Re: F19 DVD over size - what to drop?

- Original Message - > On 05/03/2013 01:40 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > > - Original Message - > >> FWIW I agree with the general trend of discussion so far: let's find > >> things to drop that don't really need to be on the DVD so we can

Re: FYI: F20 Feature: Migrate to Bluez5

- Original Message - > On Mon, 2013-05-06 at 10:08 -0400, Josh Boyer wrote: > > On Mon, May 6, 2013 at 3:35 AM, Bastien Nocera wrote: > > > Heya, > > > > > > In Fedora 20, we'll be using BlueZ 5.x to manage Bluetooth devices. > > > > So your Subject says this is a Feature, yet there's no

Fedora 19 Schedule reminders - Features 100% Complete in one week

Hi! This is a friendly reminder - all Features has to be 100% complete in one week - by Tue May 14 2013, see the current schedule [1]. Please make sure to update your Feature(s) page(s) on time. In case of any problems, let me know, we will try to find a solution. You can find automatically gener

Re: F19 DVD over size - what to drop?

- Original Message - > Dan Mashal (dan.mas...@gmail.com) said: > > I think we should look at package dependencies. It seems that lots of > > unnecessary packages are being pulled when composing media. > > Here's everything new in the F19 DVD, sorted by size. I've dropped > java-1.8.0-openj

Re: anaconda / initial-setup / gnome-initial-setup: can we do this better?

- Original Message - > On Fri, 2013-05-17 at 14:25 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > but still, it seems to be worth considering. Alternatively, we could > > make i-s behave a lot more like g-i-s: it could dump its 'root password' > > and 'date/time' spokes, and only run at all, and only

[Test-Announce] Fedora 19 Beta Go/No-Go Meeting, Thursday, May 23 @ 17:00 UTC

Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-2 for this important meeting, wherein we shall determine the readiness of the Fedora 19 Beta. Thursday, May 23, 2013 17:00 UTC (1 PM EDT, 10 AM PDT, 19:00 CEST) "Before each public release Development, QA and Release Engineering meet to determine if

Re: Fedora Hosted Usability and Developer Experience

- Original Message - > Stephen John Smoogen wrote: > > > Actually I was going to ask the opposite question: Do we still need > > FedoraHosted? > > I have found it a valuable service to provide an upstream home for fedora- > specific projects. Sure, it's a great home for fedora-specific u

Fedora 20 new planning process and schedules

Hi! Fedora 19 is close (let's hope it's alive) to the release and it's again the time to start planning for the upcoming version. For Fedora 20, in coordination with FESCo [1], the new Planning process was developed to replace the old, not satisfactory Feature process. In reality, it's pretty si

F20 System Wide Change: Perl 5.18

= Proposed System Wide Change: Perl 5.18 = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/perl5.18 Change owner(s): Petr Písař , Jitka Plesníková A new perl 5.18 version brings a lot of changes done over a year of development. See [1] for more details. == Detailed description == New perl is released

F20 System Wide Change: python-setuptools update to 0.7.x

= Proposed System Wide Change: python-setuptools update to 0.7.x = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Python_setuptools_0.7 Change owner(s): Toshio Kuratomi with help from Bohuslav Kabrda, Nick Coghlin, and the Python SIG Update to a new upstream release of python-setuptools that is not co

Re: bugzilla.redhat.com vs upstream bug trackers

- Original Message - > Am 17.06.2013 15:00, schrieb Orcan Ogetbil: > > On Mon, Jun 17, 2013 at 4:52 AM, Florian Weimer wrote: > >> I would like to avoid creating accounts in gazillion upstream bug > >> trackers, > > > > Aha! Should the package maintainers play the middle man in the > > gaz

Re: Fedora 19 Final blocker status: fix and karma requests

- Original Message - > On Sat, 2013-06-22 at 22:17 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > On Sat, 2013-06-22 at 11:00 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > > > On Fri, 2013-06-21 at 14:14 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=958426 - "19 Fin

Re: Fedora 19 Final blocker status: fix and karma requests

- Original Message - > - Original Message - > > On Sat, 2013-06-22 at 22:17 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > On Sat, 2013-06-22 at 11:00 -0400, Matthias Clasen wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2013-06-21 at 14:14 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://bugzilla.

[Test-Announce] Fedora 19 Go/No-Go Meeting, Thursday, June 27 @ 17:00 UTC

Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-2 for this important meeting, wherein we shall determine the readiness of the Fedora 19. Thursday, June 27, 2013 17:00 UTC (1 PM EDT, 10 AM PDT, 19:00 CEST) "Before each public release Development, QA and Release Engineering meet to determine if the

Re: Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2013-06-26)

- Original Message - > On Wed, Jun 26, 2013 at 8:22 AM, Bruno Wolff III wrote: > > On Tue, Jun 25, 2013 at 22:17:12 -0400, > > Josh Boyer wrote: > >> > >> > >> We had said that the new FESCo should attend if possible. I'm still > >> hoping the election results are announced in time, bu

Fedora 19 status is ALIVE, GA on July 02, 2013

At the Fedora 19 Final Go/No-Go Meeting that just occurred, it was agreed to Go with the Fedora 19 by Fedora QA, development, release engineering and FPM. Fedora 19 will be publicly available on Tuesday, July 02, 2013. Thank you everyone for heroic effort on this release! Meeting details can be

Reminder: Change Proposals Submission Deadline in two weeks

Hi, Change Proposals Submission Deadline is coming soon, in two weeks [1] - 2013-07-16 - and there are only a few submissions (with only two system wide changes accepted). Help us with Fedora 20 planning and development coordination! See https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Policy for current

F20 System Wide Change: Boost 1.54 Uplift

= Proposed System Wide Change: Fedora 20 Boost 1.54 Uplift = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/F20Boost154 Change owner(s): Petr Machata , Denis Arnaud , Benjamin De Kosnik This change brings Boost 1.54.0 to Fedora 20. == Detailed description == The aim is to synchronize Fedora with the m

F20 Self Contained Change: Ryu Network Operating System

= Proposed Self Contained Change: Ryu Network Operating System = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ryu Change owner(s): yamahata Ryu Network Operating System [1] This change was originally proposed for Fedora 19 but postponed to Fedora 20 https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Ryu == D

Re: F20 Self Contained Change: Ryu Network Operating System

- Original Message - > On 08/07/13 10:41, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > > = Proposed Self Contained Change: Ryu Network Operating System = > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ryu > > > > Change owner(s): yamahata > > > > Ryu Network Operat

F20 Self Contained Change: GLIBC 2.18

= Proposed Self Contained Change: GLIBC 2.18 = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/GLIBC218 Change owner(s): Carlos O'Donell Switch GLIBC in Fedora 20 to GLIBC version 2.18. == Detailed description == GLIBC 2.18 will be released at the end of July 2013; we have started closely tracking the

Re: Should Boost even be Feature/Change? [Was: F20 Self Contained Change: Ryu Network Operating System]

- Original Message - > Dan Mashal writes: > > > > The Feature page still belongs to the FeaturePageIncomplete category. > > > > I feel a somewhat similar way about boost and it would be nice if > > there was some more detailed descriptions here. > > Frankly, my biannual filing of Fea

F20 System Wide Change: ARM as primary Architecture

= Proposed System Wide Change: ARM as primary Architecture = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ARM_as_Primary Change owner(s): Dennis Gilmore , Peter Robinson Make ARM a primary architecture. Add armv7hl to the i686 and x86_64 as arches that we build and support. This will mean that all p

Re: F20 System Wide Change: ARM as primary Architecture

- Original Message - > Adam Williamson (awill...@redhat.com) said: > > I've had an entry on my todo list _forever_ to complete the > > 'deliverables SOP' I started several releases ago: > > > > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Adamwill/Draft_releng_SOP_deliverables > > > > (I don't rea

F20 Self Contained Change: Application Installer

= Proposed Self Contained Change: Application Installer = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/AppInstaller Change owner(s): Richard Hughes , together with the desktop team We will replace the existing gnome-packagekit frontends (gpk-update-viewer and gpk-application) by a new application.

F20 Self Contained Change: Shared Certificate Tools

= Proposed Self Contained Change: Shared Certificate Tools = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SharedCertificateTools Change owner(s): Stef Walter Fedora now has infrastructure for sharing system trusted certificates between the various crypto libraries. Tools are being worked on for addi

F20 Self Contained Change: Hadoop

= Proposed Self Contained Change: Hadoop = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Hadoop Change owner(s): Matthew Farrellee Provide native Apache Hadoop packages. == Detailed description == Apache Hadoop is a widely used, increasingly complete big data platform, with a strong open source comm

Re: Schedule for Wednesday's FESCo Meeting (2013-07-10)

- Original Message - > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- > Hash: SHA1 > > On 07/10/2013 01:14 PM, Matthew Miller wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 09, 2013 at 09:43:04AM -0700, Toshio Kuratomi wrote: > >> Note: As of this writing, the agenda for this week is very light. > >> The one known agenda ite

F20 Self Contained Change: SDDM as the default KDE DM

= Proposed Self Contained Change: SDDM as the default KDE display manager instead of KDM = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SDDMinsteadOfKDM Change owner(s): Martin Briza and KDE SIG Retire KDM as the default display manager of the KDE Fedora Spin in favor of SDDM. == Detailed descrip

Re: F20 System Wide Change: ARM as primary Architecture

- Original Message - > Hi, > > On 07/10/2013 06:14 PM, Björn Persson wrote: > > Kevin Fenzi wrote: > >> I was working on adding 2 more SOC's for packagers earlier this week. > >> > >> I wanted to see how much call there was for these... should I try and > >> make them accessable by all pac

F20 Self Contained Change: KDE Plasma Workspaces 4.11

= Proposed Self Contained Change: KDE Plasma Workspaces 4.11 = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/KDE411 Change owner(s): Rex Dieter and KDE SIG Rebase to version 4.11 of: the KDE Plasma Workspaces including the Plasma Desktop and Netbook workspaces, the KDE Applications and the KDE Platfo

F20 System Wide Change: Enable kdump on secureboot machines

= Proposed System Wide Change: Enable kdump on secureboot machines = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Kdump_with_secureboot Change owner(s): Vivek Goyal Currently kexec/kdump is disabled on machines with secureboot enabled. This feature aims to enable kexec/kdump on such machines. == Det

Re: F20 System Wide Change: ARM as primary Architecture

- Original Message - > On Wed, Jul 10, 2013 at 11:04:51PM -0700, Brendan Conoboy wrote: > > > The all or nothing element in the above simply serves to discourage > > further contribution and is harming Fedora's growth. The relentless > > "I don't want ARM to sully the good name of Fedora"

REMINDER: Submission deadline for System Wide Changes of Fedora 25 next Tuesday!

Hi everyone! The submission deadline for System Wide Changes of Fedora 25 [1] is coming pretty soon - just in one week from today on July 5th. Alpha release of Fedora 25 is planned on August 23rd with Change Checkpoint: Completion deadline on July 26th (that means changes are testable) Please, su

F25 System Wide Change: Automatic Provides for Python RPM Packages

= Proposed System Wide Change: Automatic Provides for Python RPM Packages = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ Automatic_Provides_for_Python_RPM_Packages Change owner(s): * Tomas Orsava * Miro Hroncok

Re: F25 System Wide Change: Automatic Provides for Python RPM Packages

On Thu, Jun 30, 2016 at 2:20 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > = Proposed System Wide Change: Automatic Provides for Python RPM Packages = > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ > Automatic_Provides_for_Python_RPM_Packages > > Change owner(s): > * Tomas Orsava <https://f

F25 Self Contained Change: IBus Emoji Typing

= Proposed Self Contained Change: IBus Emoji Typing = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/IBus_Emoji_Typing Change owner(s): * Takao Fujiwara The IBus core will provide the Emoji Unicode typing with the IBus XKB engines. == Detailed Description == IBus has already provided Unicode hex cod

F25 Self Contained Change: Zend Framework 3

= Proposed Self Contained Change: Zend Framework 3 = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ZF3 Change owner(s): * Remi Collet and PHP SIG == Detailed Description == See upstream annoucement: Zend Framework 3 Released! [1] The Zend Framework is a huge set of ~60 components. The framework vers

F25 Self Contained Change: Erlang 19

= Proposed Self Contained Change: Erlang 19 = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Erlang_19 Change owner(s): * Peter Lemenkov * Fedora Erlang SIG * Randy Barlow * Jeremy Cline == Detailed Description == Upgrade Erlang to version 19 which brings a lot of good stuff. Just a few highlights:

F25 Self Contained Change: Golang 1.7

= Proposed Self Contained Change: Golang 1.7 = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/golang1.7 Change owner(s): * Jakub Čajka Rebase of Golang package to upcoming version 1.7 in Fedora 25, including rebuild of all dependent packages. == Detailed Description == Rebase of Golang package to upc

F25 Self Contained Change: HTCondor 8.6

= Proposed Self Contained Change: HTCondor 8.6 = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/HTCondor86 Change owner(s): * Ben Cotton Upgrade the condor-* packages to the latest stable release series (8.6), due to be released near the end of the summer. HTCondor [1] is a job scheduler and resource

F25 System Wide Change: Ruby on Rails 5.0

= Proposed System Wide Change: Ruby on Rails 5.0 = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Ruby_on_Rails_5.0 Change owner(s): * Jun Aruga * Pavel Valena * Vít Ondruch * Ruby SIG Ruby on Rails 5.0 is the latest version of well known web framework written in Ruby. == Detailed Description == T

F25 System Wide Change: SSSD fast cache for local users

= Proposed System Wide Change: SSSD fast cache for local users = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SSSDCacheForLocalUsers Change owner(s): * Stephen Gallagher * Jakub Hrozek Enable resolving all users through the sss NSS modules for better performance. == Detailed Description == SSSD shi

F25 System Wide Change: Unicode 9.0 support

= Proposed System Wide Change: Unicode 9.0 support = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/Unicode_9.0 Change owner(s): * Mike Fabian * Pravin Satpute * Carlos O'Donell Unicode 9.0 [1] got released on 21th June 2016. Version 9.0 adds 7,500 characters, including six new scripts and 72 new emo

REMINDER: Changes submission deadline for Fedora 25 is today

Hi everyone! Today we have Fedora 25 Changes submission deadline [1]. No more System Wide Changes should be submitted for this release (after 23:59 UTC today). Alpha release is currently planned on August, the 23rd with Alpha Freeze two weeks earlier. In case you'll need any help with your Change

Fedora 25 Bugzilla Rawhide rebase

Greetings, This e-mail is intended to inform you about the upcoming Bugzilla changes happening on 2016-07-26 (Rawhide bug rebase) and what you need to do, if anything. We will be automatically changing the version for most rawhide bugs to Fedora 25. This will result in regular bugs reported again

FESCo and Council elections in July 2016

Greetings, FESCo and Council elections are now open and we're looking for new candidates: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Elections For FESCo we have opened four seats: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Development/SteeringCommittee/Nominations For Council we have opened one seat: https://fedoraproj

Fedora 25 Alpha status is GO, release on August 30, 2016

At the second Fedora 25 Alpha Go/No-Go Meeting [1][2] that just ended, it has been agreed by QA, Release Engineering and Development to go live with the Fedora 25 Alpha. Fedora 25 Alpha release will be publicly available on August 30, 2016. Meeting details can be seen here: [1] Minutes: https://

Re: Bind update (CVE-2016-2776)?

On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 10:36 AM, Igor Gnatenko wrote: > On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 10:08 AM, Tomas Hozza wrote: >> On 09/29/2016 06:19 AM, Bojan Smojver wrote: >>> Could someone with sufficient access please spin up an update of bind >>> for F-24 and other flavours of Fedora. That CVE looks like a

Re: Am I the only one who missed the election?

- Original Message - > I just saw the Fedora election results, and was surprised to learn > there > had been an election. After some digging I figured out what happened. > > Robyn sends her announce emails to: announce@, devel-announce@, > test-announce@ > > I saw the nomination email and

Re: Am I the only one who missed the election?

- Original Message - > On Mon, Dec 10, 2012 at 10:10:54AM -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > > - Original Message - > > > I just saw the Fedora election results, and was surprised to > > > learn > > > there > > > had been an el

Re: Am I the only one who missed the election?

- Original Message - > On Mon, 10 Dec 2012 09:59:03 -0600, inode0 wrote: > > > Looks like it was sent to the devel list as well. > > > > http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2012-December/174779.html > > 417 messages in December so far! Too easy to miss the announcement, > if o

Re: Am I the only one who missed the election?

- Original Message - > On 12/10/2012 04:31 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > c) how do you define 'contributor' ? > > Active fas account... So cla_done as it's requirement for elections (Board, FAmSCo) - at least it should suit elections announcement. R. > JBG > -- > devel mailing list > devel

Re: Fedora planning process: features as packages vs feature as changes

- Original Message - > I took a look at the features for the past few releases, and noticed > they > fall into about 40% completely new leaf features, 40% upgrades to > things we > already have, and 20% or fewer "distro config changes". That is, not > necessarily new packages; rather plans

Re: Am I the only one who missed the election?

- Original Message - > On Mon, 2012-12-10 at 11:42 -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote: > > - Original Message - > > > On 12/10/2012 04:31 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote: > > > > c) how do you define 'contributor' ? > > > > > > Active f

Re: fedup: does not verify source

- Original Message - > > > > > > > On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 8:01 PM, Björn Persson < > bj...@xn--rombobjrn-67a.se > wrote: > > > Except for Yum, which has for years been the only method that was > both > secure and practical anyway, but I agree. As long as people are being > discoura

[Test-Announce] Fedora 18 Go/No-Go Meeting, Thursday, January 03 @ 17:00 UTC (12pm Eastern, 9am Pacific)

Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-1 for this important meeting, wherein we shall determine the readiness of the Fedora 18. Thursday, January 03, 2013 @17:00 UTC (12:00 EST/09:00 PST/18:00 CET) "Before each public release Development, QA and Release Engineering meet to determine if th

Proposed F19 Feature: Pillow - Replace PIL (python-imaging) with Pillow, an actively maintained fork

As decided by FESCo on 2012-12-05 meeting, all proposed Features are required to pass through the community review by announcing them on devel-announce list. FESCo votes on new features no sooner than a week from the announcement. = Features/Pillow = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/Pillo

Proposed F19 Feature: 3D Printing - Bring 3D printing tools to Fedora

As decided by FESCo on 2012-12-05 meeting, all proposed Features are required to pass through the community review by announcing them on devel-announce list. FESCo votes on new features no sooner than a week from the announcement. = Features/3D Printing = https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/3D

<    1   2   3   4   5   6   7   8   9   10   >