This is a report of the weekly KDE-SIG-Meeting with a summary of the
topics that were discussed. If you want to add a comment please reply
to this email or add it to the related meeting page.
--
= Weekly KDE Summary
On Wednesday 31 March 2010 12:57:30 Michal Hlavinka wrote:
> On Wednesday 31 March 2010 12:50:10 Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > On Wednesday 31 March 2010 12:26:17 Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > > On 03/31/2010 03:45 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> > > > which will make fixing bugs
On Wednesday 31 March 2010 12:55:58 Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 31/03/10 11:50, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > On Wednesday 31 March 2010 12:26:17 Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> >> On 03/31/2010 03:45 PM, Frank Murphy wrote:
> >>> which will make fixing bugs in current even more im
On Wednesday 31 March 2010 13:32:24 Frank Murphy wrote:
> On 31/03/10 12:25, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > On Wednesday 31 March 2010 12:55:58 Frank Murphy wrote:
> >> On 31/03/10 11:50, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> >>> On Wednesday 31 March 2010 12:26:17 Rahul Sundaram wro
On Wednesday 31 March 2010 14:20:40 Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> On 03/31/2010 11:32 AM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > On 03/31/2010 02:55 PM, Ralf Corsepius wrote:
> >> If your "unworthy bug" doesn't cause malfunctions, you could easily
> >> close it "WONTFIX" and add a comment.
> >
> > Why do you advocat
This is a report of the weekly KDE-SIG-Meeting with a summary of the
topics that were discussed. If you want to add a comment please reply
to this email or add it to the related meeting page.
--
= Weekly KDE Summary
On Friday 09 April 2010 02:27:59 Christoph Wickert wrote:
> Am Donnerstag, den 08.04.2010, 17:01 -0700 schrieb Jesse Keating:
> > Part of the solution here is to not rely entirely on yum depsolving, and
> > instead add explicitly which polkit you want in the comps group, so that
> > a provider is a
On Saturday 10 April 2010 05:02:52 pm Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > We explicitly require polkit-kde from F-12 in combination with polkit-1
> > (in kdebase-workspace). F-11 still require
> > PolicyKit-authentication-agent.
>
> That would be F-13 resp
This is a report of the weekly KDE-SIG-Meeting with a summary of the
topics that were discussed. If you want to add a comment please reply
to this email or add it to the related meeting page.
--
= Weekly KDE Summary
Hi!
We've been working for some time on improving current system configuration
tools (system-config-* cleanup), some of these tools are going to be removed
completely as there's no need for them now (autoconfiguration, obsoleted), some
are really very outdated and unmaintained for some time. And
-20/kde-
sig.2010-04-20-14.13.log.html
--
= Participants =
* Jaroslav Reznik
* Kevin Kofler
* Rex Dieter
* Steven Parrish
* Than Ngo
* Thomas Janssen
* Lukas Tinkl
On Sunday 25 April 2010 10:33:13 Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Christoph Wickert wrote:
> > I'm upstreaming reports from 'lazy idiots' too and some of them get
> > fixed. In fact the percentage of the ones that get fixed is not
> > different from the 'active' reporters cause usually the backtrace
> > conta
Rex, count with me, even I'm probably not the right person too
but I think it's the must to have it and properly maintained.
R.
- Original Message -
> Being the avid package monkey I am, I whipped up some initial
> packaging for
> http://gitorious.org/qt-at-spi/ in my space at
> http://rd
- Original Message -
> On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 09:30 +, Tim Waugh wrote:
> > On Fri, 2012-01-20 at 08:39 +0100, Marcela Mašláňová wrote:
> > > I use closed/upstream, when I already fixed it in upstream. This
> > > bug
> > > should be closed with number of release, where it is fixed or
> >
- Original Message -
> On Wednesday 25 January 2012 19:05:37 Manuel Escudero wrote:
> > And also I've been told this desktop is available for
> > ArchLinux now as well... As for this facts I was wondering
> > how feasible is to port Unity to Fedora as well
>
> The last I heard from the Arc
- Original Message -
> On Fri, 2012-01-27 at 04:16 -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> > > On Wednesday 25 January 2012 19:05:37 Manuel Escudero wrote:
> > > > And also I've been told this desktop is available for
> >
more complicated...
R.
- Original Message -
> - Original Message -
> > On Fri, 2012-01-27 at 04:16 -0500, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > > - Original Message -
> > > > On Wednesday 25 January 2012 19:05:37 Manuel Escudero wrote:
> > > > >
This is a report of the weekly KDE-SIG-Meeting with a summary of the
topics that were discussed. If you want to add a comment please reply
to this email or add it to the related meeting page.
= Weekly KDE Summary =
Week: 06/2012
Time: 2012-02-07 15:00 UTC
Meeting page: https://fedoraproject.o
What's the policy to get a bugfix to Alpha?
Jaroslav
- Original Message -
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Tue, 7 Feb 2012 23:45:32 -0600
> Dennis Gilmore wrote:
>
> > We have completed mass branching for Fedora 17 you now need make
> > sure
> > that you build t
This is a report of the weekly KDE-SIG-Meeting with a summary of the
topics that were discussed. If you want to add a comment please reply
to this email or add it to the related meeting page.
= Weekly KDE Summary =
Week: 08/2012
Time: 2012-02-21 15:00 UTC
Meeting page: https://fedoraproject.org
As smb4k is a KDE Platform based app, I can also help with review,
just we will have to find a sponsor.
Also please go through the current packaging guidelines as Michael
already pointed you to it.
Jaroslav
- Original Message -
> Hi,
> I'd like that someone sponsor me, to reinsert smb4k
- Original Message -
> Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
> > So is it perhaps time to rename the qt3 stuff to -qt3 and make room
> > for the qt4 stuff?
>
> It breaks existing stuff, and besides, we'll have to distinguish Qt 4
> stuff
> from Qt 5 stuff soon too.
Yeah,
it will break Qt 5 very, very soon
- "Kevin Fenzi" wrote:
> Greetings.
>
> Fedora 14 was a pretty relaxing and stable release. I'm thinking that
> Fedora 15 may be much more exciting. ;)
>
> Things I know of so far:
>
> * systemd
> * gnome3 / gnome-shell default
> * removing a bunch of suid stuff in favor of capabilitie
- "Robyn Bergeron" wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 9:35 AM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> > Greetings.
> >
> > Fedora 14 was a pretty relaxing and stable release. I'm thinking
> that
> > Fedora 15 may be much more exciting. ;)
> >
> > Things I know of so far:
> >
> > * systemd
> > * gnome3 / gnome-s
On Monday, January 24, 2011 02:06:50 am Kevin Kofler wrote:
> You can run "systemsettings" from a terminal or a "run command" interface.
>
> (I think we should reconsider the decision of having KDE's System Settings
> only shown in the menu in KDE/Plasma sessions, I'll bring this up in our
> KDE
= Participants =
* Kevin Kofler
* Jaroslav Reznik
* Lukas Tinkl
* Rex Dieter
* Than Ngo
* Radek Novacek
* Thomas Janssen
* Steven M. Parrish
= Agenda =
topics to discuss:
* 4.6.0
On Tuesday, January 25, 2011 06:40:00 pm Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 01/25/2011 10:58 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > reconsider the OnlyShowIn=KDE; for System Settings
> > * ''AGREED'' to not enable it by now and ask upstream what they think
> > * reasons ar
On Wednesday, January 26, 2011 01:24:09 pm Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 01/26/2011 02:56 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > I think there should be way
> > how to confugure from for example Gnome and same would be great for Gnome
> > Applications to be configurable from other enviro
On Monday, February 07, 2011 03:51:42 pm Bastien Nocera wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-02-04 at 08:52 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> > Adam Williamson wrote:
> > > it's a design feature, we are told. the intent is that applications
> > > should offer the option to set themselves as the default, instead of
> >
= Participants =
* Kevin Kofler
* Jaroslav Reznik
* Lukas Tinkl
* Rex Dieter
* Than Ngo
* Radek Novacek
* Thomas Janssen
= Agenda =
topics to discuss:
* F15 alpha
* akonadi: switch to sqlite default
= Participants =
* Kevin Kofler
* Jaroslav Reznik
* Lukas Tinkl
* Rex Dieter
* Than Ngo
* Radek Novacek
= Agenda =
topics to discuss:
* F15 alpha rc1 out
** Desktop Validation tests
* Live image
On Saturday, February 26, 2011 04:15:38 pm Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Christoph Wickert wrote:
> > Please try to look beyond the rim of your KDE teacup for a moment. What
> > about the DEs / WMs that do not provide a polkit agent? Shouldn't we
> > make things like virt-manager just work in *every* envir
= Participants =
* Kevin Kofler
* Jaroslav Reznik
* Lukas Tinkl
* Rex Dieter
* Than Ngo
* Radek Novacek
* Thomas Janssen
* Christoph Wickert
= Agenda =
topics to discuss:
* kde-4.6.1
On Tuesday, March 15, 2011 01:42:19 pm Richard Hughes wrote:
> I'm planning to orphan the hal and hal-info packages in F15 and and
> retire them in rawhide.
> matahari-0:0.4.0-0.1.8003b6c.git.fc15.1.x86_64
The old code, we should update Fedora package to Sigar based version but I'm
not
sure the
= Participants =
* Kevin Kofler
* Jaroslav Reznik
* Lukas Tinkl
* Rex Dieter
* Than Ngo
* Radek Novacek
* Thomas Janssen
* Christoph Wickert
* nucleo
= Agenda =
topics to discuss:
* kde-4.6.x on f14
On Wednesday, March 16, 2011 06:36:53 pm Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-03-15 at 12:42 +, Richard Hughes wrote:
> > I'm planning to orphan the hal and hal-info packages in F15 and and
> > retire them in rawhide.
> >
> > HAL has been dead upstream for 3 years now, and all development has
On Monday 03 May 2010 02:20:51 Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Hi,
>
> You will have noticed by now that my FESCo term is about to expire, that
> the nomination period for FESCo just closed and that my name does not show
> up on the list of candidates. No, this is not an accident or negligence,
> the decisi
-04/kde-
sig.2010-05-04-14.03.log.html
--
= Participants =
* Jaroslav Reznik
* Kevin Kofler
* Rex Dieter
* Steven Parrish
* Than Ngo
* Thomas Janssen
* Lukas Tinkl
On Thursday 06 May 2010 13:10:36 Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> On Wed, May 05, 2010 at 09:39:52PM -0400, Tom Lane wrote:
> > Mail Lists writes:
> > > On 05/05/2010 09:35 AM, Miroslav Lichvar wrote:
> > >> With the latest improvements in the chrony package related to
> > >> NetworkManager and name reso
On Sunday 09 May 2010 19:13:57 Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > I think it would be better to drop ntp support completely from s-c-d once
> > chrony becomes default in Fedora. We aim to support default Fedora
> > configuration tools. Radek Novacek is now work
On Tuesday 11 May 2010 13:08:53 Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 05/11/2010 03:43 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > Do we have a security team who evaluate security issues that are filed
> > against any package, and who have the privileges to immediately fix the
> > CVE should the maintainer not be respo
-11/kde-
sig.2010-05-11-14.02.log.html
--
= Participants =
* Jaroslav Reznik
* Kevin Kofler
* Rex Dieter
* Steven Parrish
* Than Ngo
* Thomas Janssen
* Lukas Tinkl
On Tuesday 11 May 2010 18:51:08 Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Tue, 11 May 2010 15:37:51 +0200
>
> Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > On Tuesday 11 May 2010 13:08:53 Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > > On 05/11/2010 03:43 PM, Daniel P. Berrange wrote:
> > > > Do we have a securi
On Wednesday 12 May 2010 23:24:13 Seth Vidal wrote:
> On Wed, 12 May 2010, Guido Grazioli wrote:
> > 2010/5/12 Rahul Sundaram :
> >> The search box has a icon on the left side which defaults to searching
> >> the name rather than description. It is probably too subtle to notice.
> >> I bet that is
On Wednesday 12 May 2010 23:29:30 Chris Lumens wrote:
> > users do not need to find devel packages from the PackageKit GUI, we need
> > to search useful packages from here, that is my opinion...
>
> This line of thinking needs to stop. Developers are users, too, and
> development packages ending
-18/kde-
sig.2010-05-18-14.04.log.html
--
= Participants =
* Jaroslav Reznik
* Kevin Kofler
* Rex Dieter
* Steven Parrish
* Than Ngo
* Thomas Janssen
* Lukas Tinkl
On Friday 21 May 2010 11:21:49 Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> Ideally someone who uses KDE; some of the bugs filed against the Qt
> interface are rather hard to reproduce on GNOME.
Hi,
it's fair to co-maintain google-gadget as we're one of consumers, count me in.
I've already asked for ACLS.
Ja
On Friday 21 May 2010 13:00:54 Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> On Fri, May 21, 2010 at 12:11 PM, Jaroslav Reznik
wrote:
> > On Friday 21 May 2010 11:21:49 Michel Alexandre Salim wrote:
> >> Ideally someone who uses KDE; some of the bugs filed against the Qt
> >> i
On Saturday 22 May 2010 10:14:01 Thorsten Leemhuis wrote:
> On 20.05.2010 18:42, Jesse Keating wrote:
> > On Thu, 2010-05-20 at 14:25 +0100, Bastien Nocera wrote:
> >> I'd expect most of the support to end up in F13 updates, so I'm not
> >> sure a feature page really makes sense.
> >
> > This happ
On Monday 24 May 2010 17:16:58 Jon Ciesla wrote:
> http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/getfile?taskID=2205859&name=root.log
It's already fixed, you can just resubmit job.
Jaroslav
> -J
--
Jaroslav Řezník
Software Engineer - Base Operating Systems Brno
Office: +420 532 294 275
Mobile: +420 602
On Wednesday 02 June 2010 06:12:48 Peter Lemenkov wrote:
> 2010/6/2 James Laska :
> > Greetings package maintainers,
> >
> > Want to get notification of any breakage in your just-built koji
> > packages?
>
> It would be great if rpmlint logs will be automatically generated on
> each koji build an
-08/kde-
sig.2010-06-08-14.00.log.html
--
= Participants =
* Jaroslav Reznik
* Kevin Kofler
* Rex Dieter
* Steven Parrish
* Than Ngo
* Thomas Janssen
* Lukas Tinkl
On Sunday, June 13, 2010 06:54:37 pm Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Jesse Keating wrote:
> > I hope you are all as excited as I am about this!
>
> Count me as not excited.
>
> As I already pointed out several times, I don't see anything obviously
> wrong with our CVS setup, so I don't see what we have to
-15/kde-
sig.2010-06-15-13.59.log.html
--
= Participants =
* Jaroslav Reznik
* Kevin Kofler
* Rex Dieter
* Steven Parrish
* Than Ngo
* Thomas Janssen
* Lukas Tinkl
/2010-06-22/fedora-meeting.2010-06-22-14.04.log.html
--
= Participants =
* Jaroslav Reznik
* Kevin Kofler
* Rex Dieter
* Steven Parrish
* Than Ngo
* Thomas Janssen
* Lukas Tinkl
-29/kde-
sig.2010-06-29-14.05.log.html
--
= Participants =
* Jaroslav Reznik
* Kevin Kofler
* Rex Dieter
* Steven Parrish
* Than Ngo
* Thomas Janssen
* Lukas Tinkl
+ guests
* adimania
* gwerra
On Wednesday, July 07, 2010 10:29:01 pm Tom "spot" Callaway wrote:
> Hello Fedora!
>
> Please take a moment and read this email. There's cake in it for you.
>
> [jreznik] leonidas-kde-theme:
> leonidas-kde-theme-lion-11.0.3-1.fc12.noarch
> leonidas-kde-theme-landscape-11.0.3-1.fc12.noarch
rpmls l
-13/kde-
sig.2010-07-13-14.00.log.html
--
= Participants =
* Jaroslav Reznik
* Kevin Kofler
* Rex Dieter
* Steven Parrish
* Than Ngo
* Thomas Janssen
* Lukas Tinkl
* Radek Novacek
and KDEPIM guests
-20/kde-
sig.2010-07-20-14.04.log.html
--
= Participants =
* Jaroslav Reznik
* Kevin Kofler
* Rex Dieter
* Steven Parrish
* Than Ngo
* Radek Novacek
* kalev
* nucleo
* dgilmore
and KDEPIM guests
-27/kde-sig.2010-07-2
7-14.02.log.html
--
= Participants =
* Jaroslav Reznik
* Kevin Kofler
*
Rex Dieter
* Steven Parrish
* Than Ngo
* Radek Novacek
* Thomas
Janssen
On Tuesday, July 27, 2010 07:46:48 pm Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Rahul Sundaram
wrote:
> > DeviceKit or udisks backend?
>
> libudev / udisks / upower
actually. The original DeviceKit is dead. The
> name for the Solid backend
stuck, it should probably be renamed.
Yes, it should be renamed - which
name?
On Sunday, August 01, 2010 09:24:28 am Martin Sourada wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've
been wondering what's up with webkitgtk maintainership. It's pretty
>
important gnome desktop component but it looks rather neglected. Last
>
update on stable branches of fedora was done by rahul who even isn't in
>
the co
- Original Message -
> Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
> meeting tomorrow at 18:00UTC (1:00pm EST) in #fedora-meeting on
> irc.freenode.net.
>
> Links to all tickets below can be found at:
> https://fedorahosted.org/fesco/report/9
>
> = Followups =
>
>
On Mon, Sep 7, 2015 at 3:04 PM, Harald Hoyer wrote:
> Agenda:
>
> - Fedora.Base - RHEL.Base - Flock recap (continued)
> - Ring 1 vs Ring 0 (continued)
> - define the minimal install (continued)
> - define the docker base image (continued)
> - minimal disk image for importing into libvirt (contin
Greetings!
As you probably realized, the FESCo July 2014 elections were closed
prematurely due to mistake in elections setup. To be fair to all
candidates, we have decided to erase all results collected before
the fix was applied and restart elections.
Voting will be opened from today's midnight
- Original Message -
> Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
> meeting Wednesday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
>
> To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
>
> or run:
> date -d '2014
Greetings, all!
The elections for the Fedora Engineering Steering Committee (FESCo)
Summer 2014 Special Election have concluded, and the results are
shown below.
FESCo is electing 3 seats this time. A total of 195 ballots were
cast, meaning a candidate could accumulate up to 975 votes (195 *
5).
One correction - while updating Wiki with the newly elected FESCo
members I found out the initial announcement was incorrect and only
one seat is available for the full F21/F22 term.
Josh Boyer is elected for full F21/F22 term as replacement for
Toshio Kurotami (who was elected on February 2014) [
Greetings,!
as you probably noticed, Fedora 21 is still not frozen (Alpha Change
Deadline was planned for this Tuesday, 2014-07-22), due to several
issues we hit while working on the Alpha release (incomplete test
composes etc).
There's also Flock being held in the beginning of August (2014-08-06
- Original Message -
> Following is the list of topics that will be discussed in the FESCo
> meeting Wednesday at 17:00UTC in #fedora-meeting on irc.freenode.net.
>
> To convert UTC to your local time, take a look at
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/UTCHowto
>
> or run:
> date -d '
Greetings!
Alpha Change Deadline slips one more week due to requested glibc/GCC mass
rebuild [1]. Alpha Change Deadline is now 2014-08-19.
For full schedule check out [2]. I'll update TJ schedule ASAP.
[1] https://fedorahosted.org/rel-eng/ticket/5962
[2] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/21
Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-2 for this important
meeting, wherein we shall determine the readiness of the Fedora 21 Alpha.
Thursday, September 04, 2014 17:00 UTC (1 PM EDT, 10 AM PDT, 19:00 CEST)
"Before each public release Development, QA and Release Engineering meet
to determ
Fedora 21 Alpha Release Readiness Meeting.
date: 2014-09-04 place: irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-2
time: 19:00 UTC (3 PM EDT, 12 PM PDT, 21:00 CEST)
This Thursday, September 04, we will meet to make sure we are coordinated
and ready for the Alpha release of Fedora 21 on Tuesday, September 0
- Original Message -
> Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses for two package
> maintainers are no longer valid. I'm starting the unresponsive
> maintainer policy to find out if they are still interested in
> maintaining their packages (and if so, have them update their email
- Original Message -
> On Thu, Sep 04, 2014 at 11:35:43AM +0200, Johannes Lips wrote:
> > On Wed, Sep 3, 2014 at 10:44 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> >
> > > Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses for two package
> > > maintainers are no longer valid. I'm starting the unresponsive
- Original Message -
> Greetings, we've been told that the email addresses for two package
> maintainers are no longer valid. I'm starting the unresponsive
> maintainer policy to find out if they are still interested in
> maintaining their packages (and if so, have them update their email
- Original Message -
> Agenda:
> - Lennart's proposal discussion, especially in relation to /etc:
>
> http://0pointer.net/blog/revisiting-how-we-put-together-linux-systems.html
> http://0pointer.net/blog/projects/stateless.html
> - Open Floor
Phil, as I organize Akademy conferenc
Today at Go/No-Go meeting it was decided to slip Fedora 21 Alpha release
by one week due to unresolved blocker bugs [1] and no release candidate
available. More details in meeting minutes [2].
As a result, ALL MAJOR MILESTONES, and their dependent tasks, will be
pushed out by one week [3].
The n
Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-2 for this important
meeting, wherein we shall determine the readiness of the Fedora 21 Alpha.
Thursday, September 11, 2014 17:00 UTC (1 PM EDT, 10 AM PDT, 19:00 CEST)
"Before each public release Development, QA and Release Engineering meet
to determ
- Original Message -
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 09/11/2014 07:54 AM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-2 for this
> > important meeting, wherein we shall determine the readiness of
- Original Message -
> On 09/11/2014 02:02 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
>
> > We don't have a working Release Candidate yet and we're still working
> > out the mirror-manager issues ...
>
> What is happening with the mirrors?
1134524 - Product-ized network install images do not offer fil
- Original Message -
> On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 3:11 PM, Stephen Gallagher
> wrote:
> > -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On 09/11/2014 09:01 AM, poma wrote:
> >> On 09/11/2014 02:02 PM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> >>
> >>> We don't have a working Release Candidate ye
Today at Go/No-Go meeting it was decided to slip Fedora 21 Alpha release
by one week due to unresolved blocker bugs [1] and no release candidate
available. More details in meeting minutes [2].
Quoting Adam, we are moderately optimistic we could possibly actually be
done next week if the netinst st
= Proposed Self Contained Change: BIND version 9.10 =
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BIND_9.10
Change owner(s): Tomas Hozza
BIND (Berkeley Internet Name Domain) version 9.10 is the latest stable major
update of the widely used DNS server. Besides new features, some settings
defaults h
Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-2 for this important
meeting, wherein we shall determine the readiness of the Fedora 21 Alpha.
Thursday, September 18, 2014 17:00 UTC (1 PM EDT, 10 AM PDT, 19:00 CEST)
"Before each public release Development, QA and Release Engineering meet
to determ
At the Fedora 21 Alpha Go/No-Go Meeting #3 that just occurred, it was
agreed to Go with the Fedora 21 Alpha by Fedora QA, Release Engineering
and Development.
Fedora 21 Alpha will be publicly available on Tuesday, September 23, 2014.
"That's one small step for mankind but one giant leap for Fedor
- Original Message -
> Proposals are supposed to provide travel costs from pre-determined
> airports at the *targeted* period.
> If I trust informations from the proposals, SLC would be too expensive
> to cover travel expenses for EMEA folks.
Looking on airfare prices, all options seems to
- Original Message -
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> There has been some discussion in various forums lately about how we
> will handle fedup upgrades from Fedora 20 to Fedora 21 products.
>
> Several suggestions have been made that warrant discussion:
>
> * Upgrad
- Original Message -
> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On 09/24/2014 12:22 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
> > - Original Message - There has been some discussion in
> > various forums lately about how we will handle fedup upgrades from
&g
- Original Message -
> Hi
>
> On Wed, Sep 24, 2014 at 12:35 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
>
>
> Ah, you're right. On the other hand I think all spins are somehow
> desktop related (at least now), so moving spins to use workstation
> as the base is probably
- Original Message -
> > Hi, folks. As I hinted a bit, and as some of you might know from IRC,
> > I've spent the last ~24 hours on something of an epic Wiki revision
> > spree. I made some fairly major and possibly significant changes, so
> > under the 'ask forgiveness' principle I thought
- Original Message -
> - Original Message -
> > > Hi, folks. As I hinted a bit, and as some of you might know from IRC,
> > > I've spent the last ~24 hours on something of an epic Wiki revision
> > > spree. I made some fairly major and possibly significant changes, so
> > > under th
- Original Message -
> On Fri, 26 Sep 2014 12:13:35 +0200
> Václav Pavlín wrote:
>
> >
> > On 26.9.2014 11:41, Phil Knirsch wrote:
> > > Agenda:
> > > - Introduction David Sommerseth, taking over buildrequires cleanup
> > > work from Benedikt
> > > - Discussion: Sharing alpha base imag
- Original Message -
> On Fri, 2014-09-26 at 05:32 -0400, Kamil Paral wrote:
> > > Hi, folks. As I hinted a bit, and as some of you might know from IRC,
> > > I've spent the last ~24 hours on something of an epic Wiki revision
> > > spree. I made some fairly major and possibly significant c
- Original Message -
> Hi,
> I'm thinking can we ship for Fedora 22 some wallpapers in portrait
> orientation?
>
> We always shipped wallpapers in landscape mode. But I - and quite people
> around me - have monitors rotated by 90°, which I personally find much
> better for development.
> R
Greetings!
This time I'm sending "Accepted Changes 100% Complete" reminder a bit
earlier than usually as we still have quite a lot of work to do on
Changes and it's going to help other teams to participate in Changes
process earlier (aka Docs team etc.).
2014-10-14 Accepted Changes 100% Complete
- Original Message -
>
>
>
> On Mon, 2014-10-06 at 10:54 +0100, Ian Malone wrote:
> > On 6 October 2014 09:41, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> > > Hi
> > >
> > > One of the long standing features that were enabled by default in yum is
> > > support for delta rpms. dnf developers have disabled
- Original Message -
> In Fedora 21 we show any valid application in the software center with
> an application icon of 32x32 or larger. Currently a 32x32 icon has to
> be padded with 16 pixels of whitespace on all 4 edges, and *also* has
> to be scaled x2 to match other UI elements on HiDPI
Join us on irc.freenode.net in #fedora-meeting-2 for this important
meeting, wherein we shall determine the readiness of the Fedora 21 Beta.
Thursday, October 23, 2014 17:00 UTC (1 PM EDT, 10 AM PDT, 19:00 CEST)
"Before each public release Development, QA and Release Engineering meet
to determine
- Original Message -
> Hi,
>
> On 10/21/2014 08:28 AM, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
> > * Should we start all of the Products at version 1 and say "built on the
> > Fedora 21 platform"?
>
> Is there any intention to release the products on different schedules?
Definitely not now or in the ne
101 - 200 of 907 matches
Mail list logo
