Hello,
as Oracle is unlikely to re-license the libdb6 back to GPL, I like to
bring up the possibility of the libdb6 package. The idea is that the
current libdb package would still provide the libdb-5+, which is still
under GPL, and the new package would provide the newest, AGPL-ed libdb.
I would l
Dne 7.4.2014 17:47, Honza Horak napsal(a):
> On 04/07/2014 05:31 PM, Paul Howarth wrote:
... snap ...
>> Does libdb-6 have the same symbol names as libdb-5? If so, there's
>> probably not a lot of packages that can be built with libdb-6 without
>> the possibility of causing symbol conflicts with ot
Dne 11.4.2014 15:55, Florian Weimer napsal(a):
> On 04/11/2014 01:18 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
>> = Proposed System Wide Change: BerkeleyDB 6 =
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BerkeleyDB_6
>>
>> Change owner(s): Jan Staněk
>>
>> Add BerkeleyDB v.
Dne 11.4.2014 14:57, Chris Adams napsal(a):
> Once upon a time, Jaroslav Reznik said:
>> Add BerkeleyDB v. 6, which changed license from previous releases (GPLv2+ to
>> AGPLv3+), to Fedora while keeping the older version for packages which
>> cannot
>> use BerkeleyDB with the new license.
>
>
Dne 11.4.2014 16:59, Bill Nottingham napsal(a):
> Jaroslav Reznik (jrez...@redhat.com) said:
>> == Scope ==
>> * Proposal owners: Create new set of packages and introduce proper
>> versioning
>> in order to not confuse the dynamic linker.
>
> Is this symbol versioning intended to be upstream?
Dne 16.4.2014 15:44, Petr Pisar napsal(a):
> On 2014-04-11, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
>> = Proposed System Wide Change: BerkeleyDB 6 =
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BerkeleyDB_6
> [...]
>> The BerkeleyDB, used between others by rpm [1], changed license between
>> versions 5.* and 6.* to
Dne 23.4.2014 20:23, Miloslav Trmač napsal(a):
> Hello,
> 2014-04-11 13:18 GMT+02:00 Jaroslav Reznik :
>
>> = Proposed System Wide Change: BerkeleyDB 6 =
>> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/BerkeleyDB_6
>>
>
> At the FESCo meeting, we were unclear what happens to packages that don't
> get u
Dne 24.4.2014 17:22, Jerry James napsal(a):
> I need some advice on how to handle this for XEmacs, which is a GPLv3+
> package.
Well, both GPLv3+ and AGPLv3+ have clause ([1], [2]) that allow code
licensed under one of them link with code under the other one legally -
only if you run the full pr
One of the planned parts of the F21 System Wide Change: BerkeleyDB 6 [1]
is the introduction of downstream symbol versioning of both versions of
the libraries (libdb with v6 and libdb5 with v5). This part is planned
in order to not introduce bugs similar to [2]. However, if we introduce
downstream
Hello,
some time back Oracle released new version of Berkeley DB under AGPL,
which is incompatible with Fedora licensing politics.
However, it turns out that Oracle might consider re-licensing it back:
https://forums.oracle.com/message/11184885#11184885
If you are interested in DB6, consider
Hi guys,
as the new BerkeleyDB 6.x has a more restrictive license than the
previous versions (AGPLv3 vs. LGPLv2), and due to that many projects
cannot use it, perhaps it is time to get rid of it from Fedora for good
- or at least trim down the list of packages dependent on it as much as
possible.
Hi,
What should one do if the SW he is trying to package produce only
unversioned *.so files? I'm currently trying to package LMDB [1] as
possible alternative for BerkeleyDB in Fedora, and the hand-written
makefile produce only liblmdb.so.
I'm trying to persuade the upstream to change it and star
Hello,
I cannot help you with FAS, but if you could specify what problems do
you have with the softwarecollections.org, I may be able to do
something. Is this an issue with the website itself, or with a certain
collections?
Best regards,
Jan
--
Jan Staněk
Associate Software Engineer
Red Hat
]: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1677291
--
Jan Staněk
Associate Software Engineer, Core Services
Red Hat Czech
jsta...@redhat.com IM: jstanek
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel
n the meantime, the review was done by ignatenkobrain -- thanks.
--
Jan Staněk
Associate Software Engineer, Core Services
Red Hat Czech
jsta...@redhat.com IM: jstanek
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
devel ma
I'm willing to take it over, as it may come handy for my work with SCLs
in CentOS.
Also I'm planning in the near future to play with it and see if there is
any need for necromancy :)
--
Jan Staněk
Associate Software Engineer, Core Services
Red Hat Czech
jsta...@redhat.com I
thers, if there is interest?
Good luck with the SIG process!
[1]: "If nothing is going wrong, nothing needs to be said."
--
Jan Staněk
Associate Software Engineer, Core Services
Red Hat Czech
jsta...@redhat.com IM: jstanek
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP di
have claimed the dependencies (all I could find):
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8309
The maintenance will be on best-effort basis, since I do not have any
working knowledge of JavaScript.
--
Jan Staněk
Associate Software Engineer, Core Services
Red Hat Czech
jsta...@redhat.com IM: jstanek
On 26. 04. 19 16:24, Zuzana Svetlikova wrote:
> I'll take them.
Already mine (announced in the js-jquery orphaning thread) ;)
--
Jan Staněk
Associate Software Engineer, Core Services
Red Hat Czech
jsta...@redhat.com IM: jstanek
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital s
ry*
to keep them up to date with upstream; any bugs will likely go unfixed
(unless included in upstream update, OFC).
--
Jan Staněk
Associate Software Engineer, Core Services
Red Hat Czech
jsta...@redhat.com IM: jstanek
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digita
-path-exists
Keep in mind that the above list might expand in the near future,
given the current situation with many nodejs-* orphans.
--
Jan Staněk
Associate Software Engineer, Core Services
Red Hat Czech
jsta...@redhat.com IM: jstanek
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
hese issues to koschei.
Only other option I can think of is going the Rust route (packages only
in rawhide, anything depending on them must be a module), which I'm not
a fan of.
Best regards,
--
Jan Staněk
Associate Software Engineer, Core Services
Red Hat Czech
jsta...@redhat.com
On 29. 04. 19 18:44, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> jstanek: nodejs-formatio, nodejs-sinon, nodejs-lolex, nodejs-util,
> nodejs-samsam
Claimed: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8317
--
Jan Staněk
Associate Software Engineer, Core Services
Red Hat Czech
jsta...@redhat.com IM: jstanek
signatu
lling to take a review or two in exchange for helping me push this
forward.
Thanks in advance!
--
Jan Staněk
Software Engineer, Red Hat
jsta...@redhat.com irc: jstanek
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list --
rst place,
but worth mentioning in any case.
---
If you decide to push on and try to tackle any issues with Node,
I'll be more than happy to work with you on improvements.
Just be aware that this might be a very Sisyphean effort.
Best regards!
--
Jan Staněk
Software Engineer, Red Hat
jsta...@
and not being successful;
however, since at that time we were pivoting to use another malloc
implementation, I did not push that very far (i.e. trying to find other
e-mails than the one from changelog).
--
Jan Staněk
Software Engineer, Red Hat
jsta...@redhat.com irc: jstanek
signature.asc
De
e if that would work for him?
Then we can decide what approach to take next.
--
Jan Staněk
Software Engineer, Red Hat
jsta...@redhat.com irc: jstanek
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproje
the libc with any other malloc
implementation – any help or pointers appreciated.
I've also opened an inquiry about this upstream [3];
we'll see how that goes.
[3]: https://github.com/WebAssembly/wasi-libc/issues/319
--
Jan Staněk
Software Engineer, Red Hat
jsta...@r
wego.edu/pub/misc/>
>
> We can also ask Doug Lea if he can go back to the previous public domain
> dedication.
I've got some comments on the wasi-libc issue that another malloc might
work as well. Nevertheless, I'll try to contact Doug Lea with the
explanation and see where
a while :)
I had a COPR of the WIP wasi-sdk, but I set it to expire automatically,
so it is currently not available. I'll try to spin in back up today
and send you a link, in case you want to start testing the Ruby stuff
with it already.
Have a nice day!
--
Jan Staněk
Software Engineer, Red Hat
ones and contain only symlinks (/usr/bin/node → /usr/bin/node-20,
/usr/lib/node_modules → /usr/lib/node_modules_20, etc.).
Let me know what you think!
Best regards,
--
Jan Staněk
Software Engineer, Red Hat
jsta...@redhat.com irc: jstanek
signature.asc
Description: PGP sign
ault) stream available. Probably really overkill if the provides
works.
> The overly-simplified answer here is mainly that there are too many
> symlinks to maintain for this to be practical.
Acknowledged; thanks for info.
--
Jan Staněk
Software Engineer, Red Hat
jsta...@redhat.com irc: js
;
> I believe nodejs should provide nodejs20, the same way.
Thanks for the suggestion, I did not think about provides at all
when mulling over the problem. Kudos!
--
Jan Staněk
Software Engineer, Red Hat
jsta...@redhat.com irc: jstanek
signature.
hould land in rawhide sometime next week,
and later also in F40 and F39.
Let me know if that works for you or if I should change my plans.
Have a nice weekend!
--
Jan Staněk
Software Engineer, Red Hat
jsta...@redhat.com irc: jstanek
signature.asc
Description: PGP sign
As the downstream maintainer of NodeJS, I want to express both thanks
and deep understanding of your situation. Especially with the
de-modularization effort, your work was always a godsend for us.
Take care and good luck!
--
Jan Staněk
Software Engineer, Red Hat
jsta...@redhat.com irc: jstanek
27;ve added anything new in the last
month or so, I think I'm good.
--
Jan Staněk
Software Engineer, Red Hat
jsta...@redhat.com irc: jstanek
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsub
ely possible I overlooked something important,
and I would rather scrap the idea than commit to something broken.
--
Jan Staněk
Software Engineer, Red Hat
jsta...@redhat.com irc: jstanek
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
___
devel mailing list
ks flexible enough and should be compliant with FHS.
--
Jan Staněk
Software Engineer, Red Hat
jsta...@redhat.com irc: jstanek
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscr
ompilation support in Fedora would also be
appreciated :)
Thanks in advance for any help!
--
Jan Staněk
Software Engineer, Red Hat
jsta...@redhat.com irc: jstanek
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproj
ired to go through the bureaucracy 🙂
Have a nice weekend!
--
Jan Staněk
Software Engineer, Red Hat
jsta...@redhat.com irc: jstanek
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send a
Hi Aleksei,
that's awesome news! Thanks for the continous work you do.
--
Jan Staněk
Software Engineer, Red Hat
jsta...@redhat.com irc: jstanek
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.o
real idea about how OpenID actually works,
so link to the docs and "That's why" is considered a perfectly valid
answer :)
Preliminary thanks to anyone who takes the time to educate me on this!
--
Jan Staněk
Software Engineer, Red Hat
jsta...@redhat.com irc: jstanek
signature.
Kevin Fenzi writes:
> On Thu, Feb 03, 2022 at 07:16:01AM -0800, Jan Staněk wrote:
> > Hi list,
> >
> > tl;dr: Why is the Fedora ID server using HTTP communication by default?
>
> Fedora openid is using http because long ago when we started offerin
nd to orphan it in a
week or two, and your package will probably need changes.
Best regards,
--
Jan Staněk
Software Engineer, Red Hat
jsta...@redhat.com irc: jstanek
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.
As announced in the OP of this thread, I have now orphaned the package.
--
Jan Staněk
Software Engineer, Red Hat
jsta...@redhat.com irc: jstanek
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To
could begin.
Thanks in advance to the brave soul(s) that are willing to pick this up :)
[1]: https://newsboat.org
--
Jan Staněk
Software Engineer, Red Hat
jsta...@redhat.com irc: jstanek
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
___
Hi,
Jerry James wrote:
> I took them all.
Thanks! Your OCaml packages should now be also reviewed,
althoug Dan has beaten me to #1927441 :)
--
Jan Staněk
Software Engineer, Red Hat
jsta...@redhat.com irc: jstanek
OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signat
that list is moderated and I do not know if anyone actually
checks the queue :) If any Rust SIG members picks this one up,
then I'm sorry for the double offer.
--
Jan Staněk
Software Engineer, Red Hat
jsta...@redhat.com irc: jstanek
signature.asc
Description: PGP
ally again, …?
Thanks in advance for any info.
--
Jan Staněk
Software Engineer, Red Hat
jsta...@redhat.com irc: jstanek
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email t
ppreciated!
Preliminary merry holidays and happy new year. ;-)
--
Jan Staněk
Software Engineer, Red Hat
jsta...@redhat.com irc: jstanek
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an emai
50 matches
Mail list logo
