A file has been added to the lookaside cache for perl-DBD-XBase:
cbfae03a28dcae0aa0d00bec60ca710d DBD-XBase-1.03.tar.gz
--
Fedora Extras Perl SIG
http://www.fedoraproject.org/wiki/Extras/SIGs/Perl
perl-devel mailing list
perl-de...@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/l
commit 023bcc6630ac4480b121cf90da53fe6c0fb415d8
Author: Jan Pazdziora
Date: Tue Aug 2 14:50:56 2011 +0200
Rebase to 1.03.
.gitignore |2 +-
DBD-XBase-0.241-dbfdump-rename.patch | 593 --
perl-DBD-XBase.spec
explicitly say that anything under
/run/ which is not under /run/%{name}/ should not be listed in %files?
Thank you,
--
Jan Pazdziora
Senior Principal Software Engineer, Identity Management Engineering, Red Hat
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin
edora-kickstarts
What is the plan for the 22 active tickets at
https://fedorahosted.org/spin-kickstarts/report/1
? Are reporters expected to recreate them in bugzilla or will they by
migrated en masse?
--
Jan Pazdziora
Senior Principal Software Engineer, Identity Management Engineering, Re
tainer content is
supposed to be minimal on purpose but if the general agreement is
that this is a bug and the directori should be there, I sure will
file it as a bug against the base image.
--
Jan Pazdziora
Senior Principal Software Engineer, Identity Management Engineering, Red Hat
--
devel m
wer Fedora 25 image than
registry.fedoraproject.org/fedora. Is that expected?
If we are building building images
FROM fedora:25
should we start using
FROM registry.fedoraproject.org/fedora:25
instead in Dockerfiles? If merely fedora does not point to whatever
is the authoritat
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 09:03:48AM -0500, Adam Miller wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 2:39 AM, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
> >
> > If we are building building images
> >
> > FROM fedora:25
> >
> > should we start using
> >
> > FROM regi
and
if we do not want to encourage the use of
RUN dnf upgrade -y
in every Dockerfile, we might want to make it easy for people to
consume fresh content.
Incidently, registry.fedoraproject.org/fedora:25 is rather new, just
13 days old.
--
Jan Pazdziora
Senior Principal Software E
On Mon, May 08, 2017 at 01:59:36PM -0500, Adam Miller wrote:
> On Thu, May 4, 2017 at 6:55 AM, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 20, 2017 at 10:39:22PM -0500, Adam Miller wrote:
> >> Hello all,
> >> On behalf of the Fedora Atomic WG[0] and Fedora Release
> &
On Thu, May 11, 2017 at 10:04:19AM -0500, Dennis Gilmore wrote:
> El mié, 10-05-2017 a las 22:47 -0500, Adam Miller escribió:
> > On Tue, May 9, 2017 at 7:22 AM, Jan Pazdziora
> > wrote:
> > >
> > > One problem with the current Fedora 26 image is that it enables
ressed -- can we give
registry.fedoraproject.org/fedora:26
another try?
--
Jan Pazdziora
Senior Principal Software Engineer, Identity Management Engineering, Red Hat
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 11:27:13AM -0500, Adam Miller wrote:
> On Tue, May 23, 2017 at 9:38 AM, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
> >
> > The bugzilla was addressed -- can we give
> >
> > registry.fedoraproject.org/fedora:26
> >
> > another try?
>
> Yes
Hello,
it seems registry.fedoraproject.org/fedora:25 was recently updated to
some 10 month old version f3535ce68198 where packages cannot be
installed due to missing
/etc/pki/rpm-gpg/RPM-GPG-KEY-fedora-25-x86_64:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1460094
--
Jan Pazdziora
"fYYMM" for 'fedora' — which might make sense if we get
> to my dream of mixing and matching with CentOS modules)
Please make the year a full four-digit value. Typing that extra
"20" will not hurt anybody and the chance for confusion will be much
e you not happy with 'sss'
being there? Why?
--
Jan Pazdziora
Senior Principal Software Engineer, Identity Management Engineering, Red Hat
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
t).
It can also be demonstrated with
$ podman run --rm -ti registry.fedoraproject.org/fedora:32 dnf
reinstall gnupg2
Running dnf install with --setopt=install_weak_deps=false (or
in kickstart %packages --excludeWeakdeps) removes those extra
82 packages from the transaction.
--
J
ires libX.so and libY.so, and package X requires G and
that has weak dependency on K, I might not care about K.
If I explicitly say I want G, then again, sure, give me K as well.
--
Jan Pazdziora
Product Owner, Platform Security Readiness, Red Hat
__
he full report at
https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2019-07-28.txt
it lists
perl-Git-Repository (maintained by: adelton, iarnell)
perl-Git-Repository-1.323-3.fc31.noarch requires git =
2.22.0-1.fc31
perl-Git-Repository-1.323-3.fc31.sr
://infrastructure.fedoraproject.org/repo/rhel/rhel8/koji/latest/x86_64/RHEL-8-001/non_modular/kernel-headers-4.18.0-80.11.1.el8_0.x86_64.rpm
DEBUG util.py:741: Child return code was: 1
I assume it's not something I could affect from my fedpkg side.
Is that a known issue? What is the best way to report it?
--
On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 09:21:21AM -0400, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> On Fri, 20 Sep 2019 at 06:53, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
> >
> > my attempt to (scratch) build an EPEL 8 package failed with
> >
> >
> > https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//
o dnf and libdnf plugin API seems to cover
everything that we need to be able to generate SWID tags locally
after every transaction, as well as pull in SWID tags from repository
metadata, if present.
--
Jan Pazdziora
Senior Principal Software Engineer, Security Engineering,
> Since this needs to be portable, please start discussion on
> rpm-ecosys...@lists.rpm.org a.d don't do something what is DNF-specific.
Thank you for the pointer. Does rpm-ecosystem@ really deal with yum/dnf
repository metadata XML schemas?
--
Jan Pazdziora
Senior Principal Software Engi
On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 07:16:09PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> On 05. 02. 19 18:47, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
> > > > ** add SWID metadata awareness to createrepo (but this will not be
> > > Do you mean createrepo_c? createrepo is going away.
> > Yes. Is it OK to upda
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1675617
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1675618
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1675634
All of them failed on armv7hl, with some package (for example
glibc-2.29-1.fc30.1.armv7hl.rpm) missing in the mock step.
Ho
On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 09:19:03AM +, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 12, 2019 at 8:49 AM Jan Pazdziora wrote:
> >
> > All of them failed on armv7hl, with some package (for example
> > glibc-2.29-1.fc30.1.armv7hl.rpm) missing in the mock step.
> >
> >
On Thu, Feb 07, 2019 at 05:35:23PM +0100, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
> On Tue, Feb 05, 2019 at 07:16:09PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
> > On 05. 02. 19 18:47, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
> > > > > ** add SWID metadata awareness to createrepo (but this will not be
> > > > Do
uot;run: some_system_command," then
> the system command is executed.
>
> My tests.yml looks very similar to swid-tools, where it works
> (according to jenkins logs), so I'm cc-ing Jan Pazdziora just in case.
>
> I tried to find some solution on
> https://docs.fedoraproj
believe) have very little control over.
What is the recommended way to remedy the situation, for example for
reruning that pipeline run?
--
Jan Pazdziora
Senior Principal Software Engineer, Security Engineering, Red Hat
___
devel mailing list -- devel
On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 03:28:12PM +0200, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I have run fedora-rawhide-build-pipeline
>
>
> https://jenkins-continuous-infra.apps.ci.centos.org/blue/organizations/jenkins/fedora-rawhide-build-pipeline/detail/fedora-rawhide-build-p
On Tue, Jun 04, 2019 at 03:48:52PM +0200, Kamil Paral wrote:
> On Tue, Jun 4, 2019 at 3:29 PM Jan Pazdziora wrote:
> >
> > What is the recommended way to remedy the situation, for example for
> > reruning that pipeline run?
>
> Hi Jan,
> you might w
hi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2019-e00e77df62
What is the best way to get this added to the general documentation of
Fedora CI and gating? Should I take this to ci@lists?
--
Jan Pazdziora
Sr. Principal Software Engineer, Security Engineering, Red Hat
_
e kinit
> command. After I enter my passphrase, kinit returns exit status 0. I can
> then run "fedpkg build" successfully.
Can you check the current time on the problematic machine? Is it in
sync?
--
Jan Pazdziora
Senior Principal Software Engineer, Security Engineering, Red H
But autoconf is pulled in by the automake which is listed as BuildRequires
in cups.spec file, and since Fedora rawhide only has
autoconf-2.71-5.fc38.noarch, there really is not an older autoconf around
to ruin your day.
--
Jan Pazdziora | Sr. Principal Software Engineer | Red
f40 (or f40-updates) to my side tag and force the old build I need
to take precedence?
--
Jan Pazdziora | OpenShift AI | Red Hat
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedorapr
On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 03:45:35PM -0700, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 11, 2024 at 10:55:03PM GMT, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
> >
> > But when I run the scratch build, I still get the latest greatest
> > build from f40-updates. So it seems tagging into my child tag (target)
&
d-tools as well shortly.
The fact that latest python and dnf5 changes lead to FTBFS or FTI
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2220605
are also contributing to my decision to orphan.
--
Jan Pazdziora | Sr. Principal Software Engineer | Red Hat
__
On Tue, Jul 11, 2023 at 04:27:34PM +0200, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> the SWID tag enablement introduced by
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/SWID_Tag_Enablement did not lead
> to a wider SWID tag adoption, and other technologies (IMA, SPDX) seem
> to be
ow to extremely low maintenance.
--
Jan Pazdziora | OpenShift AI | Red Hat
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/
e_Schedule
> [2]https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upgrading?rd=DistributionUpgrades
Neither of these have information specific about Fedora 38.
--
Jan Pazdziora | OpenShift AI | Red Hat
--
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To u
rl-Cache-Mmap perl-Crypt-DES perl-Sys-CPU
I've updated and built
mod_authnz_pam
mod_intercept_form_submit
mod_lookup_identity
perl-Cache-Mmap
perl-Crypt-DES
I'm leaving mod_auth_openidc to John and perl-Sys-CPU to Emmanuel,
as I don't wan
/show_bug.cgi?id=1901049
The bugzillas are filed against their respective components but
I wonder if we have any guidance from the glibc point of view about
how these components should proceed. Or is the loss of _STAT_VER an
omission and will it come back?
--
Jan Pazdziora
Product Owner, Platform Security
On Wed, Nov 25, 2020 at 11:57:38AM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Jan Pazdziora:
>
> > it seems that both fakeroot and fakechroot fail to build in Fedora
> > rawhide (at least partially) because _STAT_VER is no longer declared
> > in the current glibc (or rather, its hea
On Fri, Nov 27, 2020 at 12:28:36PM +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
> * Jan Pazdziora:
>
> >> There's a Fedora-specific hack in rawhide glibc to bring back the
> >> __xstat and related symbols for linking. This in the process of being
> >> upstreamed.
> >
will often be the
> worst possible time.
But you get upgraded even now. Firefox gets major-version upgrades
even within the life of the Fedora version, as do other packages.
Yes, it might become a mess if the tooling is not right or clear. But
it is also an opportunity to potentially get a ch
ut it does not seem to have affected the images
that get built.
Does anyone have any idea what is the based container image build
process these days and in which repository we need to do the same
change to have the environment variable set by default?
--
Jan Pazdziora
Senior Principal Software E
steps that are needed.
--
Jan Pazdziora | adelton at #aos*, #brno
Sr. Principal Software Engineer, OpenShift Security Team, Red Hat
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org
ra repos or to have
From time to time, I start containers as old as Fedora 24 to test some
behaviour -- namely it was the last Fedora where systemd reliably
produced status log in docker, but it's also useful to for checking
regressions.
I don't use copr repos for that but i can imagine
c output.
What would people recommend to distinguish rawhide from non-rawhide?
For now I'm running the builds in copr but eventually I'd like for
it to work in koji as well.
Thank you,
--
Jan Pazdziora
Senior Principal Software Engineer, Secu
On Wed, Jun 06, 2018 at 02:48:25PM +0200, Florian Weimer wrote:
> On 06/06/2018 02:24 PM, Jan Pazdziora wrote:
> > Checking rpm --showrc, I can see rawhide sets %{fedora} to 29 and
> > there does not seem any mention of rawhide in the showrc output.
> >
> > Wha
lying that
we no longer do i686-only distribution? Reading this thread, the
SSE2/non-SSE2 distinction is where the change is aiming anyway, isn't
it?
--
Jan Pazdziora
Senior Principal Software Engineer, Security Engineering, Red Hat
___
devel
50 matches
Mail list logo
