Hi,
I'm interested too! Do we cover embedded platforms?
-Ilyes Gouta
On Fri, Aug 6, 2010 at 9:48 PM, Martin Sourada wrote:
> On Fri, 2010-08-06 at 18:11 +0200, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
>> There is already WebKit page on Wiki [1] but I'd
>> like to use this one as the e
Hi,
Where can I get such information? And is it possible to indicate where
I can locate Fedora's kernel git tree?
-Ilyes Gouta
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
Hi Pierre-Yves,
How you're doing? We met at Fosdem last time. I'm the Tunisian guy :)
OK, thanks. The git tree would be interesting too :)
-Ilyes Gouta
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 10:18 AM, Pierre-Yves wrote:
> On Sat, 2010-08-07 at 10:09 +0100, Ilyes Gouta wrote:
>> W
Hi,
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Kernel
So fedpkg is only available in updates-testing. Any direct link?
-Ilyes Gouta
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 10:20 AM, Ilyes Gouta wrote:
> Hi Pierre-Yves,
>
> How you're doing? We met at Fosdem last time. I'm the Tunisian guy :)
>
>
o
fedpkg for a while.
Thanks, everyone!
-Ilyes Gouta
>
> Regards
> Till
>
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
> https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
I do need to be in a ACL and have a public key, isn't? :)
-Ilyes Gouta
On Sat, Aug 7, 2010 at 12:43 PM, Ilyes Gouta wrote:
> Hi,
>
>>> So fedpkg is only available in updates-testing. Any direct link?
>>
>> fedpkg is included in the package fedora-packager and
ch for an overall improved browser security model.
-Ilyes Gouta
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 5:10 AM, Matt McCutchen wrote:
> On Tue, 2010-08-17 at 21:31 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> Adam Williamson wrote:
>> > Shipping a Firefox with no ability to use Javascript would be more or
>
the
standard way (vs. Adobe's Flash for example) to deliver a rich
experience to the end-user, right in his browser, and IMHO we should
support that.
-Ilyes Gouta
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010 at 3:22 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Ilyes Gouta wrote:
>> Since JavaScript has a client-side execut
lobal deployment (think HTTP, SOAP, XML and
on the other hand hopefully WebM vs. H.264) and a basis and a
foundation for the next iteration. It happens that HTML (and its
siblings) and JS are part of this wild landscape and both are
*evolving*, and (IMHO) I would like to see Fedora leading (and
pursu
ted source.
How about a very well maintained open source piece of software, such
as Firefox, WebKit and WebKit2 (http://trac.webkit.org/wiki/WebKit2),
as a source of that generated native code at runtime? This would
immensely help verifying the emitter of such a code and take the
appropriate action,
>> world, is that everything is being done at the application layer
>> (level 4) of the OSI model, a fact which gives a rather unique
Should actually read:
at the application layer
(level 4) of the TCP/IP model, a fact which gives a rather unique
-Ilyes Gouta
On Thu, Aug 19, 2010
still being worked on.
-Ilyes Gouta
> Please,
>
> Matěj
>
> --
> http://www.ceplovi.cz/matej/, Jabber: mceplceplovi.cz
> GPG Finger: 89EF 4BC6 288A BF43 1BAB 25C3 E09F EF25 D964 84AC
>
> SCSI is *not* magic. There are *fundamental* *technical*
> reasons why you h
Hi,
What about the WebKit SIG that Jaroslav Reznik wants to setup?
http://lists.fedoraproject.org/pipermail/devel/2010-August/140497.html
-Ilyes Gouta
On Sat, Aug 21, 2010 at 1:28 PM, Ilyes Gouta wrote:
> Matej,
>
>>> and WebKit2 (http://trac.webkit.org/wiki/WebKit2),
Hi there,
Is there any plan to have the EKOPath compiler, from PathScale,
shipped as part of the future Fedora releases?
It doesn't necessarily mean having Fedora's packages built with it,
but merely packaging it as a first step.
Any thoughts?
-Ilyes
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedorapro
13, 2011 at 1:37 PM, Ilyes Gouta wrote:
>> Hi there,
>>
>> Is there any plan to have the EKOPath compiler, from PathScale,
>> shipped as part of the future Fedora releases?
>>
>> It doesn't necessarily mean having Fedora's packages built with it,
>>
> You (or anyone else) is still free to just package it.
Sure. I'm trying to put together an initial spec file for Fedora.
-Ilyes
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 1:36 PM, drago01 wrote:
> On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 2:34 PM, Ilyes Gouta wrote:
>>> Well assuming no legal issues anyon
We should also target and package a clearly stated and defined
(features) version of the compiler, that has been tested and
validated.
-Ilyes
On Sat, Aug 13, 2011 at 4:00 PM, Jussi Lehtola
wrote:
> On Sat, 13 Aug 2011 16:42:13 +0200
> Björn Persson wrote:
>
>> Ilyes Gouta
>> Are there any plans to bring gimp 2.7.x -> 2.8 into F16 ?
>
> Is there a specific reason to? The home page states that the whole
> 2.7.x series should be considered unstable.
Alright, would then the 2.8.x series be in F16?
-Ilyes
>
> Richard
> --
> devel mailing list
> devel@lists.fedoraproj
On Fri, Nov 4, 2011 at 2:40 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> On Thu, 2011-11-03 at 23:09 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
>>
>> But based on what they've said in the past, I expect that once most
>> hardware that previously needed the fallback mode is covered, fallback
>> mode will die. AIUI, fallback
Hi,
Removing PackageKit In Fedora 14 was easy and painless since it causes up to
5 packages, all *really* related to PackageKit in the form of a yum-plugin
and few other things.
On Fedora 15, trying to "yum remove PackageKit" causes the system to attempt
removing up to 74 MB worth of software, in
Hi,
I filed a bug: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=699263
<https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=699263>-Ilyes
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 7:12 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 24.04.2011 20:04, schrieb Ilyes Gouta:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Removing Pac
if it was possible to recover to a situation where the
user would still have the choice, to use or not use PackageKit. That's all.
Fedora 14 gave that choice.
Alright, thanks for explaining!
-Ilyes
On Sun, Apr 24, 2011 at 7:55 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 04/24/2011 11:54 PM, Ilyes G
l Sundaram wrote:
> On 04/25/2011 12:36 AM, Ilyes Gouta wrote:
> > Rahul,
> >
> > > If you aren't actively using the GNOME or KDE frontend, just remove
> > those and leave the
> > > framework as it is.
> >
> > That was tough :)
> >
> &
Hi Matej,
Christoph Wickert provided an analysis in
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=699263
-Ilyes
On Mon, Apr 25, 2011 at 8:19 PM, Matej Cepl wrote:
>
> Dne 25.4.2011 10:35, Rahul Sundaram napsal(a):
> > You can [...] remove PackageKit-yum-plugin.
>
> Unfortunately not ... it takes
Hi Matěj,
> Ceterum autem censeo, Carthaginem esse delendam.
So this is Latin, what does it mean?
Btw, I'm from Tunisia (Tunis), the country of Carthage (historically) ;)
-Ilyes
On 26 avr. 2011, at 06:57, Matej Cepl wrote:
> Dne 25.4.2011 21:26, Ilyes Gouta napsal(a):
>>
Hi Reindl,
You could also build it from sources. You should already have the
latest kernel and the X server updates, compiling the intel driver
will then produce a couple of user-space shared libraries that you can
place in /usr/lib64/xorg/modules/drivers. That's it.
-Ilyes
2011/6/12 Reindl Hara
, during an install? Is it
possible to change the "kernel configuration" so that the next yum
update picks up the SMP enabled one?
-Ilyes Gouta
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
ng me the choice between running a
PAE 32bit kernel, or a x86_64 kernel on my machine.
Thanks,
-Ilyes Gouta
On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 12:43 PM, drago01 wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 5, 2010 at 1:39 PM, Ilyes Gouta wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> I own a laptop which has an Intel SU4100
>> (http://a
Hi,
Any reasons on why libgbm isn't being built and packaged in the
current mesa SPEC file? libgbm is a dependency for wayland-demos.
The --enable-gbm configure option depends on --enable-shared-glapi. Is
there any constraint?
-Ilyes
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://a
Hi,
This is to reboot the discussion about: why not also building the
libgbm part of Mesa in Fedora?
Having it would make it easier to test Wayland and friends. Any
reasons on why not having it so far?
-Ilyes
On Sat, Dec 3, 2011 at 9:49 PM, Ilyes Gouta wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Any reaso
Cool! That's what I want to be part of, too :)
Could these be installed on a Fedora 16?
Thanks,
-Ilyes
On Fri, Feb 24, 2012 at 10:16 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-02-24 at 21:28 +0100, Ilyes Gouta wrote:
>
>> This is to reboot the discussion about: why not also build
Hi,
http://linux.slashdot.org/story/10/11/16/1330233/The-200-Line-Linux-Kernel-Patch-That-Does-Wonders
patch: http://marc.info/?l=linux-kernel&m=128978361700898&w=2
Can we have this patch back ported into the current kernel for Fedora 14 and
possibly posted as an update? :)
Would be wonderful!
s III wrote:
> >>>>> "IG" == Ilyes Gouta writes:
>
> IG> Can we have this patch back ported into the current kernel for
> IG> Fedora 14 and possibly posted as an update? :)
> IG> Would be wonderful!
>
> Would be more wonderful to wait until the upstre
Thanks Kyle for making it available!
-Ilyes
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Kyle McMartin wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 04:58:11PM +0100, Ilyes Gouta wrote:
> > Can we have this patch back ported into the current kernel for Fedora 14
> and
> > possibly posted as an update
d systemd detect those and setup a
proper cgroup so that we could differentiate when scheduling with other
processes?
-Ilyes
On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 6:14 PM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
> On Tue, 16.11.10 16:58, Ilyes Gouta (ilyes.go...@gmail.com) wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> >
&g
at 5:42 PM, Ilyes Gouta wrote:
>
> Thanks Kyle for making it available!
>
> -Ilyes
>
>
> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 5:39 PM, Kyle McMartin wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Nov 16, 2010 at 04:58:11PM +0100, Ilyes Gouta wrote:
>> > Can we have this patch back ported into the
k having a term open for churning code is part (or
a possible user-case) of the desktop experience :)
-Ilyes
2010/11/17 Michał Piotrowski
> Hi,
>
> 2010/11/16 Ilyes Gouta :
> > Hi,
> >
> http://linux.slashdot.org/story/10/11/16/1330233/The-200-Line-Linux-Kernel-Patch
On Sun, Feb 13, 2011 at 11:56 PM, drago01 wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 10, 2011 at 10:28 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
>> On Thu, 2011-02-10 at 19:30 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> [...]
>> Interesting idea. Note that I've _just_ released the stable GTK+ 3.0.0.
>> We could think about updating the gtk3 packa
Hi,
Will the bytecode interpreter in freetype be enabled for Fedora 14?
-Ilyes Gouta
On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 11:53 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> Hey,
>
> early in the F13 cycle, we enabled the bytecode interpreter in our
> freetype package, since the patents on that have expir
Hi,
Google released a set of high quality fonts as open source and I'm
wondering of those can be packaged and included for/in the next Fedora
14. Would that be possible?
http://code.google.com/p/googlefontdirectory/
-Ilyes Gouta
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
I'd love to play with it. Is systemd stable enough to try it on Fedora 13?
-Ilyes Gouta
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 10:10 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 05/23/2010 02:36 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>>
>> (And as a side note: systemd by default puts a tmpfs to both /var/
Hey Lennart,
So how fast is a systemd boot (with all the changes to the scripts)
compared to the current F13 setup? How about a ratio?
-Ilyes Gouta
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 11:40 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 05/23/2010 04:04 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>>
>> ATM everythin
Hi,
> systemd package available here:
> http://people.freedesktop.org/~hughsient/fedora/
Thanks!
> Please be patient. To quote myself: "I'll publish the numbers of a 100%
> socket-activated boot soon."
I won't miss that.
Regards,
Ilyes Gouta.
On Sun, May 23,
Hi Xoze,
ClearType is a tech. for subpixel rendering that targets LCD screens, isn't it?
Xft/Cairo patching is then a different feature for Fedora 14, than the
bci vm being turned on by default in FreeType.
Regards,
-Ilyes Gouta
On Sat, May 22, 2010 at 1:06 PM, Xose Vazquez Perez
wrote:
ering
experience on the Linux desktop. Sadly, this goes through the bci
thing, a method for custom glyph control/reconstruction, which patents
expired recently.
-Ilyes Gouta
On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 3:17 PM, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
> Matthias Clasen wrote:
>> Hey,
>>
>> e
merge into the original ijg's code and get Fedora to
rebase on that unique source instead? That way ijg can test for any
regressions using their conformance tests.
Regards,
-Ilyes Gouta
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 3:23 PM, Adam Goode wrote:
> On 05/25/2010 10:09 AM, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
move on and completely
disable such a feature (bci) is a hefty price to pay. Would be nice if
we could build a kind of a whitelist where bci would be used against
this and that font and disabled otherwise.
-Ilyes Gouta
On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 5:17 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sun, 2010-05-23
of libjpeg.
Also, one has to think about the applications that depend on it: what
if they break and/or require changes.
-Ilyes Gouta
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 1:45 AM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Ilyes Gouta wrote:
>> There is one strong point that libjpeg-{6b, 8ab} inherited since it's
>
+1
On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 6:30 PM, Martin Sourada
wrote:
> On Wed, 2010-05-26 at 10:29 -0400, Matthew Miller wrote:
>> On Sun, May 23, 2010 at 09:51:53PM +0200, drago01 wrote:
>> > The patents for the former expired but apparently some fonts look
>> > worse with it so we decided to disable it.
>
Hi Adam,
> it also contains bunch of
> pure algorithmic enhancements so even if target platform doesn't
> support MMX/SSE libjpeg-turbo is around 25% faster than original libjpeg.
Can you please give some details on this point?
-Ilyes Gouta
On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 4:33 PM, Ad
items that stands out are
the SIMD routines which can be merged with the ijg's official libjpeg,
and I think we should push in that direction instead.
-Ilyes Gouta
On Tue, Jun 1, 2010 at 12:00 PM, Adam Tkac wrote:
> On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 12:51:56PM -0400, Orcan Ogetbil wrote:
>>
Hi,
http://apple.slashdot.org/story/10/07/19/1524250/FreeType-Project-Cheers-TrueType-Patent-Expiration
Are we going to have it enabled for Fedora 14?
-Ilyes Gouta
On Wednesday, May 26, 2010, Matthew Miller wrote:
> On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 07:30:56PM +0200, Martin Sourada wrote:
>> D
Sounds really amazing!
We're watching for the deployment! :)
-Ilyes Gouta
On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Brandon Lozza wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 24, 2010 at 2:54 AM, Jesse Keating wrote:
>> Hey all! It's that time again, we're gearing up to branch for Fedora 14
>>
Hi,
Zotero is a referencing tool that helps the user collecting,
maintaining and generating citations from research papers and so on.
Since version 3.0, Zotero has also been available as a standalone
executable (previously a Firefox plugin) based on the XULRunner
runtime; and I'm thinking about p
Hi,
I'm reposting this e-mail, slightly edited and with a much more clear
subject, highlighting the issue.
Hi,
Zotero is a referencing tool that helps the user collecting,
maintaining and generating citations from research papers and so on.
Since version 3.0, Zotero has also been available as a
ed that it would be OK (see
http://forums.zotero.org/discussion/23104/packaging-zotero-for-gnulinux-distributions/#Item_0).
Alright, I'm then proceeding with the packaging.
-Ilyes
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 2:24 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 07:47:32AM -0500, Rex Dieter
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 02:51:52PM +0100, Ilyes Gouta wrote:
>>
>> Alright, I'm then proceeding with the packaging.
>>
> I've opened this ticket with the Fedora Packaging Committee. I don't kno
Hi,
On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 8:00 PM, Ilyes Gouta wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 5:31 PM, Toshio Kuratomi wrote:
>> On Mon, Apr 30, 2012 at 02:51:52PM +0100, Ilyes Gouta wrote:
>>>
>>> Alright, I'm then proceeding with the packaging.
>>
Hi,
I read a recent Fedora rawhide report and found that mesa is now at
8.1 (master @ upstream), but then couldn't fetch the Fedora branch
using fedpkg, as I usually do.
$ fedpkg switch-branch f17(OK)
$ fedpkg switch-branch master(OK, still has the mesa-20120424 snapshot)
$ fedpkg switch-
The .spec file clearly states Version 8.1, sorry for the noise.
-Ilyes
On Tue, May 1, 2012 at 12:22 AM, Ilyes Gouta wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I read a recent Fedora rawhide report and found that mesa is now at
> 8.1 (master @ upstream), but then couldn't fetch the Fedora branch
>
Hi,
http://blog.macromates.com/2012/textmate-2-at-github/
TextMate 2 is (for now) placed under GPL3.
Source code is available at github: https://github.com/textmate/textmate
How about packaging it for Fedora?
-Ilyes
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproje
Doh. Just has a look on the source code. Been thinking this is
cross-platform just like Sublime Text 2.
-Ilyes
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 7:03 PM, Ilyes Gouta wrote:
> Hi,
>
> http://blog.macromates.com/2012/textmate-2-at-github/
>
> TextMate 2 is (for now) placed under GPL3.
>
The Frameworks/Oak* code looks like it calls to few routines written
in Objective-C (and probably to few OS X API) ..
Is the code base build-able for Linux (assuming no big dependencies on
OS X's Cocoa)?
-Ilyes
On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 10:38 PM, Onuralp SEZER
wrote:
> Well I did chnages in the fi
re. Just we need packages and It can be compile it. And If It's become
> open-source just MAC OSX. Yes then you right It won't be compile because of
> OS X's Cocoa
>
>
> On 10 August 2012 02:25, Ilyes Gouta wrote:
>>
>> The Frameworks/Oak* code looks li
e about the Objective-C and Cocoa bits .. Maybe they can be
> ported?
>
> I never ported OS X apps so We need check source and Cocoa syntax for
> making sure.
>
>
> On 10 August 2012 02:45, Ilyes Gouta wrote:
>
>> On Fri, Aug 10, 2012 at 12:30 AM, Onuralp SEZER
>
Hi,
> In other words,should we have to push this package into fedora?(if build
> successfully?)
Building TM2's code base for Linux is the most difficult part of the
effort; as it (may) involve interacting with many bleeding-edge s/w
components such as clang, Objective-C, and probably GNUstep for
Hi,
>> While gedit is nice, it is a GTK+ app. Do we actually have a decent
>> selection of open source text editors for the GNUStep environment? As
>> far as I know, we don't. TextMate would target a different group of
>> people, those who use the NeXTSTEP/GNUStep environment.
>
>
> Ehm, ... does
Hi Gerry,
Try contacting the main dev. mailing-list of DirectFB. I'm sure you'll get
an answer there.
Btw, DirectFB-1.5.3 is rather old, DirectFB-1.6.1 is rather the latest
stable release.
-Ilyes
On Aug 28, 2012 1:04 AM, "Gerry Reno" wrote:
> On 08/24/2012 06:56 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
> > I hav
Gerry,
You could also use DirectFB's X11 system module, so that you can run
DirectFB-based applications in a usual X11 window. You can tell
DirectFB so by using the DFBARGS environment variable:
$ export DFBARGS="system=x11,mode=1280x800"
(probably also w/ disable-module=gl)
$./
Nicolas Chauvet
Hi,
I'm getting the following errors, when attempting to build llvm-3.1
(from f18) on my Fedora 17 setup.
In file included from APInt.cpp:16:
In file included from
/home/ilyes/fedora-scm/llvm/llvm-3.1.src/include/llvm/ADT/APInt.h:18:
In file included from
/home/ilyes/fedora-scm/llvm/llvm-3.1.src/
Hi,
I've locally built and installed Fedora 18's GCC 4.7.1 packages (gcc
version 4.7.1 20120720 (Red Hat 4.7.1-5) (GCC)) on my F17 box and just
restarted building (F18's) llvm-3.1/clang-3.1 packages. It looks good
so far.
-Ilyes
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 3:30 AM, TASAKA Mamoru
Hi Lars,
Indeed! I removed an older clang-3.0 package before rebuilding the f18 set.
Cool. The builds should now complete then.
-Ilyes
On Sun, Sep 2, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Lars Seipel wrote:
> On Saturday 01 September 2012 15:06:40 Ilyes Gouta wrote:
>
>> and this is with gcc v
Hi,
On Nov 24, 2012 8:20 AM, "Dariusz J. Garbowski"
wrote:
>
> On 24/11/12 05:37 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
>>
>> Once upon a time, Kevin Fenzi said:
>
>
>>> It should also be normally trying multiple mirrors, not a bunch of
>>> times to the same one. :(
>
>
> [...]
>
>
>> Actually, when I account f
Hi,
Would it be possible to pull in and package xorg-x11-drv-intel driver
updates more frequently in Fedora?
These are kinda critical for the stability of desktop/X.
-Ilyes
-- Forwarded message --
From: Chris Wilson
Date: Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 11:07 AM
Subject: [ANNOUNCE] xf86-v
Hi Adam,
On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 8:35 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-12-15 at 12:23 +0100, Ilyes Gouta wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> > Would it be possible to pull in and package xorg-x11-drv-intel driver
> > updates more frequently in Fedora?
> >
&
Hi Adam,
On Dec 15, 2012 9:48 PM, "Adam Williamson" wrote:
>
> On Sat, 2012-12-15 at 20:54 +0100, Ilyes Gouta wrote:
> > Hi Adam,
> >
> > On Sat, Dec 15, 2012 at 8:35 PM, Adam Williamson
> > wrote:
> > On Sat, 2012-12-15 at 12
Hi,
On Dec 16, 2012 2:30 AM, "Sérgio Basto" wrote:
>
> On Dom, 2012-12-16 at 01:46 +0200, Ebru Arslan wrote:
> > I am using Adlink cPCI 3970D board. and my system also include cPCI
> > 3455 driver compatible just Fedora 14 32 bit.
>
> why is not compatible with newer Fedoras ? is the kernel ?
Th
pkg in F14 you could try
>
> rpmbuild -ba xorg-x11-drv-intel.spec ...
>
> (*) my notes to use mock
> http://www.serjux.com/alps/how_to_use_mock.txt
>
> > On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 1:06 AM, Ilyes Gouta
> > wrote:
> > Hi Adam,
> >
> > On Dec 15, 2012
and performance (blt and blending, cairo-demos) is way better than the
2.20.10 and 2.20.14 releases.
-Ilyes
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 10:47 AM, Ilyes Gouta wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Just testing the 2.20.16 release and everything looks good so far on GM45.
>
> -Ilyes
>
>
> On S
Hi,
On Mon, Dec 17, 2012 at 12:27 AM, Tom London wrote:
>
> >
> > I concur: I locally build xorg-x11-drv-intel (including
> > xf86-video-intel-2.20.16.tar.bz2), updated, and logged out/in.
> >
> > System does appear snappier, and I have not yet been able to recreate
> > the hang/crash.
> >
>
> S
Hi,
On Sun, Dec 16, 2012 at 9:44 PM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
>
> Am 16.12.2012 21:39, schrieb Tom London:
> > I concur: I locally build xorg-x11-drv-intel (including
> > xf86-video-intel-2.20.16.tar.bz2), updated, and logged out/in.
> >
> > System does appear snappier, and I have not yet been able
Hey,
Would it be possible to also push the xf86-video-intel-2.20.16 update to
Fedora 16 (technically it's not EOL yet)?
-Ilyes
On Wed, Dec 19, 2012 at 5:45 PM, Ebru Arslan wrote:
> i did like that but it doesnt work.
> I updated Fedora 14 32 bit. then i installed driver from
> intelligraphic.
Hi,
On Sat, Dec 22, 2012 at 10:03 PM, Ilyes Gouta wrote:
> Hey,
>
> Would it be possible to also push the xf86-video-intel-2.20.16 update to
> Fedora 16 (technically it's not EOL yet)?
>
I just ran a xorg-x11-drv-intel scratch build for f16 w/ the new
xf86-video-intel-2
Hi,
I'm attempting to build a software requiring glib2-devel.i686, however when
attempting to yum install it, RPM generates a transaction error and states
that few files from glib2-devel.i686 conflict w/the x86_64 flavor.
The listed conflicting files seem related to gdb and systemtap (tools)
inte
Hi,
On Thu, Dec 27, 2012 at 5:01 PM, Josh Stone wrote:
> On 12/27/2012 05:30 AM, Ilyes Gouta wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > I'm attempting to build a software requiring glib2-devel.i686, however
> > when attempting to yum install it, RPM generates a transaction error an
Yes, please!
It would be about the right time to start enabling Wayland in distributions.
-Ilyes
On Thu, Jan 24, 2013 at 6:10 PM, Matthias Clasen wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I'm tentatively planning to enable the Wayland and Broadway backends in
> GTK+ for f19.
>
> From a quick test build, this adds 3 l
Hi,
On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 10:16 AM, Ville Skyttä wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 4:55 AM, Juan Manuel Borges Caño
> wrote:
> > The packages built okay without the optional kernel module (to know,
> > linux-fusion is the one), if that turns to be obligatory, again, i'd take
> > alsa packaging
87 matches
Mail list logo
