Hi, On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 10:16 AM, Ville Skyttä <ville.sky...@iki.fi> wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 19, 2014 at 4:55 AM, Juan Manuel Borges Caño > <juanmabcm...@gmail.com> wrote: > > The packages built okay without the optional kernel module (to know, > > linux-fusion is the one), if that turns to be obligatory, again, i'd take > > alsa packaging as a cool example :) > > ALSA kernel modules are included in the upstream kernel, AFAIK > DirectFB ones are not. In order to be included in Fedora, they need to > be upstream or Fedora kernel maintainers convinced to ship them within > the kernel package. > http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:KernelModules It should be possible to build DirectFB-multi without the linux-fusion kernel module, so that's reverting to shmem and UNIX sockets for IPC. I remember I saw fixes for Fusion userspace posted against the -1.7 branch. Ilyes > > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct >
-- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct
