Trouble with gnome-sound-applet

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, I've filed a bug for the control-center package (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=729271) because I ran into a boring problem with gnome-sound-applet, which is part of that package, on my Xfce desktop. The gnome-sound-applet is autosta

wicd unuseable if NetworkManager still installed?

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Hi, is it just me or is wicd unuseable due to several SELinux erors until NetworkManager gets remove completely from the system? - -- Regards, Heiko Adams -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with

Re: wicd unuseable if NetworkManager still installed?

Am 13.08.2011 20:25, schrieb Rahul Sundaram: > On 08/13/2011 09:30 PM, Heiko Adams wrote: >> -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- >> Hash: SHA256 >> >> Hi, >> is it just me or is wicd unuseable due to several SELinux erors until >> NetworkManager gets remov

Re: Seamonkey status

an upstream bug or not but I can't set mozilla sync to override local data. But except of this thing it seems to work fine. -- Regards, Heiko Adams -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Seamonkey status

Am 22.08.2011 22:48, schrieb Kai Engert: > On 21.08.2011 23:53, Heiko Adams wrote: >> Am 21.08.2011 23:35, schrieb Kai Engert: >>> On 20.08.2011 13:59, Rahul Sundaram wrote: >>>> On 08/20/2011 03:57 PM, Matěj Cepl wrote: >>>>> Putting Firefox maintaine

Re: Broken dependencies: pino

ve given up co-maintainership now. FWIW, I use hotot > instead > > Rahul Using pino is like riding a dead horse. I moved to heybuddy some time ago. So +1 for orphaning pino. - -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen/Regards Heiko Adams -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11

Re: Firefox on Fedora: No longer funny

> > Yeah *sometimes* is okay of course. Happening every two or three > weeks it isn't. > Why don't you blame *mozilla* to make it possible to easily install and manage extensions centralized? This would IMHO be the best way for all because it makes packaging extensions allmo

Re: BEWARE: a problematic glibc made it to stable (F16)

Am 19.10.2011 23:09, schrieb Richard W.M. Jones: > On Wed, Oct 19, 2011 at 12:36:36PM -0700, Adam Williamson wrote: >> On Wed, 2011-10-19 at 15:30 -0400, Simo Sorce wrote: >> >>> What did you downgrade to ? AFAIK Several people had to >>> downgrade from -11 because of nsswitch issues ... seem glib

Latest gtk2 update breaks applications created by lazarus

t.com/show_bug.cgi?id=748031 - -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen/Regards Heiko Adams -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iF4EAREIAAYFAk6hwksACgkQ/zGbOvPHkcLW1QD9FFBEwoK3SxGWfRHYXG95c7RE eScaCZTeft8HNOs

Re: Latest gtk2 update breaks applications created by lazarus

Am 21.10.2011 21:04, schrieb Heiko Adams: > Hi, > it seems the latest gtk2 update has some changes inside which break > applications written with lazarus. These applications are crashing on > close which is new since installing this update. > > I've filed a bug at http

Re: BEWARE: a problematic glibc made it to stable (F16)

Am 23.10.2011 04:14, schrieb Kevin Kofler: > Jim Meyering wrote: >> glibc-2.14.90-12.999, which has just made it to stable provokes >> a hard-to-diagnose (for me at least) problem. >> >> While most things work, and it fixed two problems that affected >> me, it caused me some frustration: >> >> ht

Re: how to block grub2 update?

Am 24.10.2011 18:56, schrieb Michał Piotrowski: > Hi, > > I would like to know if it is possible to block grub2 update? I tried > to use versionlock but unfortunately this does not work. Do anyone > knows some other effective way to block this update? > AFAIR yum.conf has this ability. Regards,

java-1.7.0-openjdk breaks java detection in LibreOffice?

found java-1.5.0 as well as java-1.6.0. - -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen/Regards Heiko Adams -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iF4EAREIAAYFAk6oOkIACgkQ/zGbOvPHkcJlWQEAglYrM5B7lPOoif6ZhJuGgKQ/ BH

Re: java-1.7.0-openjdk breaks java detection in LibreOffice?

Am 26.10.2011 19:06, schrieb Jared K. Smith: > On Wed, Oct 26, 2011 at 12:50 PM, Heiko Adams > wrote: >> is it just me or is java-1.7.0-openjdk breaking LibreOffice java >> detection? > > Sounds like it might be related to bug 748585. > That would explain why java-

xfce-weather-plugin stopped working

me or a general problem - -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen/Regards Heiko Adams -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2.0.18 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iF4EAREIAAYFAk60eaAACgkQ/zGbOvPHkcJrPwD/er5VOAB66zLk8dQcOQv+AQgx mOjQl5irwIxexv

Self Introduction

Hi, my name is Heiko Adams, I am a professional Windows (please don't blame me for that :D) Software developer and Fedora user since several years. A filed a review request for flyback (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=713122) because it was the only backup software I found

New review request for heybuddy

Hi, I've filed a new review request for heybuddy (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=713923) It would be nice if anyone could get an eye on it. -- Regards Heiko Adams -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

rpmlint warning "file-not-in-%lang"

Hi, what does rpmlint's warning "file-not-in-%lang" mean? Searching google doesn't realy help. -- Regards Heiko Adams -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Review request: gnome-encfs

gi?id=715119 -- Regards Heiko Adams -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Firefox 5 for Fedora 15?

15-updates-candidate" so it looks like that there will be an update to firefox 15. -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen/Regards Heiko Adams -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Update thunderbird to 5.0?

Hi, as far as I remember the versions of firefox and thunderbird have allways been sinchronuos at their latest stable version. So I'd like to know for personal interest if there are reasons that would deny updating thunderbird packages to version 5. -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen/Regards Heiko

Re: A software center for Fedora

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Am 26.11.2011 00:18, schrieb drago01: > On Sat, Nov 26, 2011 at 12:16 AM, Brendan Jones > wrote: >> On 11/26/2011 12:03 AM, Giovanni Campagna wrote: >>> As promised in my previous mail, here is what I find that's >>> lacking in Fedora, compared to

Re: A software center for Fedora

Am 27.11.2011 16:01, schrieb Reindl Harald: > > > Am 27.11.2011 14:31, schrieb Rahul Sundaram: >> On 11/27/2011 07:01 AM, Reindl Harald wrote: >> >>> well, if people who not going to read any textes are the >>> primary target of a operationg system this world is going down >> >> Welcome to the

Lazarus is lacking crosscompiling ability(?)

edhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=756486 - -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen/Regards Heiko Adams -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v1.4.11 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iF4EAREIAAYFAk7YHm4ACgkQ/zGbOvPHkcKBrwD8CcYKFQleIArZOa6JpNniPY3W /KR06JMvLZ

Re: MATE desktop environment (GNOME 2 fork)

-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA256 Am 10.12.2011 01:20, schrieb Kevin Kofler: > So I'm sceptical about MATE (seeing what's going on with Trinity) > and I can only strongly discourage attempting to package Trinity. I agree to that point of view. IMHO MATE is a waste of time and manpow

Re: Emesene 2.11.11 package

Am 20.12.2011 16:21, schrieb Andrea Stagi: > I see. My package is the version 2.11.11 you're still at the > 1.6.x, may be not working, we did important modifications this > year... how can I update Emesene? > The normal way would be opening a bugreport against emense and request an update and mayb

Firefox 9 breaks addons.mozilla.org?

1 The problem still exists if I disable all addons so I think there's a problem with firefox. I've filed a bug at bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=770301 -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen/Regards Heiko Adams -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Firefox 9 breaks addons.mozilla.org?

Am 26.12.2011 11:27, schrieb Tomasz Torcz: > On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 11:08:52AM +0100, Heiko Adams wrote: >> Hi, >> can anyone confirm that addon pages like >> https://addons.mozilla.org/de/firefox/addon/ghostery/?src=hp-dl-featured >> are broken in Firefox 9.0? >

Re: Firefox 9 breaks addons.mozilla.org?

Am 26.12.2011 11:27, schrieb Tomasz Torcz: > On Mon, Dec 26, 2011 at 11:08:52AM +0100, Heiko Adams wrote: >> Hi, can anyone confirm that addon pages like >> https://addons.mozilla.org/de/firefox/addon/ghostery/?src=hp-dl-featured >> >> are broken in Firefox 9.0? >

Re: Bad package selection practices in Fedora packages

Am 04.01.2012 22:02, schrieb Adam Williamson: > On Wed, 2012-01-04 at 13:14 +, mike cloaked wrote: > >> If the Gnome decision is for tracker to be there by default then that >> is a Gnome dev decision, and Gnome users can switch it off if they >> know how to and want to do so - but why was the

Re: package-cleanup after F21

lugin a try a few minutes ago and all I can say is: *srsly??* If I remove all packages listed by the leaves plugin I'd kill my system. Well done! Not! - -- Regards, Heiko Adams -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJVyhwpAAoJED6DRcV6KbgxqxsP/3

Re: Build root prepared by DNF is way larger

Am Dienstag, den 18.08.2015, 14:54 -0400 schrieb Matthew Miller: > Hmmm. I think that for the buildroot case, we probably want DNF to > _not_ installer Recommended packages. That makes sense to me. -- Regards, Heiko Adams signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed messag

Lazarus broken for fedora 22

that issue? The problem has already been reported to bugzilla (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1203118) but hasn't been any repsonse. - -- Regards, Heiko Adams -BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE- Version: GnuPG v2 iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJVEpO1AAoJED6DRcV6KbgxxWYP/3MGy4GlbIUbK5O4UHrAQRXo

No extra-backgrounds for Fedora 22

Hi, just a short question: Did I miss something or are there (currently) no extra-backgrounds for Fedora 22 (f22-backgrounds-extras) in the repos? -- Regards, Heiko Adams signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: Fedora 16 and Firefox 11 crashing hard

Am 22.03.2012 22:04, schrieb Gerry Reno: > If I might interrupt this non-stop streaming ARM discussion for just a > second, is anyone else having problems with Firefox 11 in Fedora 16? > > Firefox is crashing hard, as in shutting down the entire computer. And > this is happening quite frequently

Pidgin 2.10.2 update missing

Hi, the pidgin update 2.10.2 which fixes at least two security issues is still missing for fedora. Any reasons for the delay? -- Regards, Heiko Adams -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Pidgin 2.10.2 update missing

Am 23.03.2012 15:07, schrieb Jon Ciesla: > On Fri, Mar 23, 2012 at 8:58 AM, Heiko Adams > wrote: >> Hi, >> the pidgin update 2.10.2 which fixes at least two security issues is >> still missing for fedora. Any reasons for the delay? >> -- >> Regards, >>

Package libsmbclient needs to be rebuild against new samba4-common

Hi, the current samba4 update for fedora 17 (x86_64) is broken because libsmbclient requires version 4.0.0-41alpha18 of samba4-common package. -- Regards, Heiko Adams -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Package libsmbclient needs to be rebuild against new samba4-common

Am 22.04.2012 19:53, schrieb Kalev Lember: > On 04/22/2012 08:29 PM, Heiko Adams wrote: >> Hi, >> the current samba4 update for fedora 17 (x86_64) is broken because >> libsmbclient requires version 4.0.0-41alpha18 of samba4-common package. > > I believe the samba 3 pac

Pidgin 2.10.4

Hi there, can anyone start building pidgin 2.10.4, which is a security update since the package maintainer seems to be unresponsive? -- Grüße aus Coburg Ulrike, Leon Jan und Heiko -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Replacing grubby with grub2-mkconfig in kernel install process

Am 17.06.2012 20:15, schrieb drago01: > > By that logic we could just stop development today. > +1 -- Regards Heiko Adams -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: DNF: why does it refresh metadata all the time

Adding > alias Update='sudo dnf --refresh update' to your .bashrc will safe you that bit of typing every time you want to do an update ;) -- Regards, Heiko Adams Am Donnerstag, den 19.06.2014, 16:35 -0400 schrieb Matthew Miller: > On Thu, Jun 19, 2014 at 01:47:27PM -0500

COPR down?

Hi, just a short question: Is http://copr.fedoraproject.org/ down? -- Regards, Heiko Adams signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct

Re: dnf still is unuseable

ork as expected before the new one can replace the current one! -- Regards, Heiko Adams signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: dnf still is unuseable

Am Montag, den 18.01.2016, 00:00 +0100 schrieb Pierre-Yves Chibon: > On Sun, Jan 17, 2016 at 11:48:23PM +0100, Heiko Adams wrote: > > Am Sonntag, den 17.01.2016, 23:27 +0100 schrieb Reindl Harald: > > > may i suggest to forget that dnf ever existed and switch

Re: dnf still is unuseable

1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222812#c23 > [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259865 > [3] http://dnf.baseurl.org/2015/10/26/mark-command-usecase/ That workaround is only useable if you know what packages you've installed via PK but because this issue exist

Re: dnf still is unuseable

e while "dnf update --refresh" says no updates are available?  Happend to me several times in the past. -- Regards, Heiko Adams signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: dnf still is unuseable

1] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1222812#c23 > [2] https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1259865 > [3] http://dnf.baseurl.org/2015/10/26/mark-command-usecase/ That workaround is only useable if you know what packages you've installed via PK but because this issue exist

COPR: Fedora 21 is still available as chroot

FYI: Fedora 21 is still available as chroot on COPR. -- Regards, Heiko Adams signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org

Re: F24 Self Contained Change: Graphical System Upgrades

Am Mittwoch, den 03.02.2016, 15:00 +0100 schrieb Jan Kurik: > First supported version is going to > be Fedora 23->24 upgrades. Does this mean the changes will be backported to GNOME Software 3.18? -- Regards, Heiko Adams signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed mes

Re: java-1.7.0-openjdk provided items

upon Fedora 16 where Java 7 was a just (official not supported) technical preview. -- Regards Heiko Adams -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Firefox / Thunderbird 17 ESR for Fedora 16/17

ill stick on the latest ESR. -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen Heiko Adams -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Anaconda is totally trashing the F18 schedule (was Re: f18: how to install into a LVM partitions (or RAID))

ry feature like handling upgrade should only be removed if there is a replacement *available* for all supported versions of fedora which is *fully tested* and ready for action. Otherwise the devs who removed such a feature should take the next trip to the dark side of the moon. -- Regards Heiko

Re: Anaconda is totally trashing the F18 schedule (was Re: f18: how to install into a LVM partitions (or RAID))

ory. And last but not least Fedora could stay in sync with major upstream projects. -- Regards Heiko Adams -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Firewall blocking desktop features

Gnome's "Media Sharing" feature, and I'm sure there are lots > of other examples. > AFAIR the samba client port is also blocked by default which makes it impossible to share files with windows machines. -- Regards, Heiko Adams signature.asc Desc

Re: Firewall blocking desktop features

ission to open that ports either temporary for the current session or permanent. -- Regards, Heiko Adams signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of

Re: Firewall blocking desktop features

in the firewall is IMHO the worst case of all and a securiry nightmare. -- Regards, Heiko Adams signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedorap

Re: thunderbird-24.0.2 reverted - why? (Use the commit log..., Luke)

he bodhi comments say that thunderbird-lightning dep was broken. But it just needs to be updated to version 2.6 and everything should work fine again. -- Regards, Heiko Adams signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedo

Re: thunderbird-24.0.2 reverted - why? (Use the commit log..., Luke)

f *one* negative feedback. Regardless if it's wrong to give negative feedback because of some broken extensions. -- Regards, Heiko Adams -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel Fedora Code of Conduct: http://fedoraproject.org/code-of-conduct

Re: thunderbird-24.0.2 reverted - why? (Use the commit log..., Luke)

ng. Then the > lightning maintainer sets up a bohdi update with both t-bird and > lightning in it. So in this case the process seems to be failed or not initiated. -- Regards, Heiko Adams signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digital signature -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedora

Re: thunderbird-24.0.2 reverted - why? (Use the commit log..., Luke)

Am 24.09.2013 19:21, schrieb Michael Cronenworth: > No harm done. That statement was without judging. It was just the realization that process hat either fail or has not been initiated. Nothing more and nothing less. -- Regards, Heiko Adams signature.asc Description: OpenPGP digi

Re: LightDM is absent?

ckage&terms=lightdm* -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen Heiko Adams -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: when startup delays become bugs

x27;t have a clue why the hell I've got an avahi-daemon.service running on every startup an why it take so extreme long to start. $ systemctl show -p WantedBy -p RequiredBy avahi-daemon.service RequiredBy= WantedBy=multi-user.target -- Regards Heiko Adams -- devel mailing

Re: when startup delays become bugs

Am 16.05.2013 21:41, schrieb Chris Adams: > Once upon a time, Heiko Adams said: >> My top 6 of extreme long starting services are: >> $ systemd-analyze blame >> 27.652s NetworkManager.service >> 27.072s chronyd.service >> 27.015s avahi-d

Re: when startup delays become bugs

Is it correct that /dev/mapper/VolGroup-lv_home can't be found with systemd-bootchart? -- Regards Heiko Adams -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: when startup delays become bugs

Am 17.05.2013 14:18, schrieb Lennart Poettering: > On Fri, 17.05.13 07:09, Heiko Adams (heiko.ad...@gmail.com) wrote: > >> Am 17.05.2013 01:09, schrieb Lennart Poettering: >>> >>> For the super slow run above I'd be quite interested to have a look at >>

Re: icedtea-web installed and enabled by default in Fedora 19

t use > sun jdk/jre. > > Dan > > -- > devel mailing list > devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen Heiko Adams "Die Bildzeitung – dieses Drecksblatt, dass so widerlich ist, dass man tote

Re: icedtea-web installed and enabled by default in Fedora 19

t.org > https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel > -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen Heiko Adams "Die Bildzeitung – dieses Drecksblatt, dass so widerlich ist, dass man toten Fisch beleidigt, wenn man ihn darin einwickelt!" (Volker Pispers) -- devel mailing list devel@

Re: F19 upgrade pulls in a lot of i686 packages

; get pulled back in by dependency without pulling in all the i686 stuff. Doing > that let me get to the next problem. Someone else asked how I was doing the > upgrade...using this: > But why doesn't prevent yum packages with arch != ($Basearch, noarch) from being pulled in by default? It

COPR broken ATM

r.unlisted_on_hp > AS copr_unlisted_on_hp \nFROM copr JOIN "user" ON "user".id = > copr.user_id LEFT OUTER JOIN "group" ON "group".id = copr.group_id > \nWHERE copr.deleted IS false AND copr.unlisted_on_hp IS false ORDER > BY copr.id DESC) AS anon_1

[HEADS UP] Gnome 3.22 update for Fedora 25 is broken!

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1378987 BTW: Trying to karma for that update freezes my browsers (firefox and chromium) while loading the update-details page. -- Regards, Heiko Adams ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.o

Re: [HEADS UP] Gnome 3.22 update for Fedora 25 is broken!

Hi, it seems the latest webkitgtk4 update breaks Evolution and epiphany. As a workaround downgrading webkitgtk4 packages fixes the problem. Am Freitag, den 23.09.2016, 21:57 +0200 schrieb Heiko Adams: > Hi, > after updating to Gnome 3.22 it seems that at least evolution[1] and  > epipha

Re: [HEADS UP] Gnome 3.22 update for Fedora 25 is broken!

Am Sonntag, den 25.09.2016, 19:21 +0200 schrieb Michael Catanzaro: > Also, could you reproduce the issue with 2.13.92? >  Downgrading to 2.13.92 fixes this issue for the moment. So no I can't reproduce this with 2.13.92. -- Regards, Heiko Adams signature.asc Description: This is

Re: Mass closing EOL bugs should not close bugs with pending updates

on? > IMHO the best way would be to inform the maintainers and let them decide what to do if a bug is modified or on_qa. -- Regards Heiko Adams -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Remove echo-icon-theme from fedora

ld git snapshot. -- Regards, Heiko Adams -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel

Re: Remove echo-icon-theme from fedora

... > That would be nice and I guess I'm not the only one who thinks the current icon-mix (echo-icons and xdg icons from the fallback icon-theme) looks ugly. BTW: Could you please add a note to the project site about the current state of the project? -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen Heiko

Wifi was broken after latest NM update

again. I know we all are humans which are not perfect but this is a a no-go that should never happen! -- Regards, Heiko Adams signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___ devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproj

Re: Firefox Gtk3 test package

Am 13.01.2014 16:55, schrieb Frank Murphy: > On Mon, 13 Jan 2014 16:49:09 +0100 > Martin Stransky wrote: > >> Ahh, Okay. The package is build with Gtk3 toolkit [1] (the recent >> official ones are Gtk2) so it's a regular Gtk3 app which should >> better fit to Gnome 3 desktop, use themes/skins an

Re: Drawing lessons from fatal SELinux bug #1054350

be a better solution for the case a buggy update went to stable and the system is still up and running. With this way the user has nothing more to do than running a new update-check. -- Regards, Heiko Adams signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- devel mail

Re: Heads up; F22 will require applications to ship appdata to be listed in software center

> handle ALL software available would be better, than one only installing > GUI-related software, in my opinion. > We already got such a software but its no more installed by default: gnome-packagekit-installer -- Regards, Heiko Adams signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signe

Re: Heads up; F22 will require applications to ship appdata to be listed in software center

gekit-installer to install i.e. additional GUI-Themes or mouse-cursors because they are no apps and for that reason not listed in gnome-software, right? If yes, that's IMHO absolute bullshit! -- Regards, Heiko Adams signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- devel

Kernel 4.5 breaks upower

w_bug .cgi?id=1318845) but it would be nice if someone could take a look at it and maybe fix it. -- Regards, Heiko Adams signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/

Re: Kernel 4.5 breaks upower

Am Samstag, den 19.03.2016, 20:57 -0500 schrieb Rex Dieter: > Heiko Adams wrote: > > > > > Hello, > > I recently updated my notebook to Fedora 24 and noticed  > that upower > > > > doesn't provide about the battery anymore which means it  > all

Re: Call to retire gstreamer-0.10

_ > devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:devel@lists.fedoraproject.org> > To unsubscribe send an email to devel-le...@lists.fedoraproject.org > <mailto:devel-le...@lists.fedorapro

Can't upgrade to Fedora 27 via dnf system-upgrade

6.x86_64 does not belong to a distupgrade > repository Is there a way to upgrade with dnf system-upgrade or do I need to wait until Fedora 27 beta? -- Regards, Heiko Adams signature.asc Description: This is a digitally signed message part ___

Re: Why is Fx 57 in Updates Testing?

; of RAWHIDE. > > > > Does this mean it's also not allowed to push packaged git-snapshots of a software to updates-testing because they are unreleased and potentially unstable? -- Regards, Heiko Adams signature.asc Description: This is a

Re: Heads up: selinux-policy-3.14.1-25.fc28 breaks GDM

I can't confirm that. Maybe because I relabel my system after every selinux policy update. -- Heiko Adams Am 24. Mai 2018 04:13:25 MESZ schrieb Jerry James : >I installed the latest batch of updates for F28 tonight. Since that >included a new kernel (4.16.10-300.fc28), I rebooted.