Hi,
On 26-02-16 11:51, Peter Robinson wrote:
Peter Robinson wrote:
It's an issue we see occasionally where the package thinks it knows
better than the explicit CFLAGs being set, I'll get it sorted out.
But why are those intrinsics now requiring NEON at all? Those are GCC byte
swap intrinsics
Hi All,
I'm unretiring gkrellm-sun, the main reason for this is that
the 2 open gkrellm bugs we've:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1231394
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1246086
Both are actually in gkrellm-sun, and are a simple case
of a double free.
Since these 2 cr
Hi All,
I'm having this weird issue in rawhide / f24 where I get the following
error:
ldd -r /usr/lib64/libsfml-graphics.so
undefined symbol: __cpu_model (/usr/lib64/libsfml-graphics.so)
I've found this out by build failures like this one:
/usr/bin/ld: conftest: hidden symbol `__cpu_model
Hi,
On 27-02-16 23:08, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 11:03:57PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
I'm having this weird issue in rawhide / f24 where I get the following
error:
ldd -r /usr/lib64/libsfml-graphics.so
undefined symbol: __cpu_model (/usr/lib64/libsfml-graphi
Hi,
On 27-02-16 23:29, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 11:18:35PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
On 27-02-16 23:08, Jakub Jelinek wrote:
On Sat, Feb 27, 2016 at 11:03:57PM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
I'm having this weird issue in rawhide / f24 where I get the following
error:
Hi,
I'm getting:
Error: Package systemd-udev-229-5.fc24.x86_64.rpm is not signed
When doing a "dnf update", I'm following the f24 branch / repo.
This used to work with previous pushes, and AFAIK F24 pushes
are supposed to be signed ?
Regards,
Hans
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproje
Hi,
On 25-04-16 22:27, opensou...@till.name wrote:
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/w
Hi,
On 09-05-16 17:32, Tom Callaway wrote:
On 05/06/2016 05:30 AM, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
On Thu, May 5, 2016 at 12:07 AM, Tom Callaway mailto:tcall...@redhat.com>> wrote:
On 05/04/2016 05:20 AM, Andrea Musuruane wrote:
> Does this mean that most console emulators (i.e.
> NES/SNES
Hi,
On 11-05-16 18:58, Tom Callaway wrote:
On 05/11/2016 08:39 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
"Naturally I imagine that some emulator writers want to charge a
shareware fee for the code they have
written and we have absolutely no problem with that as long as they
aren't, in any sense, ch
Hi all,
I'm getting a bunch of broken dependencies
mails every day due to a few games I maintain
depending on pygame (during runtime) and
that is not available on ppc64 / ppc64le.
Checking pygame I noticed that Björn Esser
has tried to build pygame for ppc but that
failed to build.
Björn, thank
Hi,
On 11-11-16 13:32, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
Hello all,
After upgrading a computer with multiple DEs to F25 from F23, folders
on GNOME's desktop are managed by dolphin, which runs daemonized and
cannot be killed, unless I also kill kded5 and kdeinit5. There was
already a similar bug about
Hi,
On 11-11-16 14:29, Alexander Ploumistos wrote:
On Fri, Nov 11, 2016 at 2:53 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
I remember seeing something similar a while back. To figure out what the
problem is, check all kde related files under /etc/xdg/autostart, they
should all have a: "OnlyShowIn=KDE
Hi,
On 23-11-16 15:36, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
On Wed, 2016-11-23 at 09:39 +0100, Florian Weimer wrote:
What about the larger picture? Can tracker be made optional again
for
the GNOME desktop?
Thanks,
Florian
No, many of our core applications depend on tracker to be able to see
files, and
Hi,
On 23-11-16 22:15, carl...@gnome.org wrote:
Hi Hans,
(Talking with my Tracker maintainer hat)
Hi,
On 23-11-16 15:36, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
I don't think that is entirely true. I've recently been trying
to get gnome3 to run on under-powered machines like cheap ARM
tablets, and I can d
Hi,
Jaroslav wrote:
> It still doesn't work for me:
>
> $ fedpkg scratch-build
> Could not execute scratch_build: (-1765328370, 'KDC has no support for
encryption
> type')
>
> $ klist
> Default principal: jskarvad(a)FEDORAPROJECT.ORG
>
> Valid starting Expires Service principa
Hi,
On 12-12-16 11:44, Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
Hi,
I am stuck with same error like Michal. I logged into FAS and waited for long
time (cca 1 hour), but still I get same error:
kinit: Client 'zdoh...@fedoraproject.org' not found in Kerberos database while
getting initial credentials
There is my
Hi,
On 12-12-16 11:58, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 12-12-16 11:44, Zdenek Dohnal wrote:
Hi,
I am stuck with same error like Michal. I logged into FAS and waited for long
time (cca 1 hour), but still I get same error:
kinit: Client 'zdoh...@fedoraproject.org' not found in Kerbero
Hi,
A while back Debian has switched to using the modesetting Xorg driver
rather then the intel Xorg driver for Intel GPUs.
There are several good reasons for this, rather then repeating them
I'm just going to point to the Debian announcement:
https://tjaalton.wordpress.com/2016/07/23/intel-gra
Hi,
On 01/10/2017 06:59 PM, Michael Cronenworth wrote:
On 01/10/2017 08:22 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
If you encounter any issues causes by this change, please file
a bug in bugzilla.
Are performance regressions covered under this clause?
User visible changes, (e.g. some program
slowing to a
Hi,
On 11-01-17 12:15, Samuel Rakitničan wrote:
Hi,
A while back Debian has switched to using the modesetting Xorg driver
rather then the intel Xorg driver for Intel GPUs.
Hello,
Is it possible to configure xserver to use "intel" driver without recompiling
it?
Yes, we're just changing th
Hi All,
I've just submitted a pkg review request for libglvnd:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1412764
This is the last building block needed to allow full
parallel installation of the nvidia binary driver and
nouveau / mesa, without needing various *.conf.d to
select the right libG
Hi,
On 01/12/2017 11:24 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
2017-01-12 19:04 GMT+01:00 Hans de Goede :
Hi All,
I've just submitted a pkg review request for libglvnd:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1412764
This is the last building block needed to allow full
parallel installation o
Hi,
On 13-01-2017 18:17, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
>
> On 13-01-17 16:56, Hans de Goede wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> On 01/12/2017 11:24 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
>>> 2017-01-12 19:04 GMT+01:00 Hans de Goede :
>>>> Hi All,
>>>>
>>>> I
Hi,
On 16-01-17 12:46, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 13-01-2017 18:17, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
On 13-01-17 16:56, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 01/12/2017 11:24 PM, Nicolas Chauvet wrote:
2017-01-12 19:04 GMT+01:00 Hans de Goede :
Hi All,
I've just submitted a pkg review request for lib
Hi,
On 19-01-17 16:14, Martin Ueding wrote:
Am 16.01.2017 um 17:18 schrieb Kevin Fenzi:
Did xbacklight work in the past?
Yes, it did.
To work around that bug, I use KDE Plasma and there I can change the
brightness with Fn+PgUp. `xbacklight` does not work there, saying that
no output have bac
Hi,
On 20-01-17 02:05, Kevin Kofler wrote:
Hans de Goede wrote:
most tools simply write directly to /sys/class/backlight, but xbacklight
relies on the xrandr property (and is the only tool do so AFAICT).
KDE's PowerDevil supports both and prefers XRandR where supported:
https://cgit.kd
Hi,
On 23-01-17 11:35, Martin Stransky wrote:
On 01/21/2017 04:33 PM, Christian Dersch wrote:
On 01/21/2017 04:15 PM, Kai Engert wrote:
I've disabled autokarma.
Thanks :)
The current Firefox 50.x will go unsupported on Tuesday, replaced by
Firefox 51.
Usually new important security fixes
Hi,
On 01/29/2017 05:23 PM, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote:
Allrighty… Looks like the override for libglvnd somehow got untagged… Just
re-tagged in f25-build… Should be fixed now.
Well, that is a fix, but the real problem is that either the new libglvnd
enabled
mesa should not be in updates
Hi,
On 01/29/2017 08:00 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Sun, 29 Jan 2017 18:12:59 +0100
Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 01/29/2017 05:23 PM, Björn 'besser82' Esser wrote:
Allrighty… Looks like the override for libglvnd somehow got
untagged… Just re-tagged in f25-build… Should be fixed n
Hi,
On 30-01-17 20:41, Rex Dieter wrote:
Kevin Kofler wrote:
That is not true. Mesa is composed of multiple subpackages. The updater I
used (plasma-pk-updates) happily updated mesa-dri-drivers to the new build
and kept the old builds of mesa-libGL and mesa-libGLES that provide the
libGL librar
Hi All,
So a lot has been said about $subject and FESco has asked me
to send a mail to the devel list describing the what and why
of this change.
First the what: ever since AMD and NVIDIA started shipping
their own Linux drivers we have had multiple competing
implementations of libGL.so.1 (and f
Hi All,
We currently have 61 updates pending for being pushed to
F31 updates-testing and no push seems to have happened for
aprox. 48 hours or so ?
Regards,
Hans
___
devel mailing list -- devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to d
Hi,
On 02-10-2019 16:59, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On Wed, Oct 02, 2019 at 01:55:23PM +0200, Clement Verna wrote:
On Wed, 2 Oct 2019 at 12:49, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi All,
We currently have 61 updates pending for being pushed to
F31 updates-testing and no push seems to have happened for
aprox. 48
Hi All,
Per the
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers#Claiming_Ownership_of_a_Retired_Package
procedure here is a mail to let people know I have filed a request to
unretire tolua++: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8895
tolua++ was retired as part of the recen
Hi All,
Per the
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers#Claiming_Ownership_of_a_Retired_Package
procedure here is a mail to let people know I have filed a request to
unretire tolua++: https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8895
tolua++ was retired as part of the recen
Hi,
On 10/11/19 1:20 PM, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 11. 10. 19 12:11, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi All,
Per the
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Orphaned_package_that_need_new_maintainers#Claiming_Ownership_of_a_Retired_Package
procedure here is a mail to let people know I have filed a request to
Hi,
I will take dynamite. I've filed an ownership request for this here:
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/8975
Regards,
Hans
On 06-11-2019 20:15, Miro Hrončok wrote:
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you
Hi,
On 25-11-2019 10:52, Miro Hrončok wrote:
So for anyone interested in this:
jwrdegoede: buildnumber-maven-plugin
The chain here is:
sdljava (*):Buildrequires: jruby
jruby: [Build]Requires: buildnumber-maven-plugin
*) Which I maintain
I've broken this chain by removing the
Hi,
On 22-07-19 10:47, Miro Hrončok wrote:
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_
Hi,
On 26-07-19 18:25, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On 7/26/19 4:25 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
1) Have some automated process automatically email co-maintainers when the
primary maintainer orphan the package.
That should already be the case? FMN should mail you... perhaps this
isn't working?
If
Hi,
On 29-07-19 12:37, Miro Hrončok wrote:
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_
Hi,
On 29-07-19 16:59, Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Mon, Jul 29, 2019, 16:40 Miro Hrončok mailto:mhron...@redhat.com>> wrote:
On 29. 07. 19 16:35, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi,
>
> On 29-07-19 12:37, Miro Hrončok wrote:
>> The following packages are
Hi,
On 29-07-19 23:35, Alexander Scheel wrote:
The reason I'm confused is because AFAIK last time jpackage-utils /
javapackages-tools also was part of the set of
packages causingproblems and javapackages-tools was picked up by the
Stewardship SIG (or so I believe) so I'm
surprised to see it go a
Hi,
On 30-07-19 12:29, Hans de Goede wrote:
2) Remove the obsolete jpackage-utils stuff, which no longer is part of:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging:Java
From:
cortado
sdljava
vecmath1.2
freecol
bolzplatz2006
And keep them in the main Fedora repos
Except that the guidelines say
Hi all,
On 05-08-19 11:52, Miro Hrončok wrote:
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/
Hi Fabio,
On 05-08-19 13:37, Fabio Valentini wrote:
On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 1:15 PM Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
On Mon, Aug 5, 2019 at 12:07 PM Hans de Goede wrote:
In the extended version:
https://churchyard.fedorapeople.org/orphans-2019-08-05.txt
I see that javapackages-tools is still on the
Hi All,
So what I've been reading from the rawhide gating mailthread,
creating the gating rules unfortunately is somewhat convoluted /
involved.
As such I was wondering if maybe it is an idea to automatically
enabled the rpmlint gating test for packages which have a
.rpmlint rc. ?
Alternatively
Hi,
On 11-08-19 01:05, Sérgio Basto wrote:
Hi,
Why we would retire childsplay or gcompris or gdesklets ? IMHO we still
haven't a replacement .
childsplay and gcompris maintainer here.
Childsplay has been in a zombie state upstream for years, some work has
been done upstream but mostly focusi
Hi,
On 13-08-19 17:39, Peter Robinson wrote:
We're considering removing support for Wireless Extensions from
NetworkManager in Fedora 32 time frame.
A more modern Wi-Fi configuration API, cfg802111/nl80211, has been
available since 2007 and maybe there's no point in carrying the
maintenance bur
Hi,
On 13-08-19 16:31, Miroslav Suchý wrote:
Dne 12. 08. 19 v 13:34 Hans de Goede napsal(a):
gcompris has been replaced upstream by gcompris-qt, which is also in
Fedora and which we will keep around.
Imho gcompris should have been remove long time ago from Fedora. And
Gcompris-qt should
Hi,
On 24-10-18 00:53, Alexey Rochev wrote:
Hello,
I would like to draw some attention to this bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1622259. Description: startx unsets
DBUS_SESSION_BUS_ADDRESS, which result in launching another D-Bus session which
breaks communicating with user sy
Hi,
On 18-08-19 13:33, Gordan Bobic wrote:
On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 10:36 AM http://gnome.org/>>
wrote:
> This seems like a distraction from the real goal here, which is to
> ensure Fedora remains responsive under heavy memory pressure,
I think this is an overwhelmingly important point, and a
Hi,
On 18-08-19 15:25, Gordan Bobic wrote:
On Sun, Aug 18, 2019 at 2:06 PM Hans de Goede mailto:hdego...@redhat.com>> wrote:
Hi,
On 18-08-19 13:33, Gordan Bobic wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 11, 2019 at 10:36 AM http://gnome.org>
<http://gnome.org/>> wrote:
&
Hi all,
I've been following rawhide for the last few weeks to test some F31
things. Now that we've branched I've updated my .repo files to point to
the normal fedora repos and disabled the rawhide ones, but still
dnf update wants to install a whole load of .fc32 packages.
I've already manually u
Hi Chris,
On 03-09-19 01:47, Chris Murphy wrote:
This is an hp spectre running Fedora 30 Workstation. On Fedora 29,
there was fairly close agreement between powertop and upower and the
time estimates were sane.
Something's wonky on Fedora 30 and I'm not sure where to begin
troubleshooting, alth
Hi,
On 03-09-19 17:29, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Tue, Sep 3, 2019 at 5:13 AM Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi Chris,
On 03-09-19 01:47, Chris Murphy wrote:
This is an hp spectre running Fedora 30 Workstation. On Fedora 29,
there was fairly close agreement between powertop and upower and the
time
Hi,
I've been taking a look at:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_Program_Management/Prioritized_bugs_and_issues
And I think that this is a very good idea to help us
focus on important issues.
I've already fixed:
1490490 Plymouth doesn't echo LUKS keypresses or show boot progress
w
Hi,
On 22-09-2019 14:37, Till Hofmann wrote:
Hi all,
So I've just been notified that tolua++ has been retired, which is a dependency
of one of my packages (fawkes). BZ:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1736911
This would have been fine (as no action has been taken), if the automat
Hi,
On 26-09-2019 20:24, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2019-09-26 at 11:20 -0700, Tom Stellard wrote:
On 09/26/2019 11:03 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
We are currently in the "Beta to Pre Release" phase of the release
cycle. The updates policy for this phase -
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Upd
Hi Tom,
On 26-09-2019 20:47, Tom Stellard wrote:
On 09/26/2019 11:24 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 2019-09-26 at 11:20 -0700, Tom Stellard wrote:
On 09/26/2019 11:03 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
We are currently in the "Beta to Pre Release" phase of the release
cycle. The updates policy fo
Hi,
On 01-10-2019 18:04, Stephen Gallagher wrote:
On Mon, Sep 23, 2019 at 10:21 AM Ben Cotton wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/ThermalManagementWS
== Summary ==
Better thermal management and peak performance on Intel CPUs by
including thermald in the default install.
Install
Hi,
On 21-01-2020 01:57, Matthew Garrett wrote:
Measured boot involves generating cryptographic measurements of boot
components and configuration and using that to either control access to
a local secret (in the case of sealing secrets to a TPM) or proving to
another device (eg, a remote server
Hi,
On 22-01-2020 04:20, Matthew Garrett wrote:
On Tue, Jan 21, 2020 at 12:43:47PM +, Matthew Garrett wrote:
configinitrd file1 file2 file3
initrd initramfs1.img initramfs2.img CONFIG
Huh - it seems like grub may already support this? It looks like:
initrd initramfs.img newc:/etc/cryptt
Hi,
On 28-01-2020 10:37, Vascom wrote:
Are s390x builders ready for Mass Rebuild?
I see many fail builds only on s390x without logs.
I was about to ask the same thing, there are logs though, but only
from koji or mock, not from an actual build, e.g. :
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taski
Hi,
On 2/10/20 9:44 AM, John M. Harris Jr wrote:
On Saturday, February 8, 2020 9:40:09 PM MST John Reiser wrote:
John M. Harris Jr wrote:
Using swap on zram disables the ability to hibernate, making it a
non-starter for many users. If this is going to be thrown into anything,
the user needs
Hi,
On 3/1/20 10:30 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
I have too many packages that I am the maintainer for and need help. If you
would like to help out by either becoming a co-maintainer or becoming the
primary maintainer, please let me know. The full list follows. Many of these
I just made the
Hi,
On 3/18/20 1:56 AM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
On 3/17/20 5:27 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 3/1/20 10:30 PM, Orion Poplawski wrote:
I have too many packages that I am the maintainer for and need help. If you
would like to help out by either becoming a co-maintainer or becoming the
Hi,
On 20-12-18 10:54, Raphael Groner wrote:
So what process should I use? Pull Requests or just removing obsolete stuff?
I'm ready to do either way. Should I leave this to FESCo?
My vote would go for Pull Requests to give the packagers a (limited) chance to
look into the proposal individuall
Hi,
On 20-12-18 18:45, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
On 12/20/18 2:35 AM, Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski wrote:
On Thursday, 20 December 2018 at 11:29, Richard Hughes wrote:
On Thu, 20 Dec 2018 at 10:16, Hans de Goede wrote:
So I say +100 to just pushing the changes directly, as said
people
Hi,
On 03-01-19 20:50, John Harris wrote:
On Thursday, January 3, 2019 2:46:47 PM EST Ben Cotton wrote:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/FlickerFreeBoot
This doesn't seem to be inclusive of any other desktop environment than GNOME.
There is no reason why the new plymouth theme and
Hi,
On 08-02-19 17:41, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
Just wanted to update everyone on our current status.
As you know from the other thread:
* The mass rebuild happened and finished.
* The mass rebuild side tag was merged into the f30-pending tag
(to make sure everything was signed).
* In the middle of
Hi,
On 15-02-19 12:51, Mikolaj Izdebski wrote:
On Fri, Feb 15, 2019 at 12:11 PM Hans de Goede wrote:
I will take sdljava as bolzplatz relies on it.
I do not know how / why this was orphaned. This package has
2 other admin's in the user/group settings. If this was done
automatically it
Hi,
On 07-03-19 11:45, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
Actually it's more subtle. It didn't remove the files, but it did
break something really fundamental, perhaps execv? Perhaps new
binaries cannot link with the slightly older glibc?
$ echo /usr/bin/ls
/usr/bin/ls
$ /usr/bin/ls
-bash: /usr/bin/l
Hi,
On 12-03-19 11:38, Miro Hrončok wrote:
The following packages are orphaned and will be retired when they
are orphaned for six weeks, unless someone adopts them. If you know for sure
that the package should be retired, please do so now with a proper reason:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/How_
Hi,
On 3/13/19 9:45 AM, Emmanuel Seyman wrote:
* Hans de Goede [13/03/2019 08:51] :
A solution for this needs to be found and be in place *before* dropping
these packages not the otherway around.
We've known the solution for months, now.
If you (this is the generic you, no
Hi All,
To help testing firefox on wayland I'm running it as my day to day browser
now, but when I click links (specifically in thunderbird) I get a dialog
saying "firefox is running but not responding". I believe this is caused
by thunderbird spawning /usr/bin/firefox to open the link instead of
Hi,
On 02-04-19 18:53, Sven Lankes wrote:
On Tue, Apr 02, 2019 at 05:05:50PM +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
To help testing firefox on wayland I'm running it as my day to day browser
now, but when I click links (specifically in thunderbird) I get a dialog
saying "firefox is runni
g for this.
Regards,
Hans
Thanks.
On 4/2/19 5:05 PM, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi All,
To help testing firefox on wayland I'm running it as my day to day browser
now, but when I click links (specifically in thunderbird) I get a dialog
saying "firefox is running but not responding"
Hi All,
I just noticed that Fedora-Workstation-Live-x86_64-30-20190408.n.0.iso still
contains the dbus-daemon package even though we are using dbus-broker now.
I've tried to rpm -e it and it for some reason it is required by
anaconda-core which seems weird.
So should I file a bug against anacon
Hi All,
I recently bought a 2nd hand MX5000 keyboard, which has a builtin LCD
panel. So now I would like to add MX5000 support to the Fedora lcdproc
packages.
This requires libmx5000 which is part of mx5000-tools, so I've packaged\
this up, review request here:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_
Hi,
On 27-05-19 11:34, Florian Weimer wrote:
I'm investigating whether it makes sense to switch to a scheme where the
glibc locale data is built from source, during package installation,
based on the langpack configuration system. This is similar to what
Debian does.
The reason is that the com
Hi,
On 27-05-19 14:49, Florian Weimer wrote:
* Hans de Goede:
Interesting idea, my first thoughts on this are that doing this
during installation time feels wrong. How are you going to figure
out for which languages to generate the locale data ? The language
can differ per user. e.g. on my
Hi,
On 30-05-19 20:18, Adam Jackson wrote:
Since I was looking at a copy of the F30 repo for amd64, here's a list
of a bunch of packages whose dist tag suggests they haven't rebuilt
successfully in any currently-supported Fedora release. I'm sure some
of these are incompletely retired or there's
Hi All,
The work I've been doing to improve support for Logitech wireless keyboards:
https://hansdegoede.livejournal.com/21731.html
Has branched out a bit and now I've also been looking into improving support
for keyboards with builtin LCD panels. So now I would like to add support for
the LCD f
Hi,
On 01-08-18 17:33, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2018-07-31 at 20:29 +, Fedora compose checker wrote:
No missing expected images.
Failed openQA tests: 60/138 (x86_64), 23/24 (i386), 1/2 (arm)
New failures (same test did not fail in Rawhide-20180730.n.0):
So the big change here is a
Hi All,
Just a quick headsup for users following Fedora 29, the
dbus 1.12.10-1.fc29 build is missing the systemd dbus.service
file, breaking almost everything.
Instead it contains a dbus-daemon.service file, but the
dbus.socket file expects a matching dbus.service, not
dbus-daemon.service.
So e
Hi,
On 02-09-18 09:33, Andreas Tunek wrote:
Den lör 1 sep. 2018 kl 15:50 skrev stan :
On Sat, 1 Sep 2018 13:44:56 +0200
Andreas Tunek wrote:
I can't get a commandline, everything seems stuck in the boot
process Is there anyway to get a commandline and update the system
when it is in thi
Hi,
On 10-09-18 14:40, Abhiram Kuchibhotla wrote:
According to the LICENSE file in their git repo, the code in the repo seems to
be gplv2. Not sure if that proves anything. I'll do the licensecheck -r later
and update you guys.
On Mon 10 Sep, 2018, 6:08 PM Richard Shaw, mailto:hobbes1...@gmai
Hi,
On 09/13/2018 07:59 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2018-09-13 at 16:07 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 10-09-18 14:40, Abhiram Kuchibhotla wrote:
According to the LICENSE file in their git repo, the code in the repo seems to
be gplv2. Not sure if that proves anything. I'll d
Hi,
On 14-09-18 20:03, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Fri, 2018-09-14 at 19:37 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 09/13/2018 07:59 PM, Simo Sorce wrote:
On Thu, 2018-09-13 at 16:07 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 10-09-18 14:40, Abhiram Kuchibhotla wrote:
According to the LICENSE file in their
Hi,
On 18-09-18 01:12, Chris Murphy wrote:
I've got a Fedora 29 Silverblue installation in a VM. First boot I see
the GRUB menu, and after that it's hidden. And I can't figure out how
to unhide it. Boot is failing before I get multiuser login or ssh, so
extracting information to troubleshoot/bug
Hi,
On 18-09-18 17:28, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 8:57 AM, Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek
wrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 08:36:32AM -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 4:56 AM, Hans de Goede wrote:
Hi,
On 18-09-18 01:12, Chris Murphy wrote:
I've got a F
Hi,
On 19-09-18 02:09, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2018-09-18 at 17:06 -0700, Adam Williamson wrote:
On Tue, 2018-09-18 at 18:57 -0400, Randy Barlow wrote:
On 9/18/18 3:23 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
But is this bugginess worth a FE to try and get -58 onto the Beta?
Lots of users will install
Hi,
On 17-11-18 12:18, Antonio Trande wrote:
Regarding https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/libtimidity/pull-requests,
please i need permissions to build libtimidity on epel7 branch.
On 15/11/18 13:22, Antonio Trande wrote:
Hello!
Please, take a look to
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi
Hi All,
I'm going to update mdbtools to the 1.0.0 release in rawhide, this will change
the soname.
Only 2 packages are affected by this: libgda5 and recutils. I will take care of
rebuilding these against the new mdbtools libs myself.
Regards,
Hans
_
Hi All,
I have been keeping the Fedora xfig package alive all these years
because I know that there are still users using xfig and xfig
actually still has an active upstream.
Lately I have not been able to spend any time on this, as can
be seen from the currently open / unfixed CVE against xfig:
Hi All,
Once upon a time I packaged freecol, a FOSS game inspired by
the colonization computergame.
Unfortunately I have not been able to make time to properly
maintain the package and now it is several versions behind
the latest upstream release.
As such I think the time has come to hand freeco
ly I have already handed
it over to Vojtěch Trefný (vtrefny, added to the Cc)
a while ago.
But Vojtěch also does not seem to have time to keep this
in sync with upstream, so if you can take care of that,
then that would be great.
Regards,
Hans
> On 4/25/23 15:32, Hans de Goede wrote:
&
ilable
for questions if necessary.
If you can let me know your FAS login/username then I add you as a
co-maintainer to the package.
Regards,
Hans
> On Tuesday, April 25, 2023 at 08:31:59 AM CDT, Hans de Goede
> wrote:
>
>
>
>
>
> Hi All,
>
> I have been
Hi Christopher,
On 6/13/23 23:26, Christopher Klooz via devel wrote:
> In case you are already aware of the issue, feel free to ignore this mail. I
> just want to make aware that there could be multiple interrelated (bug)
> reports that might be considered in conjunction and not on their own, gi
301 - 400 of 600 matches
Mail list logo
