Ok, I don't know what list you want this F17-alpha stuff on but here goes...
I downloaded the F17 alpha DVD and installed it on one of my laptops
today. I selected Use All Space and Encrypted. At repos I selected
Installation Repo and Fedora-i386. Install completed just fine. Boot
loader insta
Ok, I'll give that a try.
Thanks.
On 03/15/2012 07:38 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Mar 15, 2012, at 5:20 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
>
>> Can someone point out what is needed here or do I just file bug reports?
>>
> I'd suggest installing something more re
Yeah, installed the beta and I'm still having the exact same problem.
Graphics is Geforce FX 5600
On 03/15/2012 09:05 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-03-15 at 17:45 -0600, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
>> On Mar 15, 2012, at 5:43 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
>>
>>
On 03/15/2012 10:30 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-03-15 at 22:22 -0400, Gerry Reno wrote:
>
>> Yeah, installed the beta and I'm still having the exact same problem.
>>
>> Graphics is Geforce FX 5600
>>
> Ah. Then that'll be https:/
On 03/15/2012 10:46 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
> On 03/15/2012 10:30 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>
>> On Thu, 2012-03-15 at 22:22 -0400, Gerry Reno wrote:
>>
>>
>>> Yeah, installed the beta and I'm still having the exact same proble
On 03/16/2012 02:48 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-03-16 at 14:31 -0400, Gerry Reno wrote:
>
>> On 03/15/2012 10:46 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
>>
>>> On 03/15/2012 10:30 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
On 03/16/2012 06:30 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-03-16 at 23:18 +0100, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>
>> Adam Williamson wrote:
>>
>>> It's a fairly well-known issue that you can't build the NVIDIA driver
>>> against a debug kernel without tweaking something somewhere. It works
>>> fine
On 03/17/2012 12:51 AM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Sat, 2012-03-17 at 00:17 -0400, Gerry Reno wrote:
>
>>
>> And for anyone interested in the history of 3D graphics hardware here's
>> an article with a lot of good hardware photos and info:
>>
>>
On 03/18/2012 05:28 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Mar 18, 2012, at 3:23 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
>
>
>> Question then would be, can I do a yum upgrade to go from F16 to F17 or
>> F18 if things aren't fixed for F17?
>>
> Might work. Not tested. What
On 03/18/2012 05:38 PM, Rahul Sundaram wrote:
> On 03/19/2012 03:02 AM, Gerry Reno wrote:
>
>> On 03/18/2012 05:28 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>
>>> On Mar 18, 2012, at 3:23 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> Qu
kernels
Date: Wed, 21 Mar 2012 14:03:25 -0400
From: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk
To: Gerry Reno
CC: xen-de...@lists.xensource.com
On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 01:04:42PM -0400, Gerry Reno wrote:
> I installed Fedora 16 on my laptop and selected encrypted filesystem for
> security.
>
On 03/21/2012 03:24 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 14:53:27 -0400,
> Gerry Reno wrote:
>> From xen-devel list.
>>
>> How can I downgrade my Fedora 16 kernel to get around this kernel bug
>> identified by Konrad?
>>
>> Yum does no
On 03/21/2012 03:40 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
>
>> From xen-devel list.
>>
>> How can I downgrade my Fedora 16 kernel to get around this kernel bug
>> identified by Konrad?
>>
>> Yum does no
If I might interrupt this non-stop streaming ARM discussion for just a
second, is anyone else having problems with Firefox 11 in Fedora 16?
Firefox is crashing hard, as in shutting down the entire computer. And
this is happening quite frequently. Firefox is stock. No addons, or
changes. Just
On 03/22/2012 05:13 PM, Heiko Adams wrote:
> Am 22.03.2012 22:04, schrieb Gerry Reno:
>
>> If I might interrupt this non-stop streaming ARM discussion for just a
>> second, is anyone else having problems with Firefox 11 in Fedora 16?
>>
>> Firefox is crashing
On 03/22/2012 05:20 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
> On 03/22/2012 05:13 PM, Heiko Adams wrote:
>
>> Am 22.03.2012 22:04, schrieb Gerry Reno:
>>
>>
>>> If I might interrupt this non-stop streaming ARM discussion for just a
>>> second, is anyone else ha
On 03/22/2012 06:02 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Mar 22, 2012, at 3:20 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
>
>
>> Haven't been having any other problems with other apps but I'll look at
>> running memtest.
>>
>> Here are some particulars:
>>
>>kerne
On 03/21/2012 04:21 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
> On 03/21/2012 03:40 PM, Josh Boyer wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Mar 21, 2012 at 2:53 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
>>
>>
>>> From xen-devel list.
>>>
>>> How can I downgrade my Fedora 16 kernel to
On 03/22/2012 06:36 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Mar 22, 2012, at 4:07 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
>
>
>> On 03/22/2012 06:02 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>
>>> On Mar 22, 2012, at 3:20 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
On 03/22/2012 07:44 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Mar 22, 2012, at 4:58 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
>
>> Just odd that Firefox is the only app causing the problem. I'll let
>> memtest run a while.
>>
> Yeah different apps have different memory requirements so it
On 03/22/2012 09:18 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Mar 22, 2012, at 6:58 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
>
>> So I played around with the encryption settings and when
>> I disabled TLS the crashes stopped. At least so far. I haven't had a
>> crash in a couple hours now
On 03/22/2012 10:00 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
> On 03/22/2012 09:18 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
>> On Mar 22, 2012, at 6:58 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
>>
>>
>>> So I played around with the encryption settings and when
>>> I disabled TLS the crashes st
On 03/23/2012 12:50 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>
> On Mar 22, 2012, at 8:00 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
>
>
>> On 03/22/2012 09:18 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
>>
>>> On Mar 22, 2012, at 6:58 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>>>
On 03/23/2012 11:26 AM, Reindl Harald wrote:
>
> Am 23.03.2012 16:19, schrieb Michael Cronenworth:
>
>> David Lehman wrote:
>>
>>> I was able to complete an install of F17-Alpha just now with all lvm. I
>>> had to force the use of MSDOS disklabel instead of GPT (used parted's
>>> mklabel co
Shotwell 0.10 has a nasty event name corruption bug so I thought I would try to
compile 0.12 from source.
I installed the dependencies:
# yum install vala GConf2-devel libgee-devel libgexiv2-devel glib2-devel
gstreamer-devel gstreamer-plugins-base-devel
gtk3-devel libgudev1-devel libexif-devel l
On 03/28/2012 10:16 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-03-28 at 21:06 -0400, Gerry Reno wrote:
>> Shotwell 0.10 has a nasty event name corruption bug so I thought I would try
>> to compile 0.12 from source.
>>
>> I installed the dependencies:
>> # yum insta
If you watch, you can get DVD burners for about $15 USD.
eg:
http://slickdeals.net/permadeal/62972/newegg-liteon-external-cddvd-burner-w-lightscribe-support
Or used for about $5-$10 at any flea market.
On 05/09/2012 04:33 PM, drago01 wrote:
> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 10:07 PM, Jaroslav Reznik w
On 05/09/2012 05:34 PM, John Reiser wrote:
> On 05/09/2012 01:33 PM, drago01 wrote:
>> On Wed, May 9, 2012 at 10:07 PM, Jaroslav Reznik wrote:
>>> I'd like to break CD limit too but we should not forgot there are users
>>> for which CD is top technology from dreams and we have a lot of these
>>> u
On 05/14/2012 08:15 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Mon, 2012-05-14 at 11:49 -0700, John Reiser wrote:
>> On 05/12/2012 09:51 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 10, 2012 at 11:00:48AM -0400, Adam Jackson wrote:
>>>
So the set of people we'd be inconveniencing is exactly the set of
On 05/15/2012 12:21 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Tue, 2012-05-15 at 09:52 -0400, Gerry Reno wrote:
>
>>>> The most important issue in this thread is ability to boot from USB2.0.
>>> No, it isn't. mjg59 wrote:
>>>
>>> "the inability
In looking back through some of the meeting minutes I saw that RealHotspot has
been approved for Fedora 18.
===
#fedora-meeting: FESCO (2012-03-19)
===
Meeting started by limburgher at 18:00:23 UTC. The full logs ar
On 05/18/2012 09:42 PM, Dan Williams wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-05-18 at 18:21 -0400, Gerry Reno wrote:
>> In looking back through some of the meeting minutes I saw that RealHotspot
>> has been approved for Fedora 18.
>>
>> ===
>>
What does Fedora do currently, if anything, to optimize for solid-state drives
(SSD).
Things like swap and logging can generate a huge number of writes. So I
suppose those should maybe be placed on a
rotating drive if one is available but if not does Fedora do anything to reduce
the amount of
On 05/24/2012 04:45 AM, drago01 wrote:
> On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 10:30 AM, Juan Orti Alcaine
> wrote:
>> 2012/5/24 Gerry Reno
>>> What does Fedora do currently, if anything, to optimize for solid-state
>>> drives (SSD).
>>>
>>> Things like swap
On 05/25/2012 04:40 AM, Roberto Ragusa wrote:
> On 05/24/2012 03:20 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
>
>> Since I'm putting an SSD in my laptop this is important because the laptop
>> drive must be encrypted.
> I hope your CPU has AES-NI.
> A powerful i7 does AES at 50MiB/s
On 05/31/2012 09:27 AM, Brian Wheeler wrote:
>
>
> On 05/31/2012 08:59 AM, Lennart Poettering wrote:
>
> * We bring Fedora closer to commercial Unixes and other Linux distributions.
>
> Um, so? Any solaris admin worth their salt kills the ram-based /tmp as soon
> as the install is finished. Its
http://www.fsf.org/campaigns/secure-boot-vs-restricted-boot/statement
SecureBoot is not about security. It is about restriction.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 05/31/2012 12:06 PM, Peter Jones wrote:
> On 05/31/2012 12:04 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
>> SecureBoot is not about security. It is about restriction.
>
> If you're looking for a mantra to recite ad infinitum, that's a fine one, but
> right now we're looki
On 05/31/2012 12:13 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
>>http://www.fsf.org/campaigns/secure-boot-vs-restricted-boot/statement
>>
>> SecureBoot is not about security. It is about restriction.
> That is just untrue. Secure
On 05/31/2012 12:22 PM, Peter Jones wrote:
> On 05/31/2012 12:11 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
>
>> This is a monopolistic attack disguised as a security effort.
>
> The argument that it's a security effort is bolstered in many vendors eyes
> by the existence of attacks in the wi
On 05/31/2012 12:46 PM, Peter Jones wrote:
> On 05/31/2012 12:16 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
>> On 05/31/2012 12:13 PM, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 6:04 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
>>>> http://www.fsf.org/campaigns/secure-boot-vs-restricted-boot/stateme
On 05/31/2012 12:51 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 12:49:53PM -0400, Gerry Reno wrote:
>> The issue could be solved by having the SecureBoot default setting depend on
>> the OS being booted:
>>
>> SecureBoot should only be Default:ON for Micros
On 05/31/2012 12:57 PM, Basil Mohamed Gohar wrote:
> On 05/31/2012 12:53 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
>> On 05/31/2012 12:51 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 12:49:53PM -0400, Gerry Reno wrote:
>>>> The issue could be solved by having the SecureBoot d
On 05/31/2012 01:03 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 12:53:30PM -0400, Gerry Reno wrote:
>> On 05/31/2012 12:51 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 12:49:53PM -0400, Gerry Reno wrote:
>>>> The issue could be solved by having
On 05/31/2012 01:10 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
>> Could be any of a thousand ways to implement this.
>> Maybe it checks the BIOS to determine whether some SecureBoot flag is set.
> While it pains me to argue with someone
On 05/31/2012 01:19 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
>> On 05/31/2012 01:10 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 1:07 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
>>>> Could be any of a thousand ways to implement this.
&g
On 05/31/2012 01:34 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
>> On 05/31/2012 01:19 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 12:16 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
>>>> On 05/31/2012 01:10 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
>>>&g
On 05/31/2012 01:47 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> Platforms implementing secure boot will require cryptographically signed
> firmware updates, so the only way an attacker
> will be able to modify your system is by having physical access to the flash.
Well, at least that part is good.
--
devel m
On 05/31/2012 01:48 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
>> On 05/31/2012 01:34 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 12:22 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
>>>> On 05/31/2012 01:19 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>>>>>
On 05/31/2012 01:57 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
>> On 05/31/2012 01:48 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 12:42 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
>>>> On 05/31/2012 01:34 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>>>>>
On 05/31/2012 02:17 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
>> On 05/31/2012 01:57 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 12:52 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
>>>> On 05/31/2012 01:48 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>>>>>
On 05/31/2012 02:52 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
>> On 05/31/2012 02:17 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 1:08 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
>>>> On 05/31/2012 01:57 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>>>>>
On 05/31/2012 04:04 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 2:57 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 2:07 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
>>> On 05/31/2012 02:52 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>>>> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 1:21 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
>>&g
On 05/31/2012 04:26 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
>> And I'd rather see a User-Controlled implementation rather than a
>> Monopoly-Controlled implementation.
> SecureBoot is (currently, on x86 but not arm) _also_ user-con
On 05/31/2012 05:47 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-05-31 at 16:31 -0400, Gerry Reno wrote:
>> On 05/31/2012 04:26 PM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
>>> On Thu, May 31, 2012 at 4:19 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
>>>> And I'd rather see a User-Controlled implemen
On 05/31/2012 09:14 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Chris Adams wrote:
>> - Secure boot is required to be able to be disabled on x86 (the only
>> platform Fedora will support it).
> And this is exactly why we should just require our users to disable it!
>
> I don't see any advantage at all from supportin
So everyone needs to go out and buy twice as much RAM so F18+ can run /tmp as
tmpfs without causing memory shortfalls
for everything else they do.
That's crazy.
.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
On 06/01/2012 11:05 AM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 9:50 AM, Gerry Reno wrote:
>> So everyone needs to go out and buy twice as much RAM so F18+ can run /tmp
>> as tmpfs without causing memory shortfalls
>> for everything else they do.
>> That
On 06/01/2012 11:18 AM, Cosimo Cecchi wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-06-01 at 03:14 +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> Chris Adams wrote:
>>> - Secure boot is required to be able to be disabled on x86 (the only
>>> platform Fedora will support it).
>> And this is exactly why we should just require our users to d
On 06/01/2012 11:35 AM, Gregory Maxwell wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Gerry Reno wrote:
>> This "feature" may have some benefits but I think they are infinitesimally
>> small.
> The feature may be adopted/promoted on the basis of SSD writecycle
> pres
On 06/01/2012 11:52 AM, Alexey I. Froloff wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 11:31:21AM -0400, Brian Wheeler wrote:
>> Well, since I'm probably going to turn it off, can someone give me a
>> good reason why it should be turned _on_ by default? For me, the
>> "Benefit to Fedora" bullets are not com
On 06/01/2012 12:07 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Peter Jones wrote:
>> Next year if we don't implement some form of Secure Boot support, the
>> majority of Fedora users will not be able to install Fedora on new
>> machines.
> Nonsense. They will be able to install it very easily, they just need to set
On 06/01/2012 12:10 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
> On 06/01/2012 12:07 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> Peter Jones wrote:
>>> Next year if we don't implement some form of Secure Boot support, the
>>> majority of Fedora users will not be able to install Fedora on new
>>
On 06/01/2012 12:30 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Debarshi Ray wrote:
>> By the way, I am assuming that you know that one can't modify Firefox and
>> redistribute it as Firefox without certification.
> I've been pointing out this issue in several threads. That's exactly why
> Fedora should finally fol
On 06/01/2012 12:10 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
> On 06/01/2012 12:07 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> Peter Jones wrote:
>>> Next year if we don't implement some form of Secure Boot support, the
>>> majority of Fedora users will not be able to install Fedora on new
>>
On 06/01/2012 12:45 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 06:16:37PM +0200, Kevin Kofler wrote:
>> Adam Jackson wrote:
>>> False. Quoting from Matthew's original post:
>>>
>>> "A system in custom mode should allow you to delete all existing keys
>>> and replace them with your own. A
On 06/01/2012 12:55 PM, Kevin Kofler wrote:
> Tom Callaway wrote:
>> Do we want to support dual-booting with Windows 8? Microsoft describes
>> SecureBoot enablement as "Required for Windows 8 client" [1]? What does
>> that mean? We're not sure. At best, it means that BitLocker isn't going
>> to wor
On 06/01/2012 12:27 PM, DJ Delorie wrote:
>> The feature may be adopted/promoted on the basis of SSD writecycle
>> preservation,
> I'm about to put in an SSD boot disk, so I care about this argument,
> but I'm still not using tmpfs, for my reasons stated previously.
>
>> but tmpfs also offers consi
Windows-8 will install/boot on existing hardware w/o SecureBoot.
Will Windows-8 install/boot on new hardware that contains SecureBoot without
SecureBoot enabled?
Can users flash BIOS to remove SecureBoot?
.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/
On 06/01/2012 02:19 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Fri, 01 Jun 2012 14:16:45 -0400
> Gerry Reno wrote:
>
>> Windows-8 will install/boot on existing hardware w/o SecureBoot.
> My understanding: no.
There are multiple examples on the web of people installing Windows-8 on
On 06/01/2012 02:24 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 02:16:45PM -0400, Gerry Reno wrote:
>> Windows-8 will install/boot on existing hardware w/o SecureBoot.
> Yes.
>
>> Will Windows-8 install/boot on new hardware that contains SecureBoot without
>>
I just read through the MS docs on SecureBoot and this is the biggest
Rube-Goldberg machine.
I could not think of a nastier solution to a problem than what they've dreamt
up here.
The whole problem they are trying to solve is that of booting only known-good
code.
That would be much easier
On 06/01/2012 03:22 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-06-01 at 15:14 -0400, Gerry Reno wrote:
>> I just read through the MS docs on SecureBoot and this is the biggest
>> Rube-Goldberg machine.
>>
>> I could not think of a nastier solution to a problem than what
On 06/01/2012 03:32 PM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Jun 1, 2012, at 1:14 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
>
>> That would be much easier accomplished by having the OS reside on a
>> read-only device that could only be written to by
>> the user actively using hardware to enable the w
On 06/01/2012 03:56 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
>>
>> Drive manufacturers need to do nothing.
>>
>> One drive probably SSD at this point, gets dedicated to OS. Other drive to
>> everything else.
>>
>> T
Today tried installing F17 x86_64 from DVD and get these errors:
ERROR: could not insert 'floppy': No such device
Loading Fedora 17 x86_64 installer...
dracut Warning: Unable to process initqueue
dracut Warning: /dev/disk/by-label/Fedorax2017x20x86_64 does not exist
dracut War
On 06/04/2012 10:24 AM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 3:10 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
>> On 06/01/2012 03:56 PM, Jon Ciesla wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 2:37 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
>>>> Drive manufacturers need to do nothing.
>>>>
>&
On 06/04/2012 03:19 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, 04 Jun 2012 15:06:46 -0400
> Gerry Reno wrote:
>
>> Today tried installing F17 x86_64 from DVD and get these errors:
>>
>> ERROR: could not insert 'floppy': No such device
>> Loading Fed
On 06/04/2012 06:23 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
> On 06/04/2012 03:19 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>> On Mon, 04 Jun 2012 15:06:46 -0400
>> Gerry Reno wrote:
>>
>>> Today tried installing F17 x86_64 from DVD and get these errors:
>>>
>>> ERROR: could not
On 06/04/2012 07:37 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
> On 06/04/2012 06:23 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
>> On 06/04/2012 03:19 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
>>> On Mon, 04 Jun 2012 15:06:46 -0400
>>> Gerry Reno wrote:
>>>
>>>> Today tried installing F17 x86_64 from DVD and
On 06/04/2012 07:44 PM, Kevin Fenzi wrote:
> On Mon, 04 Jun 2012 19:37:07 -0400
> Gerry Reno wrote:
>
>>> Burned another DVD and booting it got some other errors (rpcbind?)
>>> but it runs the installer at least.
>>>
>>> I'm doing custom partition
On 06/07/2012 01:25 PM, Richard Vickery wrote:
> since the upgrade to 17, I've been experiencing system freezes on frequent
> occasions when getting up from the
> computer. The term "frequent" used in this context has a different meaning
> from "constantly"; there are many moments
> when I can ge
On 06/08/2012 08:07 AM, Mario Torre wrote:
> On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 14:34 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
>
>> that would not allow custom kernel and such. Don't support the locked
>> down platform; the answer to "Fedora on ARM" is "don't buy a Win8 ARM
>> system and expect to run Fedora".
> One should b
On 06/08/2012 09:00 AM, drago01 wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
>> On 06/08/2012 08:07 AM, Mario Torre wrote:
>>> On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 14:34 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
>>>
>>>> that would not allow custom kernel and such. Don&
On 06/08/2012 09:20 AM, Peter Robinson wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 2:11 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
>> On 06/08/2012 09:00 AM, drago01 wrote:
>>> On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 2:47 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
>>>> On 06/08/2012 08:07 AM, Mario Torre wrote:
>>>>> O
On 06/08/2012 10:11 AM, Chris Adams wrote:
> Once upon a time, Gerry Reno said:
>> And I expect this idea of preventing other OS's from being installed on Win8
>> ARM hardware will not fly in the EU. It's
>> anti-competitive.
> You mean they don't have iPa
On 06/08/2012 11:55 AM, Chris Murphy wrote:
> On Jun 8, 2012, at 6:47 AM, Gerry Reno wrote:
>> And I expect this idea of preventing other OS's from being installed on Win8
>> ARM hardware will not fly in the EU. It's
>> anti-competitive.
> There's no such
On 06/08/2012 01:04 PM, Adam Williamson wrote:
> On Fri, 2012-06-08 at 14:07 +0200, Mario Torre wrote:
>> On Thu, 2012-06-07 at 14:34 -0500, Chris Adams wrote:
>>
>>> that would not allow custom kernel and such. Don't support the locked
>>> down platform; the answer to "Fedora on ARM" is "don't bu
Has there been any trouble booting the 3.4.4-5 kernel?
I updated one of my F17 machines today and it brought in a new kernel, 3.4.4-5.
When I rebooted the box after all the updates completed it refused to boot.
It just hangs with a non-blinking cursor in the upper left hand corner of a
totally
On 07/18/2012 04:12 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 18, 2012 at 15:21:24 -0400,
> Gerry Reno wrote:
>> Has there been any trouble booting the 3.4.4-5 kernel?
>
> I didn't have issues with it, but have now switched to 3.4.5-2 which is
> available from koji.
It worked.
I grabbed the libdrm 2.4.37 rpm from bodhi and it fixed the problem on my
Xeon(Ivy Bridge) machine.
On 07/18/2012 05:32 PM, Adam Jackson wrote:
> On Wed, 2012-07-18 at 16:33 -0400, Gerry Reno wrote:
>> On 07/18/2012 04:12 PM, Bruno Wolff III wrote:
>>> On Wed,
I encountered a similar problem when using a new Intel Xeon (Ivy Bridge) CPU.
The issue occurred with Ivy Bridge w/iGPU onboard.
Ref: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=840180
.
--
devel mailing list
devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
There are missing Ivy Bridge definitions in the intel_chipset.h file in libdrm
which causes machines with Ivy Bridge
CPU's w/embedded iGPU to fail when starting X.
As I said in the bug, installing libdrm 2.4.37 from bodhi fixed the issue on my
F17 machine.
On 07/26/2012 02:05 PM, Gerry
On 07/26/2012 04:31 PM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 02:44:24PM -0400, Gerry Reno wrote:
>> There are missing Ivy Bridge definitions in the intel_chipset.h file in
>> libdrm which causes machines with Ivy Bridge
>> CPU's w/embedded iGPU to fail when s
On 07/26/2012 05:12 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 08:59:20PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>
>> When booting Fedora 17 x64 there's the GRUB bootloader with graphical
>> background image,
>> I let it boot the default entry "Fedora 17", I see it the allocating memory
>> page
On 07/30/2012 10:58 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 05:35:20PM -0400, Gerry Reno wrote:
>> On 07/26/2012 05:12 PM, Matthew Garrett wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 08:59:20PM +0300, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>>>
>>>> When booting Fedora
On 07/30/2012 11:28 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 30, 2012 at 11:21:54AM -0400, Gerry Reno wrote:
>> On 07/30/2012 10:58 AM, Pasi Kärkkäinen wrote:
>>> On Thu, Jul 26, 2012 at 05:35:20PM -0400, Gerry Reno wrote:
>>>> On 07/26/2012 05:12 PM, Matthew Garre
I have had no success whatsoever getting DirectFB to run under F17 as a regular
user on my HP laptop.
# yum list DirectFB
Installed Packages
directfb.x86_64 1.5.3-7.fc17
@updates
I have discussed the pr
On 08/24/2012 06:56 PM, Gerry Reno wrote:
> I have had no success whatsoever getting DirectFB to run under F17 as a
> regular user on my HP laptop.
>
> # yum list DirectFB
>
> Installed Packages
> directfb.x86_64
On 08/27/2012 10:59 PM, Ilyes Gouta wrote:
>
> Hi Gerry,
>
> Try contacting the main dev. mailing-list of DirectFB. I'm sure you'll get an
> answer there.
>
> Btw, DirectFB-1.5.3 is rather old, DirectFB-1.6.1 is rather the latest stable
> release.
>
> -Ilyes
>
>
Thanks Ilyes.
I'll try posting o
1 - 100 of 120 matches
Mail list logo
