On 06/01/2012 11:35 AM, Gregory Maxwell wrote: > On Fri, Jun 1, 2012 at 11:27 AM, Gerry Reno <gr...@verizon.net> wrote: >> This "feature" may have some benefits but I think they are infinitesimally >> small. > The feature may be adopted/promoted on the basis of SSD writecycle > preservation, but tmpfs also offers considerable performance > improvements for workloads that create/remove files in /tmp at high > speed— which is the reason that many people have been using tmpfs for > /tmp on many systems for much longer than SSDs have existed.
Well, I don't have any workloads that are doing high-speed create/remove of file in /tmp. And I don't think most people have any of those types of workloads either. Wouldn't it make sense that people with those types of workloads could enable /tmp on tmpfs? Rather than making it the default for everyone. . -- devel mailing list devel@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
